Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Date:
Time:
INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES
1. Time allowed is THREE (3) hours
2. Questions 1, 2 & 3 in Section A are compulsory
3. Answer ONE question only from Section B.
All questions carry equal marks
Section A
ALL THREE questions are compulsory
Question 1
You are the audit senior of a new audit client Appliances Co and you are currently planning
the audit for the year ended 31 December 2022.
Appliances Co manufactures white goods for domestic and commercial use including
washing machines, tumble dryers, fridges, dishwashers.
Their key client, who represents 90% of their revenue, was the market leader in white goods
industry last year with 65% market share.
The company recognises revenue when the customer places an order as 92% of orders are
processed and dispatched the day they are received.
Inventory is initially valued at cost, and management then performs a review of the aged
inventory listing to identify any write downs required. Inventory that is more than 200 days
old is written down by 10%.
Appliances Co uses several suppliers to source components for their products. Most
suppliers are based in Europe. They assemble their goods in their single factory based in
Dublin. The work in progress balance is expected to be material at the year end.
During the year Appliances Co started developing advanced steam clothing care system
which is a new advanced technology using steam to clean more delicate fabrics that were
traditional only dry clean. They have spent €5 million on these stream cleaning machines.
There was a technical difficulty in production of the steam cleaning machines and as a result
their launch was delayed from November 2022 to August 2023.
In March 2022 the finance director of Appliances Co was dismissed. He had been employed
by the company for over 16 years, and he is suing the company for unfair dismissal.
Appliances Co is also seeking a listing on the Irish Stock Exchange in January 2024.
The directors have agreed to pay themselves a profit related bonus for the year.
Required:
(a) Identify and evaluate EIGHT audit risks to be considered in planning the audit of
Appliances Co AND discuss the auditor’s response to each audit risk. (25 marks)
Total 25 marks
SOLUTION
8 X 3 marks for each relevant audit risk and response
1 discretionary mark
Question 2
Recording transaction
The purchases ledger clerk enters invoices onto the system in batches. A batch control sheet
is used, which details the number of invoices and the total value. These details are checked to
the system batch report.
Each invoice is stamped as "recorded" once the details have been entered onto the system.
The purchase ledger manager inspects the file of invoices on a monthly basis to ensure that
all invoices have been recorded.
Suppliers are required to submit monthly supplier statements, which are reconciled to the
suppliers ledger account by the purchases ledger manager. The purchase ledger is reconciled
to the purchase ledger control account on a monthly basis by the purchase ledger manager,
and reviewed by the company accountant.
Cash payment
The list of payments is sent to the company accountant, who agrees the details of each
payment to the relevant invoice and signs each invoice to authorise payment and evidence the
check. The list of payments is signed by the accountant once all invoices have been checked,
and sent to the cashier's office for payment.
If any individual payment is for more than $30,000 or total payments are for more than
$300,000 a second signatory is required. These payments must also be checked and signed by
either the financial controller, or finance director.
Payments are made by the cashier's office by bank transfer. Invoices are stamped as "paid",
and returned to the purchases ledger team who record the payment and file the invoices
(separately from invoices not yet paid).
The purchase ledger manager checks GRNs on a monthly basis to ensure that invoices have
been received and paid on a timely basis.
Required:
(a) Identify and evaluate SEVEN controls in Gerard Co’s recording transaction and cash
payment system AND discuss how the auditor would test those controls. (15 marks)
Kay Co
Non-current assets: Property, Plant and equipment note
Land and Fixtures Motor Total
buildings and fittings vehicles
€000 €000 €000 €000
Cost at 1 January 2022 3,000 2,525 375 5,900
Additions - 1,050 75 1,125
Disposals - (300) - (300)
Cost at 31 December 2022 3,000 3,275 450 6,725
Required:
(b) Describe TEN key audit procedures to be performed to confirm the non-current assets
included in Kay Co’s financial statements. (10
marks)
Total 25 marks
SOLUTION PART A
12 X 2 marks for each relevant control and corresponding test
1 discretionary mark
SOLUTION PART B
Subsequent events review for James Co for the year ended 31 December 2022.
On 21 January 2023, Daniel Co, a major customer of James Co, was placed into
administration owing €500,000.
On 30 January 2023, the sales director left the company. The sales director is suing
James Co for constructive dismissal. If successful, the claim amounts to €700,000.
On 7 February 2023 there was a fire at the premises of the third party warehouse
provider, which destroyed all inventory held there. Approximately one third of James
Co's inventory was stored in these premises. The total value of inventory stored at the
premises was $1,000,000.
The financial statements include a €100,000 provision for an injury case brought by a
customer of James Co. On 10 February 2023 a letter was received from the claimant's
solicitors stated that they would be willing to settle outofcourt for €90,000. It is likely
the company will agree to this.
Required:
(a) Discuss whether each issue above is an adjusting or non-adjusting event, in accordance
with IAS 10, Events after the reporting period. (17 marks)
(b) Discuss EIGHT audit procedures you would undertake with regard to subsequent events
at the completion and review stage of the audit. (8 marks)
Total 25 marks
SOLUTION PART A
James Co was placed into administration after the yearend, which provides
evidence of the recoverability of the receivables balance at the year end.
Therefore this is an adjusting event. The total value of the balance is
€500,000 which is 2% of revenue, 3% of total assets and 33% of profit, and is
therefore material. The receivables balance should be writtenoff or an
allowance for receivables created.
The marketing director left the company after the yearend and is suing for
constructive dismissal, which is an event that arose after the reporting date.
Therefore this is a nonadjusting event. The total value of the claim is
€700,000, which is 2.8% of revenue, 4.6% of assets and 46.7% of profit
before tax and is therefore material. This may also be considered material by
nature. The nature of the event and any estimates of the financial impact
should therefore be disclosed.
The fire destroyed inventory after the yearend, which is therefore a non-
adjusting event (as the inventory was not damaged at the yearend). The total
value of inventory stored at the premises is €1,000,000, which is 4% of
revenue, 6.5% of total assets and 66.7% of profit and is therefore material
and the nature of the event and any estimates of the financial impact should be
disclosed.
After the yearend a letter was received offering to settle a claim for unfair
dismissal outofcourt. This is an event that provides evidence of the valuation of
the provision at the yearend and is therefore an adjusting event. The current
provision is for €100,000 and the adjustment would therefore be €10,000. This is
not material being 0.04% of revenue, 0.07% of total assets and .7% profit before
tax. Therefore no adjustment is necessary.
4 x 4 mark
1 Discretionary mark
SOLUTION PART B
• Enquiring of directors if they are aware of any subsequent events that require
adjustment in the financial statements.
8 x 1 mark
Section B
Answer ONE question
Both questions carry equal marks
Question 4
Various Companies
The audit of Orchid Co is nearing completion. During the audit, it was identified that the
notes to the financial statements do not include a disclosure note to the closing inventory
(which is material), which is required by the applicable financial reporting framework.
The audit engagement partner has discussed the issue with management and those
charged with governance but no amendment to the disclosures has been made.
Rose Co is a cash retailer. There is no system to confirm the accuracy of cash sales.
Required:
(a) For each of the above situations, discuss the implications for the audit opinion and the
audit report. (15 marks)
To be effective, the internal audit activity must be undertaken by qualified, skilled and
experienced people who can work in accordance with the Code of Ethics and the
International Standards. (Chartered Institute of Internal Auditors)
Required:
Total 25 marks
SOLUTION PART A
Garden Co
– Inventory is material as it represents 16% of sales revenue and 53% of profit.
– There is a lack of sufficient appropriate audit evidence over inventory. The auditor cannot
form a conclusion as to whether inventory is materially misstated or free from material
misstatement.
– The audit opinion will be modified.
– A qualified opinion using the 'except for' wording will be issued as the matter is material
but not pervasive.
– The basis for opinion section will be amended to basis for qualified opinion.
– The basis for qualified opinion section will explain the reason for the qualified opinion and
quantify the effect of the issue on the financial statements.
Orchid Co
- The disclosure is required by the financial reporting framework to provide
information to users to aid their understanding of the loan.
- The loan is material.
- The financial statements are materially misstated and should be adjusted.
- The misstatement is material but not pervasive.
- If management refuse to amend this misstatement, the audit opinion will need to be
modified. The opinion paragraph will be qualified.
- The ‘except for’ wording will be used.
- The basis for qualified opinion paragraph will explain the issue and provide the
missing information that should have been included in the disclosure.
Rose Co
- There is no system to confirm cash sales therefore the auditor cannot form a
conclusion as to whether revenue is materially misstated or free from material
misstatement.
- The auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence for a significant class
of transaction in the financial statements.
- The issue is material and pervasive.
- The audit opinion will be modified.
- A disclaimer of opinion will be issued stating that the auditor does not express an
opinion of the financial statements.
- The basis for opinion section will be amended to a basis for disclaimer of opinion.
- The basis for disclaimer of opinion section will explain the reason for the disclaimer
and quantify the effect of the issue on the financial statements.
- The statement referring to the audit being conducted in accordance with ISAs and
ethical requirements will be moved form the basis for opinion section and included in
the Auditor responsibilities section.
3 x 5 marks
SOLUTION PART B
Regulation
Nowadays companies operate in a regulated sector and is under the supervision of a
regulatory authority. It is very likely that there are regulatory controls and reports that they
must produce or comply with. Establishing an internal audit department will enable a
company to produce those reports more efficiently and show compliance with the regulatory
regime. Even if internal audit is not required now, codes of governance increasingly suggest
that it is good practice to have an internal audit department.
Risk assessment
Internal audit enables management to perform proper risk assessments (another central theme
of corporate governance codes) by means of properly understanding the strengths and
weaknesses of all parts of the control systems in the business.
Any 5 x 2 marks
Question 5
Required:
(a) Briefly explain the terms “integrated test facilities” and “embedded audit software”.
(5 marks)
You will be the engagement partner in the audit of Fast Food Giant Co as you have done so
for the last 9 years and you are also a close friend of the finance director of Fast Food Giant
Co and he trusts you with the audit.
The audit fees for last years audit of Fast Food Giant Co have not yet been received and you
know they have had a cash shortage and that you will eventually receive payment.
Fast Food Giant Co is being sued by a former employee and has asked your audit firm to
support them in the upcoming court case.
Fast Food Giant Co is an important client to your audit firm as it represents 28% of total fee
income. For that reason you have also decided to appoint Frank as the audit senior as he
worked in Fast Food Giant Co as the finance director up to six months ago.
Required:
(b) Explain FIVE ethical threats and discuss how the threats can be mitigated in the audit
of Fast Food Giant Co. (10 marks)
(c) Discuss the inherent limitations of all internal control systems. (10 marks)
Total 25 marks
SOLUTION PART A
Integrated test facilities- this involves the creation of dummy ledgers and records to which
test data can be sent. This enables more frequent and efficient test data procedures to be
performed live and the information can simply be ignored by the client when printing out
their internal records.
Embedded audit software – this requires a purpose written audit program to be embedded into
the clients accounting system. The program will be designed to perform certain tasks similar
to audit software with the advantage that it can be turned on and off at the auditors wish
throughout the accounting year. This will allow the auditor to gather information on certain
transaction (material ones) for later testing and will also identify peculiarities that require
attention during the final audit.
2 x 2.5 marks
SOLUTION PART B
Threat Mitigate
Familiarity Threat Auditor loses independence as have become
You will be the engagement partner in the too friendly/familiar with the client. Audit
audit of Fast Food Giant Co as you have
partner should be rotated every 5 to 7 years.
done so for the last 9 years and you are also
a close friend of the finance director of Fast
Food Giant Co and he trusts you with the
audit.
SOLUTION PART C
It is possible to reduce the volume of transaction testing required in conducting an audit if the
internal controls are sound and are operating effectively, but it is not likely that an auditor
will be able to rely on internal controls entirely. This is because all control systems have
inherent limitations such as:
The need to balance the cost of the control with its benefits.
The fact that internal controls are usually applied to regular, recurring transactions,
not one-off year-end adjustments or unusual transactions, which are often large and
subject to error.
The potential for human error.
The possibility of fraudulent collusion ( two or more persons operating together) to
get round controls that segregate duties. e.g. the supervisor responsible for checking
and authorising overtime claims could collude with employees, to enable excess
overtime payments to be claimed.
The abuse of authority and override of controls by senior managers or the owners of
the business. E.g. Abuse of authority might involve ordering personal goods through
the firm. It is very easy for directors and managers of organisations of any size to
instruct staff to bypass normal procedures such as the requirement for authorisation
for payments.
The obsolescence of controls which have not changed to reflect changes in the
business activities or organisation.
In practice the training of auditors always involves a warning never to rely on internal
controls entirely, no matter how effective they may appear to be. Hence, some verification of
transactions is always carried out as part of the auditor’s work. The auditor should always to
aware of the possibility of fraud and error and, if they find something unusual during their
audit testing which may not form part of that piece of work, they should always investigate
further.
10 marks