Home Definitions Reasoning Aptitude Verbal Ability GK Programs Java JSP

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISING
ADVERTISEMENT

Paradox Definition
People have long been fascinated by the idea of paradox.
A circumstance or a statement that seems
contradictory or ludicrous but yet has a hidden truth
in it is called a paradox. There are contradictions in
many different branches of human thought, including
philosophy, mathematics, and literature.

The word paradox is derived from the Greek phrase

"paradoxon," which means "contrary to
expectation." When something seems to be true but is
actually incorrect or contradictory to itself, it is called a
paradox. Contradictions or inconsistencies that are
unresolvable frequently appear in paradoxes. They are
employed in order to disprove our presumptions and
provoke fresh perspectives on the human condition.
ADVERTISEMENT
Facts on Paradox
A paradox is a statement that at first glance seems to
contradict itself or be illogical, but upon closer
examination, reveals a deeper truth or insight. Since
ancient times, they have captivated scientists,
philosophers, and mathematicians, and they still present
us with difficulties in terms of logic, language, and reality.
The following are some fascinating paradox-related
facts:

Greek word "paradoxos," which means "contrary

to expectation," is the source of the English word
"paradox."

There are several categories into which paradoxes

might be subdivided, including logical, semantic,
and epistemic paradoxes.

The liar paradox, which is embodied in the phrase

"This statement is false," is one of the most well-
known paradoxes. If a statement is true, then it
must also be false, and vice versa if a statement is
false.

The conundrum of the heap, which poses the

query, "When does a heap of sand stop being a
heap if we keep removing one grain at a time?" is
another well-known paradox. Our instinctive
knowledge of terms like "heap" and "non-heap" is
put to the test by this dilemma.

Mathematics, philosophy, physics, and linguistics

are just a few of the fields of knowledge where
paradoxes can occur. For instance, the paradox of
Zeno's arrow challenges our perception of space
 and time, but the paradox of the unexpected
hanging questions our perception of logic and
forecasting.

In disciplines like computer science and

cryptography, certain paradoxes are used in real-
world situations. To determine the likelihood of
collisions in hash functions, for instance, the
birthday paradox demonstrates that there is a 50%
chance that two people in a group of 23 share the
same birthday.

In literature and art, paradoxes can be employed to

add ambiguity and irony. For instance, the paradox
of the "giant prawn" in language produces a funny
effect while the paradox of the "living dead" in
vampire myths questions our idea of life and death.

Types of Paradox
Paradoxes come in a variety of forms, some of which are
given below:

Paradoxes resulting from the use of logic are

referred to as logical paradoxes. The liar paradox, or
"this statement is false," is the most well-known
illustration of a logical paradox. If the assertion is
true, then it must also be untrue, and vice versa if it is
false. This results in an insoluble contradiction.

Epistemic paradoxes are contradictions that result

from our understanding of our convictions about
the world. An epistemic paradox is best illustrated
by the conundrum of the heap, which is widely
known. If you take away one grain of sand from a pile of
sand, is it still a pile? is the question posed by this
paradox? The removal of one more grain of sand should
also result in a heap if the response is yes. Eventually the
heap won't exist if you keep taking away sand grains. The
paradox is that there is no precise point at which a heap
ceases to be a heap.
Paradoxes that stem from our moral convictions and
values are referred to as moral paradoxes. A moral
contradiction is best exemplified by the tram problem.
This paradox poses the question, "What should you do if
a trolley is headed towards five persons who are fastened
to the tracks and you have the ability to direct the trolley
onto another track where only one person is fastened?"
In spite of the fact that both options will result in
someone's death, there is paradoxically no apparent
moral conclusion to this dilemma.

The contradictions that result from our aesthetic

preferences are known as aesthetic paradoxes.
Tragic paradox is the most well-known instance of
an aesthetic paradox.Why do we like witnessing
tragedies despite how depressing and terrible they are?
is the question posed by this contradiction. The paradox
is that, despite our general desire for happiness and
pleasure, we tend to prefer going through bad feelings
through art.

Paradoxes arising from the use of language are known as

semantic paradoxes. The Grelling-Nelson paradox is a
prime example of a semantic paradox. Is the word
"heterological" heterological? poses the question in this
conundrum. If the term "heterological" is itself
heterological, it cannot be considered such, and is
therefore not heterological. Therefore, if it does not
describe itself, it is heterological, proving that it is not
heterological. This leads to an unresolvable
contradiction.

Examples of Paradox
The Liar Paradox: This paradox is predicated on a
statement that contradicts itself. For example,
"This statement is false." If the assertion is true, it
must be untrue. But if it's false, it must be true.
This paradox is a classic example of a self-
referential contradiction that calls into question the
concept of truth itself.

The Grandfather Paradox: This conundrum is

predicated on time travel. It implies that if a person
could travel back in time and kill their grandfather
before having children, the person would not have
been born. But, if the person was never born, how
could they have gone back in time to murder their
grandfather? This paradox raises concerns about
the nature of causality and the feasibility of time
travel.

The Bootstrap Paradox: This dilemma is based on

a circumstance in which an object or idea has no
obvious origin. Consider a composer who writes a
song that becomes immensely successful. One
day, a time travellerer travels back in time and
provides the composer a copy of their own song,
which the composer then uses to write their own
song. In this example, it's unknown where the
original music came from, as it doesn't appear to
have a clear origin. This paradox emphasises the
idea that thoughts and objects can exist without
having obvious beginnings.
The Sorites Paradox: This conundrum is founded
on the concept of a heap. It implies that removing
one grain of sand from a heap does not make it any
less of a heap. When you continue to remove sand
grains one by one, when does the heap stop being
a heap? This paradox emphasises the challenges in
defining terminology and concepts that are
subjective and based on human views.

The Barber Paradox: This dilemma is predicated

on a situation in which a town has just one barber
who shaves all the males who do not shave
themselves. The paradox emerges when the
question, "Who shaves the barber?" is posed. If
the barber shaves himself, he is not one of the men
who do not shave and should not be shaving.
However, if he does not shave, he is one of the men
who do not shave, and he should shave. This
paradox emphasises the limitations of logic and the
challenges in finding a solution to a problem when
the answer appears to contradict itself.

The Achilles and The Turtle Conundrum: This

dilemma is based on a scenario in which Achilles,
the world's fastest runner, races a turtle. The
tortoise is given a head start, but Achilles is
convinced that he can catch up to it. The paradox
emerges when Achilles considers that he must first
reach the spot where the tortoise began, by which
time the turtle will have moved a little further
ahead.
As a result, Achilles must reach the new place
where the tortoise is, by which time the turtle will
have moved a little further ahead. This paradox
demonstrates the limitations of reasoning as well
as the difficulties of infinite series.

The Ship of Theseus Paradox: This paradox is

predicated on the steady replacement of a ship
over time. Is it the same ship if every part of it is
replaced? This contradiction highlights issues of
identity and continuity over time.
Quine's Classification of Paradox
Willard Van Orman Quine, an American philosopher,
and logician, is best known for his works on the
philosophy of language, ontology, and
epistemology. One of his most significant contributions
to the field of philosophy is his classification of
paradoxes.

According to Quine, there are two types of

paradoxes: semantic and set-theoretic paradoxes.
Semantic paradoxes arise from the use of language
and its relationship to truth, while set-theoretic
paradoxes arise from the relationship between sets
and their members.

Semantic paradoxes, in turn, can be further divided

into three categories: liar paradoxes, truth-teller
paradoxes, and paradoxes of higher-order
languages. The liar paradox is the most famous example
of a semantic paradox. It arises when a sentence, such as
"This statement is false," is neither true nor false but is
instead self-referential. The sentence asserts its own
falsity, but if it is true, then it must be false, and if it is
false, then it must be true. The liar paradox is therefore a
contradiction.

The truth-teller paradox is a similar self-referential

paradox, but instead of asserting its own falsity, the
sentence asserts its own truth. For example, "This
statement is true." Again, if the sentence is true, then it
asserts its own truth, but if it is false, then it asserts its
own falsity. The truth-teller paradox is also a
contradiction.

Finally, the paradoxes of higher-order languages arise

when a language is used to talk about itself. For example,
"This sentence has five words" is a sentence about a
sentence. If we take this sentence to be true, then it is
true that the sentence has five words, which means that
the sentence is itself five words long. However, if the
sentence is five words long, then the statement "This
sentence has five words" is false. The paradox arises
because the sentence is self-referential.

Set-theoretic paradoxes, on the other hand, arise

from the relationship between sets and their
members. The most famous example of a set-
theoretic paradox is Russell's paradox, named after
the philosopher Bertrand Russell. Russell's paradox
arises when we consider the set of all sets that do not
contain themselves as a member. If we assume that such
a set exists, then we can ask whether it contains itself or
not. If it does contain itself, then it cannot be a member
of the set of all sets that do not contain themselves, but if
it does not contain itself, then it must be a member of
that set. This paradox shows that our assumptions about
sets and their membership can lead to contradictions.

Quine's classification of paradoxes has several

implications for our understanding of truth and
meaning. First, it shows that truth is not a simple
matter of correspondence between language and
reality. Instead, truth is a complex and self-referential
concept that can lead to paradoxes when we try to define
it too precisely. This challenges the traditional view of
truth as a simple correspondence between propositions
and facts.

Second, Quine's classification of paradoxes

suggests that language is a complex and recursive
system that can refer to itself. This challenges the
traditional view of language as a simple code for
expressing ideas or propositions.

Ramsey's Classification of Paradox

Frank Plumpton Ramsey was a British philosopher
and mathematician who made significant
contributions to both fields. One of his notable
contributions is his classification of paradoxes, which he
published in his paper "The Foundations of Mathematics"
in 1925. Ramsey's classification of paradoxes differs
from Quine's in that it focuses on the role of self-
reference in paradoxes.

Ramsey identified two types of paradoxes: semantic

paradoxes and logical paradoxes. Semantic
paradoxes, like Quine's, arise from language and its
relationship to truth. However, Ramsey argued that
these paradoxes are a result of the failure of self-
reference.In other words, the paradox arises when a
sentence refers to itself in a way that leads to a
contradiction. The liar paradox and truth-teller paradox
are examples of semantic paradoxes according to
Ramsey's classification.

On the other hand, logical paradoxes arise from the

structure of logical systems themselves. These
paradoxes are not a result of self-reference but
rather the way that the logical system is structured.
The most famous example of a logical paradox is the
paradox of the heap. It arises when we consider a pile of
sand and remove one grain of sand at a time. At what
point does the pile stop being a pile? This paradox arises
from the fact that our definitions of "pile" and "not a pile"
are not clear-cut and can lead to contradictions.

Ramsey's classification of paradoxes emphasizes the

importance of self-reference in understanding semantic
paradoxes. He argues that a proper understanding of
self-reference is necessary to avoid paradoxes such as
the liar paradox. Additionally, Ramsey's classification
shows that not all paradoxes arise from language but can
arise from the structure of logical systems themselves.
 ← Prev Next →

ADVERTISEMENT

For Videos Join Our Youtube

Youtube
Channel: Join Now

Feedback

Send your Feedback to feedback@javatpoint.com

Help Others, Please Share

Learn Latest Tutorials

Splunk tutorial SPSS tutorial

Splunk SPSS

Swagger tutorial T-SQL tutorial

 Swagger tutorial T-SQL tutorial

Swagger Transact-SQL

Tumblr tutorial React tutorial

Tumblr ReactJS

Regex tutorial

Regex Reinforcement
Learning

RxJS tutorial

R Programming RxJS

React Native Python Design

Patterns

Python Pillow Python Turtle

Keras tutorial

Keras

Preparation

Aptitude
 Aptitude

Aptitude Reasoning

Verbal Ability

Verbal Ability Interview Questions

Company Questions

Trending Technologies

AWS Tutorial

Artificial AWS
Intelligence

Selenium tutorial Cloud Computing

Selenium Cloud Computing

Hadoop tutorial ReactJS Tutorial

Hadoop ReactJS

Data Science Angular 7

Git Tutorial
 Git Tutorial

Blockchain Git

DevOps Tutorial

Machine Learning DevOps

B.Tech / MCA

DBMS tutorial

DBMS Data Structures

DAA tutorial Operating System

DAA Operating System

Computer Network Compiler Design

Computer Discrete
Organization Mathematics

Ethical Hacking

Ethical Hacking Computer Graphics

html tutorial
 html tutorial

Software Web Technology

Engineering

Automata Tutorial

Cyber Security Automata

C++ tutorial

C Programming C++

Java tutorial

Java .Net

Python tutorial List of Programs

Python Programs

Control System Data Mining

Data Warehouse