Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RADHA J. PARKER
H. SHELTON HORTON, JR.
Myth and ritual are thelceys to collective and individual cognitive consonance. Because the postmodern
cultural landscape is littered with "broken" myths,people need to learn how to birthviable symbols and
create contemporary rituals. Thisarticle examines ritualfrom theoretical, clinical, and practical perspec-
tives. Symbolic cognition and its relation to myth and ritual are discussed. A typology of ritual is
abstracted from phenomenological sources. Examples ofliberation, transformation, andcelebration rituals
are given. Elements commonly employed in ritualactivityare identified asguides to ritualconstruction.
Finally, suggestions are given concerning how to create powerful and effective personal rituals.
America's hunger for archetypal experience and wisdom is evident from the
popularity of Joseph Campbell's The Power of Myth (1988) and from the
current profusion of myth-related books, projects, seminars, and therapies.
The popularity of this quest in a culture with an overwhelmingly empirical
bias corroborates the contrary, ancient perspective that the universe is made
up of stories rather than of atoms. From a religious, anthropological, and,
more recently, a psychosocial perspective, these stories are designated myths.
Myth in this sense does not connote an imaginative and therefore delusive
fable. The substance of true myth is the meaning embedded in the stories and
ritual practices that express an individual or culture's worldview or metanar-
rative. The purpose of myth, then, is not to paint an objective picture of reality,
but to express symbolically humankind's deepest self-understanding and
understanding of the world (Bultmann, 1972). Myth and ritual are the vehicles
through which the value-impregnated beliefs and ideas that we live by, and
live for, are preserved and transmitted.
Myths are indispensable. Rollo May (1991) affirmed the importance of
mythic metacognition in the introduction to his most recent work, The Cry for
Myth, when he wrote: "A myth is a way of making sense in a senseless world"
(p. 15). Victor Frankl (1984) identified the need to discover an overarching
In the late nineteenth century, Sigmund Freud and Josef Breuer noted that
some neurotic symptoms have symbolic physical corollaries (e.g., a hysterical
constriction of the throat may reflect a patient's inability to "swallow" an
unendurable situation). Such observations led Freud to posit that the mind is
not a passive mirror of the external world, but an active and creative par-
ticipant in the process of perception and cognition (Jung, 1964). Freud's
recognition that the unconscious mind shapes all knowledge and ex-
perience-and that the symbolism expressed in dreams can serve as a royal
road by which one explores the unconscious-proved foundational for sub-
sequent speculation about the nature of the mind. This insight also set the
stage for a new appreciation of the power of myth, for according to Freud,
"Myths ... are of the psychological order of dreams. Myths, so to say, are
public dreams; dreams are private myths" (Campbell, 1972, p. 12).
Later exponents of what became known as depth psychology broadened
and deepened Freud's initial discovery that symbols are the language by
which the unconscious conveys meaning (Tamas, 1991).Jung rejected Freud's
method of interpreting dreams via psychosexual theory as too reductionistic,
preferring to allow the richness of dream symbolism to speak for itself.Instead of
seeing the unconscious as a mere repository of repressed trauma, competing
drives, and mechanical defense mechanisms, Jung saw the unconscious as a
dynamic microcosm filled with intelligence, purpose, and wisdom. He high-
lighted the significant fact that myth and symbol, the keys to meaning
in religion and art, were also the keys to doing the healing work of
psychotherapy (Jung, 1970). Jung viewed the imagery of mythology as a pic-
tographic representation of the powers of the psyche, and treated myth as a
powerful tool through which those powers could be identified and integrated.
Studies in a variety of disciplines, including the philosophy of science,
sociology, anthropology, analytical philosophy, and religious studies, have
suggested that all cognition is inherently metaphorical (Barbour, 1974; Fyerabend,
1988; Rorty, 1979). Like adherents of contemporary post-Jungian depth
psychology, they affirmed the vital role that symbolism plays in perception.
It is increasingly clear that symbolic cognition does not function in contrast
with or in opposition to the power of reason. Rather, imagination and sym-
bolic cognition undergird and make possible perception and even
rationality itself (Tamas, 1991). Mythopoesis (myth creating, making, or
doing) ultimately "constitutes the matrixing mode and activity for any and all
our endeavors" (Doty, 1986, p. xvii).
The foremost modern-day authority on myth and ritual, Mircea Eliade (1959),
alluded to the therapeutic potency of rituals in observing that rituals create
"sacred space" and "sacred time" through which both the practitioner and the
world may be blessed. Psychotherapists Imber-Black and Roberts (1992, P: 3)
echoed Eliade's language in claiming that rituals create "protected space." For
example, the elements that constitute a child's preparation for bedtime, such
as storytelling, being tucked into bed with a beloved stuffed animal, or
repeating special goodnight phrases, constitute a ritual that nurtures the
child's inner world.
A 1992 study by Berg-Cross, Daniels, and Carr illustrated how effective
even simple rituals are in fostering wellness-in this case, in the context of
marriage. Questionnaires were given to a sample of women married 10 years
or more; women married 3 years or less; women divorced 10 years or more;
and women divorced 3 years or less. Results indicated that high ritual activity
was associated with long-term marital success and that "long-term marriages
that end in divorce are characterized by significantly less ritual activity than
long-term intact marriages" (p. 26). Examples of the kinds of rituals measured
by the questionnaires included talking together in bed before sleeping, using
special or pet names with each other, preparing meals together, having
special ways of hugging or touching, and attending seasonal religious ser-
vices together.
True ritual, then, is more than a repetitive behavior pattern. It is logocentric,
or meaning creating. Borrowing from Comstock's sociofuntionalist analysis
(1972), one might state that working rituals have the qualities of being validat-
ing, heuristic, integrative, symbolically rich, and curative. Imber-Black and
Roberts (1992) defined rituals as symbolic rites that help people do the work
of relating, changing, healing, believing, and celebrating. Rituals are increas-
ingly recognized by therapists as powerful tools that can create a window
through which the ideal can become actual, bringing renewal, transforma-
tion, community, and healing. Rituals create psychic handholds by which we
can grasp and manipulate our inner reality, for in ritual "the world as lived
and the world as imagined, fused under the agency of a single set of symbolic
forms, turns out to be the same world" (Geertz, 1973, pp. 112-113).
TYPESOF RITUAL
Paul Tillich's Dynamics of Faith (1957) offered a classic analysis of the nature
of symbols and the power of symbolic cognition. Tillich noted, first, that
symbols are different from signs. Unlike signs, symbols participate in the
Broken Symbols
Because true symbols emerge from the unconscious and are born rather than
invented, it is also true that they may grow old and eventually die. Symbols
(or myths) that lose their vitality and cease to resonate archetypally because
of shifts in individual or cultural ideology are designated as "broken"
(Campbell, 1988; Doty, 1986; Tillich, 1957). Regarding the example of the
American flag, although it is true that the flag is a symbol rather than a sign
and therefore cannot be replaced, its present power to function as a meaning-
ful symbol of the unity and spirit of America may vary greatly (e.g., percep-
tions of a World War II veteran and a 1960s antiwar activist may vary). The
fact that flag burning was once a serious offense but is today a misdemeanor
may suggest that, from a cultural viewpoint, the flag has become devitalized
as a symbol for some people.
Despite the degree to which the cultural landscape is littered with broken
symbols, symbols remain indispensable for us, because symbols are the way
we register meaning in our inner being. The predicament that confronts us
both culturally and individually is how to continue to avail ourselves of the
archetypal nurturance communicated through myth and ritual despite
postmodern society's positivistic antipathy to metanarrative or symbolic
knowledge. Because myth and ritual are the keys to both collective and
personal cognitive consonance, it is helpful for therapists to assist clients in
learning ways to birth viable symbols and to create contemporary rituals
appropriate to their personal needs. It is this practical consideration that the
remainder of this article seeks to address.
Witmer and Sweeney (1992) and Chandler, Holden, and Kolander (1992) have
espoused the position that spirituality is at the core of wellness theory (Maher
& Hunt, 1993).This is an increasingly compelling consideration for those who
conceive of counseling and psychology as helping disciplines meant to en-
gender personal transformation (Hendricks & Weinhold, 1982;Maslow, 1971;
Peck, 1993; Tart, 1975, 1990). One of the most intriguing discoveries of the
twentieth century is how much the great world religions or "wisdom tradi-
tions" (Smith, 1989) have to teach Western psychology about the parameters
of the psyche or the soul. These traditions, including shamanism, are repositories
of the archetypal wisdom of the race. Their mythology, ritual, philosophy,
and contemplative practices arguably constitute a collection of "psychotech-
nologies" (Tart, 1975), which contain paradigms for self-transformation that
have been tested and refined over many centuries. Consequently, the findings
of phenomenologists of religion may serve as gold mines from which inspira-
tion for new theories and therapies may be quarried.
In the Judea-Christian tradition, for example, ritual activity can be seen
phenomenologically to fall broadly into three categories: (a) cursing, used
here primarily in the sense of arar [Hebrew], creating a barrier to exclude or
anathematize someone or something (Kselman, 1985); (b) blessing;and (c)wor-
ship, including the commemoration of sacred events such as the Passover or
the Last Supper. In the Asian religious tradition, as expressed in Tibetan
Buddhist tantric practice, rituals may be classified as (a) "pacifying" (zhiba)
and "subjugating" (dbang-'dus) rituals (used to overcome or eradicate disease,
enemies, or other "harmers"); (b) "expansive" (rgyas-pas) rituals (used to prolong
life, increase power, acquire possessions, or gain knowledge); and (c) "un-
common" rituals, which lead directly to liberation or enlightenment (Beyer,
1973;Horton, 1972).Finally, in the Western magical tradition, which is based
in alchemical, Cabalistic, and Hermetic models of self-transformation, there
are three main types of rituals: (a) banishing rituals, which aim at removing
harmful forces; (b) evocation or invocation rituals, which enlist the aid of
helpful forces; and (c) consecration rituals, which involve a sacred celebration
or aim at the magical transmutation of oneself or a sacred object (Bardon,
1984;Crowley, 1990).
Working from phenomenological overviews such as these, we have ex-
trapolated three prevalent foci or tributaries of ritual activity. We have chosen
to label these typologically (in order corresponding to the examples within
each of the preceding groups): liberation rituals, transformation rituals, and
celebration orcommemoration rituals. In the remaining sections of the article, we
explore these proposed categories of ritual activity. The distinguishing char-
acteristic of each category is described, and each category is illustrated with
examples from the literature of religious anthropology. Contemporary ex-
amples are offered that demonstrate how each paradigm can be used to
design personalized rituals. The names in these vignettes are fictitious to
protect client confidentiality. Finally, some of the elements or building blocks
Liberation Rituals
Liberation rituals are paradoxical in that they can use an act of destruction to
effect healing. In liberation rituals, restoration is accomplished via the sym-
bolic removal of or disengagement from obstacles to healing. Negative in-
fluences are symbolically terminated, dissipated, or "cursed," and closure is
attained. The goal of liberation rituals may therefore be regarded as release.
Because significant losses and interpersonal conflict are inevitable in life,
personal and relationship healing is often needed. Liberation rituals help
individuals release and therefore recover from trauma caused by violence,
sexual abuse, or betrayal. They enable individuals to forgive others and to
reconcile their differences. By encouraging people to relegate previous pain
to the past, healing rituals empower them to embrace the future with hope.
A biblical example of symbolically actuated deliverance may be glimpsed
in the transference of the sins of Israel to the scapegoat on the annual Day of
Atonement (Leviticus 16). After the sins of the nation were linked to the
sacrificial animal by the high priest through the laying on of hands, the scape-
goat (derived from an Arabic word meaning remove) was led into the wilder-
ness and released. In so doing, Israel freed herself from her sins by vicariously
delivering them into the hands of the demon of the wilderness, Azazel
(Greybill, 1987). Another common variation on this motif was the ritual that
followed recovery from leprosy. A leper restored to wellness was not con-
sidered truly cleansed until a living bird was taken into the countryside and
set free, symbolically carrying the evil of the disease away (Leviticus 14:6).
Contemporary examples of liberation rituals might include releasing bal-
loons after a funeral to promote acceptance of the reality of death. Another
example is a string-cutting ceremony atthe time when a divorce is made final,
as a way of facing the future and relinquishing unrealistic hopes of reconcilia-
tion. Yet another example of liberation ritual is found in meditation exer-
cises, in which cancer patients attempt to mobilize their immune systems by
visualizing cancer cells being "zapped," as in a video game (Siegel, 1986,
1990). For any such rituals to be effective, the symbolic activity must be
enacted, not just thought about. In the example of the string cutting, only as
the string is actually cut does the finality of the former spouse's absence
register at the level of the unconscious.
Vignette 1. The Mays family used a liberation ritual to restore peace after a major conflict
occurred between ll-year-old George and lo-year-old Meg. The problem arose when Meg
took George's new bicycle without his permission and accidentally crashed it into a wall.
The bicycle was badly scratched and dented and could no longer command the respect
of George's peers. To retaliate, George slipped Meg's diary out of her secret hiding place,
broke its lock, and read it to her classmates at school. This instigated a bitter battle between
the two children that seemed to have no resolution.
After all attempts to reason with the children had failed, the parents decided to try a
ritual. They asked both George and Meg to write a letter to one another, in which they
would express all their angry feelings. The parents collected the written letters and asked
the children if they wanted to make up and feel better. After they both enthusiastically
Transformation Rituals
Ritual Elements
Therapists can help clients learn to tap into the creative power of ritual by
educating them about some fundamental elements employed in ritual ac-
tivity. By imaginatively combining these elements, individuals and families
can develop personalized rituals. Three of the most important of these ele-
ments are word, name, and touch, elaborated as follows.
Word. The archaic conception of "word" is of a living, creative power.
Blessings or curses, once spoken, act autonomously (note that in the Bible,
Jacob's blessing, once given, could not be recalled; Genesis 27: 33-38).
Mythopoetically, fertility, physical strength, political success, material
prosperity, and protection all traditionally depend on the blessing of God, the
gods, parents, or ancestors.
Psychically, words are the equivalent of actions and, as such, carry great
potential for destruction or creation. For example, because words have a
tremendous influence on a person's sense of self-efficacy (Bandura, 1982), they
can be a significant factor in the development of self-concepts. Children are
particularly vulnerable to evaluative feedback (Ellis & Harper, 1975) and
desperately seek the approval of loved ones (Rogers, 1961). It is thus especially
imperative that parents speak words of blessing to children if the power of
self-acceptance is to be released in them. Silence from the parent in this regard
can be as deadly as a curse.
A traditional method of blessing, and a microritual in itself, is the use of
word pictures (Smalley & Trent, 1986). Word pictures harness the intrinsic
power of symbolism, sympathetic magic, and metaphor-the irreducible
mechanisms at the heart of religion, art, and effective communication in
general. Illustrations of word pictures and the blessings and curses that they
convey, could be multiplied endlessly. Yiddish contains many particularly color-
ful examples. The benevolence of the blessing "May you live to lead your
children and your children's children to the wedding canopy" is palpable and
nurturing. The ringing disdain of "May he grow like an onion: with his feet
in the air and his head in the ground" or "Kiss a bear under his apron" is, in
this case, delightfully acerbic, but equally effective (Matisoff, 1979). Word
pictures function by creating a symbolic link between the individual and an
everyday object with which he or she is familiar ("Like a lily among thorns is
my darling among the maidens" [Song of Songs 2:1]; see also Genesis 27:27).
Such words build understanding via the power of the imagination and
penetrate our customary defenses ("Hey, cutie" would sound insincere by
comparison.).
CONCLUSION
Though the study of ritual is a fascinating academic enterprise, the typology
in this article is primarily meant as a practical aid to foster the practice of ritual
as a performing art. The grouping of rituals we have formulated is obviously not
a rigid phenomenon. In practice the three categories will overlap, because rituals
serve more than one purpose. We believe that the typology offered can
nevertheless be helpful for those seeking to incorporate the power of symbolic
cognition into personalized rituals and events. It can serve as an inventory to
fine-tune therapeutic rituals and ensure that they are dynamic, comprehen-
sive, natural, and personally meaningful. The typology may also aid one in
making the transition from simple, spontaneous rituals to more complex,
personalized rituals. Through using the power of ritual for liberation, celebra-
tion, and transformation, we can learn ways to heal ourselves, our clients, our
families, and perhaps, in some small way, our culture as well.
REFERENCES
Alexander, H. B. (1980). Soul: Primitive. In]. Hastings (Ed.), Encyclapedia of religion andethics
(Vol. 11, pp. 725-731). New York: Scribner's.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanisms in human agency. American Psychologist, 37,122-
147.
Barbour. I. (1974). Myths, models, and paradigms: A comparative study in science andreligion. New
York: Harper & Row.
Bardon, F. (1984). The practice ofmagical evocation. Wuppertal, West Germany: Dieter Ruggeberg.
Beck, R., & Metrick S. B. (1990). The art of ritual. Berkeley, CA: Celestial Arts.