IELTS HIGH PERFORMANCE

(Tài liệu thuộc tủ sách tham khảo của IHP - dành tặng cho các bạn yêu thích tiếng Anh -
- vui lòng không sử dụng để khai thác giá trị thương mại dưới mọi hình thức)

Đây là bộ bài mẫu Writing task 2 band 7.0+ được viết bởi giáo viên và cựu giám khảo
IELTS. Các bạn hãy sử dụng tài liệu hiệu quả trong việc học IELTS Writing nhé.

(Bài mẫu từ trang 2)

Chúc các bạn học vui 🌱

IELTS HIGH PERFORMANCE

Facebook/Instagram/Tiktok: @ieltshighperformance
Website: www.ieltshighperformance.com
Hotline: 0929 27 22 27
Địa chỉ: Số 10 ngõ 61 Hoàng Cầu, Ô Chợ Dừa, Đống Đa, Hà Nội

Topic: Crime
Ielts writing (7.0)
Task 1: The graph shows the changing rates of crime in New Port City from
2003-2012

Sample:
The line graph depicts the variations in levels of three types of crime in
the city center of Newport between 2003 and 2012.

In general, in the city center of Newport, the burglary rate decreased

dramatically. In contrast, the rate of robbery stabilized, and the number of car
thefts increased throughout the surveyed period.

To begin with, in 2003, burglary (about 3400 cases) outnumbered car

theft (approximately 2800) and robbery at just above 500. Over the next four
years, the figures for burglary decreased substantially to around only 1000
cases, and from 2007 onwards, there were more cases of car theft than
burglary, followed by robbery.

Car theft was a consistent level of crime from 2003 to 2005, with around
2600 cases. After fluctuations between 2000 and 2600, the figures for this
crime experienced a slight drop to under 2500 cases in 2012. The number of
robberies peaked in 2005 at 900, then dropped to 500 in 2008. This then
climbed back to 700 in the following two years before remaining at that level
by the end of the period.
Task 2: Some people think most crimes result from circumstances like poverty
and other social problems. Others believe that they are caused by people who
are bad in nature. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Sample:
There are divergent opinions regarding the root causes of criminal
behavior. Some people argue that external factors such as poverty or other
social issues are to blame for most crimes, while others contend that people
who engage in criminal activity are intrinsically bad in nature. In this essay, I
will discuss both perspectives and provide my own opinion.
On the one hand, those who believe that social problems are the primary
cause of criminal behavior argue that people are driven to commit crimes due
to their difficult and disadvantaged circumstances. For example, individuals
facing extreme poverty or unemployment may resort to stealing or other illicit
activities as a means of survival. Proponents of this view also point out that
issues such as substance abuse or mental illness can exacerbate criminal
tendencies, emphasizing the importance of addressing underlying social
difficulties to reduce crime rates.

On the other hand, there is a counterargument that criminal behavior

arises from individual traits such as impulsivity, selfishness, or a lack of
empathy. This perspective suggests that some people have a natural
tendency to engage in harmful behavior, regardless of environmental factors.
In support of this view, critics of the social circumstance theory point out that
there are people who grow up in difficult circumstances but do not resort to
crime, indicating that innate character traits play a significant role.

In my view, it is likely that both factors play a role in criminal behavior.

While social issues can be a significant driver of crime, it is also true that
some individuals may be more inclined to engage in criminal activity due to
inherent character flaws. Therefore, addressing both the root causes of social
problems and providing intervention programs that focus on individual
development could be effective in reducing crime rates.

In conclusion, there are varying opinions regarding the root causes of

criminal behavior. While some argue that criminal activity is solely attributable
to social problems, others believe that individual traits play a more significant
role. In my opinion, it is essential to consider both perspectives and work
towards comprehensive solutions to reduce the prevalence of crime in our
society.
 Ielts writing (7.5)

Task 1: The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different
areas of crime in Panama City from 2010 to 2019. Summarize the information
by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where
relevant.

Sample:
This graph illustrates how crime rates altered in Panama City from
2010-2019. We can see immediately that the most tremendous change
occurred in the number of burglaries, while incidents of theft remained low but
steady.

In 2010, burglary was the most common crime, with approximately

3,400 reported cases. The figure rose to around 3,700 in 2011, but then there
was a downward trend until 2015. At this point, the figure stood at just over
1,000 incidents. This rose slightly in 2016, then continued to fluctuate for the
remaining period.

In 2010, the number of cars being stolen stood at around 2,800 and
followed a similar trend to burglary until 2013. At this point, the number rose,
standing at approximately 2,200 in 2014. There was a marginal decrease in
the following year, but from then on, the trend was generally upward.

Finally, robbery has always been a fairly minor problem for Panama
City. The number of offenses committed changed little over nine years. It is
interesting to note that the figure of approximately 700 in 2010 is the same
figure for 2019.

Task 2: There is an opinion that young offenders should be held accountable

for their actions just as adults. While I find this view of some people justifiable
to some extent, treating both young and mature lawbreakers equally may
have adverse effects.

Sample:
On the one hand, I can understand why a young age should be no
deterrent to dealing with criminals. If these juvenile delinquents were easily
pardoned in place of receiving strict punishments as adults, they would not
become fully aware of the serious consequences of their crimes. Therefore,
imposing appropriate penalties could prevent them from conducting illegal
actions in the future. Besides, young perpetrators usually receive lighter
sentences than they deserve, which is an injustice to the victims. In Vietnam,
there was a well-known case in which a teenager murdered almost every
member of a family deliberately, escaping the death sentence due to being a
few months under the responsible age.
On the other hand, I am convinced that juvenile criminals should be
tried in a different court from that for adults. Firstly, children are proven not to
have sufficient intellectual or moral capacity to understand the outcomes of
their misdeeds, so they lack the necessary conditions to be trial defendants as
grown-up people. Secondly, when given a second chance, these underage
convicts can have an opportunity to successfully rehabilitate and learn a
valuable lesson. Thirdly, children can be negatively influenced by some bad
role models, which should also be considered to give them a fair trial.
 In conclusion, breakers of laws should not be spared punishments, but I
believe young offenders should be dealt with differently from adults.

Ielts writing (8)

Task 1: The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among
men and women of different ages in the UK and the proportion of male and
female prison inmates in the British prison system. Summarize the information
by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where
relevant.
Sample:
Given are two figures concerning criminality in Britain. The first provides
data on the rates of conviction among men and women of various ages, while
the second indicates the gender balance of the UK prison population.

It is apparent from the information supplied that the rate of conviction

among Brits of both sexes increases exponentially during adolescence and
peaks at the age of about 20. Also evident is the fact that men are far more
likely to offend than women. From a negligible 2 percent among 10-year-old
boys, the male conviction rate soars to approximately 16 percent among 20-
year-olds. The percentage of female offenders, meanwhile, climbs from 0
percent among girls of 10 to some 5 percent for 20-year-olds. The subsequent
decades, however, see dramatic decreases in criminality among both sexes.
A mere 2 percent of crimes are committed by 60-year-old men and 0 percent
by women of the same age.

As for the proportion of male and female prison inmates, men

outnumber women 24 to 1. Some 96 percent of all prisoners are men, while
the remainder are female.
Task 2: Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each
type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual
crime and the motivation for committing it should always be considered when
deciding on the punishment. Discuss both these views and give your own
opinion.

Sample:
Most countries around the world have specific sanctions for each type
of crime. However, others believe that while penalizing victims, the context,
circumstances, and motivation should also be considered. There are several
points of view, but I am of the opinion that there should be a predetermined
sentence for each crime.

To begin with, equality is the most essential factor that any democracy's
court adheres to. We live in a modern world where everyone has equal rights,
and the law applies to everyone equally. All democracies adhere to their
constitutions, which are the same for all citizens. Treating the same crime
differently results in hypocrisy and disrespect for the judiciary and the
Constitution. It even creates unease and a sense of inequity among citizens.

Furthermore, factors like motivation and environment can be changed to

mislead the judge. It will be difficult for the judiciary to keep track of each type
of case, and if such rules are implemented, it will be more akin to a monarchy
or dictatorship. Criminals may exploit these gaps in the legislation to mislead
the court by presenting an incorrect circumstance.

On the other hand, it is feasible that the same punishment for a similar
crime will be unfair at times. Some crimes, most likely big crimes that occur in
a wholly different setting, should be punished differently. A planned murder,
for example, should be punished differently than an accident. Instead of
making people feel unsafe, these laws will allow them more freedom.

To conclude and offer my position, crime should be fixed for all types of
punishment, as this is the best way to keep the system running. Accountability
and simplicity will be maintained, as will citizen equality.

“To have another language is to possess a second soul.”

 Các mẫu writing task 2 (7.0+)

Task 2.1: Some people argue that the death penalty is an effective deterrent
against serious crimes, while others believe it is inhumane and should be
abolished. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Sample:
The death penalty, a highly controversial issue, elicits strong opinions
from both sides. Advocates contend that it serves as an effective deterrent
against serious crimes such as murder. They argue that the fear of facing the
ultimate punishment can dissuade potential offenders. While this may hold in
some cases, the effectiveness of the death penalty as a deterrent remains a
topic of debate.
On the other hand, opponents of the death penalty argue that it is
inhumane and violates the fundamental right to life. Furthermore, there is a
risk of wrongful convictions, which raises ethical concerns about executing
innocent individuals. In many countries, there is a global trend toward
abolishing the death penalty in favor of life imprisonment.
In my view, the death penalty should be abolished. The potential for
irrevocable errors and ethical concerns about taking a human life outweighs
the deterrence argument. Alternative measures, such as life imprisonment
without parole, can prevent dangerous criminals from society while avoiding
the moral dilemmas associated with the death penalty.
Moreover, the financial cost of maintaining death row inmates and the
lengthy legal processes involved in capital punishment make it a less practical
option than life imprisonment. The resources saved by abolishing the death
penalty can be redirected toward victim support, crime prevention, and
rehabilitation programs.
In conclusion, while proponents of the death penalty argue for its
deterrent effect, the ethical concerns, risk of wrongful executions, and
practical considerations make it a less viable option. Life imprisonment offers
a humane and more cost-effective alternative while ensuring the safety of
society.

Task 2.2: In many countries, the crime rate is increasing. What are the main
causes of this rise in crime, and what measures can governments take to
address this issue?
Sample:
In recent years, the crime rate has witnessed a disturbing increase in
many nations. This essay will examine some key factors contributing to this
rise in crime and suggest measures governments can take to address this
issue.
One major cause of the surge in crime is socio-economic inequality.
People living in poverty often turn to criminal activities due to desperation and
a lack of opportunities. Governments should prioritize poverty alleviation
programs, job creation, and affordable housing initiatives to combat this.
When individuals have access to necessities and meaningful employment, the
incentive to engage in criminal behavior decreases significantly.
Another contributing factor is inadequate education. A well-educated
populace is less likely to resort to crime. Therefore, governments should focus
on improving the quality of education, particularly in underprivileged areas.
Investing in schools and teachers can equip students with the skills and
knowledge necessary to lead productive lives.
Moreover, substance abuse plays a crucial role in driving crime rates.
Drug addiction can lead individuals to commit crimes to support their habits.
Governments should allocate resources to addiction treatment and
rehabilitation programs. A combination of counseling, therapy, and community
support can help addicts break free from the cycle of addiction and criminality.
In addition to these causes, ineffective law enforcement and a lack of
community engagement contribute to the rise in crime. To address this,
governments should invest in community policing initiatives and foster a sense
of responsibility among citizens. Neighborhood watch programs and
community outreach efforts can create safer environments and deter criminal
activity.
In conclusion, the increasing crime rate in many countries is a
multifaceted issue with socio-economic, educational, and substance abuse
components. Governments should adopt a comprehensive approach that
includes poverty reduction, education improvement, addiction treatment, and
community engagement to combat this problem effectively. By addressing
these root causes, we hope to create safer and more secure societies for
everyone.
Task 2.3: Giving detailed descriptions of crimes in newspapers and on TV can
have negative consequences, so it should be restricted.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Sample:
The advent of diverse multimedia platforms has facilitated the
widespread dissemination of detailed information about crimes, including
graphic depictions and images, which are readily available to audiences.
However, this trend has ignited debates regarding the potential hazards of
such content, leading to calls for restrictions. I firmly concur that the
drawbacks of this type of content outweigh the benefits.
Access to comprehensive portrayals of crime can indeed offer valuable
insights into criminal behavior and spur individuals to take preventive
measures. For example, revealing a serial killer's modus operandi could assist
law enforcement in suspect identification and prevention of further incidents,
while also enabling the public to adopt protective measures. However, it's
crucial to consider the potential psychological ramifications for the public.
Instead of graphic depictions, standardized and written methods may serve as
a more effective and less distressing approach to raising awareness.
You sent
There are, however, profound drawbacks associated with the
dissemination of graphic crime content that cannot be overlooked. One of the
primary concerns is the potential to induce unnecessary fear and anxiety
among the audience. Graphic details of crimes, when widely circulated, can
lead to a sense of panic and apprehension in communities, regardless of the
low probability of similar crimes occurring in their vicinity. This can result in
increased stress levels, decreased sense of safety, and harmful vigilantism.
Furthermore, the sensationalization of over-representation of certain crimes in
media can reinforce negative stereotypes about specific groups of people,
such as racial or ethnic minorities.
This can lead to serious repercussions for these groups, including
increased discrimination, harassment, and even violence. For instance, media
coverage that disproportionately emphasizes the race or ethnicity of a criminal
can fuel prejudice and discrimination against members of that group.
In conclusion, while it is critical for the public to stay informed about
crime trends and safety measures, the distribution of detailed crime
information should be handled responsibly. It should consider potential
psychological impacts on viewers and avoid perpetuating harmful stereotypes.
In this way, we can balance the need for public safety information with the
need to maintain societal harmony and individual psychological well-being.

Task 2.4: Young people are committing more crimes. Discuss the causes and
solutions for this problem.

Sample:
It has been observed that juvenile delinquency is on the rise. Some of
the leading causes of this issue are parents' lack of attention and their
impoverished living conditions. However, some actions can be implemented to
tackle this development, such as incorporating lessons in ethics in schools
and allocating more funding towards essential services such as education and
social security.
To begin with, there are a few reasons why more of the youth are
committing illegal acts. One of them is that parents may fail to fulfill their moral
duty to take care of their offspring and guide them on what is right or wrong
because they may either be too busy with their work or need more skills or
knowledge due to generational neglect. Thus, these children may be forced
into surviving on their own by any means necessary, even if it means breaking
the law. Furthermore, some of these youth may also live in deprivation and,
therefore, cannot afford to live a normal childhood. As such, they may also be
forced to earn a living by illegitimate means.
Fortunately, some actions can be taken to resolve this issue. Firstly, the
government can pass measures to incorporate ethics into the national school
curriculum. There can be some lessons every week that teach children how to
behave responsibly in society. That way, children can learn from a young age
what the consequences are for committing the crime and thus be deterred. In
addition, the state should also devote more funding to bolster crucial services,
namely education and social security. As these services are critical to a
functioning society and as people become better educated and more
financially secure, there would be less of an incentive for them to commit
crimes.
In conclusion, the lack of parental guidance and poverty are the leading
factors behind the rise in juvenile crime. However, it can be addressed by
teaching children ethics lessons and providing more financial resources for
education and the social safety net.
 Task 2.5: Recent figures show an increase in violent crime among
youngsters under the age of 18. Some psychologists claim that the basic
reason for this is that children these days are not getting the social and
emotional learning they need from parents and teachers.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this option?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your
own knowledge or experience.

Sample:
Nowadays, there is an alarming problem is that violent crime rates have
increased considerably, particularly among young people under 18. To me, I
strongly agree that lack of education from parents is the main reason for this
situation. The below essay will analyze my view clearly.

The first reason that can be easily seen is that in modern life, parents
spend their time working to earn money. Obviously, there is less time to take
care of and supervise their children carefully. In addition, the gap between
parents and children has been expanded; so these children have rarely had
chances to share their feelings with their parents as well as to learn from the
family side. Moreover, there are plenty of negative mediums such as violent
films, and bad things from the Internet of crime that are prominent around us;
without parents’ control, children are influenced by those things easily.

Another factor that needs to be mentioned is that unstable marriage life

has led to a surge in divorce rates. Having a broken family and a shortage of
love from both mother and father have caused the destruction of those
youngsters in their study and some significant negative impacts on their
psychology. As a result, children with immature characters have become more
aggressive, behave rudely, and particularly imitated violent films or plunged
headlong into social evils.

However, it is undeniable that parents are not the only factor that leads
to an increased violent crime percentage. Since it depends on the conceit of
these youngsters about protecting themselves from harmful impacts, In spite
of dealing with the above situation, some of those children have lived
positively. Nevertheless, from what has been considered above, parents have
played a vital role in preventing growth in crime rates.
 In conclusion, the personality development of children is unable to be
perfect without support from the family side. Furthermore, appropriate
nurturing of parents not only has helped to drop crime in youngsters but also
produced good citizens for our future.

Task 2.6: Most criminals engage in unlawful activities out of necessity, often
driven by socio-economic and family circumstances, rendering traditional
policing and punishment systems less effective in reducing crime rates. Do
you share the same viewpoint or disagree with it? Provide reasons and
examples to support your stance. Additionally, it discusses alternative
approaches governments and law enforcement agencies could adopt to
address the root causes of criminal behavior and mitigate crime in society.

Sample:
It is believed by some that out of the significant number of criminals,
only a tiny proportion of them execute it intentionally, and most of them do it,
considering it as necessary. Thus, the police and punishment system do not
have to do anything to decrease the prevalence of crimes. In my opinion, I
agree with the statement and will provide reasons why this is so.
To begin, certain situations that some people have make them
vulnerable to commit crimes. This means a person has a well-off or poorly
deprived socio-economic or family status, significantly impacting their decision
to engage in offenses. Consequently, those with depressed situations affect
their contentment and cause them to get involved in unlawful activities such as
robbery, kidnapping, drug pushing, and even murder. For example, a recent
study conducted by Scene of the Crime Operatives in the Philippines showed
that 88% of the robbers stated that they committed such crimes because of
poverty.
Furthermore, the policing and prison system became less effective if the
criminals were more motivated to perform crimes. This is because, despite the
government's efforts to decrease crimes, such as putting up CCTVs and
assigning more police in an area, there is still a high criminal activity rate
recorded. In addition, current punishment methods need to be more rigorous,
such as more years of imprisonment or capital punishment, to deter criminals
from committing crimes. For instance, a study conducted by Crime Patrol in
China showed that 46% of criminals are known repeat offenders.

In conclusion, crime became a constant problem because of innate

situations that some people had, putting them at greater risk of becoming a
criminal. As a result, this motivation makes policing methods irrelevant in
lessening crime circumstances. I fully agree with the current scene, and
authorities should prioritize this to create a more peaceful society.

Task 2.7: In many countries, crime rates are on the rise. Some people believe
that the government and law enforcement agencies should focus on
increasing the number of police officers on the streets to combat crime, while
others argue that addressing the root causes of crime, such as poverty and
lack of education, is more effective. Discuss both views and provide your
opinion.

Sample:
The issue of increasing crime rates has sparked a debate about the
most effective approach to crime prevention. While some argue that bolstering
police presence is the solution, others contend that tackling the underlying
causes of crime, such as poverty and lack of education, is more effective. In
my view, a balanced approach that combines both strategies is necessary to
effectively address the rising crime rates.
Proponents of increasing police numbers argue that a visible police
presence can deter potential criminals and respond promptly to criminal
incidents. This argument has merit, as studies have shown that increased
police visibility in high-crime areas can lead to a decrease in criminal activity.
For example, a study conducted in New York City found that the deployment
of more police officers to crime hotspots resulted in a significant reduction in
violent crimes.
However, solely relying on law enforcement is not a comprehensive
solution. Crime often stems from socio-economic disparities and lack of
opportunities. Therefore, addressing the root causes of crime is equally
important. High levels of poverty and limited access to quality education can
lead individuals to resort to criminal activities out of desperation. To combat
this, governments should invest in poverty reduction programs, job creation
initiatives, and educational reforms.
Moreover, rehabilitation and social support programs for ex-offenders
can play a pivotal role in reducing recidivism. When individuals are provided
with opportunities for reintegration into society, they are less likely to return to
a life of crime.
In conclusion, while increasing police presence can have a positive
impact on crime reduction, it is essential to address the underlying socio-
economic factors that drive criminal behavior. A holistic approach that
combines effective law enforcement with initiatives to alleviate poverty and
improve access to education is the most viable strategy for tackling rising
crime rates. By doing so, societies can work towards creating safer and more
secure communities for all.

Task 2.8: Some people argue that the primary purpose of prisons should be to
punish criminals, while others believe that the focus should be on
rehabilitating them. Discuss both views and provide your opinion.

Sample:
The role of prisons in society is a subject of ongoing debate. While
some advocate for prisons primarily as punitive institutions, others argue that
their primary focus should be rehabilitating offenders. I believe rehabilitation
should take precedence over punishment, as it offers a more effective and
humane approach to addressing criminal behavior.
Those who emphasize punishment argue it is a deterrent, discouraging
potential offenders from committing criminal acts. They contend that harsh
prison conditions, such as long sentences and restrictive environments, send
a clear message that crime will not be tolerated. While this viewpoint holds
merit to some extent, it often overlooks the root causes of criminal behavior.
In contrast, proponents of rehabilitation argue that prisons should aim to
reform inmates and equip them with the skills and support needed for
successful reintegration into society. This approach recognizes that many
offenders' underlying issues, such as addiction, mental health problems, or
lack of education, contribute to their criminal behavior. Addressing these
issues through counseling, therapy, vocational training, and education
programs can significantly reduce recidivism rates.
Research has consistently shown that when properly implemented,
rehabilitation programs lead to lower reoffending rates. For example, a study
conducted in Norway, which prioritizes rehabilitation over punishment, has
one of the lowest recidivism rates in the world. Inmates are provided with
education and job training, focusing on preparing them for a productive life
upon release.
In conclusion, while punishment has a role in the criminal justice
system, rehabilitation should be the primary focus of prisons. By addressing
the underlying causes of criminal behavior and providing inmates with the
tools for successful reintegration into society, we can reduce crime and
promote a more just and humane approach to criminal justice. This approach
benefits both the individuals involved and society as a whole.

Task 2.9: Some people believe that prisons should focus on changing the
perspective of prisoners through education and rehabilitation programs, while
others argue that prisons should primarily serve as places of punishment.
Discuss both views and provide your opinion.

Sample:
The purpose of prisons has long been a matter of debate. Some argue
that prisons should prioritize changing inmates' perspectives through
education and rehabilitation, while others contend they should primarily serve
as punitive institutions. The emphasis should be on transforming prisoners'
perspectives, as it reduces recidivism and contributes to society's overall
betterment.
Those advocating for a punitive approach argue that prisons should
primarily focus on punishment as a deterrent to criminal behavior. They
believe that harsh conditions, lengthy sentences, and restricted privileges
clearly show potential offenders that crime carries severe consequences.
While this viewpoint has its merits in theory, it often fails to address the root
causes of criminal behavior.
On the other hand, proponents of rehabilitation assert that the criminal
justice system should aim to reform inmates and equip them with the skills
needed for successful reintegration into society. This approach recognizes
that many prisoners have underlying issues, such as substance abuse, mental
health problems, or a lack of education, contributing to their criminal conduct.
Education and rehabilitation programs, including counseling, therapy,
vocational training, and literacy courses, can address these issues and
provide inmates with a path to a crime-free life.
Research has consistently shown that focusing on rehabilitation can
lead to lower recidivism rates. In countries like Norway, which prioritize
rehabilitation over punishment, inmates are provided education and skill
development opportunities, leading to successful reintegration into society
upon release.
In conclusion, while punishment has its place in the criminal justice
system, the primary goal of prisons should be to change the perspective of
inmates. By addressing the root causes of criminal behavior and offering
opportunities for personal growth and education, we can reduce the likelihood
of reoffending and create a safer, more rehabilitative justice system. This
approach benefits not only the individuals involved but society as a whole by
promoting reintegration and reducing crime rates.

Task 2.10: Some argue that the traditional prison system is no longer suitable
for addressing the complexities of modern society's criminal issues. In
contrast, others believe that it remains a necessary and effective tool. Discuss
both views and provide your opinion.

Sample:
The traditional prison system, focusing on incarceration and punitive
measures, has been the cornerstone of the criminal justice system for
centuries. However, in the face of evolving societal challenges, there is a
growing debate about whether this system is still suitable to address the
complexities of modern criminal issues. In this essay, I will examine both sides
of the argument and provide my perspective.
Supporters of the traditional prison system argue that it serves as a
necessary deterrent to crime and a means of protecting society from
dangerous individuals. They contend that imprisonment punishes wrongdoers
and removes them from the general population, thereby ensuring public
safety. Additionally, the punitive nature of incarceration is seen as a just
consequence of criminal acts and can act as a deterrent to potential offenders.
On the other hand, critics argue that the modern prison system is ill-
suited to address the underlying factors contributing to criminal behavior, such
as addiction, mental health issues, and socioeconomic disparities. They assert
that prisons often exacerbate these problems and increase recidivism rates.
Moreover, the immense cost of maintaining prisons and the strain on
resources for rehabilitation and support programs are considered inefficient
and unsustainable.
While the traditional prison system may have its merits in some
instances, it is increasingly inadequate for addressing modern criminal issues'
complex and diverse challenges. Instead of primarily focusing on punishment,
there should be a shift towards a more rehabilitative and therapeutic
approach. This would involve investing in educational, vocational, and mental
health programs for inmates to address the root causes of criminal behavior
and facilitate their reintegration into society.
In conclusion, the suitability of the modern prison system is a subject of
ongoing debate. While it may serve a purpose in some situations, a more
nuanced and rehabilitative approach is needed to address the evolving
complexities of criminal issues in today's society. By prioritizing rehabilitation
and support, we can work towards a justice system that punishes and seeks
to address the factors that lead to criminal behavior, ultimately contributing to
safer and more equitable communities.