Professional Documents
Culture Documents
01 BACKGROUND
Vertically-infected HIV
Vertically-infected HIV
adolescents are
children still persist
increasing
WHO WHY
• Children with HIV infection • Maximally and durably suppressing viral
replication
• Restoring and/or preserving immune function
as reflected by CD4 cell measures
• Preventing emergence of viral drug-resistance
mutations
• Minimizing drug-related toxicity
• Maintaining normal physical growth and
neurocognitive development
• Reducing HIV-related mortality and morbidity
• Improving quality of life.
ARV management - WHEN
WHO 2010 WHO 2013
When
Deferred
x ARV initia
WHO 2016
tio n
PNPK
2019
Clinical stage 3 ALL ALL ALL ALL
or 4
• Treat all HIV-infected
0-12 months ALL childrenALL(not depend on ALL HIV stage
ALL
ormonths
12-24 CD4 level). ALL ALL ALL ALL
24-59 months CD4+ ≤750 cells/mm or
3 ALL ALL ALL
• Treat opportunistic ≤ 25% infection
Priority: such
CD4+ ≤350as TB Priority:
for 2CD4+ weeks
≤750
cells/mm cells/mm
before ARV initiation – no need to wait untilALL
3 3
5-10 years old CD4+ ≤350 cells/mm 3 CD4+ ≤500 cells/mm 3 ALL
management of IO is completed. Priority: CD4+ ≤350
cells/mm3
Priority: CD4+ ≤350
cells/mm 3
• Patient/family/caregiver
10-19 years old CD4+ ≤350 cells/mm 3
ready
CD4+ ≤500 cells/mm 3 ALL ALL
Priority: CD4+ ≤350 Priority: CD4+ ≤350
cells/mm3 cells/mm3
Protease inhibitors chromosome of in
1995 Saquinavir capability to be ac
1996 Ritonavir new infective viral p
Antiretroviral drugs
2006 Darunavir (/r, /c) Viral load: term u
Receptor
binding and quantity of genetic
entry RNA, of a virus pre
Usually, in HIV-infe
cycle
Assembly
2007 Maraviroc gp120-
and HIV-infected individ
gp41
budding achievement of co
2018 Ibalizumab-uiyk
2020 Fostemsavir viral replication, me
Env
plasma as less tha
Reverse
copies/mL.
Fusion
Gag
ssRNA transcription
inhibitors Gag-Pol
2003 Enfuvirtide
dsDNA
Reverse
transcriptase Integration
inhibitors
NRTIs 1987 Zidovudine (AZT)
1991 Didanosine
1992 Zalcitabine
Integrase inhibitors
1994 Stavudine 2007 Raltegravir
1995 Lamivudine 2012 Elvitegravir (/c)
Abbreviations: AZT, azidothymidine; /c, boosted 1998 Abacavir 2013 Dolutegravir
2001 Tenofovir (TDF, TAF) 2018 Bictegravir
with cobicistat; NRTI, nucleoside reverse 2003 Emtricitabine 2021 Cabotegravir
transcriptase inhibitors; NNRTI, non-nucleoside NNRTIs 1996 Nevirapine
reverse transcriptase inhibitors; /r, boosted with 1997 Delavirdine
1998 Efavirenz
ritonavir; TAF, tenofovir alafenamide; TDF, 2008 Etravirine
2011 Rilpivirine
tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. 2018 Doravirine
Menéndez-Arias L, Delgado R. Trends
Trends inPharmacol Sci. 2022;43:16-29
Pharmacological Sciences
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
55
PT
RI
SC
NU
MA
T ED
EP
US Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Pediatric HIV Infection, 2022
Antiretroviral Drug
Abacavir 300 mg
Lopinavir 100 mg/
ritonavir 25 mg
Lopinavir 40 mg/
ritonavir 10 mg
Dolutegravir 50 mg
Courtesy: UPT HIV RSCM, Child Health Department FKUI/RSCM
Dolutegravir
from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jia2.25970 by INASP/HINARI - INDONESIA, Wiley Online Library on [06/12/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-an
17582652, 2022, 11, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jia2.25970 by INASP/HINARI - INDONESIA, Wiley Online Library on [06/12/2022]. See t
25970
rg/10.1002/jia2.25970
Figure 3. Proportion of infants, children and adolescents achieving viral suppression of <50 copies/ml (open symbols), or <400 copies/ml,
<1000 copies/ml or viral suppression at an unspecified threshold if <50 copies/ml was not reported (shaded symbols) after treatment
re 3.with
Proportion of infants,
(a) dolutegravir children
or (b) andover
raltegravir adolescents achieving
time. Results viral suppression
are stratified of <50
by age (colour copies/ml
of symbol), line (open symbols),
of therapy (shapeorof<400 copies/ml,
symbol) and
00 copies/ml or viral suppression at an unspecified threshold if <50 copies/ml was not reported (shaded symbols)
study size (size of symbol). Connecting lines link data follow-up points from the same study population. Data from an individual study after treatment
h (a) may
dolutegravir or (b)at raltegravir
be presented more than oneovertimepoint;
time. Results are at
however, stratified
a given by age (colour
timepoint, of symbol),
data from a group line of therapy
of subjects (shape
are only of symbol)
presented once and
dy size (size data
(overall of symbol). Connecting
were prioritized over lines link data).
sub-group data follow-up points
For randomized from the
controlled same
trials andstudy population.
single-arm studies, Data from anrepresents
the timepoint individualthe
study
be presented at more than one timepoint; however, at a given timepoint, data from a group of subjects are only presented once
duration of follow-up; for observational studies, the timepoint represents the median follow-up time of the study. A table showing the
viral were
rall data load data used to over
prioritized createsub-group
the scatterplot
data).isFor
included in File S2
randomized Proportion of infants, children and adolescents achieving
(Table S2).trials and single-arm studies, the timepoint represents the
controlled
viral suppression (8 studies, 1281 subjects)
ation of follow-up; for observational studies, the timepoint represents the median follow-up time of the study. A table showing the
l load data used to create the scatterplot is included in File S2 (Table S2).
(follow-up to 144 weeks in IMPAACT P1093, 24 weeks in for up to 1 year, and the study was considered high risk of
ODYSSEY pharmacokinetic sub-study and up to 43 weeks in bias.
Bacha 2020) [19, 25, 28, 30, 31] (Figure 4). One discontin- Total cholesterol data in children and adolescents were
What – New Guideline
PMK No. 23 Th 2022 tentang Penanggulangan HIV, AIDS dan
Infeksi Menular Seksual
a
For infants younger than four weeks old, see Table A1.4 for more accurate dosing, which is reduced because of the decreased ability to excrete and metabolize medications. For infants who are at
least four weeks old but weigh less than 3 kg, the immaturity of renal and hepatic pathways of elimination are less of a concern, but uncertainty still exists on the appropriate dosing of ARV drugs for
preterm and low-birth-weight infants.
b
This formulation will be phased out of use over time, and programmes should transition to using the 120 mg/60 mg dispersible scored tablets.
WHO, 2021
Table A1.3 Simplified dosing of child-friendly solid and oral liquid formulations for twice-daily dosing for
infants and children four weeks of age and oldera
Drug
Solid formulations
Strength of
paediatric tablets
AM
3–<6 kg
PM
Wrong do
6–<10 kg
AM PM
W
Number of tablets or mL by weight-band morning (AM)rand
10–<14 kg
AM PM
onevening
se
g for(PM)
mula
14–<20 kg
AM
x
PM
20–<25 kg
AM PM
Strength of
adult tablet
Number of tablets
by weight band
AM
25–<35 kg
PM
✓
Granules 40 mg/10 mg 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 – –
Table A1.2 Simplified
sachet
dosing of child-friendly solid formulations for once-daily dosing for infants and children
four weeks and oldera (continued)
DRV c
Tablet 75 mg – – – – – – 5 5 5 5 400 mg 1 1
Drug
RTVd Strength of 25
Tablet paediatric
mg tablet – – Number
– of tablets
– or–capsules
– by weight
2 band2 once daily
2 2 Strength
100 mg of Number
1 of tablets
1 or
adult tablet capsules by weight
Tablet 50 mg – – – – – – 1 1 1 1
band once daily
RALe Chewable tablets 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 6 6 400 mg 1 1
3–<6 kg 6–<10 kg 10–<14 kg 14–<20 kg 20–<25 kg 25–<35 kg
✓
25 mg
DTGh Film-coated tablet 50 mg – – – – 1 50 mg 1
Chewable tablets – – – – – – 1 1 1.5 1.5
Dispersible
100 mgtablet 5 mg 1 3 4 5 6
Dispersible scored tablet 10 mg 0.5 1.5 2 2.5 3
a
See Table A1.4 for dosing recommendations for infants younger than four weeks old. Doses for this age group are reduced to account for the decreased ability to excrete and metabolize medications. For infants who
are at least four weeks old but weigh less than 3 kg, immaturity of renal and hepatic pathways of elimination are less of a concern, but uncertainty still exists on the appropriate dosing of ARV drugs for preterm and
low-birth-weight infants. WHO, 2021
b
EFV is not recommended for children younger than three years and weighing less than 10 kg.
c
Colour legend
Drug Interaction
These drugs should not be co-administered
Potential clinically significant interaction that is likely to require additional monitoring,
alteration of drug dosage or timing of administration
Potential interaction likely to be of weak intensity. Additional action/monitoring or
dosage adjustment is unlikely to be required
Table A2.1 Key drug interactions for ARVs (continued) No clinically significant interaction expected
Numbers indicate further information is available in the footnotes.
ABC FTC 3TC TAF TDF ZDV ATV/r DRV/r LPV/r EFV NVP RPV BIC/FTC/TAF DTG RAL
Kanamycin
Amoxicillin 21
Levofloxacin
Ampicillin 36 36 18
Meropenem
Azithromycin 22 22 18
Bedaquiline
Metronidazole 23
37 24
37 23
38 25
Capreomycin
Moxifloxacin 21 39 2 39 2 18
Cefalexin
Penicillins
Cefixime
Pyrazinamide
Ceftriaxone
Rifabutin 40 41 41 41 42 43
Clarithromycin
Rifampicin 16
40 17 44 26 27 20 28 29 30 19 45 46
Clofazimine
Rifapentine 40 31 31 47 48
No Interaction details
Cycloserine
Spectinomycin
38 No interaction expected with lopinavir/ritonavir
Dapsone
Sulfadiazine 49 tablets.
49 Coadministration
21 is contraindicated
32
14 with lopinavir/ritonavir oral solution. 50
40 Potential decreased exposure of tenofovir alafenamide. However the intracellular tenofovir
Delamanid
Tetracyclines 20 diphosphate
33 (active
20 entity) levels are likely to be higher than those obtained with TDF even
without rifampicin, suggesting that usage of TAF 25 mg QD with rifampicin, rifabutin or rifapentine may be acceptable.
Doxycycline
Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole 32 34 34
44 Coadministration decreased zidovudine exposure. Coadministration is not recommended in the European product label for zidovudine, however, the US product label states that
Ethambutol
Vancomycin
routine dose modification is not warranted. 21 14
45 Ethionamide
Anti-coagulant
Coadministration and Anti-platelet
decreased dolutegravir concentrations. A dose adjustment of dolutegravir to 50 mg twice daily is recommended when coadministered with rifampicin in the absence
of integrase class resistance. In the
Flucloxacillin
Apixaban 35presence of integrase class resistance this combination should be avoided. Dolutegravir
2 502mg twice daily dosing should be maintained for another
2 weeks following cessation of rifampicin due to the persisting inducing effect upon discontinuation of a strong inducer.
ABC FTC 3TC TAF TDF ZDV ATV/r DRV/r legend
Colour LPV/r EFV NVP RPV BIC/FTC/TAF DTG RAL
Anti-diabetics These drugs should not be co-administered
Potential clinically significant interaction that is likely to require additional monitoring,
Glibenclamide (Glyburide) 1 1 1 2 2
alteration of drug dosage or timing of administration
Drug Interaction
Gliclazide 2 2 2 interaction
Potential 1 likely to be of weak intensity. Additional action/monitoring or
dosage adjustment is unlikely to be required
Insulin
Table A2.1 Key drug interactions for ARVs (continued) No clinically significant interaction expected
Metformin 77
Numbers indicate further information is available in the footnotes. 78
Antifungals ABC FTC 3TC TAF TDF ZDV ATV/r DRV/r LPV/r EFV NVP RPV BIC/FTC/TAF DTG RAL
Anti-diabetics
Amphotericin B 21 32
Glibenclamide
Clotrimazole (Glyburide)
(topical) 1 1 1 2 2
Gliclazide (pessary, troche)
Clotrimazole 2 2 2 1
Insulin
Fluconazole 75 36 36 79 30
Metformin
Flucytosine 80 80 80 32 77
80 78
Antifungals
Itraconazole 16 17 81 82 81 83 19
Amphotericin B
Ketoconazole 16 21
17 32 84 85 86 19
Clotrimazole (topical)
Nystatin
Clotrimazole (pessary, troche)
Voriconazole 87 88 89 90 91
Fluconazole Agents
Antimigraine 75 36 36 79 30
Flucytosine
No Interaction details 80 80 80 32 80
Ergotamine 2
Itraconazole 16 17 81 82 81 83 19
Antiprotozoals
36 No pharmacokinetic interaction expected. However, caution is recommended as both drugs have risks of QT prolongation. ECG monitoring is
Ketoconazole 16 17 84 85 86 19
Amodiaquine recommended. 14 92
Nystatin
75 Coadministration may increase zidovudine exposure. Routine dose modification of 1zidovudine
Artemisinin 1 93is not warranted,
94 95but monitor closely for potential toxicity of
Voriconazole zidovudine. 87 88 89 90 91
Chloroquine 96 96 18 19
79
Antimigraine Coadministration
Agents increased nevirapine exposure by ~100% compared to historical data. Use with caution. Patients should be monitored closely for
nevirapine-associated adverse events.
Ergotamine 2
Antiprotozoals WHO, 2021
Table A1.5 ARV drug dose adjustment for children receiving rifampicin-containing TB treatmenta
x
Drug Strength of Number of tablets or mL by weight-band morning (AM) and evening (PM) Strength of Number of tablets by
paediatric tablets adult tablet weight band
✓
Chewable tablets
50 mg film-coated –– –– –– –– –– –– –2 –2 31 31
100 mg
tablets
RAL (with
LPV/r c
Oral solution 80/
10 mg/mL
d
61 mL
mL 61 mL
mL 101.5
mL 101.5
mL 2 mL
16 mL 2 mL
16 mL 202.5
mL 202.5
mL 3 –mL 3 –mL 400–mg –2 –2
additional RTV) 20 mg/mL
(Oral granules for mL mL mL mL
suspension: 100 mg/
Pelletse 40 mg/10 mg 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 – – –
sachet)
✓
Granules 40 mg/10 mg 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 – – –
Chewable
sachet tablets 2 2 4 4 6 6 8 8 – –
✓
25 mg
Tablet 100 mg/25 mg – – – – 2 1 2 2 2 2 100 mg/25 mg 3 3
Chewable tablets – – – – – – 2 2 3 3
100 mg
LPV/rc (with Oral solutiond 80/ 1 mL 1 mL 1.5 1.5 2 mL 2 mL 2.5 2.5 3 mL 3 mL – – WHO,– 2021
additional RTV) 20 mg/mL mL mL mL mL
ARV management
WHERE HOW
Monitoring
Fig. 4.2 Treatment monitoring algorithm updated in 2021