Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Harsh Modi
Tina Prouty
CPRE 394
2 March 2024
Ethics Essay
Ethics is a subject that most people gloss over. It isn’t something that people really think
or care about when it comes to most people’s lives. However, ethics is how the world is able to
work together. It binds us and holds us accountable to our environment and to each other.
Knowing how we should treat each other, what works, and what doesn’t work is the most crucial
philosophy we can hold in life. The concept of a code of ethics is what allows us to complete this
mission. A Code of Ethics is like a moral compass for decision-making in our diverse world. It
brings people together by sharing basic principles and ensuring everyone plays fair. It's like a
social agreement, setting the rules for how we should behave and building trust and teamwork. It
nudges us to keep getting better, encouraging self-awareness and personal growth. Essentially, a
Code of Ethics shapes how we make our ethical choices, keeps us united, ensures fairness, and
pushes us always to do better. It gives us rules and individual philosophies we can adhere to so
that we can all thrive together without harming anything or anyone on our path to that
destination.
In our path to that final goal, we can face multiple obstacles and ethical dilemmas on the
way. The way I make decisions when confronted with an ethical dilemma involves carefully
considering several factors. Firstly, I assess the potential consequences of each option, weighing
Modi 2
the impact on different individuals, groups, and the general community. Understanding the
short-term and long-term effects of my decisions helps me gauge the ethical implications of my
choices. Secondly, I consider the principles and values that guide my actions. This involves
reflecting on my personal Code of Ethics – the set of moral guidelines that I've developed for
myself over time. These principles act as a compass, helping me navigate complex situations and
make decisions that align with my core beliefs. Another crucial aspect is empathy. I try to put
myself in the shoes of those affected by my decision, understanding their perspectives and
feelings. I always do this no matter what the situation is. Always being considerate of others,
even at my own expense, helps me ensure that my choices are considerate of the diverse
experiences and needs of others. Moreover, I take into account legal and societal norms.
Understanding the legal framework and social expectations provides a broader context for my
decision. While legality doesn't always equate to ethicality, it serves as an additional layer of
process. Every so often, I ask my friends what they think about something I made. Whether that
be something digital or something physical, I always have my opinion about it. But what helps
me decide the quality of what I made actually is that I always seek others' opinions. Seeking
diverse opinions and perspectives enriches my understanding of the situation and helps me make
consequences, adhering to personal principles, empathizing with others, considering legal and
societal norms, and seeking advice when needed. This comprehensive process allows me to
The ethical issue I discussed in class revolved around the James Andrew Bates
first-degree murder case, where conflicting alibis and the use of technology became central
Modi 3
points. Bates, the prime suspect, had an alibi that clashed with another person involved, Owen
MacDonald. The victim's cause of death was drowning in a bathtub, and the household featured
smart devices like Amazon Alexa and a Nest thermostat. The police sought to obtain audio
recordings from the Alexa, which could serve as crucial evidence. However, Amazon refused to
release the data, asserting that user privacy takes precedence and would only comply if legally
obligated. This situation resonates with the IEEE Code of Ethics, particularly under code number
2. This code emphasizes the importance of avoiding conflicts of interest and being transparent
about them when they arise. In the context of the Bates case, user privacy is crucial, reflecting a
critical feature of modern products. The ethical dilemma arises from the tension between using
potentially valuable data for a criminal investigation and respecting user agreements prioritizing
privacy. In accordance with the IEEE Code of Ethics, Amazon's stance aligns with ethical
principles. By refraining from handing over user data without legal compulsion, Amazon avoids
compromising user privacy and maintains a neutral position. This adherence to ethical guidelines
ensures that conflicts of interest are minimized, and users are made aware of the company's
commitment to safeguarding their privacy. While the situation may present challenges in solving
the murder case, it underscores the importance of upholding ethical standards, mainly when
dealing with sensitive user data. The exception within the IEEE Code of Ethics recognizes that
adhering to principles may lead to dilemmas but also emphasizes the need to navigate such
situations with integrity. In this instance, Amazon's commitment to user privacy reflects a
responsible and ethical approach, upholding the principles outlined in the IEEE Code of Ethics.
The ethical considerations introduced by my class and my own perspectives on the James
Andrew Bates case shared common ground but also exhibited some differences. The central
theme revolved around the balance between justice and the integrity of companies, particularly in
Modi 4
the context of user privacy and agreements. In my analysis, I emphasized the significance of user
privacy as outlined in the IEEE Code of Ethics, specifically code number 2. I argued that
conflicts of interest should be avoided, and the user agreement prioritizing privacy should be
perspective aligns with prioritizing the integrity of companies and respecting user agreements.
One classmate supported this view, emphasizing the potential harm of setting a precedent that
could compromise user privacy. They acknowledged the difficulty of the case, recognizing the
need for a careful balance between justice and the integrity of companies. On the other hand,
another classmate brought up the application of the fourth code of ethics, which relates to
refusing bribery in all forms. They suggested that by cooperating with the government, Amazon
could have benefited, possibly implying that not cooperating might be seen as a form of
resistance against potential unethical practices by the government. While our perspectives had
commonalities in valuing privacy and ethical standards, the difference emerged in interpreting
the fourth code of ethics. Some saw potential benefits in cooperation, while others, including
myself, leaned towards a more cautious approach to protect user privacy. In our class discussion,
a consensus on the most "ethical" decision may not have been reached. The nuanced nature of
the case, involving conflicting ethical principles and potential consequences, allowed for diverse
perspectives. The understanding that the case wasn't straightforward and required a balance
between competing values was clear in the responses. Overall, the discussion highlighted the
complexity of ethical decision-making and the importance of considering multiple factors when
Reflecting on the "Virtue of Ethics" in relation to the discussed case study involving the
Bates murder investigation, three virtues stand out as most relevant: integrity, fidelity, and
Modi 5
principles, refusing to hand over user data without legal compulsion. Fidelity becomes evident in
Amazon's loyalty to user agreements and users' trust in the company to protect their information.
Responsibility plays a crucial role, emphasizing the obligation to act ethically and consider the
consequences of actions, guiding Amazon's decision to prioritize user privacy. These virtues
were chosen for their direct alignment with the ethical considerations in the case, providing a
framework for navigating the complex dynamics between justice and privacy. In contrast, the
Self-discipline, although necessary in personal conduct, does not directly address the
complexities of corporate decisions involving user privacy and legal obligations. Charity,
typically associated with benevolence and generosity, may not be directly applicable as the
primary focus in this scenario is on respecting user agreements and legal constraints rather than
philanthropy. While honesty is an inherent aspect of integrity, it is implicitly covered within the
broader concept, making it less distinct in this context. The three chosen virtues—integrity,
fidelity, and responsibility—align closely with the nuanced ethical considerations in the case,
navigating the delicate balance between user privacy and law enforcement needs. Another virtue
that could apply is "fairness," closely tied to responsibility and integrity in balancing the rights of
law enforcement and user expectations. In essence, these virtues collectively guide ethical
decision-making in a scenario where principles, loyalty, and obligations come into play,
Works Cited
Mar. 2024.
Online PDH Provider for Engineers Land Surveyors Architects PE CEU PLS CPC LS CPD
PDU - Professional Development Hours and Continuing Education Units for AIA LU RA
Sponsor Courses Credits Hour Units Self Home Study PDH Free CEU License Renewal CE