Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MODULE 3:
QUALITY
3.2.S.1.1 Nomenclature
INN : PREGABALIN
3.2.S.1.2 Structure
Structural Formula :
NH2
H
COOH
(s)
SOLUBILITY TABLE
Solubility
Water Soluble
Alkaline solution (NaOH 1N) Soluble
Acidic solution (HCl 1N) Soluble
Ethanol (96%) Very slightly soluble
Chloroform Practically insoluble
Potential isomerism : Based on the structure of the product there are two potential optical
isomers : the (S)-(+) enantiomer ( Pregabalin ) and the (R)-(-)
enantiomer.
The purity of the (S)-(+) enantiomer is determined by preparing a
diastereoisomeric derivative and analyzing by HPLC ( enantiomeric
excess).
PS: The powder of Pregabalin is very coarse being around 60% <710 µ tested by
Alpine Airjet Sieving method.
Finer powder can be made available upon customer’s requirements.
3.2.S.2 Manufacture
3.2.S.2.1 Manufacturer
Manufacturer
LABORATORIO CHIMICO INTERNAZIONALE S.p.A.
Head office
The head office is located in:
Via Tommaso Salvini 10
20122 Milano, Italy
Manufacturing facility
The manufacturing facility is located in:
Via Benvenuto Cellini 20
20090 Segrate (Milano), Italy
O
NH2
NH2 1)NaClOaq
NaOH 30%
H
H
COOH
COOH (S)
(R) 2) HCl 33%
R(-) Monoamide Crude Pregabalin
STEP 2 = PREGABALIN
MANUFACTURING PROCESS
1st step: R (-) Monoamide reacts with a solution of NaClO and NaOH, with addition of
Na2SO3 and HCl to yield Pregabalin (crude).
2nd step: Pregabalin (crude) is purified to obtain Pregabalin (final active ingredient)
3.2.S.3 Characterisation
PREGABALIN
NH2
H
COOH
(s)
mol.wt.159.18
The product is manufactured with the Labochim synthesis route described in section 3.2.S.2 Manufacture.
The final API is tested according to the method described in section 3.2.S.4 Control of Drug Substance.
Originally, an R&D sample was characterized as reference standard: it was named PRG0D001R (former
FG 1509) after being investigated by different techniques.
NH2
H
COOH
(s)
The 1H-NMR spectrum of Pregabalin reference standard Labochim batch 108002 is enclosed in the
following page. The spectrum is consistent with the structure assigned to Pregabalin.
NH2
H
COOH
(s)
The mass spectrum (EI+), reported in the following page, is consistent with the structure assigned to
Pregabalin reference standard Labochim batch 108002.
m/z Fragment
142 M-OH
The Mass Spectrum of Pregabalin Labochim batch 108002 is enclosed in the following page.
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) diagrams performed on the three Pregabalin validation batches
108001, 108002 ( current Reference Standard PRG0M010R) and 108003.
The DSC diagrams, obtained at a scan rate of 10°/minute, show for reference standard a single melt
endotherm around 197 °C.
In order to demonstrate the absence of polymorphism and the consistency of Labochim production
Pregabalin, an x-ray powder diffraction has been run on three different production batches. All the
supporting data are enclosed in the following pages:
The translation from Italian into English of Politecnico University comment confirming the X-ray powder
diffractograms to be superimposible is enclosed as well.
POLITECNICO OF MILAN: COMMENT ABOUT THE COMPARISON AMONG THE X-RAY POWDER
DIFFRACTOGRAMS OF PREGABALIN LABOCHIM BATCH PRG0M010R AND THREE VALIDATION
BATCHES OF CURRENT PRODUCTION.
Re.: identification, through XRPD, of the crystalline phases of 4 samples of Pregabalin batches 108001,
108002, 108003 and PRG 0D001R.
From the comparison among the diffractograms of samples in analysis and the ones in patent literature of
Pregabalin it is evident that:
− From an update of scientific literature, it results also that the crystalline structure of this form
was resolved and described by X ray diffraction data of single crystal and this work was
published on: Acta Christ. C63, o306 (2007)
Note: four samples batches were formed by single crystals, having a coarser size than conventional
crystalline powders. For this reason, samples in analysis were properly milled.
4 diffractograms enclosed:, prg 108001, prg 18002, prg 18003 and prg 0D001R.
Element C H N O
Analysis performed by an external laboratory (REDOX s.n.c. – Viale Stucchi 62/26 - 20052 Monza MI).
3.2.S.3.2 Impurities
ORGANIC IMPURITIES
The potential impurities detectable in Labochim Pregabalin are listed here below:
O
NH2
COOH
This impurity corresponds to the starting material of the synthesis process to manufacture the Pregabalin .
It represents a synthesis impurity and not a degradation product.
This impurity is kept under control by UPLC analysis used for the release.
COOH
This impurity can be generated , as by-product , during the synthesis of crude Pregabalin.
This impurity is kept under control by UPLC analysis used for the release.
c. (S)-4-isobutyl-2-pyrrolidinone ( S-Lactam )
H
N
H
O
(s)
This impurity can be obtained by an intramolecular cyclization of the final product ( Pregabalin) as
described by the following scheme:
NH2 H
OH N
H H
(s) -H2O O
O (s)
Pregabalin
The certificate of analysis and spectra listed here below are enclosed in the following pages:
(S)-4-isobutyl-2-pyrrolidinone ( S-Lactam ):
- IR spectroscopy of Labochim Reference Standard PRG 0D003I (former batch FG 1470)
- 1H-NMR spectroscopy of Labochim Reference Standard PRG 0D003I
- MASS spectroscopy of Labochim Reference Standard PRG 0D003I
- DSC of Labochim Reference Standard PRG 0D003I
- UPLC of Labochim Reference Standard PRG 0D003I
- certificate of analysis of Labochim Reference Standard PRG 0D003I
O
NH2
COOH
The NMR, enclosed hereafter, is consistent with the structure assigned to 3-carbamoylmethyl-5-methyl
hexanoic acid , [ R(-)Monoamide ]
.
COOH
COOH
The NMR, enclosed hereafter, is consistent with the structure assigned to 3-isobutyl glutaric acid.
The mass spectrum (EI+), reported in the following pages, is consistent with the structure assigned to 3-
isobutyl glutaric acid.
The molecular weight of 3-isobutyl glutaric acid is confirmed by M+1= 189
The most prominent fragments and their possible structures are shown below.
m/z Fragment
189 M+1
171 M-OH
The mass spectrum of 3-isobutyl glutaric acid batch PRG-0D002I is enclosed in the following page.
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) diagrams performed on 3-Isobutyl Glucaric Acid Labochim
Reference Standard batch number PRG-0D002I.
The DSC diagrams, obtained at a scan rate of 5°/minute, show for reference standard a single melt
endotherm around 45 °C.
O
NH2
COOH
The NMR, enclosed hereafter, is consistent with the structure assigned to (S)-4-isobutyl 2-pyrrolidinone
m/z Fragment
142 M+1
141 M
111 M-(CH3CH3)
84 M- (CH3CH3CHCH2)
The DSC diagrams, obtained at a scan rate of 5°/minute, show for reference standard a single melt
endotherm around 41-42 °C.
INORGANIC IMPURITIES
a. Salts
The salts potentially present in Labochim Pregabalin derive from the use of sodium sulphite in the
synthesis. Their potential presence is controlled by the Sulphated Ash test.
b. Catalysts
RESIDUAL SOLVENTS
The only solvent used by Labochim in the manufacturing process of Pregabalin is Isopropyl Alcohol that
belongs to Class 3 solvents (not more than 5000 ppm).
It is used in the final crystallization step and its limit on the Pregabalin API has been fixed to 2000 ppm.
Further justification can be found under section 3.2.S.4.5.
3.2.S.4.1 Specification
PREGABALIN
NH2
H
COOH
(s)
Storage:
Store in well closed containers, protected from light.
Tests Specifications
Description White to off white crystalline powder. Soluble in
water and in alkaline and acidic solutions
Identification :
A) IR Spectrum Conforms to Pregabalin RS
B) UPLC The retention time of the major peak in the
chromatogram of the test solution correspond to that
of Pregabalin RS in the Resolution test.
Tests Specifications
Related substances (UPLC):
-R(-)-3-carbamoylmethyl-5-
Not more than 0.1%.
methyl hexanoic acid
[ R(-)Monoamide ]
Residual solvents:
Isopropanol NMT 2000 ppm
TEST METHODS
Identification
a) IR spectrum: the infrared absorption spectrum is concordant with the reference spectrum of Pregabalin
RS.
b) In the test for the related substances the retention time of the major peak in the chromatogram of the
test preparation corresponds to that of Pregabalin RS in the chromatogram of the standard solution.
Melting point
(Equipment : Differential Scanning Calorimetry DSC 50 Shimadzu or equivalent sistem )
Charge an aluminum crucible with 2-4 mg of dry powder and close the crucible. Heat to 230°C at the rate
of 10°C/min.
Water
Determined by Karl Fisher on 0.5-1 g of Pregabalin.
Heavy metals
1.0 g of the substance to be examined are dissolved in 20 ml of water; 12 ml of this solution complies
with the limit test A for heavy metals (20 ppm). Prepare the reference solution using 1 ml of the lead
standard solution (10 mcg Pb/ml) R.
pH
Accurately weight 1 g of Pregabalin in analysis. Dissolve and dilute to 50 ml with water.
Limit of chloride
Accurately weight approximately 1500 mg of the substance being examined and transfer to a 100 ml
beaker. Dissolve in 50 ml of a mixture of 60 volumes of water , 39 volumes of methanol and 1 volume of
acetic acid. Titrate with 0.01 N silver nitrate, determining the end point potentiometrically. Perform a
blank determination , and make any necessary corrections. Each ml of 0.01 N silver nitrate is equivalent
to 0.3545 mg of chloride
Loss on drying
Dried 1 g of sample at 60°C at a pressure of 0.7kPa for 3 hours.
Residue on ignition
Not more than 0.1%
Assay ( potentiometric)
Accurately weigh about 200 mg of the sample in analysis . Dissolve in 30-40 ml of acetic acid and titrate
with 0.1 N perchloric acid.
Each ml of 0.1 N perchloric acid is equivalent to 15.918 mg of Pregabalin.
Correct the assay with the value of loss on drying of the sample, applying the following formula: assay /
(100 – LOD) x 100.
Related substances
Apparatus and Conditions
Sample solution :
In a 25 ml volumetric flask weight accurately about 700 mg of sample; make to volume with diluent.
Standard solution:
In a 50 ml volumetric flask weight accurately about 70 mg of each impurity :R (-) Monoamide RS ; S(+)
lattame ; 3-isobutyl glutaric acid ; Pregabalin RS and make to volume with diluent.
Transfer 1.0 ml of this solution in a 10 ml volumetric flask and make to volume with diluent.
Procedure
Inject three times 0,7 μl of standard solution and record the peak responses :
The resolution factor is not less than 3.
The RSD% for three injection is not more than 5.0%
Inject 0.7 μl of sample solution and record the peak responses.
Identify the impurities in the sample Vs standard solution and calculate the impurities content by
following formulas:
Where:
Wsa =Weight of R (-) Monoamide ( mg)
Wsb = Weight of S(+) lattame ( mg)
Wsc = Weight of 3-isobutyl glutaric acid ( mg)
Wc = Weight of sample ( mg)
Aca =Area R (-) Monoamide
Acb = Area of S(+) lattame
Acc = Area of 3-isobutyl glutaric acid
Enantiomeric Excess
solution A
Transfer about 80 mg of Pregabalin in analysis , accurately weight , to a 10 ml volumetric flask , dissolve
and dilute to volume with water.
solution B
Transfer about 10 mg of Nα-(2,4-dinitro-5-fluoro-phenyl)-L-Valinamide , accurately weight, to a 10 ml
volumetric flask, dissolve and dilute to volume with acetone.
solution C
Transfer about 840 mg of Sodium hydrogen carbonate, accurately weight, to a 10 ml volumetric dissolve
and dilute to volume with water ( 1 M solution).
solution D
Transfer 1.0 ml of solution A, 2.0 ml of solution B, 0.4 ml of solution C in 5 ml volumetric flask.
Heat to 40°C and hold for 3 hours. Cool to 25°C and add 0.2 ml of 2 M hydrochloric acid.
Procedure
Inject 20 μl of the solution D and record the peak responses: the first peak in the chromatogram is the
unreacted Nα-(2,4-dinitro-5-fluoro-phenyl)-L-Valinamide (excess reactant); the second peak is the
diastereomeric adduct of S(+) Pregabalin; the third peak is the diastereomeric adduct of R(-) Pregabalin.
Measure the areas of the second and third peaks. Using the response obtained from the UV detector and
calculate the enantiomeric excess by the formula:
AS - AR
Enantiomeric excess (%) = ------------------ x 100
AS + AR
AS = area of the diastereomeric adduct of S(+) Pregabalin , second peak
AR = area of the diastereomeric adduct of R(-) Pregabalin , third peak.
Residual solvents
Apparatus and Conditions
Instrument Gas chromatograph Agilent 7890 equipped with HS G1888 or
equivalent system.
Detector Flame ionization
Column Fused silica, DB-624, 30m x 0.53 mm
Temperature 40°C for 7 minutes up to 150°C increasing 10°C/minute,
hold time 3 minutes
- Injector, 150°C
- Detector, 270°C
Carrier Helium (36 KPa, constant pressure)
Autosampler head space Agilent G1888 or equivalent sistem
Injection 1 ml of the gaseous phase
Split flow 26 ml/min
Standard Solution A
In a 200 ml volumetric flask transfer 4 ml of Isopropanol. Dissolve and dilute to volume with water. Isopropanol
d= 0.79 c = 15,8 mg/ml
Standard Solution B
In a 200 ml volumetric flask transfer 10 ml of the standard solution A. Dilute to volume with water, and
mix accurately. c = 790 µg/ml.
Standard Solution C
In a 200 ml volumetric flask transfer 10 ml of the standard solution B. Dilute to volume with water, and
mix accurately. c = 39,5 µg/ml
In a suitable bottle for head space transfer 10 ml of the standard solution C and close accurately- Prepare
5 bottles.
Each bottle contains 395 µg of Isopropanol.
Test solution
In a suitable bottle for head space transfer 0.2 grams of Pregabalin in analysis and 10 ml of water. Close
the bottle accurately and shake to dissolution.
System suitability
The retention time are approximately 2.9 minutes for Isopropanol.
The relative standard deviation, for 5 replicate injections of standard solution C is not more than 5%.
Procedure
Separately inject into the gas chromatograph 1 ml of gaseous phase taken from head space each of
standard solution C and the test solution.
AECx 395
ppm Isopropanol : -----------------------
AES x W(g)
Where:
AEC is the area of Isopropanol in the chromatogram obtained with the test solution;
AES is the area of Isopropanol in the chromatogram obtained with the standard solution C;
W(g) is the weight in grams of Pregabalin in the test solution.
The methods of analysis used for the final control of the product are described in sections “3.2.S.4.1
Specification” and “3.2.S.4.2 Analytical Procedures”.
1 METHOD DESCRIPTION
Liquid chromatograph Acquity UPLC, or equivalent system.
Column Acquity UPLC BEH C18 1.7 μm, 2.1 x 50 mm
Column temperature 60°C
Preparatio of eluent A Dissolve 0.58 g of monobasic ammonium phosphate and 1.83 g of
sodium perchlorate in 1000 ml of water. Adjust with phosphoric acid
to a pH of 1.8.
Eluent B Acetonitrile
Gradient time (min) Eluent A Eluent B
0 80% 20%
0.6 80% 20%
2.0 95% 5%
3.0 95% 5%
3.2 80% 20%
5.0 80% 20%
Sample solution :
In a 25 ml volumetric flask weight accurately about 700 mg of sample ; make to volume with diluent.
Standard solution:
In a 50 ml volumetric flask weight accurately about 70 mg of each impurity :R (-) Monoamide RS; S(+)
lactam ; 3-isobutyl glutaric acid; Pregabalin RS and make to volume with diluent.
Transfer 1.0 ml of this solution in a 10 ml volumetric flask and make to volume with diluent.
Procedure
Inject three times 0,7 μl of standard solution and record the peak responses:
The resolution factor is not less than 3.
The RSD% for three injection is not more than 10.0%.
Identify the impurities in the sample Vs standard solution and calculate the impurities content by
following formulas:
Where:
Wsa =Weight of R (-) Monoamide (mg)
Wsb = Weight of S(+) lactam (mg)
Wsc = Weight of 3-isobutyl glutaric acid (mg)
Wc = Weight of sample (mg)
Aca =Area R (-) Monoamide
Acb = Area of S(+) lactam
Acc = Area of 3-isobutyl glutaric acid
2 VALIDATION
2.1 SPECIFICITY
The resolution factor obtained with the nearest peaks is:
R Pregabalin / R(-)monoamide = 5.2
Comments
The acceptance limit, resolution factor > 3, has been respected.
The analytical method is selective for all the impurities considered.
2.2 PRECISION
2.2.1 System precision
System precision was evaluated by performing six replicate injections of a solution containing Pregabalin,
R(-)monoamide, S(+)lactam and 3-isobutyl glutaric acid in a concentration equivalent to 0.05% w/w
related to the concentration of the sample solution described in the analytical method.
Average, standard deviation and relative standard deviation have been calculated on the areas and
retention times.
Comments
The RSD% is within the acceptance limit (RSD% less than 10.0%) for both areas and retention times,
therefore the results obtained show good reproducibility of the retention times and good precision of the
responses.
Pregabalin R (-)Monoamide
Weight Area RF Weight Area RF
S1 70.39 mg 172 2.44 S1 70.17 mg 556 7.92
S2 70.27 mg 165 2.35 S2 70.04 mg 530 7.57
S3 70.96 mg 173 2.44 S3 70.56 mg 562 7.96
S4 70.68 mg 174 2.46 S4 71.15 mg 621 8.73
S5 70.19 mg 177 2.52 S5 70.42 mg 587 8.34
S6 71.63 mg 177 2.47 S6 70.71 mg 523 7.40
Average S 173 2.46 Average S 563.2 7.99
Std. dev. 4.43 0.06 Std. dev. 36.55 0.49
RSD% 2.6 2.33 RSD% 6.5 6.14
Comments
The RSD% calculated on the response factors obtained is within the acceptance
limit (RSD less than 10.0%).
Comments
The RSD% is within the acceptance limit (RSD less than 10.0%) for both areas and retention times,
therefore the results obtained show good reproducibility of the retention times and good precision of the
responses.
Pregabalin R (-)Monoamide
Weight Area RF Weight Area RF
S1 73.60 mg 164 2.23 S1 72.39 mg 570 7.87
S2 70.03 mg 151 2.16 S2 71.10 mg 535 7.52
S3 70.02 mg 149 2.13 S3 70.74 mg 536 7.58
S4 70.47 mg 160 2.27 S4 70.23 mg 537 7.65
S5 70.40 mg 159 2.26 S5 70.85 mg 563 7.95
S6 70.52 mg 159 2.25 S6 70.30 mg 547 7.78
Average S 157 2.22 Average S 548 7.72
Std. dev. 5.76 0.06 Std. dev. 15.13 0.17
RSD% 3.7 2.69 RSD% 2.8 2.19
Comments
The RSD% calculated on the response factors obtained is within the acceptance
limit (RSD less than 10.0%).
2.4 LINEARITY
The linearity study was carried out with standard solutions containing Pregabalin,
R(-)monoamide, S(+)lactam and 3-isobutyl glutaric in different concentrations (equivalent to 50% - 75%
- 100% - 125% - 150% of the concentration used for the routine calibration). Each solution has been
injected three times.
The concentrations, areas obtained, linearity curve and calculations of the linear regression for the
impurities under examination are illustrated in the following charts.
Solution Pregabalin
area 1 area 2 area 3 average area
L1 155 149 146 150
L2 224 224 222 223
L3 301 307 305 304
L4 391 394 394 393
L5 466 467 458 464
Solution % concentration against Pregabalin
specification limit μg / ml average area
L1 50% 14.206 150
L2 75% 21.309 223
L3 100% 28.412 304
L4 125% 35.515 393
L5 150% 42.618 464
PREGABALIN LINEARITY
500
450
400
350
300
Area
250
200
150 y = 11,2206x - 11,9333
2
100 R = 0,9982
50
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
ug/ml
Comments
Considering the coefficient of linear correlation (R2), which is very close to 1 (acceptance limit: NLT
0.995), a good correlation between the response and the concentration is confirmed.
Solution R (-)Monoamide
area 1 area 2 area 3 average area
L1 559 556 558 558
L2 852 855 850 852
L3 1109 1110 1108 1109
L4 1404 1407 1460 1424
L5 1736 1778 1729 1748
R(-)MONOAMIDE LINEARITY
2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
Area
1000
800
600
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
ug/ml
Comments
Considering the coefficient of linear correlation (R2), which is very close to 1 (acceptance limit: NLT
0.995), a good correlation between the response and the concentration is confirmed.
1000
900
800
700
600
Area
500
400
300
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
ug/ml
Comments
Considering the coefficient of linear correlation (R2), which is very close to 1 (acceptance limit: NLT
0.995), a good correlation between the response and the concentration is confirmed.
S(+)LACTAM LINEARITY
9000
8000
7000
6000
5000
Area
4000
3000
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
ug/ml
Comments
Considering the coefficient of linear correlation (R2), which is very close to 1 (acceptance limit: NLT
0.995), a good correlation between the response and the concentration is confirmed.
The response factor has been calculated (peak response divided by the concentration) and the values have
been individually compared with the average response factor obtained with standard solution L3 very
close to the standard solution used for the routine calibration.
The values obtained with the relevant graphic elaboration are reported in the following charts.
Solution Pregabalin
RF DRF%
L1 10.55 -1.42
L2 10.48 -2.15
L3 10.71 ---
L4 11.07 3.31
L5 10.88 1.57
PREGABALIN DRF%
20
15
10
5
0
-5 1 2 3 4 5
-10
-15
-20
RF DRF%
L1 178.67 -6.79
L2 185.67 -3.13
L3 191.69 ---
L4 182.67 4.70
L5 189.11 1.34
S(+)LACTAM DRF%
20
15
10
5
0
-5 1 2 3 4 5
-10
-15
-20
RF DRF%
L1 21.39 6.54
L2 21.19 5.53
L3 20.08 ---
L4 21.00 4.58
L5 20.29 1.05
20
15
10
5
0
-5 1 2 3 4 5
-10
-15
-20
Solution R(-)Monoamide
RF DRF%
L1 39.55 0.57
L2 40.30 2.47
L3 39.33 ---
L4 40.38 2.70
L5 41.32 5.06
R(-)MONOAMIDE DRF%
20
15
10
5
0
-5 1 2 3 4 5
-10
-15
-20
Comments
The DRF% obtained at the different concentrations for all the impurities considered are within the
acceptance limits (± 10%), therefore the method under validation is linear in the interval considered.
2.5 ACCURACY
The accuracy study was performed by evaluating the recovery obtained with the injection of three
solutions containing each impurity in different concentrations (50% - 100% - 150% of the specification
limits). The standard solution described in the method has been prepared and it was injected three times
to evaluate the system precision.
The results obtained are reported in the following charts.
Comments
Upon the evaluation of the data obtained, the RSD% calculated on the three injections of the standard
solution is within the acceptance limit of the system precision, therefore it can be used to calculate the
recovery for the three accuracy levels considered.
Pregabalin
A1
ug/ml ug/ml
R%
calculated theoretical
1 13.75 14.078 97.67
2 13.19 14.054 93.66
3 13.83 14.192 97.45
4 13.91 14.136 98.40
5 14.15 14.038 100.80
6 14.15 14.326 98.77
Average === === 97.83
Std. dev. === === 2.28
RSD% === === 2.33
Comments
The average recovery obtained for Pregabalin is within the acceptance criteria
(90%-110%).