Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3
Copyright © 1977 American Society for Microbiology Printed in U.S.A.
model kinetics, with drug elimination occurring mg/kg dose compared to the 1-mg/kg dose at
from the central compartment (11). With this model, most sampling times in groups 1 and 2. In
serum levels of netilmicin, C, at any time, t, after group 3, netilmicin serum levels were increased
dosing are described by equation 1, where D is the about 1.5-fold after the higher dose. In group 1,
dose and V, is the apparent distribution volume of netilmicin serum levels had fallen to values
the central compartment.
below the minimum inhibitory concentration
D_ values for most susceptible organisms by h 8
V, [(k2( - P)e-5 - (k2l - qea) (1) after both the high and low doses (5). In group
The complex rate constants a and /3 are given by 3, netilmicin serum levels exceeded minimum
equation 2, where k12 and k2l are first-order rate inhibitory concentration values for most orga-
constants for drug distribution from the central to nisms at 12 h after dosing. Group 2 yielded
the tissue compartment and from the tissue to the intermediate values.
central compartment, respectively, kei is the first- The biphasic nature of serum netilmicin
order rate constant for drug elimination from the levels is indicated by the semilogarithmic plots
central compartment, a > /3, and the elimination of averaged data in Fig. 1 and 2. The drug
half-life of netilmicin in serum is given by 0.693//3. appears to equilibrate between the serum and
a extravascular tissues and fluids within 1 to 2 h
= 0.5 [(kl2 + k2l + kel) of dosing. After that time, clearance of drug is
monoexponential.
± ](k12 + k2l + ke1)2 -4ki2kke] (2) Urinary excretion data are summarized in
Table 3. In all groups, and at both dose levels,
Individual serum levels were fitted to equation 1 urine concentrations of netilmicin far exceeded
using the digital computer program NREG (15). minimum inhibitory concentration values of
Although serial urine collections were obtained, susceptible organisms during 24 h after dosing.
the combined effects of rapid elimination and also The percentage of dose excreted in 24-h urine
bladder holdup caused considerable variation in cal- tended to be greater in patients with normal
culated renal clearances both between subjects and
at different urine collection times in the same indi- renal function, although differences in this
vidual. These values were therefore not included in value between groups were not.significant (P >
our calculations. Differences in various values be- 0.05). Urinary recovery of antibiotic was consid-
tween groups were compared using Student's two- erably less than 100% of the dose in all groups.
tailed t test. Results of a pharmacokinetic analysis are
summarized in Table 4. Pharmacokinetic con-
RESULTS stants were generally not influenced by the
Serum levels of netilmicin are summarized in different dose levels used and are similar to
Table 2. The levels are clearly dose related, those reported for other aminoglycosides (1, 7,
being approximately twice as high after the 2- 8, 16).
330 WELLING ET AL. ANTIMICROB. AGENTS CHEMOTHER.
eq1
u cc co0 _
eq+1 +1+1
CD CD CD
+1 +1+1
OZ CD ti*CP
La °cq
1tE- CCD 0 G(
OO6
H oi e' 0 GROUP I?
*GROU 3
+1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 \
CD cq CD
o.
co -J +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 z
E' 010
h4~~~~t
_ OF 61.-
_4o0lC)C
_I 00 0
. +1 +1+1 +I +1 +1
S 60
t 6
.0 CI 2 4 6 102
+1 +1+1 +1 +1 +1 (HOURS)
Co 'a TIME
LO Le; C.6
8 . + t +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 00.
6) a+1+1+1 +1+1 +1
CD O0 0 0 v-
0 ~1.0
0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
COE-CO
+1 +1+1 +1 +1 +1
cq 0CDC
V-M
-
00 m 0
0tI,4,- I.2 vrg srmlvl fneimcni a
6) t- LO C4 o VO
12
o.* +1 +1+1 0
+1 +1 +1 2 4 6 a 10
Phracknei costnt
TIME (HOURS)
associated pri
'~~~ 0 ~12 1R
0 C CO CO
VE,c -sm FIG. l 2. Average serum
ee 2o mgigiianllevels of netilmicin
ltrdbycag in pa-
n u} cl tients Vreceiving
~~ ~ ~ ~~~n rena funtio ofinnetilmicin
patent per kg of body
reeiigh
weight by intravenous injection.
Pharmacokinetic constants associated pri-
eq ~~~~manily with drug distribution (a, k12, k2l, TIP,
Vl, Vd) were not significantly altered by chang-
ing renal function in patients receiving the
smaller dose of netilmicin. In patients receiving
the larger dose, there was a tendency for distri-
bution volumes to increase with declining renal
function.
VOL. 12, 1977 PHARMACOKINETICS OF NETILMICIN 331
TABLE 3. Urinary concentration of netilmicin (±1 standard deviation) and cumulative percentage of dose
(±1 standard deviation) excreted in 24 h
Netilmicin concn in urine (jg/ml) % of dose ex- 24-h urine vol
Group
Dose0(mg/kg) 2-4h 4-8h 8-12 h 1 h creted in 24 h (liters)
Pharmacokinetic constants associated pri- umes were calculated by two different methods
marily with drug elimination (,3, t,12, kei) were to give Vd,SS) and Vd(,. The methods of calculat-
influenced by renal function, although differ- ing these values are given as footnotes to the
ences in these values between groups were not table, and their significance has been discussed
always significant. The serum half-life of netil- elsewhere (2, 10).
micin increased from approximately 2 to 3 h in A major criticism of the use of Vd(,% to de-
"normal" individuals to approximately 10 to 14 scribe the total apparent distribution volume of
h in severe uremia. The individual with great- a drug obeying two-compartment model kinet-
est impairment of renal function (CLCR = 5 ml/ ics is that the method tends to yield a biased
min) had a netilmicin half-life of 22 h. overestimate of the equilibrium volume as cal-
The relationships between some pharmacoki- culated by Vd,S) (10). The values of Vd(, calcu-
netic constants and kidney function are de- lated from our data do not overestimate but
scribed in the form of linear regressions in Ta- rather agree extremely well with Vd(SS) values.
ble 5. Good correlations were obtained between Although netilmicin, like other aminoglyco-
netilmicin /3 values and half-lives, and also sides, has a fairly short biological half-life, the
serum clearances and appropriate kidney value of keI is small compared to k12 and k2l in
function indicators. Correlations between all groups. The similarity of the volumes calcu-
drug distribution characteristics and renal lated by the two methods is therefore consistent
function were poor. with the observation by Riegelman et al. (10)
that VAm will overestimate the true equilib-
DISCUSSION rium distribution volume only when keI is large
Results obtained in this study indicate that compared to kl2 and k2,.
netilmicin has pharmacokinetic characteristics The reason for the increase in netilmicin dis-
similar to those of the other aminoglycosides. tribution volumes with decreasing renal func-
Serum levels of antibiotic are greater than the tion is not clear. Aminoglycosides bind to se-
minimum inhibitory concentrations for suscep- rum proteins to only a small extent (1). Thus, if
tible organisms for at least 8 h after dosing, any displacement of drug from circulating pro-
and, from our data, there appears to be little teins were to occur in renal failure, this should
advantage to using the higher dose, except per- not cause a detectable change in the apparent
haps for more resistant organisms. A large pro- drug distribution volume (14). Other possible
portion of antibiotic is cleared unchanged mechanisms for the increase in distribution vol-
through the kidneys, although part of the dose ume in uremia after the high dose, i.e., changes
is eliminated by other mechanisms. This uri- in circulatory characteristics or membrane
nary recovery pattern, particularly in group 1, permeability, were not investigated in this
is very similar to recoveries of gentamicin, gen- study.
tamicin C, (7), sisomicin (8), and tobramycin There is evidence from experimental animals
(16) in similar patient populations and lends that netilmicin is somewhat less ototoxic and
support to our previous suggestion that extrare- nephrotoxic than gentamicin (4, 6). Neverthe-
nal elimination may account for 10 to 40% of less, dosage adjustment is necessary in patients
dosed aminoglycosides in these elderly individ- with impaired renal function. As relationships
uals. between netilmicin elimination and renal func-
The drug distributes in the body in a fashion tion were similar at both dose levels used,
consistent with a central compartment approxi- regressions of netilmicin serum half-life versus
mately 10% of body weight and a total distribu- serum creatiine and of netilmicin (8 values
tion volume approximately 20 to 30% of body versus creatinine clearance were calculated us-
weight. In Table 4, the overall distribution vol- ing data from the 42 patients.
332 WELLING ET AL. ANTMCROB. AGzNS CuhzMomt.
I
oo o C aoo o
.eq3A eq ,-ieq
+1+1 +1 AA <
eq -
+1+ t eq +l
ee 04
_ +I++
tl tl a t+1 +1+1 A
o Z co
eq o
aeo.
"4 ..4oaeqeIe .
"4
41 t+1
+1 zes uz t +1 +1
+1 cq 0 A
0 .. CI "
eq q "4
> c c@ Z "4.U eq|
+1 +1 +1
00000 O0 +1 +1+1
00eqt A X
O
_ ik
eso
C-6CT; z o o^
Cq g 0
+I4=w
+I cq +1 +1 +1 +1
Q QH
i4 o.o
mm
C;i
t- c Z _o
Oeiq' 0 A
+1 +1+1 "4 +1 +1+1 eqA
eq3 eq A cq
0 N
O eq4 co
0-4
Sa . U .: tlr4. eq U4 U1. U i
eq i |
+1 +1+1
A +1 +1+1A
00eq4 "
C4v
00"4"4 0
COeqco.4
0_44 "4 4 Q
+I +I+1 o +1 +1 +1
eq g bo Z Cv Z-C
.00"4"4"4 -i o
eq"4"4
I] -f CiC- 4 C- A-
a lE! i t]i}l
+1+
+1 cq +1 +1 +1 r,q
+1+1co+ coqe
000.0
"-4 t "4 Z w w eq
e844
S.
q 4
~~~~~~eqeq~E-
~~eqeq
0~~~~~~~~~~a %
VOL. 12, 1977 PHARMACOKINETICS OF NETILMICIN 333
TABLz 5. Regression equations, correlation coefficients, and significance levels after single intravenous
irnections of netilmicin
Correlation Linear equation of best fit ra p
Dose = 1 mg/kg; n = 23
Beta vs creatinine clearance y = 0.02 + 0.002x +0.79 <0.01
Vd(.) vs creatinine clearance y = 21.8 - 0.07x -0.34 NS
Serum clearance vs creatinine clearance y = 8.3 + 0.55x +0.75 <0.01
TIP vs creatinine clearance y = 1.52 + 0.O1x +0.22 NS
t1/2 (,8) vs serum creatinine y = 0.18 + 3.53x +0.75 <0.01
Dose = 2 mg/kg; n = 19
Beta vs creatinine clearance y = -0.01 + 0.003x +0.86 <0.01
Vds.) Vs creatinine clearance y = 19.0 - 0.046x -0.53 <0.05
Serum clearance vs creatinine clearance y = 5.51 + 0.53x +0.74 <0.01
TIP vs creatinine clearance y = 1.76 - 0.004x -0.33 NS
tj/2 (,B) vs serum creatinine y = -1.22 + 4.32x +0.85 <0.01
a
r, Correlation coefficient.
22r- A
y- -027 + 386x y-00023# 00023 x
20 r-+0.803, P<a.o0, n-42 r- +0829, P<001, n-42 A
A
ls A o/mg. kg-'dose A
cn A - 2mg.kgd'dose 0
O 16 0
2 14
0: 0
tn
z 12 0.2
0
w
IL
EJ 10 A
7
A 0
-J 0.1
4
-J
w
OL
z 4 o 20 40 60 e0 00 120 140
CREATININE CLEARANCE (mimlin'1)
2
ga o-/mg.ke doW
A- 2mg. '
dose FIG. 4. Relationship between the netilmicin elimi-
nation rate constant ,3 and creatinine clearance.
0-
0 2 3 4 5 6