Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Page
44
The cost of Quality
“traditional” attitude is that there is a cost to quality
Quality is a “support” function; does not contribute
directly to manufacturing and so is often one of the
first functions to go in hard times
Waste
Rejects
Testing
Rework
Customer returns
Inspection
Recalls
Pg 46
Cost of Poor Quality
The costs of poor quality include the following hidden costs:
Pg 46
Competitiveness and the U.S. Economy
The United States came out of World War II as the only
major industrialized nation with its manufacturing sector
completely intact.
Germany and Japan were devastated by damage during
the war.
They rebuilt their manufacturing bases on the
assumption that to compete globally, they would have to
produce goods of world-class quality.
That strategy helped them recover and become world
leaders in manufacturing.
Pg 46
Competitiveness and the U.S. Economy
While the U.S. was enjoying it’s position as the world’s
preeminent economic superpower, the other industrialized
nations of the world were busy rebuilding their
manufacturing sectors.
U.S. manufacturers were slow to catch to catch on that the
game had changed
Foreign companies started to errode U.S. markets
U.S. companies mistakenly saw cost rather than quality as
the issue & began sending work off shore to reduce labor
cost
In a relatively short time, the U.S. went from the world’s
leading lender & exporter to the world’s biggest debtor…..by
1980 the U.S. was consuming more than it produced.
Pg 47
Competitiveness and the U.S.
Economy
Ability to compete globally has direct impact on
quality of life
Ability to compete depends upon the ability to do a
better job of producing goods
To do a better job producing goods nations and
organizations need to focus on policies, systems
and resources in a coordinated way to continually
improve
Pg 47
Competitiveness and the U.S.
Economy
Many industrialized nations have taken steps to link
education, economics and labor market policy to
promote competitiveness
The U.S. is still debating the need for a national
industrial policy and a national education policy
1980s – U.S. improved productivity by putting more
people to work – other nations improved productivity
by making the worker more efficient
2000 to 2010 – the number of U.S. workers is on the
decline to maintain productivity U.S. workers must
become more efficient
Pg 48
Competitiveness and the U.S.
Economy
Today 27% of children born in the U.S. will live in
poverty. 30 years ago it was 12%
The real hourly wage of a worker in the U.S. today
is 16% less than in 1979
Today the U.S. has the most unequal distribution of
wealth of any industrialized nation in the world.
Pg 56
Pg 49
Factors Inhibiting Competitiveness
Pg 49
DEMING'S SEVEN DEADLY DISEASES
1. Lack of constancy of purpose to plan product and service that will
have a market and keep the company in business, and provide jobs.
2. Emphasis on short-term profits: short-term thinking (just the
opposite of constancy of purpose to stay in business), fed by fear of
unfriendly takeover, and by push from bankers and owners for
dividends.
3. Personal review systems, or evaluation of performance, merit
rating, annual review, or annual appraisal, by whatever name, for
people in management, the effects of which are devastating.
Management by objective, on a go, no-go basis, without a method for
accomplishment of the objective, is the same thing by another name.
Management by fear would still be better.
4. Mobility of management; job hopping.
5. Use of visible figures only for management, with little or no
consideration of figures that are unknown or unknowable.
6. Excessive medical costs.
7. Excessive costs of liability.
Page
21
Factors Inhibiting Competitiveness
Family
The family unit is the nation’s most important
human resource development agency
Single parents who must work full time jobs have
little or no time to help their children excel in school
Parents who must work more than one job have
little or no lime to help their children excel in school
Children with parents who do no value education
are unlikely to value it themselves
Pg 51
Factors Inhibiting Competitiveness
Education
Quality of the education system is a major factor in
the quality of the labor pool
The higher the quality of the labor pool, the higher
the quality of entry level employees
The higher the quality of the entry level employees,
the faster they can become productive employees
and contribute to competitiveness
Pg 55
Comparisons of International
Competitors
When making comparisons among internationally
competing countries, the following indicators are
usually used:
standard of living
trade and export growth
Investment
manufacturing productivity
Comparisons of International
Competitors
Standard of Living
Standard of Living Index is gross national product
per capita
U.S. SOL has grown since 1972, but has not kept
pace with most other competitive nations.
Pg 57
Comparisons of International
Competitors
Trade and export growth
Pg 58
Comparisons of International
Competitors
Manufacturing productivity
Up until the mid 1970s the U.S. had the highest
productivity levels in the world – 56% higher than
than Japan, next on the list.
By the late 1980s this lead was down to 6%
Currently the U.S. and Japan are about even
Human Resources and Competitiveness
The most important key in maximizing competitiveness is the
human resource. Following World War II, this was the only
resource that Germany and Japan had to draw on.
Consequently, they built economic systems that encourage
private employers to make business decisions that emphasize
improved productivity and quality, rather than price.
The basic philosophical constructs underlying the human
resource aspects of the competitiveness of both Japan and
Germany are as follows:
cooperation among business, labor, and government;
high-quality education and training;
employee involvement and empowerment;
leadership at all levels;
Pg 59
teamwork.
The culture is so different in Europe
and Asia that what works in these
countries will not work in the U.S.
Pg 59
Human Resources and Competitiveness
Cooperation among business, labor, and government
Social partners is the term used in both Japan & Germany
Both Germany & Japan were very much like the U.S. prior to WWII
High-quality education and training
U.S. standing among industrialized nations is poor
Germany & Japan go about it different ways, but arrive in the same
place
Employee involvement and empowerment
In Germany & Japan employees are involved in functions which in the
U.S. would be traditional management responsibilities
Leadership at all levels
In Germany & Japan leadership and leadership training occurs at all
levels including first line employees.
Teamwork
In Germany & Japan, not only is work done by teams of employees, but
planning and design as well.
Pg 60
Characteristics of World-Class
Organizations
Ultimate manufacturers are those that perform at world-class
levels in the following areas:
Competitive analysis strategies
– Operations cost efficiencies, speed to market, RnD, rapid
supplier delivery, logistics, real time delivery, zero defects, zero
inventory
Production and supply chain management strategies
– Collaborative planning, forecasting, delivery to point of use,
supplier managed inventory
Customization strategies
– Building to order, global sourcing
Electronic commerce strategies
– Supply management, purchasing, internet ordering and tracking
Compensation systems strategies
Pg 63
Management by Accounting, Antithesis
of Total Quality
Managing the organizations financial results instead of
the people and processes that produce those results
Creates an analytically detached approach to
decision making
– Printouts vs firsthand knowledge and insight
Focus on short-term cost reduction
– At the cost of long term improvements in people and
processes
Narrowly focused manages viewing every problem
from a finance and accounting perspective
Pg 67
Key global trends
Pg 68
U.S. Companies: Global Strengths and
Weaknesses
Strengths Weaknesses
Strong entrepreneurial spirit Expanding government
Presence of a “small cap” stock regulation (?)
market for small and mid-sized A growing underclass of “have-
firms nots”
Rapidly advancing A weak public school system
technologies (k-12)
Comparatively low taxes A poorly skilled labor force and
Low rate of unionization poor training opportunities
An increasing protectionist
World class system of higher
education sentiment
Growing public alienation with
large institutions
Pg 70
Focus on the long term