Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Two or more persons may also form a partnership for the exercise of a profession.
(Article 1767)
CHARACTERISTICS
Persons who are prohibited from giving each other any donation or advantage
cannot enter into universal partnership. (Article 1782)
ESSENTIAL REQUISITES
A partnership must have a lawful object or purpose, and must be established for the
common benefit or interest of the partners.
When an unlawful partnership is dissolved by a judicial decree, the profits shall be
confiscated in favor of the State, without prejudice to the provisions of the Penal Code
governing the confiscation of the instruments and effects of a crime. (Article 1770)
EFFECTS OF UNLAWFUL OBJECT
A partnership must have a lawful object or purpose, and must be established for the
common benefit or interest of the partners.
When an unlawful partnership is dissolved by a judicial decree, the profits shall be
confiscated in favor of the State, without prejudice to the provisions of the Penal Code
governing the confiscation of the instruments and effects of a crime. (Article 1770)
ESSENTIAL REQUISITES
There must be the affectio societatis — the desire to formulate an ACTIVE union
(Fernandez v. De la Rosa, 1 Phil. 671) with people among whom there exist mutual
confidence and trust (delectus personarum).
Delectus Personae (Personal Choices) – the right to choose who to associate with.
PARTNERSHIP – A JURIDICAL PERSON
The partnership has a juridical personality separate and distinct from that of each of
the partners, even in case of failure to comply with the requirements of article 1772,
first paragraph. (Article 1768)
Every contract of partnership having a capital of three thousand pesos or more, in money or
property, shall appear in a public instrument, which must be recorded in the Office of the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Failure to comply with the requirements of the preceding paragraph shall not affect the
liability of the partnership and the members thereof to third persons. (Article 1772)
CONSEQUENCES OF THE PARTNERSHIP’S JURIDICAL
PERSONALITY
The partnership can, in general:
acquire and possess property of all kinds;
Any immovable property or an interest therein may be acquired in the partnership name.
Title so acquired can be conveyed only in the partnership name. (Article 1774)
incur obligations;
bring civil or criminal actions;
can be adjudged INSOLVENT even if the individual members be each financially
solvent.
INSTANCES WHEN partnership shall not acquire juridical
personality
Partnership with unlawful object or purpose. [Article 1770, Article 1409(1)]
A contract of partnership is void, whenever immovable property is contributed
thereto, if an inventory of said property is not made, signed by the parties, and
attached to the public instrument. (Article 1773)
Associations and societies, whose articles are kept secret among the members, and
wherein any one of the members may contract in his own name with third persons,
shall have no juridical personality, and shall be governed by the provisions relating
to co-ownership. (Article 1775)
PARTNERSHIP VS. CORPORATION
PARTNESHIP CORPORATION
Creation Voluntary agreement of parties Created by the state in the form
of a special charter or by a
general enabling law (The
Corporation Code)
Number of Organizers Two or more Not more than 15
Existence No time limit except agreement Perpetual existence under the
of parties Revised Corporation Code
Liability of owners May extend to private property Liable only up to their subscribed
capital stock
PARTNERSHIP VS. CORPORATION
PARTNESHIP CORPORATION
Transferability of interest All partners need to consent to Does not need the consent of
the transfer of interest to the other stockholders
another
Ability of the owners to bind the Generally, partners acting on Generally, stockholders cannot
firm behalf of the partnership are bind corporation since its official
agents thereof acts are through the board of
directors
Remedies in case of A partner can sue another A stockholder cannot sue a
mismanagement partner who mismanages member of the board of
directors who mismanages: the
action must be in the name of
the corporation.
PARTNERSHIP VS. CORPORATION
PARTNESHIP CORPORATION
Nationality A partnership is a national of the Generally, under whose laws it
country where it was created, was created as to whether
and dependent on percentage of domestic or foreign, and as to
ownership nationality, on the ownership of
the outstanding capital stock
Legal Personality From the time the contract Generally from issuance of SEC
begins COR.
Right of Succession No right of succession With right of succession
General Rule:
A partnership may be constituted in any form, xxx. (Article 1771)
Contracts shall be obligatory, in whatever form they may have been entered into,
provided all the essential requisites for their validity are present. Xxx. (Article 1356)
FORMAL REQUIREMENTS
Exceptions:
Where immovable property or real rights are contributed:
The contract must appear in a public instrument; and
Attached to such instrument must be an inventory, signed by the parties, of the
property contributed.
Xxx, except where immovable property or real rights are contributed thereto, in which case a
public instrument shall be necessary. (Article 1771)
A contract of partnership is void, whenever immovable property is contributed thereto, if an
inventory of said property is not made, signed by the parties, and attached to the public
instrument. (Article 1773)
FORMAL REQUIREMENTS
Exceptions:
Where the capital is at least P3,000, in money or property:
The contract must appear in a public instrument; and
It must be recorded in the SEC.
Failure to comply with these requirements, however, does not affect the liability of
the partnership and the partners to third persons. (Articles 1768 and 1772)
PROBLEM
A partnership was formed orally though more than P500 was contributed in cash.
Now then, under the last paragraph of Art. 1358, contracts “where the amount
involved exceeds P500 [such contract] must appear in writing, even a private one.”
Should the oral partnership formed be considered valid?
Yes, because Article 1358 applies only for the purpose of convenience and not for validity or
enforceability. Being valid, the contract can be put in writing upon the demand of any of the
parties pursuant to Article 1357 of the Civil Code.
However, if a real property had been contributed, the oral partnership would be void; and
therefore not one of the partners can compel the others to execute the public instrument.
PROBLEM
If two persons agree to form a partnership in the future, does the partnership
immediately arise from the moment of said agreement?
No. An agreement to form a partnership does not of itself create a partnership. When there are
conditions to be fulfilled or when a certain period is to elapse, first, the partnership is not created
until after the fulfillment of the conditions or the arrival of the term, and this is true even if one
of the parties has already advanced his agreed share of the capital.
PROBLEM
A and B today orally agreed to form a partnership one and a half years from today,
each one to contribute P1,000. If at the arrival of the period, one refuses to go ahead
with the agreement, can the other enforce the agreement?
No, because the agreement was merely oral and executory. It is true that a partnership contract is
not governed by the Statute of Frauds but here, there is merely an agreement to form a
partnership in the future. Since therefore the agreement is to be enforced after one year from
the making thereof, the same should be in writing to be enforceable under the Statute of Frauds.
(Article 1403, No. [2][a])
Commencement and term of partnership
A partnership begins from the moment of the execution of the contract, unless it is
otherwise stipulated. (Article 1784)
When a partnership for a fixed term or particular undertaking is continued after the
termination of such term or particular undertaking without any express agreement,
the rights and duties of the partners remain the same as they were at such
termination, so far as is consistent with a partnership at will.
A continuation of the business by the partners or such of them as habitually acted
therein during the term, without any settlement or liquidation of the partnership
affairs, is prima facie evidence of a continuation of the partnership. (Article 1785)
KINDS OF PARTNERSHIP
AS TO OBJECT (ARTICLE 1776, par. 1)
UNIVERSAL PARTNESHIP
PARTICULAR PARTNERSHIP
UNIVERSAL PARTNERSHIP
A and B entered into a universal partnership of all present property. No stipulation was made
regarding other properties. Subsequently, A received a parcel of land by inheritance from his
father; and another parcel of land from the ABC College as remuneration for A’s work as
professor therein. Are the two parcels of land and their fruits to be enjoyed by the
partnership?
Answer: No, because there was no stipulation regarding future properties or their fruits.
Same facts except that in the contract, it was stipulated that all properties subsequently
acquired would belong to the partnership.
Answer: The land acquired as salary as well as its fruits will belong to the firm; but the land
acquired later by inheritance will NOT belong to the partnership since this cannot be stipulated
upon. The fruits of the inherited land will go to the firm because said fruits may be considered as
properties subsequently acquired, and there is no prohibition to stipulate on fruits, even if the
fruits be those of properties acquired later on by inheritance, legacy, or donation.
In a universal partnership of profits, A contributed the use of his car. At the end of the
partnership, should the car be returned to him?
ANS.: Yes, because the naked ownership had always been with him, and upon the end of the
usufruct, full ownership reverts to him. Remember that only its use had been previously
contributed.
A and B entered into a universal partnership of profits. Subsequently, A won 1st prize in the
sweepstakes. Will the money belong to the partnership?
ANS.: No, because it was not acquired by “industry or work.” (Article 1780, par. 1, Civil Code)
PROBLEMS ON ALL PROFITS
Persons who are prohibited from giving each other any donation or advantage cannot
enter into universal partnership. (Article 1782)
Examples:
Husband and Wife – As a rule (Article 133)
Those guilty of adultery and concubinage (Article 739)
Those guilty of the same criminal offence, if the partnership was entered into in
consideration of the same (Article 739)
PARTICULAR PARTNERSHIP
A particular partnership has for its object determinate things, their use or fruits, or a
specific undertaking, or the exercise of a profession or vocation. (Article 1783)
AS TO LIABILITY (ARTICLE 1776, par. 2)
General Partnership where all the partners are general partners whose liability
extends to their individual properties, after the assets of the partnership have been
exhausted;
Limited Partnership where at least one partner is a general partner and the others are
limited partners. A general partner is liable beyond his contribution; a limited partner
is liable only to the extent of his contribution.
AS TO TERM (ARTICLE 1785)
Partnership with a fixed term or particular undertaking – upon arrival of the fixed term
or fulfilment of a particular undertaking, the partnership is dissolved, and if continued,
it will constitute a partnership at will and the rights and duties of the partners remain
the same, so far as is consistent with a partnership at will.
Ordinary or real partnership – one which actually exists among the partners and also
as to third persons; or
De jure partnership – one which has complied with all the legal requirements for its
establishment; or
De facto partnership – one which has failed to comply with all the legal requirements
for its establishment.
As to PUBLICITY
Secret partnership – one wherein the existence of certain persons as partners is not
made known to the public by any of the partners; or
Open or notorious partnership – one whose existence is made known to the public by
the members of the firm.
As to PURPOSE
General Partners – those who can be held liable to third persons for partnership
obligations even to the extent of their separate property.
Limited Partners – those who can be held liable up to his capital contributions only.
AS TO MANAGEMENT
Managing Partners – those who manage actively the business or affairs of the
partnership.
Silent Partners – those who do not take active part in the business or affairs of the
partnership though they share in the profits and losses.
Liquidating Partners – those who take charge of the winding-up or liquidation of
the partnership affairs after dissolution.
AS TO THIRD PERSONS
Secret Partners – those who are not known to third persons as partners.
Dormant Partners – those who do not take active part in the business and are not
known to the public as partners. They are both silent and secret partners.
Ostensible Partners – direct opposite of dormant partners or those who take active
part in the management and are known to third parties as partners.
AS TO MEMBERSHIP
Original Partners – those who are members of the partnership from the time of its
constitution.
Incoming Partners – those who became members of the partnership after its
establishment.
Retiring Partners – those who withdraw from the partnership.
AS TO STATE OF SURVIVORSHIP
Expelled Partners – those who are expelled from the partnership by the other
partners for a valid cause.
Expelling Partners – those who caused the expulsion of a partner for a valid cause.
AS TO THE VALUE OF THE CONTRIBUTIONS
The following are the requisites before a capitalist partner may be obliged to sell his
interest to the others:
There is an imminent loss of the business of the partnership;
The majority of the capitalist partners are of the opinion that an additional
contribution to the common fund would save the business;
The capitalist partner refuses deliberately (not because of his financial inability to
do so), to contribute an additional share to the capital; and
There is no agreement that even in case of an imminent loss of the business the
partners are not obliged to con tribute.
RISK OF LOSS OF THINGS CONTRIBUTED (ARTICLE 1795)
Contributed property Loss to be borne by Loss to be borne by
Partnership Partner
Specific and determinate things, which are √
not fungible, where only the use and fruits
are contributed
Specific and determinate things the √
ownership of which is transferred to the
partnership
Fungible things (consumable) √
Cannot be kept without deteriorating √
Things contributed to be sold √
Things brought and appraised in the √
inventory (limited to value appraised)
OBLIGATION NOT TO ENGAGE IN ANOTHER BUSINESS
Capitalist Partner (Article 1808) Industrial Partner (Article 1789)
RELATIVE PROHIBITION ABSOLUTE PROHIBITION
Cannot engage for their own account in any Cannot engage in business for himself,
operation which is of the kind of business in unless the partnership expressly permits him
which the partnership is engaged, unless to do so
there is a stipulation to the contrary
Reason: To avoid conflict of interest Reason: Industrial partners must devote his
entire industry to the partnership
REMEDIES REMEDIES
1. Bring to the common funds any profits 1. Exclude him from the firm
accruing to him from his transactions 2. Avail themselves of the benefits which
2. Shall personally bear all the losses he may have obtained
3. Damages, in either case.
Obligation of managing partner who collects debt
(ARTICLE 1792)
General rule:
A partner authorized to manage, who collects a demandable sum owed to him in his
own name from a person who also owes the partnership a demandable sum, is
obliged to apply the sum collected to both credits pro rata, even if he issued a receipt
for his own credit only.
Exceptions:
In case the receipt was issued for the account of the partnership credit only,
however, the sum shall be applied to the partnership credit alone.
When the debtor declares, pursuant to Article 1252, at the time of making the
payment, to which debt the sum must be applied, it shall be so applied.
Obligation of managing partner who collects debt
(ARTICLE 1792)
Requisites:
There exist at least two debts, one where the collecting partner is creditor, and
the other, where the partnership is the creditor;
Both debts are demandable; and
The collecting partner is a managing partner.
ILLUSTRATION
X owed ABC partnership and A, the managing partner, P100,000.00 and P25,000.00,
respectively. A was able to collect P50,000 from D.
If A issued a receipt in the name of the partnership, the whole amount of P5,000
will be applied to the partnership credit.
If A issued a receipt in his own name, the P5,000 shall be applied as follows:
P40,000 (P50,000 x P100,000/P125,000) to the partnership credit;
P10,000 (P50,000 x P25,000/P125,000) to A’s credit.
The above, however, will not apply, if the debt to the managing partner is more
onerous to the debtor and the latter chooses to apply the payment to such debt.
Obligation of partner who receives share of partnership
credit (ARTICLE 1793)
Article 1792 Article 1793
As to the number of credits There are two distinct There is only one credit,
debts, that is, one in favor that is, in favor of the
of the partnership and partnership
another in favor of the
managing partner
Requisites:
A partner has received, in whole or in part, his share of the partnership credit;
The other partners have not collected their shares; and
The partnership debtor has become insolvent.
ILLUSTRATION
In this case, even if A had given a receipt for his share only, he can be required to
share the P1,500,000.00 with B and C.
TO ACCOUNT AND HOLD AS TRUSTEE FOR ANY PROFITS
DERIVED WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE OTHER PARTNERS
Every partner must account to the partnership for any benefit, and hold as trustee for
it any profits derived by him without the consent of the other partners from any
transaction connected with the formation, conduct, or liquidation of the partnership
or from any use by him of its property. (Article 1807)
Obligation of partner for damages to partnership
Every partner is responsible to the partnership for damages suffered by it through his
fault, and he cannot compensate them with the profits and benefits which he may
have earned for the partnership by his industry. However, the courts may equitably
lessen this responsibility if through the partner's extraordinary efforts in other
activities of the partnership, unusual profits have been realized. (Article 1794)
OBLIGATIONS OF A PARTNER: TO THIRD
PERSONS
FIRM NAME
Every partnership shall operate under a firm name, which may or may not include
the name of one or more of the partners. (Article 1815, par. 1)
Strangers who include their name in the firm are liable as partners because of
estoppel but do not have the rights of partners – this is to protect customers from
being misled. (Article 1815, par. 2)
If a limited partner included his name in the firm name, he shall be liable as a
general partner. (Article 1846)
PRO RATA AND SUBSIDIARY LIABILITY ARISING FROM
PARTNERSHIP CONTRACTS
All partners, including industrial ones, shall be liable pro rata with all their property
and after all the partnership assets have been exhausted, for the contracts which may
be entered into in the name and for the account of the partnership, under its signature
and by a person authorized to act for the partnership. However, any partner may
enter into a separate obligation to perform a partnership contract. (Article 1816)
Any stipulation to the contrary shall be void, except as to the partners. (Article 1817)
ILLUSTRATION
ANS.: X can hold liable either the fi rm or A or B, and the liability is for the whole amount
because it is solidary. However, if B is made to pay the full amount, he can recover the
whole amount, plus the interest from A later on instead of only A’s share, for the simple
reason that it is only A who is guilty.
AUTHORITY TO ACT FOR AND IN BEHALF OF THE
PARTNERSHIP
Acts apparently carrying on in the usual way the business of the partnership (Article 1818, par. 1)
General rule : Every partner is an agent of the partnership for the purpose of its
business, and the act of every partner, including the execution in the partnership
name of any instrument, for apparently carrying on in the usual way the business of
the partnership of which he is a member binds the partnership.
General rule : An act of a partner which is not apparently for the carrying on of
business of the partnership in the usual way does not bind the partnership.
General rule : One or more but less than all the partners have no authority to:
Assign the partnership property in trust for creditors or on the assignee's promise to pay the debts
of the partnership;
Dispose of the good-will of the business;
Do any other act which would make it impossible to carry on the ordinary business of a partnership;
Confess a judgment;
Enter into a compromise concerning a partnership claim or liability;
Submit a partnership claim or liability to arbitration;
Renounce a claim of the partnership.
AUTHORITY TO ACT FOR AND IN BEHALF OF THE
PARTNERSHIP
Acts of strict dominion or ownership (Article 1818, par. 3)
All partners All partners All partners Passes all the rights in such
property
EXAMPLE
A, B, C, and D are partners of the firm “Abakada”. A parcel of land registered under the name
“Abakada” was sold by A on behalf and in the name of the firm, but without express
authority. The purchaser is X. Does X become the ownership.
ANS.: YES, but the firm may get back the land unless:
The firm is engaged in the buying and selling of land (consequently, the act of A is “usual”); or
X had in turn sold the same land to Y for value and Y did not know of A’s actual lack of
authority. (This is the case even when the selling of the land was not for apparently carrying
on the business in the usual ways.) Thus, the firm cannot get back the land.
Reason: Because the property has in turn been “conveyed by the grantee (X) to a holder for value (Y)
without knowledge that the partner, in making the conveyance, has exceeded his authority.” (Article
1819, par. 1)
EXAMPLE
A, B, C, and D are partners of the firm “Abakada” engaged in the buying and selling of land. A
parcel of land registered in the name “Abakada” was sold by A in his own name. Does the
buyer become the owner of the land? If not, what right does the buyer have?
ANS.: The buyer does not become the owner of the land. However, he gets the “equitable
interest” of the firm insofar as the land is concerned, because after all the selling of land was in
the “usual” course of business. The buyer may later on ask for the reformation of the contract, so
that the seller’s name would appear to be that of Abakada, provided that the other partners
would not object. If the contract be thus reformed, it is clear that the buyer has also been given
TITLE.
If the partnership had not been engaged in the buying and selling of land, the buyer would not
even be entitled to the “equitable interest.”
EXAMPLE
A, B, C and D were partners in the real estate firm of “Abakada”. Although a certain parcel of land really
belonged to the firm, it was registered in the name of A and B. A and B sold, in their own name, the land
to X. May the firm get back the land?
ANS.: Since the firm is engaged in the real estate business, the act of selling the land was for carrying on in
the usual way the firm’s business. So, the firm cannot get back the land, for title thereto has been
conveyed to X.
Suppose A and B had not been expressly authorized by the firm to sell land, would your answers remain
the same?
ANS.: It depends:
If X had been in good faith, that is, he had no knowledge of the lack of authority, the answer would be
the same. (Article 1818, par. 1)
If X had been in BAD FAITH, the firm can get back the land unless X in turn had sold the property to Y
who is in GOOD faith. (Y is a “holder for value without knowledge.”)
EXAMPLE
A, B, C, and D were partners in the real estate firm of “Abakada”. A certain parcel of
land was in the name of “A, in trust for the firm Abakada.”
If A sells the land to X in the name of Abakada, will X become the owner?
ANS.: No. What X gets will only be the equitable interest of the firm.
If A sells the land to X in his (A’s) own name, will X become the owner?
ANS.: No. What X gets will also be only the equitable interest of the firm.
Reason: It is clear in both instances that under the registry records A is only the trustee.
EXAMPLE
A, B, C and D were partners in the real estate firm of “Abakada”. A certain parcel of
land was registered, not in the name of the firm, but in the name of A, B, C and D. If A,
B, C, and D will sell the land to X, will X become the owner, or will he have only the
equitable interest?
ANS.: X will get the title. Consequently, he becomes the owner, for the law says that
“where the title to real property is in the names of all the partners, a conveyance
executed by all the partners passes all their rights in such property.” (Article 1819, par. 5)
The phrase “all their rights” includes “ownership” because under Article 1811 — “A
partner is co-owner with his partners of specific partnership property.”