Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • LIT Peer Evaluation

    Uploaded by

    Lloyd Keene
    2 views2 pages
    The peer evaluation form rates 8 group members on their contributions to a project on a scale of 1 to 5. All members except one received a perfect score of 20, indicating outstanding contributions to content, efficient group procedures, cooperation, and participation. The one member who did not receive a perfect score was still rated highly for cooperation and participation, but received a lower score of 3 for contributions to content and procedures.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    LIT Peer Evaluation .docx (1)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The peer evaluation form rates 8 group members on their contributions to a project on a scale of 1 to 5. All members except one received a perfect score of 20, indicating outstanding contributions to content, efficient group procedures, cooperation, and participation. The one member who did not receive a perfect score was still rated highly for cooperation and participation, but received a lower score of 3 for contributions to content and procedures.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    LIT Peer Evaluation

    Uploaded by

    Lloyd Keene
    The peer evaluation form rates 8 group members on their contributions to a project on a scale of 1 to 5. All members except one received a perfect score of 20, indicating outstanding contributions to content, efficient group procedures, cooperation, and participation. The one member who did not receive a perfect score was still rated highly for cooperation and participation, but received a lower score of 3 for contributions to content and procedures.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Peer Evaluation Form

    Scale: 5 (Outstanding) 4 (Very Good) 3 (Good) 2 (Needs Improvement)

    Group Member Contributions to content: Contribution to efficient Degree of cooperation: Degree of participation: TOTAL
    (Alphabetical Order) Contributed effective written group procedure: Helped Listened to understand; Attended meetings regularly; SCORE
    material; supplied important with agenda planning; reliable; responsible; group - arrived promptly and
    information; provided keeping the group on track; centered; open - minded; attended outside meetings
    thoughtful input during team updating the members about flexible; followed through. (if held); provided input and
    discussions; helped make the progress of the feedback; submitted
    decisions with regards to the performance task. material when expected.
    performance task output.

    1. Boy, John Ryan 5 5 5 5 20

    2. Carrera, Chris Allen 5 5 5 5 20

    3. Ganut, Frisian Nicole 5 5 5 5 20

    4. Katalbas, Mikyla 5 5 5 5 20

    5. Lagrimas, Keene Lloyd 5 5 5 5 20

    6. Mercado, Eirihn Ligien 5 5 5 5 20

    7. Soron, Alexia Beatrice 3 3 5 5 16

    8. Paciente, Angelie Jo 5 5 5 5 20
    Continue to the next page….
    Please give a zero score to members with no contribution.

    Keene Lloyd Lagrimas A.


    Leader’s Signature

    You might also like