Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10-04-2024
Wordcount: 760
We can look at this painting through a feminist art historical lens. Until the end of the 19th
century, it was believed that women were not musically capable like men were, so, at the
time, they were not allowed to join any schools or classes for professional musical education.
Therefore, if they wanted to learn an instrument or sing, a private teacher would come to their
residence to teach them. Such a private music lesson is portrayed in Louis Moritz’s painting. 2
1
Rijksmuseum. “De Muziekles, Louis Moritz, 1808 - Rijksmuseum,”
2
Rijksmuseum. “De Muziekles, Louis Moritz, 1808 - Rijksmuseum,”
In 1880, George P. Upton, who was a well renowned music critic from Chicago, published a
book called Women in Music, in which he argued that women, despite their musical
acknowledged that women could technically compose music, but they would never be on the
same level as men. According to Upton, because women are such emotional creatures, they
can do nothing else but keep these emotions inside themselves. To express these emotions in
music is impossible for them. Meanwhile the stern and relentless nature of man allows them
It was a common belief that women could only perform music, not compose it. To be a
woman, was to entertain and nothing more. These beliefs based on traditional gender roles
confined women to domestic settings like the one portrayed in De Muziekles, and forcibly
kept their musical pursuits at amateur level. Women’s apparent lack of musical expertise,
which kept them from educating themselves, was maintained by the fact that they were denied
that professional education they sought. However, despite the protest of many academic men,
at the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century, the music education
industry was dominated by women. Women were regarded to be fit for educating others about
music previously composed by men, through various institutions like the church or as
kindergarten teachers.4 Unfortunately, they were still not respected in their ability to compose
new music themselves. 5 Due to these misogynistic male interpretations, we have missed
many musical female talents that could have shaped and formed the art history we learn about
right now.
3
Upton, George Putnam. Woman in Music, 1886.
4
Roske, Michael. “The Professionalism of Private Music Teaching in the 19th Century: A Study with
Social Statistics.” Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 91 (1987): 143–48.
5
“Women Composers in American Popular Song, Page 1,”
The misogyny that De Muziekles shows is how women were not
Muziekles exude wealth, evident from their generous gowns and jewelry and the grandeur of
their surroundings. The women being portrayed like they are adds another layer for us to
consider. The painting is most probably an accidental portrayal of the gender inequality of the
19th century. It was not meant as a political comment or to make people socially aware. It was
meant to be pretty to look at. The women are dressed and posed elegantly and are objects of
admiration. Performers. On top of that, the man teaching is in the middle. He is the main
De Muziekles by Louis Moritz shows us a glimpse of the reality for 19th century women. The
painting reflects women’s’ exclusion from formal musical training and when you zoom out
and look through a feminist art historical lens it also shows women’s role as performers, not
creators. De Muziekles is a product of its time, urging the viewer to look further, and
Bibliography
n.d. https://www.rijksmuseum.nl/nl/collectie/SK-A-4037.
Roske, Michael. “The Professionalism of Private Music Teaching in the 19th Century: A
Study with Social Statistics.” Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 91
n.d. http://parlorsongs.com/issues/2002-9/thismonth/feature.php.