TANAUAN CITY COURSE:

COLLEGE CPEN18 CPE LAWS AND PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE

Tanauan City, PROFESSOR CATEGORY RATING
Batangas
Engr. Rionel B. Caldo Case Study # 1

Group Name:Memers Year/Section: 3B

Member 1: Erecilla, Jason D. Date: February, 2 2024
Member 2: Para, Dhyrelyn

Case Study #1

Ethical Dilemmas in AI Hiring Systems: Navigating Engineering, Social Justice, and Human
Rights Traditions

I. PROBLEM SPECIFICATION

Imagine a scenario where a multinational technology company is developing a cutting-edge artificial

intelligence (AI) system for automated hiring processes. The company claims that the AI system, based
on advanced algorithms, can select candidates more efficiently and objectively. However, reports
suggest that the system exhibits biases, disproportionately favoring certain demographics while
disadvantaging others. The biases seem to be perpetuating existing social inequalities rather than
promoting fairness in hiring practices.

In light of the learning outcomes related to engineering and social justice, human rights traditions, and
the application of social justice frames in engineering and philosophy, critically analyze and discuss
the following:

1. Identify the engineering and social justice implications:

 How do the biases in the AI hiring system align with the principles of social justice in the
context of employment and human rights?
 What ethical concerns arise from the potential discriminatory impact of the technology on
diverse groups?

2. Evaluate the situation from the perspective of human rights traditions:

 How do the reported biases in the AI system relate to human rights traditions and principles?
 In what ways might the deployment of this technology infringe upon individuals' rights and
contribute to social injustices in the professional sphere?

3. Examine the role of social justice frames in engineering and philosophy:

 How can social justice frames be applied to assess and rectify the biases in the AI system?
 TANAUAN CITY COURSE:
COLLEGE CPEN18 CPE LAWS AND PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
Tanauan City, PROFESSOR CATEGORY RATING
Batangas
Engr. Rionel B. Caldo Case Study # 1

 Discuss the ethical responsibilities of engineers and professionals in addressing social justice
concerns, particularly in the development and deployment of advanced technologies like AI.

4. Propose strategies for incorporating social justice in engineering practices:

 Suggest concrete steps that the company and its engineering team could take to rectify the
biases in the AI system, ensuring fair and equitable hiring practices.
 Explore how a philosophical framework emphasizing social justice can guide engineers and
professionals in creating technologies that align with ethical and human rights standards.

This case study encourages students to apply their understanding of engineering and social justice,
human rights traditions, and the role of social justice frames in the context of a real-world scenario,
emphasizing the ethical considerations and responsibilities of engineers in shaping a more just and
equitable society.`

II. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Ethical Dilemmas in AI Hiring Systems: Navigating Engineering, Social Justice, and Human
Rights Traditions

1. Identify the engineering and social justice implications:

The biases in the AI hiring system contradict social justice principles in employment and human rights.
It appears to be unfair, hindering equal opportunities for all candidates and potentially perpetuating
existing social inequalities. Social justice asserts that all individuals should have equal opportunities
regardless of their background, and discriminatory biases in hiring processes undermine this principle.
Human rights principles emphasize the right to work and the right to equal opportunities, which are
compromised by biased AI systems.Social justice emphasizes providing equal opportunities for all
individuals in the employment sphere.
 TANAUAN CITY COURSE:
COLLEGE CPEN18 CPE LAWS AND PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
Tanauan City, PROFESSOR CATEGORY RATING
Batangas
Engr. Rionel B. Caldo Case Study # 1

The potential discriminatory impact of biased technology raises ethical concerns. If the system favors
specific demographics, it may result in unfair treatment, limiting job opportunities for some groups and
impacting diversity in the workplace. By disproportionately favoring certain groups, the technology
denies others a fair chance at employment based on their qualifications and skills. This not only
perpetuates systemic discrimination but also erodes trust in the hiring process. Also, the technology's
bias violates individuals' right to equal opportunities, which is a fundamental human rights.

2. Human rights traditions evaluation:

The reported biases in the AI system relate to human rights traditions by potentially violating
individuals' rights to equal opportunities. The system may infringe upon the fundamental human right
of fair and unbiased access to employment opportunities. Human rights traditions advocate for
universal access to fundamental rights, including the right to work without discrimination. The
reported biases in the AI system violate these principles by perpetuating systemic disparities and
limiting access to opportunities for marginalized groups, thereby deviating from the essence of human
rights.

The deployment of a biased AI system could infringe upon individuals' rights by compromising their
right to equal opportunities and fair selection processes. By perpetuating discriminatory practices, the
technology contributes to social injustices in the professional sphere through systemic exclusion and
unequal treatment of individuals based on their demographics. Such infringements not only limit
individuals' professional growth but also hinder efforts to achieve a diverse and inclusive workforce,
thereby perpetuating social inequalities. The Department of Information and Communication
Technology Act of 2015 (RA10844) may shall be taken this.

3. Social justice frames in engineering and philosophy:

To rectify biases, engineers can apply social justice frames in the development process. This involves
evaluating the system from a fairness perspective and prioritizing equal opportunities for all candidates.
By prioritizing inclusivity and non-discrimination, social justice frames can facilitate the identification
and mitigation of biases within the AI system.

Engineers and professionals hold ethical responsibilities in addressing social justice concerns. They
must actively work to ensure that the AI system promotes fairness and inclusivity, reflecting ethical
values in the development and deployment of advanced technologies like AI. By actively engaging
with social justice issues, engineers can contribute to the creation of inclusive and equitable
technological solutions that align with ethical frameworks and benefit diverse communities.

4. Strategies for incorporating social justice:

 TANAUAN CITY COURSE:
COLLEGE CPEN18 CPE LAWS AND PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
Tanauan City, PROFESSOR CATEGORY RATING
Batangas
Engr. Rionel B. Caldo Case Study # 1

The company and its engineering team can take concrete steps to rectify biases. This involves thorough
audits of the system, identification, and correction of biased algorithms, ensuring fair treatment for all
candidates.

A philosophical framework emphasizing social justice can guide engineers in creating technologies
aligned with ethical and human rights standards. This involves considering the societal impact of their
work, prioritizing fairness in the design and deployment of AI systems. This framework can guide the
development of technologies that uphold fairness, equity, and justice in their applications, ensuring
alignment with ethical and human rights principles. Principles such as transparency, accountability,
and social responsibility can serve as guiding pillars for engineers to create technology that fosters a
more just and inclusive society.

III. CONCLUSION
This case study underscores the delicate balance between technological advancements and ethical
considerations in AI development. To create a more just and equitable society, engineers must actively
address biases in AI systems, ensuring fairness, diversity, and adherence to human rights principles in
the hiring process. The study emphasizes the crucial role of ethical responsibilities in shaping the
future of technology for a more inclusive and just world.

Filenaming Convention: CPEN18_Surname1_Surname2_casestudy1.pdf