Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I Don't Attack It, But It's Not For Actors': The Use of Yoga by Jerzy Grotowski
I Don't Attack It, But It's Not For Actors': The Use of Yoga by Jerzy Grotowski
‘I don't attack it, but it's not for actors’: the use of
yoga by Jerzy Grotowski
Maria Kapsali
To cite this article: Maria Kapsali (2010) ‘I don't attack it, but it's not for actors’: the use
of yoga by Jerzy Grotowski, Theatre, Dance and Performance Training, 1:2, 185-198, DOI:
10.1080/19443927.2010.505002
Grotowski’s use of yoga for theatrical purposes is well-known not only through the exercises
that travelled across the Atlantic and infiltrated American actor training, but also because he
finally dismissed yoga as inappropriate for acting and actor training purposes. This article traces
the sources of Grotowski’s encounter with yoga and examines them through the lens of
scholarship on Modern Yoga. It thus attempts to shed light on the way Grotowski used the
discipline and examines the caution he voiced in regard to yoga’s incompatibility with acting.
Introduction
Theatre, Dance and Performance Training ISSN 1944-3927 print/ISSN 1944-3919 online
Ó 2010 Taylor & Francis http://www.informaworld.com
DOI: 10.1080/19443927.2010.505002
186 M. Kapsali
unlike many directors who approached yoga because of its potential use in
actor training, Grotowski was interested in, one dare say fascinated by, the
discipline, prior to and independently of, any theatrical application. Second,
despite the influence that yoga exerted on his artistic vision and the training
of the Theatre Laboratory, the Polish director, in a statement published in
Towards a Poor Theatre, declared yoga as inappropriate for actors:
affected both the way yoga is viewed in Grotowski’s work as well as the
manner in which yoga is approached in theatre training. Dymphna Callery
(2001, p. 27), for example, states that ‘yoga certainly promotes suppleness
and flexibility, but if done exclusively can inhibit rather than release actors’.
Grotowski’s comment is cited as a proof of her thesis (ibid.). Equally, Robert
Benedetti’s (1972, p. 88) caution, in a volume on actor training published in
1972, bears strong resemblance to Grotowski’s position. The author
instructs actors to ‘[b]eware of yoga . . . which in its passivity and self-
relatedness may lead one away from theatre’. He adds, nevertheless, that
‘hatha yoga as a purely physical discipline is valuable’.
However, as I am going to demonstrate, a critical examination of the way
Grotowski used yoga not only reveals a life-long interest, but also exposes
certain attitudes towards the discipline that underlie this statement. This
article has two complementary aims; the first is to discuss the director’s
primary sources of yoga through the lens of current scholarship on the
subject of Modern Yoga. The second aim is to closely and critically examine
Grotowski’s statement on yoga in relation to the sources of his original
contact with yoga as well as the way yoga positions were used in the training
of the Theatre Laboratory. I will draw from currently available material as
well as interviews I conducted in 2009 with two of Grotowski’s close
collaborators; Ludwig Flaszen (1930–), co-founder and literary director of
the Theatre of Thirteen Rows (later The Laboratory Theatre), and Rena
Mirecka (1934–) one of the first actors who joined the company in 1959 and
1. For more information on remained until its disbandment.
this see Slowiac and
Cuesta (2007) as well as
the autobiographical
documentary With Jerzy The presence of yoga
Grotowski (1980).
Zbigniew Osinski (2008)
also examines As I have already suggested, yoga played a considerable role both in
Grotowski’s contact with
India, but the volume is
Grotowski’s life and work. His first encounter with yoga at a young age, his
written in Polish. early wish to study Sanskrit, and his repeated trips to India, mark a life and
artistic journey that was significantly influenced by the discipline.1 In
particular relation to his theatrical work, the presence of yoga can be traced
from the beginning of his career. Barba (1999), in his book Land of Ashes and
Theatre, Dance and Performance Training 187
Furthermore, it is important to bear in mind that yoga during the last 150
years has gone through developments that drastically changed both the
profile of the discipline’s propagators and practitioners as well the way(s) in
which the discipline is viewed, disseminated and practised. In order,
therefore, to provide a solid background against which Grotowski’s approach
can be examined I will now turn to the developments that the discipline
underwent during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.
Modern Yoga
regarding the land of India as ‘sacred’ and invoking the ‘thousand years’
experience of thought’ possessed by the ‘men of Asia’ (ibid., p. xiii).
Furthermore, the book reflects popular tendencies to mask Hinduist dogma
under a Christian cloak, and as a result, Ramakrishna’s life is relayed in an
overtly biblical manner (see De Michelis 2004, p. 100). The first chapter is
titled ‘The Gospel of Childhood’, and claims that Ramakrishna’s birth was
preceded by a vision that visited both his mother and father, and that his
conception was immaculate (Rolland 2000, p. 6). Ramakrishna’s spiritual
sensitivity became apparent from the first years of his life, when at the age of
six he was first ‘seized in ecstasy’ (ibid.). Similar experiences accompanied
Ramakrishna throughout his life and Rolland promptly advises his audience to
refrain from ‘disrespectful thoughts’ regarding Ramakrishna’s ecstatic states,
since they were of a rare religious and spiritual nature (ibid., p. 32). In a
similar tone Rolland recounts the relationship between Ramakrishna and one
of his students Swami Vivekananda, who is referred to as part of ‘the great
army of the Spirit’ (ibid., p. xiv).
A more sober account of Ramakrishna’s life is offered by De Michelis
(2004, p. 100), who supports that Ramakrishna ‘was virtually untouched by
modern influences’ and his teachings were deeply rooted in theistic Sanskrit
texts (ibid., p. 129). Furthermore, according to De Michelis, Ramakrishna
discouraged ‘those who identify themselves with the body’ to pursue a
transcendental experience through yoga, and advised them to practise the
6. This is a point where more devotional forms of the discipline6 (ibid., p. 142). Despite’s his ascetic
Rolland’s portrait of outlook, Ramakrishna acquired a prominent place in the Indian pantheon,
Ramakrishna agrees with
recent studies. He due to Vivekananda and the latter’s –already mentioned – leading role in
actually cites an incident shaping and disseminating MY. Ramakrishna was portrayed as Vivekananda’s
where Ramakrishna
severely scolded spiritual master, although Vivekananda greatly distorted the latter’s teaching
Vivekananda when the and their relationship was far from the straightforward guru–disciple
latter asked for
instructions in order to
connection to which Vivekananda alluded (ibid., p. 50) and Rolland (2000,
achieve Samadhi, the final p. 114) confirms.
stage of yoga where an It is not possible to know Grotowski’s reaction to the book and whether
altered state of
consciousness is thought he had a more critical perspective on Rolland’s comments, but Ramakrishna’s
to be achieved. personality must have made a lasting impression on him, as Grotowski visited
Ramakrishna’s shrine during one of his trips to India. It is also quite indicative
Theatre, Dance and Performance Training 191
though can only be guessed at. Apart from the medieval text of Hatha Yoga
Pradipika which gives a ‘rather vague and cryptic’ account of some yoga poses
(Alter 2004, p. 25) there is no line of written tradition for the practice of the
asanas (Sjoman 1999, p. 35). Equally, during the 1950s Western scholarship,
still carrying a strong orientalist legacy, was preoccupied with yoga as a
system of thought. As a result, the phenomenon of MPY in the West was
7. Theo Bernard’s book still nascent.7 Taking the above into account, it would be safe to assume
Hatha Yoga: The Report of that Tokarz’s and subsequently Grotowski’s knowledge of yoga was
a Personal Experience
published in 1944 is an predominantly based on books and the scant information on the practice
exception to the of asanas.8
dominant scholarly
oriented approaches to As the above examination shows, Grotowski’s contact with the discipline
yoga of the time. The during his young adult life was through written works either of classical
book offers illustrations
of the author practising
scholarship, which inevitably placed yoga in a pre-modern context, or
yoga poses, and conveys a modern scholarship which was oblivious to or even dismissive towards
practical but mystified contemporaneous developments. A critical review of Rolland’s and Brunton’s
account of yoga practice
(for a detailed discussion books makes clear that they were both permeated by an a-historical attitude
see Albanese 2007, pp. towards the discipline, betrayed a deeply embedded orientalist worldview
364–368). There is no
evidence that Grotowski
that identified India as the land of universal spirituality, and made no
knew about this book at reference to the developments that yoga was undergoing at the very time
the time. these books were written. Finally, it should be noted that the character and
8. During his trips to India, content of these volumes reflects a deeper schism in the study and
there is no evidence to
suggest that Grotowski understanding of yoga: yoga as an ancient, almost primordial philosophy and
received training in the practice and yoga as a ‘social product of the ‘‘the wonder that is the world’’’
asanas from a yoga
teacher.
(Alter 2004, p. xiv), constantly worked on and reshaped by its practitioners.
If one thus bears in mind Maharishi’s reclusion and silence, and Rolland’s
hagiographic account of Ramakrishna, it is hardly surprising that Grotowski
reached the conclusion that yoga is not fit for actors. Indeed, in the
statement under examination, Grotowski (1991, p. 208) regards the result of
‘an introverted concentration that kills all expression’ produced by yoga as
typical of the discipline since ‘the goal of yoga is to stop three processes:
192 M. Kapsali
however, are a bit more complicated, since Grotowski’s (1991, p. 208) use of
yoga has an additional facet and his statement in Towards a Poor Theatre a
second part:
[W]e also observed that certain yoga positions help very much the natural
reactions of the spinal column; they lead to a sureness of one’s body, a natural
adaptation to space. So why get rid of them? Just change all their currents.
From the above it becomes clear that an element of yoga was retained in the
training, specifically the practice of the yoga poses, and that this element was
modified. The next section will thus discuss the use of yoga in the Theatre
Laboratory as well as the ensuing modifications.
Figure 1a–c From Training at Teatr Laboratorium in Wroclaw, a film by Torgeir Wethal Ó Odin
Teatret Archives.
194 M. Kapsali
but it comprised the base on which such material could be adapted and
modified towards theatrical purposes.
As Grotowski (1991, p. 208) relates in his statement, he did not simply
maintain the yoga postures in the training, but ‘changed the currents’ with
the aim to ‘transform the physical elements [of the yoga practice] into
elements of human contact’. The developments that were incurred by
Grotowski and his actors to the practice of the asanas can be seen in the
1972 session. First of all, apart from the poses and the aforementioned
variations that can be traced directly to Light on Yoga, Cieslak executes and
teaches additional variations on the two inversions. After headstand and
shoulderstand are demonstrated and practised, Cieslak executes the same
poses but places the head, the arms or the legs slightly differently. As a result
the way he goes in and out of the pose also changes. It is clear, however, that
these variations are grafted on the shape of the main asanas, and they are
taught after the demonstration and practice of each ‘classical’ pose.
Moreover, it is worth mentioning that the asanas, as presented in Light on
Downloaded by [Universite Laval] at 23:57 10 April 2016
Yoga, already feature a number of variations and thus make possible further
10. It is also important to experimentation.10 Finally, as the last part of the training session shows, the
mention that Iyengar most important aspect of Cieslak’s modifications is that they made easier
Yoga, as it is currently
practised, features a the transition from one pose to the next and thus enabled continuous
number of variations movement between the poses.
that were developed
after the book’s After teaching the poses and their variations to the two Odin actors,
publication and as such Cieslak demonstrates an improvisation, where he moves from one pose
do not appear in Light on
Yoga.
to the next in uninterrupted movement and without a predetermined
order. He then asks the actors to go through the poses in the same
manner, and develop an organic flow from one pose to the next without
premeditation. After this initial improvisation, Cieslak asks them to work
in a pair and go through the poses while relating to one another in
different ways, such as ‘against’ each other (Odin Theatre 1972, 1:14:20–
1:15:00), ‘for’ each other (ibid., 1:17:13–1:19:10) and finally ‘as two small
cats who play together’ (ibid., 1:19:15–1:22:15). The training session as
well as Grotowski’s remark makes clear that the nature of the yoga
practice was changed in a manner that de-emphasised one’s attention on
the execution of the poses, and instead placed it on the surrounding
space and the rest of the group. As Flaszen (telephone interview 2009)
remarks ‘Grotowski with his actors practiced yoga which was directed
outwards. This was the crux of his discovery. [. . .] They practiced with a
partner, with the sound, with the wall, the contact with the environment,
a very precise uninterrupted contact.’
In particular relation to the ‘change of the currents’ and the focus of
one’s attention outwards it should be noted that an external orientation
is to a degree inherent in the practice of asanas as materialised in Iyengar
Yoga. Since the emphasis is on the execution of the postures, and this
execution is necessarily situated in and subjected to the contingencies of
space and gravity, the body is constantly related to space and the space is
thematised by the body. As a result, even without ‘changing the currents’
the character of the asana practice is consequently more outward-facing
than breathing or meditational techniques. Apart from this, it should also
be taken into account that both MY and MPY were based on and derived
from a desire to use yoga as a means to satisfy this-worldly concerns
Theatre, Dance and Performance Training 195
Equally she identifies the same exercises in a training session she observed in
Pontendera in 1992 (ibid., p. 202). Having exposed Grotowski’s key primary
sources, the type of yoga that was used in the Theatre Laboratory as well as
the way in which it was modified, I will now return to Grotowski’s statement
in Towards a Poor Theatre and re-examine it through these sources.
the two discourses and, in fact, it seems that he considers the use of
the poses as developed in a modern context to be a non-legitimate form of
yoga.
In his statement, Grotowski first declares yoga to be inappropriate for
actors and then he refers to the use of the yoga positions. When, therefore,
he explicitly states that yoga is not for actors, and then he mentions the use
of the yoga positions, it ensues that the practice of yoga positions is not
‘yoga’. Moreover, his reference to the yoga poses has a casual character and
their practice is justified due to their physiological benefits (flexibility in the
spine, space awareness). The employment of MY therefore, although it
formed a significant part of the training, is presented as ‘yoga positions with
changed currents’, and as such is not regarded as part of the discipline. As a
result, Grotowski’s statement seems to rest on a preconception in regard to
what does and what does not count as yoga. Furthermore, it points at a
disjunction between the foundations that formed Grotowski’s attraction to
11. It is worth mentioning and cultural understanding of yoga and the source that influenced his
Downloaded by [Universite Laval] at 23:57 10 April 2016
that Grotowski’s trips to practical application of the discipline. It is not simply that Grotowski came
India, all after 1966, do
not feature any – into contact with a number of yoga practitioners each resulting in various
recorded – visit to degrees and kinds of influence. Quite troublingly, it seems that Grotowski
Iyengar’s base in Pune
(Mirecka for example was fascinated by a kind of yoga he could not apply and applied a kind of yoga
sought tuition there in that did not fascinate him.
the late 1970s; Mirecka
interview 2009).
Grotowski’s attraction to a ‘pure’ and ‘primordial’ form of practice is
12. It is also quite telling that
also supported by the profile of the yoga practitioners that Grotowski
Grotowski in a letter to sought in his journeys to India. During his trips there11 Grotowski visited
Barba in 1965 likens the Ramakrishna’s shrine, Maharishi’s place of hermitage, and Aurobindo’s
residence of the Theatre
of the 13 Rows in Opole ashram.12 Furthermore, during his first trip in 1969, Grotowski came into
to Ramana’s hermitage in contact with the practice of Bauls, a Bengali devotional form of singing, which
Arunachala, whereas he
draws parallels between
was maintained and led to the participation of a Baul singer in the last
the subsequent gathering of the Theatre of the Sources. Bearing in mind Grotowski’s attitude
relocation of the towards yoga, it is not surprising that all of the aforementioned figures
Theatre Laboratory to
Wroclaw (a bigger city) display a significant ascetic orientation, and their outlook and lifestyle bear
with Aurobindo’s resemblances to the image of the archetypal yogi.
ashram in Pondicherry,
which is a bustling urban
A similar tendency has been identified by Milling and Ley in relation to
centre (Barba 1999, Grotowski’s interest in other disciplines and their practitioners.13 They
p. 136). particularly refer to an ‘ideology that in the very choice of participants
13. Grotowski’s interest in constructs these traditions of ritual as closer to the ‘‘origin’’ and the primal’
and influence by a (Milling and Ley 2000, p. 137; emphasis added). They further identify a
number of practices is
well-known and ‘fetishization of the work of these practitioners as ‘‘pure’’‘ and suggest that
discussed; for more Grotowski was reluctant to view them in relation to their ‘own history and
information see I Wyan
Lendra in Wolford and the contingencies of cultural development’ (ibid.). In the same vein,
Schechner (1997, p. Schechner (1997, pp. 490–491) points out that Grotowski ‘assumes that
310).
the ancient practices are superior to the modern’, and most pertinently
14. This disjuncture is also he continues ‘this formation does not satisfy me. I cannot recognize
apparent in both Callery’s wisdom that exists before or behind cultures and genres, in the ‘‘original’’
(2001) as well as
Benedetti’s (1972) times, in the ‘‘old practices’’. Why for Grotowski, does old equal good?’
previously cited opinion, Schechner’s point appears to encapsulate Grotowski’s understanding of, as
who although they
caution against the well as his statement on, yoga. Indeed, it seems that according to
discipline, acknowledge Grotowski’s worldview the practice of MY paled in front of the archetypal
the potential of the poses
for the actor’s work.
yogi and the ‘new’ form of practice was condemned to be inferior to
the ‘old’.14
Theatre, Dance and Performance Training 197
Conclusion
References
Albanese, C.L., 2007. A Republic of Mind and Spirit. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Alter, J.S., 2004. Yoga in Modern India: The Body between Science and Philosophy. Princeton,
NJ: Princeton University Press.
Barba, E., 1999. Land of Ashes and Diamonds. Aberystwyth: Black Mountain Press.
Benedetti, R., 1972. Notes to an Actor. In: R.B. Brown, ed. Actor Training I. The Institute
for Research in Acting, 70–89.
Brunton, P., 1970. A Search in Secret India. London: Rider and Company; first published
1934.
Callery, D., 2001. Through the Body. New York: Routledge.
De Michelis, E., 2004. A History of Modern Yoga. New York: Continuum.
Eliade, M., 1973. Yoga, Immortality and Freedom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press;
first published 1936.
Grotowski, J., 1991. Towards a Poor Theatre. London: Methuen Drama; first published
1968.
Grotowski, J., 1997. Theatre of Source. In: L. Wolford and R. Schechner, eds. The
Grotowski Sourcebook. London: Routledge, 250–269.
Grotowski: Theatre and Beyond, 2009. The British Grotowski Project, University of Kent.
Hulton, 2006. in Exeter Digital Archive 12, University of Exeter.
Iyengar, B.K.S., 1991. Light on Yoga. London: Thorsons; first published 1966.
Milling, J. and Graham, L., 2000. Theories of Performance. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Odin Theatre Archive, 1972. Odin Theatre Training at Grotowski Laboratory in Wroclaw.
Video. Holstebro, Denmark.
Osinski, Z., 2008. Polskie Kontakty Teatralne z Orientem, Gdansk, Terytoria.
Rolland, R., 2000. The Life of Ramakrishna. Calcutta: Advaita Ashrama; first published
1934.
Schechner, R., 1997. Exoduction. In: L. Wolford and R. Schechner, eds. The Grotowski
Sourcebook. London: Routledge, 458–492.
198 M. Kapsali
Sjoman, N.E., 1999. The Yoga Tradition of the Mysore Palace. New Delhi: Shakti Malik
Abhinav Publications.
Slowiac, J. and Cuesta, J., 2007. Jerzy Grotowski. London: Methuen.
Strauss, S., 2005. Positioning Yoga: Balancing Acts across Cultures. New York: Berg.
Wolford, L., 2000. Grotowski’s Vision of the Actor. In: A. Hodge, ed. 20th Century Actor
Training. London: Routledge, 191–208.
With Jerzy Grotowski, Nienadówka, 1980. Facets Video.
Wolford, L. and Schechner, R., eds., 1997. The Grotowski Sourcebook. London:
Routledge.
Zarrill, P., 2009. in Exeter Digital Archive 12, University of Exeter.
Zarrill, P., 2009. Psychophysical Acting. London: Routledge.
Downloaded by [Universite Laval] at 23:57 10 April 2016