Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COMPETITION ACT,
20026.53
A Brief Analysis From –
Gidhwani Kiran Dipakkumar - 17
Parekh Priteshkumar Ashokkumar - 36
Pathak Harshil Devanbhai - 41
INTRODUCTION –
MRTP ACT, 1969
The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Activities (MRTP)
This provision of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right Article 39(c) mandates that economic resources should not
to practice any profession, occupation, or trade. The MRTP be concentrated to the common detriment. The MRTP Act
Act complements this by regulating monopolies and aligns with this provision by regulating monopolistic and
restrictive trade practices, ensuring that businesses operate restrictive trade practices that could harm competition,
fairly and do not engage in practices that stifle competition restrict consumer choice, and lead to the misuse of
that the ownership and control of material resources are of the Constitution directs the State to secure a social order
distributed to serve the common good. The MRTP Act works to promote the welfare of the people. The MRTP Act
towards this objective by preventing the concentration of contributes to this objective by promoting fair competition,
economic power in a few hands and promoting a more preventing unfair trade practices, safeguarding consumer
equitable distribution of economic resources. interests, and fostering a more equitable and just economic
system.
These practices involved the UTPs encompassed practices RTPs comprised agreements,
the market by one or more or fraudulent, leading to unfair among businesses that restricted
entities. MTPs included actions advantage or harm to consumers competition or hindered market
such as price manipulation, or competitors. Examples of entry. RTPs included actions such
refusal to deal & discriminatory UTPs included false advertising, as price-fixing, collusion, market-
pricing aimed at excluding misleading product claims, and sharing agreements, and tie-in
consumers.
power in a few hands by regulating monopolistic practices that level playing field for businesses, preventing unfair trade practices, and
could stifle competition and harm consumer interests. fostering an environment conducive to innovation and efficiency.
regulatory authority was founded under the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices (MRTP)
Act of 1969 in India. The MRTPC was responsible for enforcing the regulations of the MRTP Act
and settling conflicts concerning monopolies and restrictive trade practices. The entity had the
authority to investigate complaints, conduct inquiries, issue orders, and impose penalties on
entities that were found to be in breach of the Act. The MRTPC was essential in overseeing
in India until it was disbanded in 2009 following the implementation of the Competition Act, of
2002.
Restrictive Trade Practices (MRTP) Act in addressing contemporary enacted in 2002. The Act established the Competition Commission of India (CCI) as the
competition issues, the Indian government appointed a committee headed regulatory authority responsible for enforcing competition law and promoting fair
by Justice S.V. Raghavan to review and recommend reforms to competition competition in the Indian market.
law in India.
• The Competition Act introduced several key provisions, including prohibitions on anti-
• The Raghavan Committee submitted its report in 2000, proposing competitive agreements, abuse of dominance, and regulation of mergers and
comprehensive reforms to replace the MRTP Act with a modern acquisitions. It aimed to create a level playing field for businesses, stimulate innovation,
competition law framework. It recommended the enactment of a new and safeguard consumer welfare.
LIBERALIZATION
CCI
1969
2002
MRTPC
ECONOMIC REFORMS
Restrictive Trade Practices (MRTP) Act, signifying a notable change in India's competition law
system. The Competition Act is designed to encourage fair competition, deter anti-competitive
behaviors, and safeguard consumer welfare in the market. The Competition Commission of
India (CCI) is established as the regulatory entity in charge of implementing competition law.
The Act bans collusion, and monopolistic behavior by companies, and oversees mergers and
acquisitions that could harm competition. The Competition Act in India aims to establish fair
competition among enterprises, promote innovation, and safeguard consumer welfare through
rigorous enforcement measures such as investigations and penalties.
• The CCI is responsible for enforcing the provisions of the • The CCI engages in competition advocacy activities to raise
Competition Act to prevent anti-competitive practices, promote awareness about the benefits of competition, educate stakeholders
fair competition, and protect consumer interests in the market. about competition law, and promote a competitive market culture
in India.
• It investigates complaints and cases related to anti-competitive
agreements, abuse of dominant positions by firms, and anti- • It provides guidance, recommendations, and advisory opinions to
competitive mergers and acquisitions to ensure compliance businesses, government agencies, and other stakeholders on
assess their potential impact on competition in the market and • The CCI conducts market studies, research, and analysis to assess
prevent combinations that could result in a substantial lessening competition issues, identify market trends, and propose policy
• Act implemented partly by the Central Government and • The primary duty to achieve the objectives of the Act devolves
partly by the MRTP Commission into a competition commission of India
THE CEMENT CARTEL CASE THE DLF CASE THE TATA ENGINEERING CASE
This prosecution accused many The MRTP Commission examined DLF, a Tata Engineering (formerly Tata Motors) was
cement makers of forming a cartel to major real estate developer, for abusing accused of abusing its commercial vehicle
control pricing and limit competition. its market dominance. The Commission market dominance by unfairly treating
MRTP judged cement companies' found that DLF had unfairly dealers and suppressing competition. The
price-fixing and market allocation discriminated against homebuyers, MRTP Commission fined Tata Engineering
agreements anti-competitive. Thus, reducing competition and injuring for anti-competitive activities under the
the Commission fined and ordered consumers. For violating the MRTP Act, MRTP Act. The case showed the
the corporations to stop their anti- DLF was ordered to stop its anti- Commission's responsibility in regulating
competitive actions. competitive conduct and pay fines. corporations for fair competition and
consumer welfare.
regulator. In 2002, the Competition Act replaced the MRTP Act because it