Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Types of Legislation
The type of measures that Congress may consider
and act upon (in addition to treaties in the Senate)
include bills and three kinds of resolutions. They are:
February 4,
2014
1. Bills
These are general measures, which if passed upon,
may become laws. A bill is prefixed with S., followed
REMMAN
by a number assigned the measure based on the
order in which it is introduced. The vast majority of
legislative proposals––recommendations dealing
with the economy, increasing penalties for certain
crimes, regulation on commerce and trade, etc., are
drafted in the form of bills. They also include
ENTERPRISES,
budgetary appropriation of the government and
many others. When passed by both chambers in
identical form and signed by the President or
INC. and
repassed by Congress over a presidential veto, they
become laws.
2. Joint Resolutions
CHAMBER OF
A joint resolution, like a bill, requires the approval of
both houses and the signature of the President. It REAL ESTATE
has the force and effect of a law if approved. There is
no real difference between a bill and a joint
resolution. The latter generally is used when dealing
AND
BUILDERS'AS
with a single item or issue, such as a continuing or
emergency appropriations bill. Joint resolutions are
also used for proposing amendments to the
Constitution.
3. Concurrent Resolutions
A concurrent resolution is usually designated in the
Senate as S. Ct. Res. It is used for matters affecting
SOCIATION, known as the
Petitioners, "Real Estate
vs. Service Act of
PROFESSIONA the Philippines"
L was signed into
REGULATOR law by President
Y BOARD Gloria
OF REAL Macapagal-
ESTATE Arroyo. The
SERVICE and purpose is to
PROFESSIONA professionalize
L the real estate
REGULATION service sector
COMMISSION, under a
Respondents. regulatory
FACTS: scheme of
R.A. No. 9646, licensing,
otherwise registration and
supervision of passed by
real estate Congress shall
service embrace only
practitioners in one subject
the country. which shall be
According to expressed in the
petitioners, the title thereof.
new law is After a
constitutionally summary
infirm because it hearing, the trial
violates Article court denied the
VI, prayer for
Section 26 of issuance of a
the 1987 writ of
Philippine preliminary
Constitution injunction.
which mandates ISSUE:
that every bill
Section 26 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution which
9646 is
injunction.
ISSUE:
1.Whether or not R.A. No. 9646 is unconstitutional
subject" rule subject rule. The Court laid down that rule that
constitutional provisions relating to the subject
matter and titles of statutes should not be so
VI, Section 26
legislation. The Court has previously ruled that the
one-
subject requirement under the Constitution is
of the Philippine
satisfied if all the parts of the statute are related,
and are
germane to the subject matter expressed in the title,
1952 …………………….71
%
1953……………………..72%
1954……………………..73%
1955……………………..74%
Provided however, that the examinee shall have no
grade lower than 50%.
Section 2 of the Act provided that “A bar candidate
who obtained a grade of 75% in any subject shall be
deemed to
have already passed that subject and the
grade/grades shall be included in the computation of
the general average in
subsequent bar examinations.”
ISSUE:
Whether of not, R.A. No. 972 is constitutional.
RULING:
Section 2 was declared unconstitutional due to the
fatal defect of not being embraced in the title of the
Act. As per itstitle, the Act should affect only the bar
flunkers of 1946 to 1955 Bar examinations. Section2
establishes a permanentsystem for an indefinite
time. It was also struck down for allowing partial
passing, thus failing to take account of thefact that
laws and jurisprudence are not stationary. As to
Section1, the portion for 1946-1951 was declared
unconstitutional, while that for 1953 to 1955 was
declared inforce and effect. The portion that was
stricken down was based under the following
reasons:
1. The law itself admits that the candidates for
admission who flunked the bar from 1946 to 1952
had inadequate preparation due to the fact that this Court. The rules laid down by Congress under this
was very close to the end of World War II; power are only minimum norms, not designed to
2. The law is, in effect, a judgment revoking the substitute the judgment of the court on who can
resolution of the court on the petitions of the said practice law; and
candidates; The pretended classification is arbitrary and amounts
3. The law is an encroachment on the Court’s to class legislation.
primary prerogative to determine who may be As to the portion declared in force and effect, the
admitted to practice Court could not muster enough votes to declare it
of law and, therefore, in excess of legislative power void. Moreover, the law was passed in 1952, to take
to repeal, alter and supplement the Rules of Court. effect in 1953. Hence, it will not revoke existing
Therules laid down by Congress under this power are Supreme Court resolutions denying admission to the
only minimum norms, not designed to substitute the bar of an petitioner. The same may also rationally
judgment of the court on who can practice law; and fall within the power to Congress to alter,
4. The pretended classification is arbitrary and supplement or modify rules of admission to the
amounts to class legislation. As to the practice of law.
portion declared in force and effect, the
Court could not muster enough votes to
declare it void. Moreover,the law was passed ISSUES OF THE CASE:Due to the far reaching effects
in 1952, to take effect in 1953. Hence, it will that this law would have on the legal profession and
not revoke existing Supreme Court the administration of justice, the
resolutionsdenying admission to the bar of S.C. would seek to know if it is CONSTITUTIONAL
an petitioner. The same may also rationally .
fall within the power to Congress to −
alter,supplement or modify rules of An adequate
admission to the practice of law. legal preparation
is one of the vital requisites for the practice of the
law that should bedeveloped constantly and
Section 2 was declared unconstitutional due to the maintained firmly.
fatal defect of not being embraced in the title of the −
Act. As per its title, the Act should affect only the bar The Judicial system from which ours has been
flunkers of 1946 to 1955 Bar examinations. Section2 derived, the act of admitting, suspending, disbarring,
establishes a permanent system for an indefinite andreinstating attorneys at law in the practice of the
time. It was also struck down for allowing partial profession is concededly judicial.
passing, thus failing to take account of the fact that −
laws and jurisprudence are not stationary. The Constitution, has not conferred on Congress and
the S.C. equal responsibilities concerningthe
As to Section1, the portion for 1946-1951 was admission to the practice of law. The primary power
declared unconstitutional, while that for 1953 to and responsibility which the constitutionrecognizes
1955 was declared in force and effect. The portion continue to reside in this court.
that was stricken down was based under the −
following reasons: Its
retroactivity is invalid
The law itself admits that the candidates for in such a way, that what the law seeks to “cure” are
admission who flunked the bar from 1946 to 1952 not the rules set in place bythe S.C. but the lack of
had inadequate preparation due to the fact that this will or the defect in judgment of the court, and this
was very close to the end of World War II; power is not included in the power granted by the
The law is, in effect, a judgment revoking the Const. to Congress,
resolution of the court on the petitions of the said it lies exclusively w/in the judiciary
candidates; .
The law is an encroachment on the Court’s primary −
prerogative to determine who may be admitted to Reasons for
practice of law and, therefore, in excess of legislative UNCONSTITUTIONALITY:
power to repeal, alter and supplement the Rules of 1. There was a manifest
encroachment on the constitutional responsibility of opponents state that the use of foreign law is simply
the Supreme Court an act of “cherry picking” whereby judges choose the
.2. It is in effect a judgment revoking the resolution laws that help support their own positions.
of the court, and only the S.C. may revise or alter Furthermore, the use of foreign law has also been
them, inattempting to do so R.A. 972 violated the viewed as one of the tactics of judicial activism.
Constitution.3. That
congress has exceeded its power to repeal, alter, and The kind of application of foreign law described
supplement the rules on admission tothe bar above is, however, not the real object of the present
(since the rules made by congress must elevate the discussion, as I understand it. The main question
profession, and those rules promulgated addressed ten years ago, and that we are revisiting
areconsidered the bare minimum.)4. today, concerns the referential framework within
It is a class legislation which judges operate. In other words, the question is
5. whether the legal rules and social standards of other
Art. 2 of R.A. 972 states and legal systems are or should become
is not embraced in the title of the law, contrary to operational in domestic legal systems through the
what the constitution enjoins, andbeing inseparable agency of judges. More generally, what elements
from the provisions of art. 1, the entire law is void and standards do judges take into account, or should
they take into account, when interpreting national
jurisprudence-the philosophy of law the study, law? In that sense, the question is not, for example,
knowledge, or science of law. whether an international treaty has legal effects in a
Jurisprudence--the study of legal philosophies, domestic legal order, or whether a legal rule of a
theories and perspectives- foreign state or, by the same token, of a member
---Philosophical interpretation of the nature and state is relevant to deciding a case, but rather what
purpose of law. criteria should inform judges when they are deciding
It is your idea and beliefs about what the purpose of such a problem.
the law should be.
What is International Law?
International law is the term given to the rules which
govern relations between states.
The scope of jurisprudence is vast and diverse,
covering various topics such as legal logic, legal Despite the absence of any superior authority to
frameworks, human behaviour, politics, economics enforce such rules, international law is considered by
and culture. states as binding upon them, and it is this fact which
gives these rules the status of law. So, for example,
where a state wishes to avoid a particular rule, it will
foreign law for a number of reasons. Often,
not argue that international law does not exist, but
a court will turn to foreign law in order to merely that states have not agreed that such a rule is
fill gaps in domestic law, especially if to be binding upon them, or that the rule does not
domestic law does not provide satisfactory apply to the particular circumstances.
answers to a particular legal question.
Unlike national or domestic law, international law is
Moreover, in some cases, judges may not set down in any legislation approved by a
encounter a novel legal question for which parliament. Even multilateral treaties do not apply to
domestic jurisprudence is entirely unfit to all states, but only to those which have consented to
answer. Lastly, principles and opinions be so bound, by signing and ratifying or acceding to
them. As a result, the precise rules of international
found in foreign judgments can be used to
law are often more difficult to identify than national
enhance and sharpen a judge’s legal laws, and may be found in a variety of sources.
reasoning.
However, the use of foreign law is not free from Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of
controversy. One of the most basic criticisms is that Justice directs the Court to apply the following
foreign law does not accurately reflect the national sources of law in deciding disputes:
experience and the national legal culture. Other
"(a) international conventions, whether general or declared conclusive
particular, establishing rules expressly recognised by by statute.
contesting states; Conclusive
presumptions may
(b) international custom, as evidence of a general not be controverted.
practice accepted as law; (2) All presumptions,
other than conclusive
(c) the general principles of law recognised by presumptions, are
civilised nations; disputable
presumptions and
(d) … judicial decisions and the teachings of the most may be controverted.
highly qualified publicists of the various nations, as
subsidiary means for the determination of rules of when a couple is married and the wife gives birth,
law.” the presumption that the husband is the child's
father is a conclusive presumption, regardless of how
Processual presumption means much evidence there is to the contrary.
Conflict of laws is a part of the municipal law of So when we talk about the issue in China, the refusal
thestate. Meaning what will govern the situation toapologize. Is that an issue involving public or
whenthere is a foreign element? Our laws. We do privateinternational law? Those comfort women.
not lookother laws.2. There is a casebefore the SC involving comfort
women asking forremuneration for the suffering
Here, it directs the courts and administrative they experienced duringthe Japanese occupation.
agencies.You remember Article 1753 that we Japan refused to acknowledge. Isthat private or
discussedyesterday? The law of the country of public? Both mentioned are under
destination willgovern the loss, destruction or publicinternational law
deterioration of thegoods. So it is directed to the
courts, telling the courtswhat law to apply. Let us say SOURCES OF CONFLICT OF LAWS:
we have a flight fromManila to Russia. Goods are 1.
sent to Russia. Goods arelost. Then a case is filed in
the Philippines. Can our ourts automatically use our Civil Code;2.
laws on transportation?Under art 1753, the law of
destination. Our courtshave to look the Russian law Code of Commerce;3.
on transportation. So it istelling the courts what law
to use.3. Special laws- Foreign Investment Act,
CorporationCode, General Banking Act, Intellectual
A legal problem involving a foreign element. If there Property Code.COGSA is a US Law. Warsaw
isno foreign element, then there is no conflict of law Convention is a treaty.4.
tospeak of.4.
Multinational treaties and international
Application or non-application of a foreign conventionssuch as Warsaw Convention and Geneva
law.Perhaps our municipal law will tell us that Convention,bilateral treaties;5.
ourdomestic law will apply or the foreign law will
apply.So this is what we talked about in the Law of Nations- lex rei sitae or lex situs, or
beginning, the scopeand function of the subject, the formalitiesof contracts as where the contract is
determination of whichcountry has jurisdiction. The executed;6.
determination in theapplicable case of either the
local or the foreign law andthe determination of the Jurisprudence- local or foreign;7.
force, validity and effectivenessof the foreign
judgment. These are the main topics.Let us Constitution
distinguish. Private international law from
publicinternational law
PrivateInternational Law- Municipal inCharacte So jurisdiction in international law is the right of the
Involves PrivateIndividuals orPersons, Natural stateto exercise authority over persons within its
orJuridical boundaries.So we are not talking about jurisdiction
of the RTC, MTC.But jurisdiction of the state. Where
Betwween Persons do you file? What statehas jurisdiction? Remember
When you want to file an action you go to court Warsaw Convention underarticle 28? In any action
involving internationaltransportation, there are 4
places where we can file theaction- the place of the
Public InternationalLaw domicile of the carrier, the placewhere the contract
was entered into, the principal place ofbusiness, the
nternational incharacter place of destination
So we are talking about the state. Not the court over the person is proper service of
which has jurisdiction.So the state does not assume summons.Jurisdiction over the res by proper
jurisdiction overambassadors, diplomats, or other attachment of propertyhere in the Philippines
states under publicinternational law
Jurisdiction over the subject matter is the authority
So we have to distinguish between judicial of thecourt to hear and determine cases of a general
jurisdictionwhich is the authority of the state to take class towhich the proceedings in question belong. It
hold of any judicial matters it seems fit by making its is conferredby law. It is the law itself which tells us
courts andagencies assume jurisdiction over cases what are thesubject matter to which the particular
before them.Legislative jurisdiction which is the court has jurisdiction. Cannot conferred by consent
power of the state toexercise control through rules of the parties orvoluntary submission. So in relation
on law, interest of person,thing, event or situation to that we have thecase of Saudi Arabian Airlines. In
this case, this womanMilagros Morada worked as a
So insofar as we are concerned in conflict of laws we flight attendant for Saudia.In April 1990, during lay-
lookat three types of jurisdiction. Let us go to an over in Jakarta, Milagros went todisco with Thamer
example John,an American, married Maria, a and Allah. When they were in the hote
Filipina. After 3 months,she discovered that John is
homosexual, left thePhilippines after such discovery. In relation to conflict of laws, a state has the power
Maria filed an action forannulment and damages toexercise judicial jurisdiction over an individual on
with the RTC here in thePhilippines. Since John was one ormore of the following base
already out of the country,summon by publication
was made. You know that underRule 15 section 15 Proper service of summons if he is here. If the
under extraterritorial service ofsummons foreigndefendant is here. That is presence;2.
Now 1stquestion, is summon by publication
allowed? Yesbecause it is action in rem and further Domicile. If he is domiciled here. If he is a resident;3.
involves thepersonal status of the plaintiff. That is
jurisdiction over theperson. When is jurisdiction If he is a national of this country or a citizen. It
acquired? Upon properservice of summons. So if it is couldbe that the plaintiff is a foreigner and the
summon by publication, jurisdiction is acquired over defendant isa national;4.
the person of the foreigndefendan
Does the RTC have the jurisdiction to annul the Consent. If the person allows the state to acquire
marriage?Yes. Because it has jurisdiction over the jurisdiction. This is not jurisdiction over the
res, the annulmentitself.Does the RTC have subjectmatter. This is jurisdiction over the person.
jurisdiction to award damages? No.even if the Theconsent of the person is significant.5.
marriage has been annulled because an awardfor
damages is a judgment in personam Appearance in the action;6.
What if John has property in the Philippines, can the Doing business in the state;7.
court
satisfy John’s liability for damages of such property? Act done in the state;8.
No.
John never incurred personal liability therefore Causing an effect to the state by an act
hisproperties cannot be held liable unless the court doneelsewhere;9.
haspreviously acquired jurisdiction over such
property byattachment or any other proceeding in Ownership, possession or use of the thing in the
rem state;10.
Now with respect to the subject matter, does the Other relationships to the state which made
RTC has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the theexercise of jurisdiction reasonable
case filed byMaria against John? Yes. This is an
action for thedeclaration of nullity of marriage or What is the difference between an appeal and
annulment. RTC has jurisdiction over annulment. RTC application to vary an order?
has jurisdiction over thesubject matter.Jurisdiction
An application to vary is made to the original court
asking that court to vary its own order or judgment.
An appeal is brought to a higher court (i.e., the Court
of Appeal) asking it to overturn the original court’s
order or judgment
No 'judicial
That courts apply the law is tritely true. legislation' in
When a court applies the law, what exactly is it
applying? This is not a trick question. Courts are said
ruling on cases
to ‘apply’ all sorts of things: statutes, rules,
Legislative department is assigned the power to make
principles, policies, doctrines, other courts’ views,
and enact laws.
and more. Is ‘the law’ the name of another item on
this list? That sounds wrong. Or is it by applying Judicial legislation is defined as the move of a court
some or any of those items that courts apply the to step in to craft missing parts, to fill in the gaps in
law? And if it is, can we give a principled criterion for laws, or when it oversteps its discretional boundaries
determining what the list contains? and goes beyond the law to coin doctrines or
principles which are not previously established.
A second set of questions regards the indirect object
of law-application. Courts do not just apply the law; SC’s need to have its own complex, Aquino
they apply it to something. To what, exactly? To complained about delays in court proceedings and
cases? To facts? To the ‘facts of the particular case’ the high court’s supposed tendency to go beyond its
before them, as the common phrase goes? We also mandate.
say that a court applies the law in a certain case; and
in deciding a certain case. Are all these the same? Look back at the controversial issues faced by the
And what precisely is it to apply the law to a case? judiciary, like situations when the position of one or
Indeed – what is a ‘case’? a few justices were puzzling, when the court’s
decision about an important issue suddenly changed
Third, there are questions about the content of law- or there is so-called judicial legislation)
application. Is ‘applying the law’ the name of a
specific type of act? If so, what are its distinctive Judicial legislation refers to a court’s actions that
features? If not – what then? There are also things involve filling in the gaps of laws or overstepping
courts are said to do – decisions they are said to boundaries of the judicial branch of government. It
issue – by applying the law. Are these themselves means going beyond the law to create doctrines and
acts of law-application? principles not available previously.
There is no obvious order in which to address these Aquino has previously questioned decisions of the
issues. Any attempt to deal with the questions in one SC, including that of the now defunct Disbursement
set would benefit from our having first tackled those Acceleration Program (DAP).
in the others. Still, we need a strategy, and mine will
be to leave the first set of questions for last. I will He, at that time, warned of a clash between the
not explicitly discuss the direct object of law- executive and the judiciary because DAP was
application before the very end of the paper; and declared partly unconstitutional.
until then, for convenience, I will focus on the
application of statutory and other written legal
provisions – indisputable instances of law- “In every en banc session we continue to debate on
application. whether what we are doing is actually legislation or
maybe it is still within the bounds of what we can
What is meant by judicial legislation? do,” she said.
noun. : laws held to be created by the
pronouncements of a judge who departs from a “It will redound to a question of what the final vote
strict interpretation of a law according to the will be. So it’s an evolving thing but we are mindful
manifest intention of the legislature. of that need to maintain that line