1

1. Imprisonment

Laws in India regarding Imprisonment

Table of Contents
1. Imprisonment
o Types of Imprisonment
o Life Imprisonment Meaning
2. Purpose of Imprisonment
3. Life imprisonment in India
o Judicial precedents on duration of Life imprisonment
 Double Life Imprisonment in India
 What is in the Constitution?
o List of offenses liable for Life Imprisonment
o How many years is a Life Imprisonment
 Section 57 of IPC
 What can be the reason for the release of
prisoners?
o Comparison with other countries
 Impact of Life Imprisonment
4. Difference between Women and Men Prisoners
o Advantages and Disadvantages of Life Imprisonment
 Advantages
 Disadvantages
5. Life Imprisonment vs Death Penalty

 Remission of Sentence in India

o Pardoning Power of the President
o Pardoning Power of the Governor

 Meaning of discretionary power

o Prison conditions in India
o Prison statistics India 2015 report

Imprisonment

Imprisonment is the word which means taking away the freedom of prisoners when
they are punished by a court of law. They are locked up in prison and all the rights are
taken away they are not given any rights which are under Article 21 or 32 of the
Constitution of India. They have to stay in jail till the end of the imprisonment given by
the court of law before that they are not allowed to be released from the jail.

Types of Imprisonment
1. Mandatory imprisonment- When any person commits a crime it becomes
mandatory to give him/her punishment for that crime because if the person
who commits crime are left with no punishment he will become dangerous to
society it harms whole public. This is the reason criminals are not kept free
after he commits any crime they have to face imprisonment.
2. Maximum sentences- The person who commits crime they got life
imprisonment and the duration of life imprisonment is decided by a court of
law. The minimum life imprisonment is 14 years but it can extend upto 30
years of life imprisonment.
3. Minimum life imprisonment- The minimum life imprisonment is for 14 years.
It is decided by the Supreme Court of India.
4. False imprisonment- Many times people unlawfully caught by the police and
get imprisonment because of false crime.

Life Imprisonment Meaning

Life imprisonment means the whole life in prison. Prisoners has to end up their life in
prison. They have no other options of release. According to the Supreme Court life
imprisonment means jail term for the prisoner for entire life.
 There will be no release before fourteen or twenty years of life
imprisonment.
 The prisoner has no such right as to release.
 The period of life imprisonment cannot be reduced. It cannot be less than 14
years.

Under what cases life imprisonment can be granted under IPC?

1
 2

The report is based on the punishment of imprisonment for life in the Indian Penal
Code. Itdeals with the sentence of imprisonment for life which is rigorous or simple.
The State Government has clarified the law on imprisonment for life in this report. This
report is made by the Law Commision of India for the clarification of law. According to
this report, the offences under Indian Penal Code have come into effect in the year
1956 on 1st of january. And the Code of Criminal Procedure came into Existence in the
year 1955. After this report two old laws were replaced namely punishment of
transportation for life.

Purpose of Imprisonment
There are five purposes of Life imprisonment:
1. Punishment: when any person commits a crime, they are punished by a
court of law then put in the jail that deprives them of all their freedom and
removes them from their society. Punishment may change the person into a
good person and return their fundamental freedoms and also give them a
chance to live in society freely with their family members. Sometimes it also
provides them work so they again, don’t commit a crime. So punishment is
important for the criminals.
2. Deterrence: deterrence is another type of punishment for the offenders so
that they don’t repeat their crime again because punishment teaches values
to the offender and give them an opportunity to change themselves and
transform them into a law-abiding citizen.
3. Public protection: when any person commits big crime like murder or rape,
they have to face life imprisonment as ordered by the judge. This is the only
reason we can protect the public from these criminals.
4. Rehabilitation: rehabilitation means when a prisoner is ready to accept the
crime he has committed and take some necessary steps to change
themselves in that case the government chooses to give them an
opportunity, in prison itself, to change.
5. No other choice: after committing crime prisoner have no choice of release
they have to face imprisonment.

Case laws
The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir vs State of J&K & others
1. The details of the petitioner about the period of the sentence was given in
paragraph 1 which petitioner has undergone till 31.05.2012
2. If we want to deal with the issue of the case in the right way and reach to
the conclusion of the case.
Here are some of the questions to discuss through which we can deal with the case in
the right manner.
 Whether life imprisonment means entire natural life or 20 years of life
imprisonment?
 Whether a life convict can be released automatically after completion of
twenty years without any orders from the state, including the jail
authorities?

When I went through the provisions of the law, I reached the conclusion that life
imprisonment means imprisonment for life and it does not automatically come to an
end without any order from the competent authority.

Some more related cases with a similar matter came up for consideration before a
division bench of this court.

Md. Munna vs Union Of India & Ors on 16 September, 2005

Facts of the case:
The writ petition is filed under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution. The petitioner was
found guilty of murder. And previously he has already got imprisonment for life for 21
years. In this petitioner claimed that life imprisonment should be equivalent to 20
years and further subject to remission admissible under law.

Life imprisonment in India

Under article 72 and 161 CrPC life imprisonment means the entire life in prison which is
guaranteed under the Code of Criminal Procedure. The minimum duration of life
imprisonment is of 14 years and also commuted the death sentence to the prisoner.
Judicial precedents on duration of Life imprisonment

Case laws:
Maru Ram Etc. Etc vs Union Of India & Anr on 11
Facts of the case:

2
 3

This case is based on the power of remission act under article 72 and 161. Revisiting
the law on remission – The Hindu. In this case the Constitutional Validity of Section
433-A of the Criminal Procedure court, 1973 was upheld. Petitioner has filed a case
alleging the provisions of Article 14, 20(1), 72, and 161 of the Constitution of
India.Landmark judgment

Rajiv Gandhi assassination case

Facts of the case:
On the date of 25.5.1991 Rajiv Gandhi with his former Prime Minister of India faced a
terrorist attack with a human bomb. There were more than 15 persons and 9
policemen including 43 persons get severely injured by this terrorist attack. When the
investigation started, police officials found some footprints of the criminals. Criminals
are caught after the testing of footprints and they are punished under Terrorist and
Disruptive activities act, Indian Penal code, Explosive Substances Act, Arms Act,
Passport Act, Foreigners Act and the Indian Wireless Telegraphy act. 26 persons has to
face the criminal trial and others are commited suicide because of threat of trial. The
court has 288 witness against those terrorists during the trial. All the terrorist has to
face death sentence.

Case law on power of remission

Gautam Dutta vs State of Jharkhand 10 Feb, 2016
Facts of the case-
The boy named Atif Mustafa get kidnapped intentionally and the kidnappers murdered
him and disposed of his body to protect themselves from the criminal trial. M.D Safique
is already in the court trial. During the court trial court find about his second crime of
kidnapping a boy with his three friends. Court find them and convicted them for the
offense of kidnapping which is punishable under section 364a ,120b ipc.

Double Life Imprisonment in India

Like everyone human being has one life, as prisoners has also one life to live so
prisoners cannot serve consecutive sentences of life imprisonment. But according to
Supreme court constitutional bench life sentence would be twice or thrice of the
heinous crimes like rape murder, etc. The court said that multiple life imprisonment will
be served consecutively. Chief Justice of India has interpreted the law that in multiple
imprisonment prisoners would be anomalous and irrational.

In a first, rare double-death and double-life sentence for man who raped,
murdered 2-year-old girl.

In Nagpur city the 21 year old man raped her 2 year niece and murdered her. The case
was filed in the Bombay high court. The sentence was the first of its kind, given
under Section 376A of the Indian Penal Code, under an amendment made in
light of the gruesome Nirbhaya rape case in delhi( 2012 Delhi gang rape). The
Nagpur bench confirmed the rare double-death and double-life sentence to the 21 year
old man. In the Divison Bench, comprising Justice Bhushan Gavai and Justice Prasanna
Varale confirmed the verdict of a Yavatmal sessions court sentencing Shatrughan
Masaram to death for raping and murdering his two year child.

Report On The Punishment Of Imprisonment For Life

This is the thirty-nine report of the law commission on the subject of life imprisonment
for life under the Indian penal code. Some time ago the Ministry of Home Affairs asked
question to the Law Commission of India about the punishment of life imprisonment in
India. This question was asked because the State governments wanted clarification on
this subject matter and because IPC and CrPC were under revision.

What is in the Constitution?

In the Constitution of India it is now mentioned that the sentence of life imprisonment
will be of 14 years. In any crime culprit will be punished according to their crime and it
will be decided by the court that punishment will be given to which culprit. For the
serious crime like murder and rape, culprit will get life imprisonment or death sentence
in any manner. There will be no pardon of life imprisonment and death sentences.
This decision is taken in the year 2012 by the Supreme Court of India and life
imprisonment is not limited it can extend upto 25 years. Culprits cannot claim
regarding their release from the prison and neither their family or friends. Constitution
of India mentioned rules and regulations regarding life imprisonment

1. Life imprisonment is 14, 20 or 25 years.

2. It can extend upto whole life.

3
 4

3. Life imprisonment can go till the end of life.

4. After the life imprisonment culprit has to face all the circumstances in the
jail.
5. They cannot claim about their release.
6. Life imprisonment cannot be pardon.

There are some reasons behind 14 years of life imprisonment.

Under section 432 and 433 of the CrPC it is mentioned about the 14 years of life
imprisonment. This is a very serious misconception about 14 years of life imprisonment
in India. Because life imprisonment is not limited to 14 years. It can extend as much as
the action of the prisoner. Life imprisonment is dependent on the action of the
prisoner. Life imprisonment can be reduced if the prisoner proves themselves in prison.
Death sentence can also be pardoned in the case of prisoner’s action and reaction
noticed in the prison. Otherwise there life becomes hell in prison if they don’t act nicely
in the prison. The convict can be released, first they have to fulfill some of the
conditions of the prisons.
List of offenses liable for Life Imprisonment
SL.
Section Offense Punishment
No
Waging, abetting
1 121 against the Life imprisonment and death sentence.
government of india.
Abetment is committed Death and life sentence for 10 years or
2 132
in other consequences. fine
False evidence shown Death sentence, life imprisonment and
3 194 in the court during the fine can be charged as decided by the
court proceedings. court.
Murder is mentioned in
4 302 Death sentence, life imprisonment.
this article.
5 303 Dacoity in murder or
Death sentence or life imprisonment or
6 364A more number of
fine.
7 396 murders are caused.

Indian Penal code has 34 sections which talks about the offences which are punishable
with imprisonment of life or death sentence or fine. For this offence there is no
maximum limit for the imprisonment.

Punishment has no uniformity. It get changed, according to the crime caused. It can
extend for whole life. It could be of 7 years, 10 years, 14, 20, 25, 30 or for whole life
till death. Here I mentioned some more offenses:

If any person tries to omit any public servant who is under

7 222
sentence or lawfully committed.
8 225 Try to obstruct or resist lawfully any other person is an offence.
9 232 If Indian coins are counterfeited is an offence. .
10 238 Importing or exporting counterfeits of Indian coin is an offence.
11 255 Government coins cannot be counterfeited.
Being a wrong thing of any crime is also considered as an
12 311
offence.
13 313 Abortion or misscarriage is a serious offence.
14 314 If someone killed any woman for the misscarriage.
Cause damage by the weapons to any other person
15 326
intentionally.

How many years is a Life Imprisonment

Years are not fixed for life imprisonment. It is for whole life also. Because of Life
imprisonment prisoner can get death penalty if he or she has committed heinous
crimes like rape and murder. For this type of crime Supreme court said prisoners will
get double-prisonment. There is no uniformity in the life imprisonment. Life
imprisonment is for 14 years. It may also last for 25 years. It depends on the type of
crime committed by the prisoner. Prisoner has no right of the release. This is a very big
misconception in Indian law that Life imprisonment can only of 14 years it can extend
by noticing the action of the prisoner in the prison. It can be reduced if prisoner
proves themselves guilty of not doing the crime. Its minimum limit is 14 years.
4
 5

Section 57 of IPC
Case laws:
1. Lakkhi vs The State of Rajasthan
Facts of the case
This case is based on the years of life imprisonment. Prisons Act, 1894, Prisons Rule,
1958, Rajasthan Prisons Rule, 1958 and Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules,
1958 has some different statutes and rules different from the provisions of CrPC, IPC
and Constitution of India. There are different sections of IPC like section 53, section 57,
section 511 in which different types of life imprisonment are defined. And in the section
432 and 433, CrPC suspension and remission is defined. The government imposes
power of remission in certain cases. Power of remission is mentioned in the section 433
and 432 in the CrPC.
Some more cases are referred:
 Gopal Vinayak Godse vs The State Of Maharashtra
 Bhagirath & Ors vs Delhi Administration on 16 April, 1985
 Subhas Chandra Bose vs R. Knight And Sons And Anr. on 30 January …

Facts of the case:

The editor of the Statesman newspaper copyright the words of the leading article of
Earl of Lytton. Because of this plaintiff Subhash chandra Bose sues the defendant on
this issue.
But in the month of october Local government of Bengal has got the power from the
Governor-General to arrest the person who believed to be guilty of the crime and
arrest them and lodged in the jail.

What can be the reason for the release of prisoners?

There are many reasons when prisoners can get release:
1. When any person wrongly caught for any crime then he can get release.
2. If any person change themselves and prove themselves in front of police that
they will not commit any other crimes then he can get release.
3. If any women in the period of life imprisonment get pregnant or she has any
other reproductive problem then she can be released.
4. Before 14 years no prisoners get released.

Impact of Life Imprisonment

Effects of prison:
Prisoners has a very bad effect of the prison in their life. Prison’s main aim is to cure
the criminals and make them a good person so they can live in the particular society
with normal people with full freedom. Prisons have their own culture, rules and
regulations. Prisoners has to follow the rules and regulations of the prisons and they
have no choice in their life. They always have a fear of deterioration.

They lack personal choices and they have to work according to the prisons rules. They
have to dedicate their lives to the prison. But some people in the prison get completely
changed or unscathed by the prison experience. As we see prisons are very painful,
and incarcerated persons suffer very long-term imprisonment and because of that are
affected with a lot of pain, deprivation, etc.

 Effect of prison in children

Thousands of children are, every day, locked up in the prison due to different reasons.
They are locked up with adults. In some of the prisons youth get the quality education
in the prison to make him a good person and can be relieved from the prison after a
short period of time. This type of prisons are also called as schools.

Health facilities are also provided to the children in the prison. They are cared for in the
prison in every manner possible. Many youths are facing solitary confinement for only
22 to 24 hours. This punishment is very harsh on children because they have to face
physical injuries, emotional trauma and many more things.

The death penalty for young offender is banned by the Supreme Court of India.
Because below the age of 18 youth are immature, irresponsible. This is very important
for young prisoners to be treated nicely and help them to improve themselves with
feelings of happiness and joy. If they are not treated well, they can face severe mental
trauma. It can also affect their life very badly.

Case law

5
 6

Raju vs. State of UP & another

Facts of the case:
This case is related to Protection of Children Act and THE JUVENILE JUSTICE (CARE
AND PROTECTION OF CHILDREN. In this case there were two boys named Raju and
Ashish who are bullies and goondas of the area. They ever-tested and molested the
daughter of defendant. Then the brother of the girl came at the scene and tried to
protect her but Raju and Ashish pushed both of them into the pool.

 Effect of prisons in women

According to the Criminal Justice System women are supported in the prison. They are
treated well in prison. Female prison population in India is 53%. They are increasing
day by day. The reason for the increase in women’s population in prison is, they get
involved in drug trade. The women who belongs from lower community they generally
get involved in drug trade because of shortage of money, shortage of food etc.. They
don’t have houses to live so they have to get involved in this trade forcefully because
of their families. This trade destroy the life of a woman because of this their children
get harmed.
Difference between Women and Men Prisoners

Woman in prison Men in prison

1. Women’s prison- 84% Men’s prison- 76%
Offences- robbery, sexual offences,
2. Offences- theft, involved in drug trade.
fraud, drugs, and motoring offences
3. 80% theft because of shoplifting. Because of many reasons.
4. 28% woman’s crimes were financially
20% of men.
motivated.
5. Sentenced woman- 22% Sentenced men- 12%
6. TV licence evasion accounted-36% Men- 6%

Psychological effects
The prison was originally designed to allow prisoners to rediscover themselves like
conscience and better voice through conversion. Unfortunately, it was later discovered
that it is a form of torture because it ended up causing many prisoners adverse
psychological effects such as:
1. Delusion
2. Dissatisfaction with life
3. Claustrophobia
4. Depression
5. Feeling of panic
6. And on many instances madness
7. Stress
8. Denial
9. Nightmares and the inability to sleep
10. Phobias
11. Substance abuse
12. Criminal activity
13. And some forms of self-destructive behavior
14. Guilt
15. Shame
16. Suicidal tendencies
Other effects are
1. Depend on institutional structure and contingencies
2. Interpersonal distrust and suspicion
3. Emotional over-control, alienation, and psychological distancing
4. Social withdrawal and isolation.
5. Incorporation of exploitative norms of prison culture.
6. Diminished sense of self-worth and personal value.
7. Post-traumatic stress reactions are shown in the prisoner during the pain of
prison.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Life Imprisonment

Advantages

6
 7

 If a person commits a crime like rape or murder, it gives a very serious

impact on the life of victim or victim’s family because of this their lives get
destroyed. So accused get life imprisonment or death sentence.
 Capital punishment means if legallly someone is killing someone then as a
punishment takeing the life of the person is not valid.
 Life imprisonment gives a chance to the criminals to realize their mistakes so
their life imprisonment or death sentence can be pardoned or remitted.
 Prisons give chance to prisoner to study and explore themselves in good
works they provide them employment so they can change the prisoner to
release them from the prison.
 Prisons for youth is very favorable. They try to help them with all the
facilities and guidelines to improve them and support them so they can live
in the particular society with normal people.
 Prisons provide good food and health facilities and many more facilities to
the prisoners to change themselves or to live a happy life.
 Many prisoners get released of their change and they are allowed to live in
the particular society and with a job, so they can earn something for their
own lives and change their life and their family’s life.
Disadvantages
 Life imprisonment cannot be given to prisoner for capital punishment as they
are not only responsible for the crime. This is the biggest mistake it can
make the prisoners’ life hell.
 Capital punishment is the way in which we can pass some messages to the
normal individual.
 Capital punishment help to remove dangerous criminals from society making
it a safer place for the people.
 Life imprisonment can help people from the discrimination which they are
facing in the society due to their crime, which should be corrected by giving
capital punishment to murderers.
Life Imprisonment vs Death Penalty

Life imprisonment Death penalty

1. Life imprisonment is not so
harsh because it also help
prisoners to change
themselves, it is not so cruel
like death sentence.
2. Life imprisonment gives chance to
prisoners to change themselves by
providing them with schools and
colleges in the school to explore
themselves and they are also provided
with health facilities, etc. and also help
them to keep in touch with their
families.
3. It gives chance to prisoners so they
can realise their mistake and get to
know what bad things are done. They
get a chance to correct their mistake
during life imprisonment.
Death penalty is defined as the death
sentence which is given to the prisoner for
their crime.
Death penalty is very cruel and harsh to
prisoners it doesnt give any chance to
proove themselves if they are given death
sentence by the court.
In death penalty the prisoner only get
death sentence. In case if their family
members or friends get a chance to prove
them right then death sentence can be
pardon.

Remission of Sentence in India

Power of remission is defined in the section 432 and 433 of Criminal Code of
Procedure. Life imprisonment is subjected to Statutory Powers of Remission. If
punishment is given with the executive process then remission can be premature
release in a sentence of life imprisonment. Because of the Power of Remission Act
punishment which is decided by the judiciary has the very serious. It can disturb the
constitutional balance as well as separation of powers.

Power of remission is important when we have to review the premature release. Under
section 302 of Indian Penal Code prisoners can file a writ petition against Jail
Authorities. If Jail Authorities for placing their case in front of State Advisory Boards
for shortening their life imprisonment.

 Life imprisonment without the possibility of release.

Supreme court gives the decision of death penalty or life imprisonment without the
possibility of release. Prisoners has to face lime imprisonment for life. They have no
chance of release. They have to spend their whole life in the prison.
7
 8

Pardoning Power of the President

President of India is the head of the state. And the powers of the president is always
termed as an extraordinary power which includes grant of pardon. The constitution of
India also grants the power of pardon to the President of India. The power of pardon is
mentioned in Article 72 of the Indian Constitution.

Rules of pardon the death sentence:

1. If punishment is given by the court martial the president has the power to
pardon or commute the sentence of any person.
2. The offences which is committed which is related to law or it belongs to the
executive power of the union.
3. President can pardon death sentence.

Pardoning Power of the Governor

Meaning of discretionary power
Discretionary means “freedom to act according to one’s judgment”. Governor has
the power of discretion means he has the power or right to take decisions freely. He
can exercise his power in his own individual judgement without the advice of the
council of ministers.

Discretionary power is divided into two parts:

1. Specific Discretionary Powers: in this Governor uses his specific powers to
take the decisions of certain case. Certain responsibilities are provided to
governor for the discretionary power. He is not bound to anyone. He doesn’t
have to ask anyone for the decision. Powers can only be used in time of legal
requirement.
2. Circumstantial Discretionary Power: many times the power of the Governor
become circumstantial. Governor is not questionable in any manner if he
doesn’t take decisions in the time of discretion. Governor decision is final in
his discretion.

Prison conditions in India

In some major cities of the country that we visit, and probably we see some, unlucky
faces who gets arrested and tortured, or worse, by the hands of the police. In many
countries entirely there is lack of protections for civil liberties available in India.
Though, some in linking in advance that we would find extensive police abuse of
detainees. It is not yet discovered about the conditions of prisons and jails, to which
detainees are sent after the police are done with them.

If incarceration is meant to punish, life inside the prisons will be worse. Though prisons
are supposed to be leveling institutions in which the variables that affect the conditions
of confinement are expected to be the criminal records of their inmates and their
behavior in prison, other factors play a part in many countries. But India and Pakistan
have retained colonial-era regulations that explicitly counter the concept of prison as a
leveler.

The management of prisons falls exclusively under the domain of the State
Government, as per the seventh schedule of the constitution. In every state, the prison
administrative machinery works under the chief of prisons who is a senior ranking IPS
officer. Indian prisons face three long-standing structural constraints, overcrowding,
thanks to a high percentage of undertrials in the prison population, understaffing and
underfunding. The inevitable outcome is subhuman living conditions, poor hygiene, and
violent clashes between the inmates and jail authorities.

Role of Indian Police in Administration of Criminal Justice

The Indian police play a significant part in the criminal justice system. The primary
goals of the police are to assist the victim immediately, take preventative measures,
apprehend the accused, fairly investigate the crime, and enforce and preserve law and
order conditions.
In this post, you will learn about the role of the Indian police in the administration of
criminal justice. It will provide information and insights into the specific responsibilities
and functions performed by the Indian police in the context of the criminal justice
system.

Powers of Police Officers

History of Police Administration in India
Meaning of Police
Meaning of Police Station

8
 9

Role of Police in the Administration of Criminal Justice

Section 36 of CrPC: Powers of Superior Officers of Police

Powers of Police Officers

The Criminal Procedure Code does not mention anything about the constitution of the
police. It assumes the existence of the police and devolves various powers and
responsibilities onto it. More expansive powers have been given to police officers in
charge of a police station.

History of Police Administration in India

The first British leader to attempt to reform the police system was Lord Cornwallis. In
1791, he appointed a Superintendent of Police for Calcutta, and from that point on, he
focused on the Mofussil.

Note: The term “Mofussil” refers to the rural or provincial areas of a country that are
located outside of major cities or urban centres. The term is derived from the Hindi
word “Mufassil,” which means “outskirts” or “peripheral.” In a broader sense,
“Mofussil” is associated with areas that are less developed or less urbanized compared
to metropolitan or urban regions.

In 1793, Cornwallis ordered the District Judge to open a police station every 400
square miles, staff it with a regular police station officer, and remove police authority
from the Zamindars of Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa. The Daroga was his nickname.
However, Kotwal remained in charge of the local police force.

Between 1801 and 1860, the country’s police system underwent a series of botched
attempts to be organised. First, it was attempted to be organised in various ways by
each province. A similar effort was made in 1816 by Sir Thomas Munro, who
transferred the Madras Superintendent of Police from the Judge to the roving Collector,
who was in charge of the local village police. Other provinces soon followed this.

Note: The phrase “from the Judge to the roving Collector” refers to a change in the
administrative hierarchy of the police system. In the context provided, it means that
the responsibility of overseeing the Madras Superintendent of Police was transferred
from the Judge to the Collector. The term “Judge” likely refers to a judicial official who
previously had some level of authority over the police. On the other hand, the “roving
Collector” refers to an administrative official who had the task of overseeing various
local matters, including the village police. This shift in responsibility was an attempt to
reorganize and restructure the police system during that period. [Between 1801 and
1860, there were multiple unsuccessful endeavours to establish an organized police
system in the country. Initially, each province attempted to organize it in different
ways. In 1816, Sir Thomas Munro made a similar attempt by transferring the Madras
Superintendent of Police from the Judge to the roving Collector, who was responsible
for the local village police. This approach was subsequently adopted by other
provinces.]

In the recently captured region of Sind, presently in Pakistan, Sir Charles Napier set
out in 1843 to establish a police agency modelled after the Royal Irish Constabulary.
According to his concept, the police force would still report to the Collector while being
overseen by a district-level official whose sole responsibility was supervising and
directing them. Napier established a distinct police force with its officers in charge. The
Inspector General of Police and the Superintendent of Police provided leadership
throughout Sind, respectively. The latter was answerable to the District Collector and
the Inspector General of Police.

The Governor of Bombay, Sir George Clarke, appointed full-time European

Superintendents of Police in numerous areas in 1848. The police in Bombay were
reorganised in 1853 along Napier’s standards.
The 1857 uprising made the Indian government aware of the need for immediate police
reorganisation. As a result, a commission was established in 1860 to investigate the
government’s requirement for police thoroughly. The Indian Police Act of 1861 included
its primary suggestions. The Act’s objectives were to reorganise the police and make
them a more effective tool for investigating and preventing crime. Without any
significant modifications, this Act is still in effect in India.

Meaning of Police

9
 10

According to the Indian Police Act of 1861, police means all persons who shall be
enrolled under the Act.

Meaning of Police Station

A police station is a physical facility or building operated by a law enforcement agency,
typically at a local level, where police officers carry out various administrative and
operational functions related to maintaining public order, enforcing laws, preventing
and investigating crimes, and providing assistance and services to the community. It
serves as a base of operations for police officers assigned to a particular geographic
area or jurisdiction.

Police stations often serve as a hub for receiving and responding to emergency calls,
conducting patrols, filing reports, processing arrests, conducting interviews and
interrogations, gathering evidence, and other activities related to law enforcement.
They may have holding cells or temporary detention facilities for the short-term
custody of suspects or individuals awaiting further legal processing.

Further, a beat house, unless declared generally or mainly by the state government to
be a police station, is not a police station. Whether the boundary between two police
station areas is declared or specified by the government as the midstream of a river
and that river changes its course, such change will automatically determine, increase
or decrease the territorial jurisdiction under the police stations.

Role of Police in the Administration of Criminal Justice

The police force is an instrument for the prevention and detection of crime and is
established and enrolled by every state government under the Police Act of 1861.

The Delhi Special Police Establishment Act of 1946, which established the Central
Bureau of Investigation (CBI), has played a crucial role in recent police operations. The
CBI is known for its perceived impartiality and independence, which has often led the
public to demand investigations by the CBI instead of relying on state police
investigations. In certain cases, the judiciary has bypassed the inherent restrictions
outlined in sections 3, 4, and 5 of the Act and ordered investigations to be conducted
by the CBI. This demonstrates the judiciary’s confidence in the CBI’s ability to conduct
fair and unbiased investigations.

The overall administration of the police in the entire state is vested in the Director-
General of the Police. However, the administration of police in every district vests in
the District Superintendent of Police under the general control and direction of the
District Magistrate, who is usually the Collector of the District.

Every police officer appointed to the police force other than the Inspector-General of
Police and the District Superintendent of Police receives a certificate in the prescribed
form by virtue of which he is vested with the powers, functions, and privileges of a
police officer which shall cease to be effective and shall be returned immediately when
the police officer ceases to be a police officer.

In Prakash Singh vs UOI, (2006) 3 S.C.C. (Cri) 417, the Supreme Court issued
some guidelines for the police set-up and directed the states and the centre to
reorganise their police set-up as envisaged in its judgment.

The Code of Criminal Procedure confers specific powers on the members of the police
force who are enrolled as police officers:

Power to make an arrest (section 41 of CrPC)

The procedure of arrest and duties of the officer making an arrest (section 41B
of CrPC)
Arrest how made (section 46 of CrPC)
Power to seize offensive weapons (section 52 of CrPC)
Power of police officer to take certain property (section 102 of CrPC)
Police to prevent cognisable offences (section 149 of CrPC)
Information in cognisable cases (section 154 of CrPC)
Power to investigate non-cognisable cases (section 155 of CrPC)
Power to investigate cognisable cases (section 156 of CrPC)
Procedure for investigation (section 157 of CrPC)
Power to hold investigation (section 159 of CrPC)
Power to require the attendance of witnesses (section 160 of CrPC)
Examination of witnesses by police (section 161 of CrPC)
Recording of confessions and statements (section 164 of CrPC)

10
 11

Medical examination of the victim of rape (section 164A of CrPC)

Search by a police officer (section 165 of CrPC)
Procedure when investigation can’t be completed in 24 hours (section 167 of
CrPC)
Report of the police officer on completion of the investigation (section 173 of
CrPC)
Police to enquire and report on suicide, etc. (section 174 of CrPC)
Power to summon persons (section 175 of CrPC)

The police officers in charge of police stations have been given broader powers as the
Code of Criminal Procedure requires them to play a pivotal role in investigating and
preventing crime. But they do not have powers to look into complaints that do not
contain allegations of commission of cognisable offences. Under sections 177 and 178
of the CrPC, the police have broad jurisdiction enabling them to inquire into a
complaint already filed in another jurisdiction.

Section 36 of CrPC: Powers of Superior Officers of Police

Police officers in higher ranks than the officer in charge of a police station may use the
same authority in the locality to which they are appointed as the officer in charge of
the station.

In the case of RP Kapur vs Sardar Partap Singh (1961), the Supreme Court made
a significant ruling. The court held that if the Additional Inspector-General of Police,
who holds a higher rank than the officer-in-charge of a police station, receives a
complaint from the Chief Minister of the state, and considering the accused’s status,
forwards it to the Deputy Superintendent of Police, CID, who has jurisdiction over
the entire state for investigation, it cannot be regarded as an adoption of an unlawful
procedure. The court emphasized that the provisions of this section did not restrict
such a course of action.

In State of Bihar vs JAC Soldhana (1980), the Supreme Court held that the
Inspector General of Police would have jurisdiction extending over the whole state.

Power of State Police Chief

In the case of State of Kerala vs PB Sourabhan, 2916 Cr.L.J. 1833 (1835) (S.C.),
the Supreme Court directed that the state Police Chief/Director General of Police is
empowered to appoint a superior police officer to investigate a crime case registered
outside the territorial jurisdiction of such officer. Section 36 of CrPC does not, in any
way, debar the exercise of powers by the state Police Chief to appoint any superior
officer who, in his opinion, would be competent and fit to investigate a particular case
keeping in view the circumstances thereof.

Section 36 of the Criminal Procedure Code does not restrict the authority of the state
Police Chief to issue orders based on their satisfaction. The decisive factor in making an
appointment is the satisfaction of the state Police Chief, considering the facts of a
particular case. In such situations, the jurisdictional limits prescribed by section 36 will
not impede or hinder the exercise of jurisdiction by the appointed superior officer. The
appointment will not be constrained by the limitations imposed by section 36 of the
CrPC.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Role Of Police In Criminal Justice System

To understand the Criminal Justice System is, an overture to understanding the police
official's framework. The following are some important characteristics of this system.
Criminal Law The Criminal Law consists of the substantive law contained in the Indian
Criminal Law (IPC) and the special and local laws frequently enacted by the Central
and State Legislatures, which are mainly composed of the following procedural laws
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr PC) and Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

These three major laws are IPC and CrPC and India Evidence Act was enacted by the
United Kingdom in in the second half of the 19th century and of these the particular
main law revised since independence was Cr.PC, which was revised in 1973 particularly
based on the recommendation of the Indian Legal Commission embarked by the
recommendations made by the officials. The other laws being not changed except left
with the few minor amendments.

11
 12

Substantive Act
With different crimes, various different types of punishment have been prescribed as
mentioned in the Indian Penal Code as the crime fully falls into the different categories
i.e. the crime against the state, country, the public order, customs, hygiene, crime
against property, election- related crimes, marriage related and the defamation cases.

The IPC totally consists of 511 sections and out of which 330 on penalties. The Criminal
Procedure Code have been enacted time to time and the new forms are added by the
way of amendment so that the interests of the weaker sections can be protected.

Daily a number of crimes are registered under this law, of which approximately are
related to the possession and manufacture of weapons, ammunition and explosives,
Drugs, Gambling, Immoral trafficking for women, Scheduled caste and tribal atrocities
of people, Sales taxes and bans; Smuggling; Stocking up essentials and taking profits
of Food Corruption; Traffic Crimes, etc.

Procedural Law

The Procedural Law describes the procedure for registrations, investigations, and
appropriate court trials in criminal cases leading to final disposition. Police are not
authorized to acknowledge all punishment crimes.
Criminal law falls into two categories:
a. Cognizable crimes and non-cognizable crimes.
b. Criminal Justice Proceedings
The process of criminal justice has the following major steps
Step 1 Registration of a First Information Report (FIR). The criminal justice process
begins with the registration of the first intelligence report. An FIR is a document
created by the police when they receive information about the execution of a
recognizable crime.
Step 2 . Police officers go to the crime scene and investigate facts of the case. Police
investigations mainly include:
a. Criminal investigations
b. Witnesses and suspects investigations
c. Name records of the accused
d. Conducting investigations
e. Seizure of property
f. Collection of fingerprints, footprints, and other scientific evidence
g. Record reference and entry Case Diaries, diaries, station diaries, etc.
predetermined record of the investigations conducted.
h. Arrest and detention

Defendant Interrogation
After the step 3 of investigation is complete, the Office in Charge of Police Department
sends a report to the local Magistrate which is called as the charge sheet when
considered. The report sent by Investigator is in the form of a claim if there is sufficient
evidence to prosecute Defendant.
1. When sufficient evidence is not available to prosecute the defendant, such a
report is referred to as a final report and the same is taken for consideration.
Upon receipt of the Step 4 claim, the court will begin a trial of the case with
recognition.
2. Charges to the accused are framed and after following the procedure, the
prosecution must definitely prove the defendant's allegations in the same
context by stating full and proper directions.
3. At this stage , the accused is given ample opportunity to protect himself.

Step 6: A court convicted of a trial may declare one of the following Punishment to the
accused
a. Fine
b. Property Forfeiture
c. Simple Imprisonment
d. Rigourous Imprisonment
e. Life Imprisonment
f. Death Penalty

Courts
Supreme Court Justice (SC) jurisdiction, i.e. at the top and called as the law of land in
the country. Below the SC is the main-level High Court and which is simultaneously
followed by the Subordinate courts. The jurisdiction of the courts varies accordingly
and they decide the matter accordingly with the level of their pecuniary jurisdiction.

12
 13

The Judiciary at all level work according to the supervision of their superior court.
Whereas the Constitution has authorized the High Courts to issue the orders, warrants,
so that the rights of the people are protected, and also for the other purposes. The
three tier thereby works in the supervision of the constitution.

1. Supreme Court is called as the Apex Court

2. High Court is the Court in the State at the highest level of the state.
3. Sessions and the District Courts
4. Judicial Magistrate of First Class/ Metropolitan Magistrate's Court
5. Judicial Magistrate of Second Class
6. The last chain is the Executive Magistrate

One of the guiding principles of national policy stipulated by the Constitution requires
that the state separate the judiciary from the administration. These separations were
approved in the criminal justice system which got revised. The judicial review of the
Criminal Procedure Law is fully carried out. It also affected the separation of prosecutor
from the police. Prior to this, District Attorney used to function more or less as part of
District Police Agency set up in the Court.

Police Officer
The purpose of this investigation is to clearly understand the terms "police" and "police
officer. Policeman". According to the Police Act of 1861 , the Police Act defines the term
"policeman". "The police shall include all persons registered in the Act."

This definition is inclusive and not exhaustive as the term police is not defined in the
"Police Law" or any other law . This term has been explained in various court rulings
with many other references which put the embarked on the sections 25 and 27 of the
Indian Evidence Act, of which focuses on the police custody.

Webster's dictionary defines the term police as "an organization composed of civilians,
especially in a city, organized according to power to maintain order, and people enforce
the law." Broadly speaking, it means to make the people follow the rules and
regulations, the application of laws in the district, city so that the law and order should
be maintain and the proper powers should be used at a different point of time when
required.

The term "police" includes all police officers appointed to maintain public peace and
tranquillity. According to Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act, the term "police" has
the same meaning as it is mentioned under Police Act. In interpreting section 25 of the
Indian Evidence Act, the term "police" officials should be interpreted not only in a
technical sense, but also in a broader and more popular sense.

The term "police" in Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act may exceed the definition in
section 1 of the Police Act. Anyone in the police law, such as the police officer in this
definition, wants a conviction more than any community member, and can resort to
inadequate means to do so.

The police officers selected under and covered under the Police Act have been given
certain powers and the duties of the Criminal Procedure Code but to exercise those
powers they have to abide with the certain rules accordingly that means they are also
bound by law to follow the rules and the regulations of the law as a law abiding citizen
needs to follow it.

With the increase of state power and responsibilities, behaviors that were considered
harmless or even commendable at certain times became crimes. The state police
power began to work on different subjects.

Various laws related to taxation and consumption, forests, customs, etc. were
promulgated. The prevention, investigation and crimes stipulated by these laws are
entrusted to the agent responsible for the prevention, investigation done according to
the special acts.

Therefore, the question arises, that is, according to the tax law, the customs law and
other acts, whether the agent responsible for the prevention, investigation and
investigation of crime falls under the question, all should be treated as the police
officers.
The Chief Justice of Calcutta gave the answer to the above noted question that by
observing "I don't think the police officer' should be interpreted in a technical sense,

13
 14

but based on its meaning that it is broader and more popular." In this case, the
question faced by the court was whether to consider a deputy commissioner of police
as a police officer. The decision given and the same has established to be regarded as
police officers under section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act.

According to the Police Act of 1861 , people do not necessarily have to be members of
the police force. It is related to national security, the maintenance of public order and
the maintenance of basic supplies.

Section 17 and 18 of the Police Act provide for the appointment of special officers of
the police who are not registered under the law but are sometimes appointed for
special occasions and having the same powers, privileges and protections and is
responsible for exercising the same functions as ordinary police officers. Section 21
also refers to officers who are not registered as such police officers and refers to village
or hereditary police officers who are appointed regularly.

Therefore, the word "policeman" should not be understood in a narrow sense but in a
broad and general sense. For the purposes of this study, "A police man " is a person
that ordinary people normally think he is, who works for the public and who completes
his duty while working in the country.

Duties and Responsibilities

Under the Police Act, 1861 the officials have been asked to put on some duties and the
responsibilities on them to work upon while maintaining the order and peace in the
country.

The following responsibilities are:

1. To comply and execute all requests made and the warrants which are
ordered by the competent authority.
2. Collect and impart knowledge influencing the public harmony
3. Prevent commission of offenses and public aggravations;
4. To Search and deal with the wrongdoers called as the offenders
5. To detain and arrest all people whom he has the reasons to believe the
he should be captured legitimately approved to and should have the
adequate grounds for the arrest or apprehend.
The sanction endorsed by the National Police Commission goes a long ways past the
1861 contract, considering not just the progressions which have happened inside the
association during this period, yet additionally in the socio-political environment in
which the association is needed to work.

The NPC's Model Police Bill endorses the accompanying obligations to the
cops:
a. Promote and protect public request;
b. Investigate crimes which are done by violating the rules which are made to
promote order, arrest the wrongdoers where suitable and partake in
ensuing official procedures remedied therewith;
c. Identify issues and circumstances that are probably going to bring about
commission of wrongdoings;
d. Reduce the chances for the commission of crime through preventive watch
and other endorsed police measures; Aid and co-work with other pertinent
offices in carrying out the endorsed measures for avoidance of
wrongdoings;
e. Aid people who are at risk for actual damage with all the crimes.
f. Create and keep a sensation of safety locally in the area
g. Facilitate organized development of individuals and vehicles
h. Provide important administrations and manage the cost of help to
individuals in trouble circumstances;
i. Collect insight identifying with issue influencing public harmony and
violations overall including social and monetary offenses, public
uprightness and security; and
j. Perform such different obligations as might be urged on them by law for
the time being in force.
k.
Role of Police in various aspects; Functions of the Police
The main role of the police is to ensure the general public by forestalling wrongdoing
and indicting lawbreakers. The other police capacities like protection of the country's
solidarity and respectability, support of public request and execution of social laws
streams from this principle objective. This load of capacities include the insurance of
life, freedom, poise and property of individuals and thus the job of the police arises in

14
 15

the exhibition of these functions.

The previous enforceable acts like the Government of India Act, 1935 contained
practically comparable arrangements of administration yet there were no particular
arrangements for the major Rights of individuals. The Fundamental Rights embarked in
the Indian Constitution make it an alternate law, particularly from eyes of every
individual. These rights target ensuring the person against sensible obstruction
throughout everyday life.

The Indian Constitution provides that every person should be protected with the life
and liberty which means that every individual shall live with a peaceful life where not
heard person should interfere according to their own privacy.

But when the murder is being committed in the society, kidnapping abducting or any
other crimes which simultaneously affects the society as a whole where people rights,
their opinions matters which affect them as a whole and also deprives them from their
personal liberty.
Now, let's talk about police in this scenario, they work fearlessly to stop these crimes
as it is enshrined in the Constitution of India that the Police is being headed over all the
responsibility so that he individuals of the country can live the peaceful and enjoyable
life and which simultaneously develops the person as a whole.

As the situation changes, the focus of the police is constantly changing. Its primary
purpose was initially to prevent and detect crime. As a social and political unrest
became a common problem thereby the maintenance of law and order became more
important to protect the society and to give the frequency of civil unrest in the
community, and also creating community harmony and ensuring the unity and integrity
of the land has become 's prime importance.

Providing security and protecting critical facilities for VIPs are other key areas. All these
have been headed by our police officer from protecting the people for crimes and also
to maintain the peace in the country at the time of elections or the rallies or even in
the VIP entry of the officials.

Some important functions of the police force are discussed below:

Maintenance of Order
For smooth continuation of any State action and for simple living in the society,
deliberateness is the premier and foremost condition. In case there is consistent
turmoil, the State apparatus thinks that it is hard to release its typical capacities. It
might prompt a tumultuous circumstance which would warrant extra-normal advances.
In this manner, to upkeep of public request is viewed as the main capacity of the
police.

Be that as it may, there is a distinction between these two terms which are ordinarily
used to signify deliberateness in the general public. The Supreme Court has drawn out
the contrast between these two expressions in Pushkar Mukherjee's case wherein it
has been held as under:

The Contravention of any law consistently influences request yet before it tends to be
said to influence public request, it should influence the local area or people in general
on the loose. In this association a line of outline should be drawn among genuine and
bothered types of turmoil which straightforwardly influence the local area or harm the
public interest and the generally minor breaks of tranquility of an absolutely nearby
importance which fundamentally harm explicit people, and just in an optional sense
depends on the public interest.

For another situation, while repeating its perceptions in Pushkar Mukherjee's case, the
Supreme Court has held that when two individuals fight and battle and attack each
other inside a house or in a road, it very well might be said that there is a disorder yet
not anpublic issue.

The financial and political changes in the post autonomy time frame have made rule of
peace and law extremely perplexing and an everyday issue for the police . Station,
strict and mutual pressures, rising number of instructed jobless youth, agrarian

15
 16

contentions, mechanical turmoil have expanded the recurrence of the rule of law
issues.

To the points which are not at all discussed and unabated urbanization, and deficiency
of fundamental conveniences have additionally disturbed the issue. Different social,
practical furthermore, political segments of the general public have framed compel
gatherings to request alleviation furthermore, different advantages from the State
specialists who are under the authority.

Control of Crowds
The conduct of individuals in a crowd is unique in relation to the ordinary conduct of
every individual establishing the crowd. Individuals become more decisive and eager in
a crowd. Any little incitement might upset the quiet environment and touch off the
displeasure of individuals to change over them into a horde which thusly may present
danger to public order.

In case there is any obstacle in the development of a parade, the members might turn
into a crowd and make a lawfulness issue.

Assuming such issues, ejecting on trivial issues, are not gone to expeditiously, the
circumstance may take an awful turn. The counter friendly components, if present on
such event, may take unjustifiable benefit of the unpredictable circumstance.

Hence, the police is sent by any means such places where there is a likelihood of a
group turning into a horde so that in the eventthat of any issue the circumstance can
be taken care of before it goes more worsens.

Unlawful Assemblies and Public Agitations

The Indian Penal Code, 1860 defines the unlawful assembly which means in general
terms when the five or more persons gathered together for any lawful purpose or can
be understood as that any get together of at least five people is assigned an unlawful
gathering, if the normal object of the people forming that gathering is to overawe by
criminal power, or show of power; or to oppose the execution of any law, or of any
lawful interaction; or to submit any underhandedness or criminal trespass, or other
offense or some other such acts.

The Code of Criminal Procedure gives that any Executive Magistrate or then again
official responsible for a police headquarters or without such official in-control any cop,
not beneath the position of a sub-investigator, may order any unlawful get together to
scatter. On the off chance that upon so instructed any unlawful get together doesn't
scatter the leader judge or the cop might continue to scatter such get together forcibly.
Compressing the State specialists via strikes, shows, rallies, and so on has consistently
been a technique embraced by individuals to get certain polices and choices checked
on or changed. As of late, the recurrence and gravity of such open exhibits and tumults
have altogether expanded. Fomentations by labourers of manufacturing plants,
government representatives, understudies, individuals from ideological groups or any
other such pressing factor bunch are very common.

To keep law and control and to guarantee that there are no conflicts between the
instigators and their rivals, the police makes elaborate plans. To forestall head on
conflicts, commonly the police needs to close certain streets and redirect the vehicular
traffic to elective roads. The Constitution of India, gives that all residents will have the
right to the right to speak freely of discourse and articulation; to collect serenely and
without arms; to structure affiliations or associations; and to move uninhibitedly all
through the domain of India.

The Constitution under Article 19 itself approves the State to put sensible limitations on
these opportunities of individuals in light of a legitimate concern for the power and
respectability of India, the security of the State, public request, tolerability or profound
quality, or in connection to scorn to Court, criticism or impelling to an offense.

Nonetheless, while putting sensible limitations upon certain central privileges of

individuals for support of public request, the police should work out most extreme
consideration. For a situation, where the applicants guaranteed unhindered and
unintercepted utilization of roadways, the Supreme Court, while excusing the appeal,
seen as under:

16
 17

"We concur that nobody is qualified for blockade a roadway so as to keep individuals
from the general population from utilizing it while they are on their typical business
chasing after ordinary hobbies of life.

However, the police, whose obligation is to implement the rule of law in the wake of
compromised mass tumults which are sensibly prone to prompt break of public
harmony, are entitled in the release of that obligation to force sensible limitations on
the actual development of individuals from general society to (guarantee) the
assurance of public property and the aversion of unnecessary bother to different
residents in their legitimate interests. In any case all such restrictions on close to home
freedom, if by any means, must be similar with the item which outfits their defence.

They should be negligible and can't surpass the limitations of the specific circumstance,
either in nature or in span. Most importantly, they can't be utilized as motors of
mistreatment, abuse, provocation or something like that. The holiness of individual and
protection must be kept up with by any means costs, and that can't at any point be
abused as far as anyone can tell support of the rule of law.

Since ordinarily individuals who arrange fights and indulged in unnecessary crimes
which cross the Constitutional and legitimate limits and put the public request in risk,
the police is perpetually needed to keep watch and keep law and control.

Public Riots
Inferable from the heterogeneity of Indian individuals, there are consistently chances
of social contrasts, ethnic and social varieties. Once in a while, these battles cause wide
spread brutality or genuine and exorbitant turmoil. Such occurrences become the
wellspring of political flimsiness and danger to harmony and monetary development.
Occurrences of shared uproars frequently upset public request influencing the general
public at huge.

Accordingly, taking care of public uproars expeditiously and appropriately is thought of

the main capacity of the police.
The accomplishment of law requirement organizations in controlling public disorder
should eventually be judged not by the speed with which an uproar is subdued, yet by
the way in which harmony are perceived in incipient organism and stave off the matter.

Role of Police during Elections

An election might be characterized as a method for selection of individuals from a
legislative association, they are a definitive and most significant method by which
government overall and assembly specifically are exposed to famous control in a
majority rule framework. The Constitution of India gives the right of vote on each
grown-up resident, when the persons attain the age of eighteen years with no
segregation on grounds of sex, race or property possession.

This arrangement of decisions dependent on grown-up testimonial makes India a

popularity based country in the genuine sense. It has been seen that viciousness is
executed previously, during and after the decisions and consequently the police can't
keep itself detached from the political race process. Even the police officials are fully
connected with the elections whether by being the part of it or by being the sole owner
who is working under the authority to protect the rights of the people as granted in the
Indian Constitution.

Each political decision is a period of important, regularly taken care of, political
pressing factors furthermore, exercises pretty much in a coordinated structure.
Promulgation and soliciting start quite a while before the real surveying time and
requests to electorate are frequently made for the sake of station, statement of faith
and religion.

During races an enormous assemblage of residents who are typically of calm and
harmony adoring attitude are stirred. Huge scope disturbances, showings, political and
mechanical unrests are matters of regular event. The air all over gets overcharged with
exceptional movement, and bunch competitions come to surface. By sharing a political
pressures mount and as a result conflicts of major or minor nature of offences might
happen in the country at the particular period of time.

In this way the police needs to strengthen its knowledge apparatus and make all
potential endeavours to establish a climate free of charge and reasonable elections.

Prevention of Crime

17
 18

Any act or omission which is punishable by any law is called an offense. Offenses with a
component of power or moral turpitude are for the most part named as wrongdoings.
The indecencies like eagerness, envy, desire, and retribution constrain individuals to
cross the moral and legitimate limits and carry out wrongdoing. Numerous different
components likesocio-financial and social changes bringing about imbalance,
joblessness and neediness are additionally liable for wrongdoing.

The crime puts life, freedom, and property of individuals at serious risk and makes
peace and lawfulness issues. The rule of peace and law issue might exasperate to
upset public harmony and carry typical urban life to a pounding end. This may, once in
a while, even represent a danger to public safety.

Hence, the crime isn't only a worry of the person in question or, the specialists are
there manage it and the secret potential in it may hurt the entire society or even the
country. As such, crime sabotages "law and order" and subsequently uncovers the
actual base of vote based system; in a wrongdoing ridden society viciousness beats the
law. Thereby, crime is the space of fixation for any police power.

The motivations to keep the wrongdoing anticipation work high on the plan of the
police are, it saves life and property of individuals and holds a difficult situation to the
person in question, both physical and mental, it precludes prosecution and hence helps
in keeping up with amicability in the general public also saves a great deal of season of
the police since they are not needed to record first data reports and take ensuing
strides of examination.

Patrolling the Area

It is a customary strategy to prevent the crime in the society and it upholds the duty
on the police that it should be protected. Police pickets are conveyed at vital focuses
and police parties are deputed for watching the region. In metropolitan regions, the
space of a police headquarters is isolated into different beats and areas and police
parties are deputed for watching every area.

The police party conveyed for watching in every area is needed to visit these essential
areas and make passages demonstrating the date and season of the visit. The checking
official likewise visits different areas to keep track on the developments of the police
watching parties.

Bonds for Keeping Peace and Good Behaviour

The Code of Criminal Procedure solely manages the subject of "security for keeping the
harmony and for appropriate conduct". The Executive Justices or the cops, who have
been proclaimed as Special Executive Judges and particularly enabled by the State
Government, manage such proposition.

According to the arrangements of the Code of Criminal Procedure, an individual who is

liable to submit a break of the harmony or upset the public quietness or to do any
illegitimate demonstration that may presumably event a break of the harmony or upset
the public quietness, might be asked by the Executive Magistrate or the Special Leader
Magistrate, by and large, to execute a bond. Code of Criminal Strategy enables the
Executive Magistrate or the Special Executive Judge, by and large, to take security for
appropriate conduct from the people scattering subversive issue.

A dubious individual can be inquired under the Code of Criminal Procedure to execute a
bond for his great behaviour. Under the arrangements of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, constant wrongdoers are continued against and requested to execute a
bond for great behaviour.

Preventive Detention
At the point when conventional course of crimes counteraction falls off and it is been
adamant to accept that an individual will get habitual of crimes and in this way they
put the public request in risk, the police can start lawful activity so that to keep such
individual in authority. The Code of Criminal Procedure engages the police to capture
an individual who plans to submit any cognizable offense if the commission of the
offense can't be in any case prevented.

Examination of Crime
It isn't generally conceivable to forestall every single wrongdoing, the following
significant capacity of the police is to record, recognize and research wrongdoing . The
job of the police in the criminal equity framework is significant in light of the fact that

18
 19

the cop is the main man to show up on the scene and keeping in mind that applying
law and his expert information gathers proof based on which the case is shipped off the
Court of law.

On the off chance that the cop examining a wrongdoing overlooks certain proof, which
therefore vanishes or gets annihilated, it might demonstrate lethal prompting
exoneration of the case. In this manner, the pretended by the police during the
examination of a wrongdoing 'is generally critical in demonstrating the argument
against the accused.

The law has separated wrongdoing in two general classifications, in particular,

cognizable also, non-cognizable. The police has the force and obligation to enlist first
data report regarding a cognizable offense and research the case to gather important
proof to effectively indict the culprit.

Conclusion
It should be noted that although its basic functions of preventing and solving crimes
and maintaining public order have not changed, the police have been given many
additional tasks to maintain the law and order in the society. People from all the
approaches ask the police for help with various problems that bother them, seeking
help to resolve their conflicts. Vulnerable groups in society, such as children, women
and scheduled castes and scheduled tribes, especially need the police to protect their
rights and prevent atrocities against them.

All government departments need the assistance and protection of the Police Force
when implementing various policies and development plans. The civil authorities mainly
rely on the help and support of the police when dealing with disasters.

The police must take appropriate action promptly to help them in accordance with Law.
In case, when the complaint resulted in limited or no power to take action by the
police, the complainant should be shown sympathy and courtesy. At the end, people
should be made aware of the police's restrictions in this situation.

19