Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.emeraldinsight.com/2042-3896.htm
Bridging
Accommodating learning styles education
in international bridging programs
education programs
Lillie Lum 147
Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Canada
Pat Bradley
Department of Nursing, York University, Toronto, Canada, and
Nikhat Rasheed
Connect: College of Ontario, Thunder Bay, Canada
Abstract
Purpose – Bridging education programs have been developed to enhance the ability of
internationally educated professionals (IEPs) to access professional employment in Canada. IEPs
are professionals who received their original training outside of Canada. Bridging education programs
consist of specialized courses, offered by higher education institutions, focusing on skill and
knowledge upgrading in preparation for meeting professional licensure requirements. The purpose of
this paper is to gain insight into the preferred learning styles of IEPs enrolled in nursing, pharmacy
and teacher programs.
Design/methodology – This survey research assessed the learning styles/preferences and degree of
self-directed readiness of IEPs enrolled in three different Ontario bridging education programs:
pharmacists, nurses and teachers. These professions represent some of the largest regulated
professions in Canada. Three professions were selected for this study because they have similar
regulatory procedures for candidates seeking licensure. These programs were situated within higher
education institutions. Adult immigrant students participated by completing Kolb’s Learning Style
Inventory and Guglielmino’s Self-Directedness Scale.
Findings – The most significant finding of this research is that all three professions were found in the
divergent quadrant of the Kolb Learning Style Inventory. The learner with a divergent style of
learning prefers observation rather than action and is able to view concrete situations from multiple
perspectives. These learners value concrete experience and reflective observation, suggesting that
they tend to consider a situation from differing perspectives. This finding suggests that being a recent
adult immigrant has a stronger effect upon preferred style of learning in bridging education than
profession-specific factors. IEPs are also illustrated to be highly self-directed learners.
Research limitations/implications – The generalizability of these results must be treated with
caution due to the small sample size. Several factors influenced the results such as difficulties in
accruing a larger and more representative sample.
Social implications – Currently, substantial funding is provided for bridging education in Canada.
There is little research being conducted on the effectiveness of this type of higher education from the
perspective of learning processes. More research is needed to enhance the ability of IEPs to succeed in
these programs. Ultimately, it can improve new immigrant professionals’ success in the labor market.
Originality/value – Research on bridging education is still in its infancy and there is little research
evidence to guide the development of effective programs. Some research indicates that bridging
education programs are useful for providing profession-specific language training and orientation to
the Canadian workplace. If the preferred learning styles of immigrant professionals can be identified,
more effective courses for immigrant learners can be developed. Educators can create increased
academic success and improved employment outcomes.
Keywords Canada, Immigrants, Nursing, Education sector, Professional qualifications, Higher Education, Skills and Work-
Based Learning
Learning styles Vol. 1 No. 2, 2011
Paper type Research paper pp. 147-168
r Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2042-3896
This research was funded by a grant from the Canadian Council on Learning from 2006 to 2008. DOI 10.1108/20423891111128917
HESWBL Introduction
1,2 Currently, approximately 60 per cent of immigrants arrive in Canada as economic
class migrants under the Federal Skilled Workers Program. As a result of these
strategic admission policies, immigrants to Canada, specifically internationally
educated professionals (IEPs), are highly educated and experienced. Approximately
half of these immigrants seek further education at higher education institutions
148 such as universities or community colleges as a means to obtaining gainful
employment (Annisef et al., 2009). Almost one in five recent immigrant university
graduates were attending school in Canada in 2007, even though they already had a
university degree (Statistics Canada, 2007).
Bridging education for IEPs has been considered an important lever in facilitating
licensure and access to stable, valued work, and has become the focus of an
extraordinary amount of government expenditure over the past two decades
(Hawthorne, 2008). The primary rationale for the development of this specialized form
of professional education is the perceived discrepancy between immigrants’ prior
knowledge and experiences and Canadian standards of professional practice. The
Canadian Information Centre for International Credentials (2007) defines bridging
education as a program of study involving courses designed specifically to provide
individuals with skills and knowledge required for entry into an occupation or a
higher level educational institution. The Ontario government describes it as “support
programs which have been put together by employers, colleges and universities,
occupational regulatory bodies, and community organizations intended to help
newcomers gain their license or certificate in their profession or trade” (Ontario
Ministry of Immigration and Citizenship, 2010).
Absence of a systematic professional development and enculturation program for
immigrant professionals may result in unnecessary barriers. Bridging education
provides a structured system for continuing professional development of professionals
educated outside North America to acquire competencies and meet domestic standards
of practice. The role of higher education in providing this type of programming has
not been extensively described. While many universities may possess faculties of
medicine, nursing, pharmacy, etc., these tend to focus on the needs of new practitioners,
or the continuing education needs of those already licensed.
The multicultural nature of bridging education poses additional challenges for
curriculum developers and instructors who may or may not be able to adapt their
instructional design and methods to meet the needs of individuals from various
cultures who display different learning styles and needs (Lum et al., 2008).
Furthermore, educators within these specialized programs are challenged to design
and provide programs that are sufficiently flexible to accommodate the diverse
learning backgrounds and needs of international professionals yet achieve a sufficient
degree of uniformity in learning outcomes to enable applicants to meet Canadian
profession-specific licensing or registration requirements. The tension that results from
the need to accommodate diversity whilst achieving performance standardization
within regulated professions has created challenges for educational practice within
bridging programs.
The research on learning styles that focuses on individual differences in cognitive
style and instructional preferences, that is, an individual’s disposition towards
particular aspects of the learning environment (Sadler-Smith and Smith, 2004) provides
a possible educational foundation for bridging programs. Traditionally, researchers
have used learning styles research as a framework for predicting and improving
educational achievement as well as improving vocational selection, guidance, and Bridging
placement. It only makes sense that when designing and facilitating learning education
experiences, in addition to organizational and environmental contexts, the
characteristics of the learner be taken into consideration (Sadler-Smith and Smith, 2004). programs
However, the learner is often forgotten in program and curriculum design. Particularly
in today’s educational environment of standards and accountability, and a focus on
standardization and cost effectiveness, there is less emphasis on the individual learner. 149
In the case of IEPs, it is particularly important to design bridging education which is
learner centered and prepares students for obtaining licensure and employment
readiness since they often suffer high unemployment and underemployment in Canada.
This paper describes the results of a survey research study examining the learning
style preferences and self-directedness of IEPs enrolled in three established
professional bridging educational programs in Toronto, Ontario, Canada in 2008-
2009. If the preferred learning styles of immigrant professionals in bridging education
programs can be identified, more effective courses and programs for immigrant
learners can be developed. In addition, educators can create increased academic
success and improved employment outcomes. Since tension is particularly salient for
educators and administrators who teach in courses outside the core curriculum of
post-secondary educational institutions, that is, institutions offering education beyond
grade 12 education, applying learning styles research to bridging education could
contribute to improved course design and subsequent learning. The key research
questions explored in this research include: (1) Do IEPs have a preferred style of
learning in bridging education programs? and (2) If so, what are the implications for
teaching methods and student learning?
Background literature
IEPs and bridging programs
Currently, immigration policy in Canada, as in many other developed countries, is
based on a human capital model. According to this model, skilled workers are the
focus of immigration selection efforts as they are chosen to come to Canada based
on a points system that is calculated on their prior education, work experience, and
official language proficiency. This policy shift toward human capital was validated
in Canada in 2002, with the revised Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. Given
this focus on human capital and careful prior assessment mechanisms, Canadian
citizens, community members, and policy actors all expect that these individuals
should be successful in the labor market. This success is assumed since the immigrant
was given priority based on education, language ability, and employment skills.
However, despite higher levels of human capital recent cohorts of immigrants are
not faring as well in the Canadian labor market. This experience rings true whether
measuring success in terms of employment/unemployment rates, income, or type of
occupation. The employment rate among prime working-age immigrants two years
after arrival was 63 per cent, 18 percentage points below the national rate of 91 per cent
(Statistics Canada, 2003). According to 2006 census data, despite strong economic
growth in the late 1990s, the gap in labor market conditions between recent
immigrants and the Canadian born individuals persisted. For example, the 2008
Canadian census revealed that 24 per cent of male, university-educated immigrants
were under employed (Statistics Canada).
IEPs represent a large group of recent immigrants possessing academic credentials
and experience from their countries of origin. Rates of under-employment are
HESWBL particularly apparent in the regulated professions who have a higher experience of
1,2 failure in securing employment than their local counterparts (The Office of the Fairness
Commissioner Annual Report, 2009). Only 24 per cent of IEPs in regulated professions
that require licensure work in the occupations match their studies, compared to 62 per
cent of Canadian-born professionals, and 53 per cent of immigrants that complete their
studies in Canada (Statistics Canada, 2010). In Canada, as in other industrialized
150 countries, most professions are regulated by self-governing bodies established under
provincial/state laws to protect the public by setting standards of practice and
competence. All of these regulated professions require that an individual be registered
with the regulatory body in order to use the title of the profession and perform the
work of the profession. Regulatory bodies assess professional qualifications,
educational credentials, language proficiency, and other criteria.
As a result of much of the research examining labor market integration, bridging
education projects have been recommended as a major policy solution for immigrant
professionals (Goldberg, 2005). Bridging programs are specifically designed to assist
new immigrants who have completed their basic professional education in other
countries to transition into the labor market by assessing their existing skills and
competencies and providing training and Canadian workplace experience to meet
Canadian licensing requirements and professional standards. The goal of this training
is to promote IEPs’ rapid integration and transition into the Canadian labor market
through the acquisition of cultural, technical and literacy competency, and also to
provide knowledge about practicing in Ontario workplaces. Good programs also
provide placement opportunities and access to mentors to help immigrants gain
Canadian experience (Austin, 2004, 2008).
Despite this policy focus for IEPs, access to professions has not improved for
immigrant professionals (Goldberg, 2006). A dramatic increase in provincial and
federal government-funded specialized immigration and settlement services has not
led to the overall success in obtaining gainful employment by IEPs and the negative
outcomes of underemployment remain (Reitz, 2005; Walters et al., 2006). Many IEPs
continue to face difficulties passing licensure exams and in accessing equivalent
professional positions in the Canadian workforce despite extensive bridging education
programs.
The lack of academic success and employment integration, often framed as the
result of individual ability deficits, may be more aptly attributed to differences in
learning style, studying approaches, and instructional format preferences. Learners
demonstrating stress or failure may be feeling the effects of the devaluing of their
previous education, skills, knowledge, and learning styles. Style approach and format
flexibility are required in order to choose or develop an appropriate strategy and
employ appropriate tactics to succeed in novel situations (Curry, 2000, p. 250) as in
the IEP learning experience.
Reflective observation
Focus: understand meaning of ideas
Values: patience, impartiality and thoughtful
judgment
Active experimentation
Focus: influencing people and changing
situations
Values: ability to manipulate environments
Methodology
Participants
This research assessed the learning styles/preferences and degree of self-directed
readiness of IEPs enrolled in three different Ontario bridge training programs:
pharmacists, nurses, and teachers. These professions represent some of the largest
regulated professions in Canada. These three professions were selected for this study
because they have similar regulatory procedures for candidates seeking licensure. Two
of the programs (nursing and pharmacy) were situated within post-secondary
institutions (community college and university) and one (teachers) at a community
agency. The programs, offered in fall 2007 to spring 2008, varied considerably in
duration, in-take processes, tuition, and curriculum design.
The three-month pharmacy and two-year nursing programs focused on increasing
IEP’s clinical skills and ability to pass certification examinations. These programs
oriented IEPs to core curricula through lecture, clinical practice, and mentoring
options. The teaching program was a six- to ten-week bridge-to-work program
providing IEPs with information, documentation assistance for certification (although
not education geared toward certification), employment preparation, and language
upgrading in collaboration with partner agencies.
Instruments
Kolb’s LSI (KLSIIa version 3.1): this inventory can serve as a stimulus for interpreting
and reflecting on the ways that a learner prefers to learn in specific settings. The Kolb’s
LSI consists of four categories of learners.
Learners who view concrete situations from different perspectives in order to
generate a wide range of ideas are creative and are good at understanding people
and are considered to have a diverging style of learning. They prefer to observe
rather than take action and have broad cultural interests. In formal learning situations,
they prefer working in groups to gather information, listening with an open mind, and
receiving personalized feedback. This learning style is considered to be effective in
arts, entertainment, and service careers.
Learners who combine abstract conceptualization and reflective observations and
who perform best at understanding a wide range of information and putting it into a
concise logical form are referred to as having an assimilating learning style. They tend
to be more interested in abstract ideas and concepts. This assimilating learning style is
important for information and science careers.
Learners who are most effective at finding practical uses for ideas and theories are
those with a converging learning style. They have the ability to solve problems and
HESWBL make decisions based on finding solutions to questions or problems. These skills are
1,2 important in technology careers. Research by Garvey et al. (1984) and Adamcik et al.
(1996) locates pharmacy students as convergers.
Learners who have the ability to learn primarily from “hands-on” experience
possess an accommodating learning style. They probably enjoy carrying out plans
and involving themselves in new and challenging experiences. They prefer concrete
156 experience with active experimentation rather than logical analyses. This learning
style is important in action-oriented careers such as marketing or sales. Because they
tend to accomplish tasks based on facts and reality, they take risks and lead others.
Castro and Peck (2005) suggest that accommodators and divergers are more
communicative learners and seem to be most successful in learning foreign languages.
Kolb locates nursing students as accommodators and nursing students have tended
to report an accommodating or assimilating learning styles (Smedley, 2007 and
Li et al., 2008).
The LSI is a self-report questionnaire that enables individuals to identify
their preferred learning style. The theory of experiential learning has been widely
used as a basis for helping individuals identify the kinds of learning activity that
they find most satisfying and will improve their learning environment (Hayes and
Allinson, 1996). Student learning styles are based on responses to the 12-item
questionnaire, with each question containing four multiple choices items. Currently,
the KLSI is the self-assessment tool forming the basis for reflective practice for
registered nurses in Ontario, Canada (Self-Assessment Tool, College of Nurses of
Ontario, 2008).
Guglielmino’s Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale (SDLRS): this is widely used
to measure readiness for self-directed learning. The SDLRS is designed to measure the
complex attitudes, abilities, and characteristics, which comprise readiness to engage
in self-directed learning. The modified version of the survey developed for adults
with low reading levels or non-native English speakers consists of 34 statements,
utilizing a five-point Likert scale response. Research has suggested that individuals
who have developed high self-directed learning skills tend to perform better in jobs
requiring a high degree of problem-solving ability, creativity, and change (Guglielmino
and Klatt, 1994).
In this study, a modified version of the assessment form adapted for students for
non-native English speakers was used since all of the IEPs spoke English as a second
or third language. The SDLRS-ABE version has been shown to be a reliable measure
of self-directness.
The Bridging Education and Professional Work Survey: an additional survey of
60 items gathered data on demographic profile, language skills, educational
qualifications, international professional experience, work/professional experience
(both prior to immigration and in Canada), family background, and income levels.
Data analyses
Survey data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS
version 17). Norms of the Learning Styles Inventory were applied in determining
IEPs’ learning styles and the evaluation was completed by taking the percentage and
frequency for the distribution of learning styles. Summary scores for the Self-Directed
Learning Readiness Scale were also calculated. Descriptive and correlation statistics
were completed. Reliability of the self-directed learning inventory was evaluated by
calculating a Cronbach’s a.
Results Bridging
Sample characteristics education
A total of 138 IEPs, 73 pharmacists, 38 teachers, and 27 nurses participated in the
study. The majority of the respondents were young to middle-aged adults, that is, programs
between 20 and 35 years old, who were recent immigrants having resided in Canada for
less than five years. They all possessed professional qualifications and work
experience obtained in their countries of origin. 157
The participants were a highly multicultural group, consisting of IEPs from a
variety of countries. The Philippines contributed the largest number of respondents
(50, 36.2 per cent)[1] followed by India (21, 15.2 per cent) and Egypt (10, 7.2 per cent).
The largest group of respondents consisted of nurses (18, 66.7 per cent) and
pharmacists (32, 43 per cent) from the Philippines. The teachers emigrated from a
variety of countries, the largest group (13, 34.2 per cent) from India.
The majority were working far below their previous levels of employment and
income levels. The pharmacists and teachers were more likely to be working at lower
levels of employment than the nurses but the differences were small. For the combined
sample, approximately half were working in the same or related profession. The
remainder were working in unskilled or in unrelated professions.
LSI
None of the programs in this study used learning styles inventories. The most
significant finding of this research is that all three professions were found in the
divergent quadrant of the Kolb’s LSI. The scores illustrating the divergent learning
style type for each of the professions within the Learning Style Type Grid is displayed
in Table II. The learner who has a divergent style of learning prefers observation rather
than action and is able to view concrete situations from multiple perspectives
(Kolb, 2005).
These learners value concrete experience and reflective observation, suggesting
that they tend to consider a situation from differing perspectives. By diverging from
conventional solutions, they explore alternative possibilities. The career characteristics
of this learning style include gathering information, being sensitive to values, and
dealing creatively with ambiguity.
An additional finding of interest is that the KLSI scores for all three groups tended
to be located close to the intersection of the two axes. Pharmacy students had scores
closest to the two axes. The further the individual score is from the intersection of the
two axes, the more that individual prefers that particular learning style and the less apt
they are to use the other three styles. Therefore, all three group scores indicate that
while they may have a predominant style, these students have the ability to use and
move easily between the four different learning styles during learning.
The location of each profession on the Kolb Learning Style Grid is displayed
in Figure 1.
–10
10 –9
–8
–7
–6
158 20
–5
–4
–3
Accommodating –2 Diverging
–1
30 0
1
2 Nurses
3
40 4
Teachers
5
Pharmacists
28 24 22 212019 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 –1 –2 –3 –4 –5 –6 –7 –8–9–10 –13–15–21
AE-RO 50
8
60 10
11
12
70 13
14
Converging 15 Assimilating
16
80 17
18
19
20
90 21
22
24
26
30
100
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Figure 1. Percentiles
Kolb learning style grid AC-CE
Further analyses of our sample suggested that their learning styles are not influenced
by their age, gender, educational level, number of languages spoken, or country of
origin. Eastern and southern European IEPs may have different preferences but the
subsamples were too small to be of statistical significance.
Guglielmino SDLRS-ABE
The total score reported on the SDLRS represents the learner’s current readiness for
self-direction in learning. Research has suggested that persons with high SDLRS
scores usually prefer to determine their learning needs and plan and implement their
own learning which may or may not include structured learning situations
(Guglielmino, 1989).
The results highlighted that IEPs tend to be highly self-directed learners. The
total score reported on a 34-item scale represents the learner’s current readiness for
self-direction in learning. The average score for adult learners completing the
questionnaire is 126. The standard deviation is 19.21. In our sample, the average score
was 134.15 for the total group. Teachers reported the highest level of self-directness, Bridging
followed by nurses and pharmacists. No significant differences were found to education
exist between the group scores. SDLRS scores for each profession are reported
in Table III. programs
The scale was found to be reliable with a Cronbach’s a of 0.895. The reliability of the
original SDLRS was calculated to be 0.916 for 740 cases. The SDLRS modified version
was found to be a reliable measure of IEPs’ readiness for self-directed learning within 159
bridging education programs.
It is interesting that all three professions demonstrated a high readiness for
self-directed learning. Research has suggested that persons with high SDLRS
scores usually prefer to determine their learning needs and plan and implement
their own learning, which may or may not include structured learning situations
(Guglielmino, 1989).
Discussion
The major result of this research is the identification of a learning style preference,
which is common to three distinctly different groups of professional students
(pharmacists, nurses, and teachers). This demonstrates that IEPs prefer self-directed
approaches to learning and have a divergent learning style. Despite any potential
methodological limitations, the Kolb’s LSI appears to be a valid measure. These results
are discussed in terms of learner benefits and their implications for teaching and
course design of future bridging education programs in higher education institutions.
Conclusion
The increased presence of IEP students in Canadian higher education has led to new
challenges for both students and educators. These results are particularly important
HESWBL for those who design programs and teach in bridging education programs. Utilizing
1,2 the LSI to assess the learning needs of a multicultural group of students has been
shown to be effective. Since learning is a continuous process inherent within the
settlement experience, educational success is particularly important for new adult
immigrants since it is a major contributor to employment and social integration
(Annisef et al., 2009).
164 The research results confirm the importance of designing flexible student-centered
learning in bridging education courses and programs based on democratic student-
centered adult education principles. These programs need to build on learner strengths
and value their learning styles as assets, desired by employers, and an advantage
in Canadian workplaces. Individual professionals who choose to uproot and relocate
in new countries are a unique group of individuals. The characteristics and skills
required for successful immigration to a new country are most likely those who are
self-directed and divergent learners. Since migration requires problem-solving
and change management abilities, it is no surprise that IEPs display these kinds of
skills and preferences especially during the early stages of the settlement process.
Bridging education should not be based on assumptions that negatively view
immigrant professionals in a deficit position in relation to the local population but to
value them as assets who are desired and required in today’s professional workplaces
and knowledge-based environments.
Further testing of the psychometric properties of major learning styles instruments
using longitudinal, large-scale designs is recommended. In order to gain deeper
understanding of how professional and cultural factors influence learning styles,
research exploring larger IEP samples across multiple, regulated professions,
particularly engineering, accounting, and law, would be useful in validating this
construct.
This study has demonstrated that the Kolb’s learning style model is promising
if used as an educational tool for promoting learner awareness of their own learning
styles and providing direction for the improving the quality of bridging education
programs. The authors of this study are in agreement with Kolb’s original
recommendation, regarding his model, and other major learning style models, that
these should be applied judiciously. He stated that his model provides an “interesting
self-examination and discussion that recognizes the uniqueness, complexity and
variability in individual approaches to learning. The danger lies in the reification of
learning styles into fixed traits, such that learning styles become stereotypes used to
pigeonhole individuals and their behaviour” (Coffield et al., 2004, p. 64).
Note
1. The relatively high concentration of participants from the Philippines in this sample
is due to the fact that the pharmacy program actively recruits young pharmacists
directly from that country. Although the Philippines is in the top five immigrant source
countries, this is not the reason for the higher numbers of participants from the country in
this sample.
References
Adamcik, B., Hurley, S. and Erramouspe, J. (1996), “Assessment of pharmacy students’ critical
thinking and problem-solving abilities”, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education,
Vol. 60 No. 3, pp. 256-65.
Akhter, A., Chakrawarti, R. and Rasheed, N. (2006), “A review of bridge training programs for Bridging
immigrants with professional backgrounds in Ontario — exploratory findings”, PROMPT
research paper, no. 5, Ottawa, available at: www.promtinfo.ca (accessed June 6, 2009). education
Annisef, P., Sweet, R., Admuti-Trache, M. and Walter, D. (2009), Recent Immigrants: A programs
Comparison of Participants and Non-Participants in Canadian Post-Secondary Education,
Citizenship Immigration Canada (CIC, Ottawa).
Armstrong, E. and Parsa-Parsi, R. (2005), “How can physicians’ learning styles drive educational 165
planning?”, Academic Medicine, Vol. 80 No. 7, pp. 680-4.
Austin, Z. (2004), “Learning styles of pharmacists: impact on career decisions, practice patterns
and teaching method preferences”, Pharmacy Education, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 12-22.
Austin, Z. (2005), Mentorship and Mitigation of the Culture Shock Experience of Foreign-Trained
Health Care Professionals: The International Pharmacy Graduate Experience in
Ontario. Program Report, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto.
Austin, Z. (2008), “Bridging to success: a learning day about bridging programs in regulated
professions”, Report for the Ontario Regulators for Access Consortium (ORAC), Toronto.
Austin, Z. and Dean, M.R. (2006), “Bridging education for foreign-trained professionals: the
international pharmacy graduate program in Canada”, Teaching in Higher Education,
Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 19-32.
Auyeng, P. and Sands, J. (1996), “A cross-cultural study of the learning styles of accounting
students”, Accounting and Finance, Vol. 36 No. 36, pp. 261-75.
Berings, M. and Poell, R. (2005), “Conceptualizing on-the-job learning styles”, Human Resource
Development Review., Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 373-400.
Canadian Information Centre for International Credentials (2007), “Foreign credential
recognition”, available at: www.cicic.ca (accessed May 20, 2008).
Castro, O. and Peck, V. (2005), “Learning styles and foreign language learning difficulties”,
Foreign Language Annals, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 401-9.
Cavanagh, S., Hogan, K. and Ramgopal, T. (1995), “The assessment of student nurse
learning styles using the Kolb learning styles inventory”, Nurse Educator Today, Vol. 15
No. 15, pp. 177-83.
Coffield, F, Mosely, D., Hall, E. and Ecclestone, K. (2004), Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post-16
Learning, Learning and Skills Research Centre, London.
Curry, L. (2000), “Review of learning style, study approach, and instructional preference
research in medical education”, in Riding, R.J. and Raynor, S.G. (Eds), International
Perspectives on Individual Difference, 1: Cognitive Styles, Ablex Publisher, Stamford, CT,
pp. 239-76.
Davis, N.H. (1998), A Comparative Analysis of the Learning Style Preferences of Medical Students
and Practicing Physicians Using Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory (Dissertation), Kansas
State University, Manhattan, KS.
De Vita, G. (2001), “Learning styles, culture and inclusive instruction in the multicultural
classroom: a business and management perspective”, Innovations in Education and
Teaching International, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 165-74.
Desmedt, E. and Valchke, M. (2003), “Learning style awareness: why would it work?”, in
Armstrong, S., Graff, L.M., Raynor, S., Sadler-Smith, E. and Peterson. (Eds), Bridging
Theory and Practice. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual European Learning Styles
Conference, University of Hull, Hull, pp. 239-150.
Felder, R. and Silverman, L.K. (1988), “Learning and teaching styles in engineering education”,
Engineering Education, Vol. 79 No. 7, pp. 674-81.
Garvey, M., Bootman, J.L. and McGhan, W.F. (1984), “An assessment of learning styles among
pharmacy students”, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 134-40.
HESWBL Goldberg, M.P. (2005), “Deconstructing training discourse: implications for immigrant
professionals’ access to their professions in Ontario, Canada”, paper presented at the
1,2 10th International Metropolis Conference, Toronto, October 18, 2005.
Goldberg, M.P. (2006), “Discursive policy webs in a globalisation era: a discussion of access to
professions and trades for immigrant professionals in Ontario, Canada”, Globalisation,
Societies and Education, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 77-102.
166 Guglielmino, L. (1978), “Development of the self-directed learning readiness scale”,
Doctoral Dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 1977, Dissertation Abstracts
International, 38, 6467A.
Guglielmino (1989), “Reactions to Field’s investigation into the SDLRS”, Adult Education
Quarterly, Vol. 38 No. 38, pp. 235-40.
Guglielmino, P.J. and Klatt, L.A. (1994), “Self-directed learning readiness as a characteristic
of the entrepreneur”, in Long, H.B. and Associates (Eds), New Ideas About Self-Directed
Learning, Oklahoma Research Center for Continuing Professional and Higher Education,
Norman, OK, pp. 161-74.
Hawthorne, L. (2008), “The impact of economic selection policy on labour market outcomes for
degree-qualified migrants in Canada and Australia”, IRPP Choices, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 1-50.
Hayes, J. and Allinson, C.W. (1984), “Cultural differences in the learning styles of managers”,
in Jackson, T. (Ed.), Cross-Cultural Management, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford,
pp. 119-35.
Honey, P. and Mumford, A. (1986), The Manual of Learning Styles, Peter Honey, Maidenhead.
Hughes-Weiner, G. (1986), “The ‘learn to learn’ approach to cross-cultural interpretation of Kolb’s
learning cycle”, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Vol. 10, pp. 485-505.
Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (2002), “Department of Justice”, available at: www.
laws.justice.gc.ca (accessed June 30, 2009).
Kolb, D.A. (1984), Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development,
Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Kolb, D.A. (2000), Facilitator’s Guide to Learning, Hay/McBer, Boston, MA.
Kolb, D.A. (2005), The Kolb Learning Style Inventory-Version 3.1: Self Scoring And Interpretation
Booklet, Hay Direct Resources, Boston, MA.
Kolb, D. and Fry, R. (1975), “Towards an applied theory of experiential learning”, in Copper, C.L.
(Ed.), Theories of Group Processes, John Wiley, London, pp. 33-58.
Lam, S.S.K. (1997), “Reliability and classification stability of Learning Style Inventory in Hong
Kong”, Perceptual and Motor Skills, Vol. 85 No. 1, pp. 10-8.
Li, Y., Chen, P. and Tsai, S. (2008), “A comparison of the learning styles among different nursing
programs in Taiwan: implications for nursing education”, Nurse Education Today, Vol. 28
No. 1, pp. 70-6.
London, M. (2003), “Antecedents and consequences of self-verification: implications for
individual and group development”, Human Resource Development Review, Vol. 2 No. 12,
pp. 273-93.
Lum, L., Chassels, C. and Wiebe, B. (2008), “Bridging education and labour market integration of
internationally educated professionals in Canada”, paper presented at the Congress of the
Humanities and Social Sciences, June 6, Vancouver.
Lum, L., Nestel, S. and Hagey, R. (2005), “Creating effective distance education for internationally
educated professionals”, Report for the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
and Heritage Canada.
McLoughlin, C. (1999), “Culturally responsive technology use: developing an on-line community
of learners”, British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 30 No. 30, pp. 231-43.
Nelson, S. and Purkis, M.E. (2004), “Mandatory reflection: the Canadian reconstitution of the Bridging
competent nurse”, Nursing Inquiry, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 247-57.
education
Ontario Ministry of Immigration and Citizenship (2010), “Working in Ontario”, available at:
www.citizenship.gov.on.ca (accessed September 5, 2010). programs
Reitz, J. (2005), “Tapping immigrants’ skills: new directions for Canadian immigration policy in
the knowledge economy”, IRPP Choices, Vol. 11 No. 11, pp. 1-18.
Sadler-Smith, E. and Smith, P.J. (2004), “Strategies for accommodating individuals’ styles and 167
preferences in flexible learning programmes”, British Journal of Educational Technology,
Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 395-412.
Self-Assessment Tool, The College of Nurses of Ontario (2008), “College of nurses self-
assessment: a guide to developing your learning plan 2009-2010”, available at:
www.cno.org (accessed April 15, 2009).
Smedley, A. (2007), “The self-directed learning readiness of first year bachelor of nursing
students”, Journal of Research in Nursing, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 373-85.
Statistics Canada (2003), “Longitudinal study of immigrants to Canada: process, progress and
prospects”, Catalogue No. 89-611-X1E.
Statistics Canada (2007), “The Canadian immigrant labour market in 2006: first results from
Canada’s labour force survey”, available at: www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/71-606-x/2008004/
5203975-eng.htm (accessed August 1, 2010).
Statistics Canada (2010), “Immigrants working in regulated occupations”, available at:
www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/100224/dq100224d-eng.htm (accessed August 1,
2010).
Stewart, R.A. (2007), “Investigating the link between self directed learning readiness and
project-based learning outcomes: the case of international masters students in an
engineering management course”, European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 32
No. 4, pp. 453-65.
Sugarman, L. (1985), “Kolb’s model of experiential learning: touchstone for trainers, students
counsellors and clients”, Journal of Counselling and Development, Vol. 64 No. 4, pp. 264-8.
Tagawa, M. (2008), “Reflection and self-directed and group learning improve OSCE scores”, The
Clinical Teacher, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 266-70.
Tan, P.L. and Pilay, H. (2008), “Understanding learning behaviour of Malaysian adult
learners across cultural framework”, Educational Research Policy and Practice, Vol. 7 No. 7,
pp. 85-97.
The Office of the Fairness Commissioner Annual Report (2009), “The Office of the Fairness
Commissioner Annual Report (2009-2010)”, available at: www.fairnesscommissioner.ca
(accessed January 15, 2010).
Walters, D., Phythian, K. and Anisef, P. (2006), Understanding the Economic Integration of
Immigrants: A Wage Decomposition of the Earnings Disparities between Native-Born
Canadians and Immigrants of Recent Cohorts (42), CERIS, Toronto.
Wolfe, K., Bates, D., Manikowske, L. and Amundsen, R. (2005), “Learning styles: do they differ by
discipline?”, Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, Vol. 97 No. 4, pp. 18-22.
Zhang, C. and Flipse, A.R. (2005), “A longitudinal study of the impact of student learning styles
in medical education”, paper presented at the American Educational Research Association
Meeting, Montreal, pp. 11-15.
Further reading
Guild, P. (1994), “The culture/learning style connection”, Educational Leadership, Vol. 5 No. 8,
pp. 16-21.
HESWBL Kolb, A.Y. and Kolb, D.A. (2005), “Learning styles and learning spaces: enhancing experiential
learning in higher education”, Academy of Management Learning and Education, Vol. 42
1,2 No. 2, pp. 193-212.
Lum, L. (2006), “Internationally educated health professionals: a distance education multiple
cultures model”, Education Training, Vol. 48 Nos 2/3, pp. 112-26.
Richmond, A.S. and Cummings, R. (2005), “Implementing Kolb’s learning styles into online
168 distance education”, International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, Vol. 1
No. 1, pp. 45-54.
Statistics Canada (2009), “The 2008 Canadian immigrant labour market: analysis of quality
of employment”, available at: www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/71-606-x/71-606-x2009001-eng.pdf
(accessed August 1, 2010).
Corresponding author
Lillie Lum can be contacted at: lum@yorku.ca