Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 18
Lecture 18
Asset Markets
Lecture 18: International Asset Allocation
0. Overview Page 1
Overview
• Barriers to global investing, both for companies and for individual investors, are getting smaller
Important Issues
– Diversification benefits
• To calculate the return on foreign securities, we need to consider the variation in returns related to
changes in the relative value of the domestic and foreign currency
• Total return determined by both the investment return and movement in exchange rates
• It is often not possible to completely hedge a foreign investment against the exchange rate risk
f
Let Pt be the price of a foreign asset in the foreign currency.
d d/f
The dollar (domestic) price of a foreign asset is Pt = Ptf St
d
Thus, the dollar return on a foreign asset, rt , is given by
d/f d/f
rtd = d
Ptd /Pt−1 −1= Ptf St f
/ Pt−1 St−1 − 1
d/f d/f
= f
Ptf /Pt−1 St /St−1 −1
d/f
= 1+ rtf 1+ st −1
d/f d/f
= rtf + st + rtf st
d/f d/f d/f
where st = St /St−1 − 1 is the percentage change in the exchange rate
d/f d/f
rtd = rtf + st + rtf st
That is, the dollar return on a foreign asset has three components:
f
The dominant risk in foreign stock markets comes from the local asset return (r )
Exchange rate variability is less important
The interaction terms are close to zero for most of the international equity investments
Country-Specific Risk
• Political risk
– Government stability, corruption, etc.
• Financial risk
– Foreign debt (%GDP), Exchange rate stability, etc.
• Economic risk
– GDP growth, annual inflation, etc.
Hedging FX Risk
d/f
• Remember that, for returns: rtd ≈ rtf + st
• What happens to the risk-return characteristics of international investment when we hedge the FX risk?
• Consider a simple FX hedging strategy in which the investor sells the expected foreign currency payoff
f d/f
from the stock E[Pt ] forward, at F
f
f f
f
• Pt = E Pt + Pt − E Pt
• The amount in parentheses represents the unexpected foreign currency payoff, and this must be sold
d/f
at the future spot rate, St . Thus, the hedged dollar proceeds are (using superscript H for hedged)
dH
f d/f f
f d/f
• Pt = E Pt F + Pt − E Pt St
Hedging FX Risk
n f d/f o f d/f
rtdH = PtdH /Pt−1
dH f d/f f
• − 1 = E Pt F + Pt − E Pt St /Pt−1 St−1 − 1
f f d/f d/f f f f
d/f d/f
= E Pt /Pt−1 F /St−1 + Pt − E Pt /Pt−1 St /St−1 − 1
f d/f
f
f d/f
= 1 + E rt 1 + FP + rt − E rt 1 + st −1
f d/f f d/f
f d/f d/f
=rt + F P + rt st + E rt F P − st
d/f
where F P is the forward premium.
• Since the third and fourth terms are likely to be small, we may write rtdH ≈ rtf + F P d/f
• The implication is that it is possible to hedge the exchange rate component by a forward contract
Hedging FX Risk
• Expected return:
h i
d/f
rtd
f
Unhedged: E = E rt + E st
dH
= E rt + F P d/f
f
Hedged: E rt
• The difference is the variance of the spot rate. This is why FX risk hedging can enhance the risk-return
efficiency of international stock market investment.
• Contracts that hedge the whole currency (FX) risk are called quanto contracts.
3. International CAPM
International CAPM
– consumption goods are sold in the local market with prices denominated in the local currency
• This implies that the U.S. T-bond is riskless for U.S. investors, but not for German or Japanese investors
• This violates the key assumption of homogeneous expectations in the CAPM: investors agree on the
distribution of asset returns
International CAPM
• The world aggregate investor, comprising of the U.S., German and other nationals, care about both the
asset returns in the chosen numeraire (e.g., $) and foreign exchange rate movements
International CAPM
• Like the CAPM, the market portfolio in the International CAPM includes all risky assets in the world
weighted according to their market values (under the same numeraire)
• Expected return on any asset includes a market premium AND a set of currency premia
International CAPM
• Risk-pricing expression for the ICAPM: the expected return on an asset is the sum of the risk-free rate
plus the market risk premium plus various currency risk premia:
• β is the world market exposure of the asset and γ s are the currency exposures, or sensitivities, of the
asset returns to the various exchange rates (1 to K). RPW is the world market risk premium and
SRPK are the currency risk premia
• To use the model, one needs to estimate two types of variables: (i) the market and currency exposures
for each asset; (ii) the risk premia on the (global) market and on currencies
• Current research supports the conclusion that assets are priced in an integrated global market
• Evidence is sufficiently strong to justify using the ICAPM in structuring global portfolios
• However, the evidence can be somewhat different for emerging smaller markets
4. Benefits of International
Diversification
– Foreign markets are imperfectly correlated, possible gains from international diversification
– It is possible to expand the efficient frontier above the domestic only frontier
– It is possible to reduce the systematic risk level below the domestic only level
– E.g., correlation between U.S. and Canadian returns > that between U.S. and European returns
– In general, long-term bond or equity returns are not very highly correlated across countries
• Correlations are increasing over time, as global competition and various regulatory barriers have fallen
OP UK
Efficient set
U.S. investing
JP
FR
US
GM
R CN
f
1 10 20 30 40 50
Number of Stocks in portfolio
• Caveat: Correlations increase dramatically in periods of crises. So the benefits of international risk
diversification disappear when they are most needed. A phenomenon referred to as correlation
breakdown.
• Fixed-income investments
– Eurobond: an international bond that pays cash flows in a currency not native to the country of issue
– Yankee bond: a bond denominated in U.S. dollars, sold in the U.S., but issued by a foreign
corporation or government
6. Home Bias
• Despite the potential benefits of international portfolio diversification, most investors tilt their portfolios
towards domestic securities.
– Canadians: 89%
– Germans: 82%
– British: 78%
Home Bias
∗ Large gross purchases of foreign stocks & bonds by U.S. investors, firms and banks in 1990s
∗ Even larger gross purchases of U.S. stocks & bonds by foreigners in 1990s (net capital inflow)
Home Bias
• Many factors can tilt investor holdings toward more domestic assets
– Banks and insurers with domestic liabilities have an incentive to hedge with domestic assets
• Market frictions
– Government controls: limitations on foreign ownership of domestic assets
– Transactions costs: these reflect the markets operating efficiency and influence informational and
allocational efficiency
Home Bias
• Unequal access to information, due to, for example, time difference language barrier, different
accounting standards
• Coval and Moskowitz find that U.S. fund managers prefer local firms, especially small firms that
produce non-traded goods
• Kang and Stulz report that Japanese MNCs (traded in Japan) with greater international presence (e.g.,
large export volume) have larger foreign ownership.
Home Bias
• Investor irrationality
– Individuals prefer investments that are culturally similar and geographically nearby
• Grinblatt and Keloharju find that investors in Finland are more likely to own firms that are
– located nearby, communicate in their native tongue (Swedish vs Finnish), or have CEOs of the
same cultural background
• Cohen reports that employees tend to overweight own company stocks in their personal portfolios