Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project Report On
Submitted by
Guided by PROF
PROF: A.B.RAUT
1
JSPM’S NARHE TECHNICAL CAMPUS
(SAVITRIBAI PHULE PUNE UNIVERSITY, PUNE)
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the following student have satisfactorily in our B.EProject
work entitled “A comparison study on material cost of 3D printing and
conventional construction ”. This work is being submitted for the award of
degree of Bachelor of Civil Engineering. It is submitted in the partial fulfillment of
the prescribed syllabus of Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune for the
academic year 2020 – 2021
2
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We take this opportunity to express our profound thanks and gratitude towards
our Guide, Respected Prof. A.B.RAUT (Department of Civil Engineering) for their valuable
guidance and untiring encouragement during the preparation of this report. Also, that they
spared their valuable time from the busy academic and administrative schedule for the expert
suggestions. A sincere note of thanks to them for motivating me through out.
We expressed ours sincere thanks to Prof. Dr. S.A.Chaudhari , (HOD), & my teachers
for their encouragement and support to complete this work, we much obliged towards all
the our friends and most important our family for their immense support. Last but not least
we are very much thankful to our Principal Prof. Dr. R.K Lad and the College for cooperation
and supportin the entire course.
We will keep our improvement curve on the rise and thereby enhance the
reputation of my College.
We are also thankful to our family and friends for their support. Let we express our
sincere thanks to all those persons from whom we received co-operation, help and
motivation directly or indirectly during the preparation of this report.
Thanking You
3
Abstract
4
INDEX
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1 AIM : 6
1.1.1 INTRODUCTION
OF PROJECT WORK
1.1.2 HISTORY OF 3DP
1.1.3 Approach of 3D
Printing Construction
with Construction
Management
1.2 PROBLEM 9
STATEMENT
1.3 OBJECTIVES 10
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY 13
REFERENCES 21
5
CHAPTER 1:
INTRODUCTION
1.1 AIM:
To Study The Most Favorable Technology In Construction Management
The current construction industry has serious issues with sustainability. In general, the current construction methods
and materials are not environmentally friendly. The entire construction process, including off-site manufacturing,
transportation of materials, installation and assembly, and on-site construction, emits huge amounts of greenhouse
gases and consumes large quantities of energy. In addition,
conventional concrete made by ordinary Portland cement (OPC) is not sustainable. Manufacture of OPC
is highly energy and carbon intensive.
The significant amount of wastage generated in the construction is another challenge. Formwork is a significant
source of waste, since all of it is discarded sooner or later, contributing to a generally growing amount of waste in the
construction industry.
Furthermore, the conventional approach of casting concrete into a formwork limits geometrical freedom for the
architects to build in various geometries, unless very high costs are paid for bespoke formworks. Rectilinear forms not
only limit the creativity of the architects, but they are also structurally weaker than curvilinear forms owing to stress
concentration. Another challenge is the slow speed of construction. The concrete construction often comprises many
steps including material production, transportation, and in-situ manufacture of formwork, and each step is time
consuming.
Application of three-dimensional (3D) printing techniques in concrete construction could solve the aforementioned
challenges. 3D printing technology is recently gaining popularity in construction industry. In the last few years,
different 3D concrete printing (3DCP) technologies have been explored. The inhibitions in the use of 3D printing in
construction come from technical, economic and social point of view. The technical inhibitions involve the assembly
and production of 3D printer and development of materials with suitable properties.
6
1.1.2 HISTORY OF 3DP
7
1.1.3 Approach of 3D Printing Construction with Construction Management
8
1.2 PROBLEM STATEMENT
• The main purpose of the present study was Benefits include improved not only
efficiencies of the environment and financial resources but also the capacity to
customize designs for aesthetic and structural applications to increase
architectural freedom.
9
1.3 OBJECTIVES
10
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
3. A Review of 3D Printing in Construction and its Impact on the Labor Market Md.
Aslam Hossain 1, Altynay Zhumabekova
In recent years, building 3D printing technology has gradually transformed from imagination
to practice and from concept to production. In the upcoming future, 3D printing will be
widely used in the construction industry. Building 3D printing technology is the fruit of
multidisciplinary collisions in architecture, civil engineering, materials science, computer
science, and automatic control. It exerts the most advanced scientific research results to bring
subversive influence to the field of building construction. But at the same time, due to the
intersection of multiple disciplines, the problem of acting blindly is inevitable. Only by
strengthening the exchange and cooperation of various disciplines and paying attention to the
actual capabilities and demands of the construction industry can we promote the vigorous
development of 3D printing technology in construction.
12
CHAPTER 3 :
METHODOLOGY
•Desk research of the existing literature on different technologies and management use for
conventional construction and 3D printing Technology
•Optimization of additive manufacturing takes virtual blueprints From CAD or animation
modelling
software system through out detail information of it.
•Used the cad software to analysis data.
Finishing
13
CHAPTER 4 : Types of 3 D Printing
There are various types of 3 D printing currently existing and certain types are more suitable for
construction than the others. The major types of concrete printing suitable for construction are
Contour crafting, concrete printing and D Shape.
1. Contour crafting:
It is fabrication technique in which the concrete is crafted layer by layer and was
developed by Khoshnevis (2004)in California. This is the most promising 3D printing
technology and allows the fabrication of the complete house in situ. Two or more nozzles
move simultaneously along the gantry and simultaneously print various
components of the structures. This method also enables the printing of accessories and
conduits along with the buildings. The Potential areas of applications for contour crafting are:
i) low income housing or emergency sheltered housing and ii)
architectural buildings involving complex shapes.
Contour Printing
14
2. Concrete Printing :
Concrete printing
15
3.D shape printing :
D shape Printing
16
CHAPTER 5 : EFFECT ON TIME, COST AND ENVIRONMENT OF
CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION METHOD
The materials used in building construction also have a serious impact on the
environment. First of all, many of the materials used in the construction of buildings
are produced in a non-sustainable way. The factories that make the materials produce
damaging CO2 emissions. Then there’s the issue of transportation. Materials that are
not produced locally are often shipped from across the country or even from
overseas. The transportation required for shipping these materials has a considerable
impact on air quality. There is a huge environmental impact associated with the
extraction and consumption of raw materials for the use of building materials. Not to
mention the actual production of those materials in their final form. According to the
USGBC, 40% of the world’s raw materials are used in the construction of buildings.
17
CHAPTER 6 : CONVENTIONAL METHOD VS 3D PRINTING
18
19
6.1 ADVANTAGES :
• Environmentally friendly: You can use raw soil and natural waste from the
rice production chain for 3D printing. Theoretically, the material for a 3D
printed house can also be plastic – and we’ve got plenty of that.
• Inexpensive: Large-scale industrial buildings can be constructed for a
relatively low price.
6.2 LIMITATIONS :
20
CONCLUSION
21
REFERENCES
[1] Ibrahim Engin Ozturk and Gozde Başak Oztur. The Future of 3D Printing Technology in the
Construction Industry: a Systematic Literature Review
[2] Jake Kidwell Best Practices and Applications of 3D printing in the Construction Industry.
[3] Behzad Nematollahia, Ming Xiab and Jay Sanjay. Current Progress of 3D Concrete Printing
Technologies.
[4] Alexandru Pîrjan and Dana-Mihaela Petroşanu .The Impact Of 3d Printing Technology on the
Society and Economy.
[5] Izabela Hager, Anna Golonka and Roman Putanowicz .3D printing of buildings and building
components as the future of sustainable construction? International Conference on
Ecology and new Building materials and products, ICEBMP 2016.
[7] Vinod G. Gokhare and Dr. D. K. Shinde. A Review paper on 3D-Printing Aspects and Various
Processes Used in the 3D-Printing.
[8] Yoon-Si Lee and Sihyun Kim.3D Printing in Concrete Materials and its Application
[9] Subhav Singh and Anju Bala. Critical Analysis Of Causes Of Delay In Residential Construction
Projects In India.
[10] Salim S. Mulla , Ashish P. Waghmar. Influencing Factors caused for Time & Cost Overruns in
Construction Projects in Pune-India & their Remedies.
[11] Mr. Dinesh Bhatia 1, Prof. Emeritus M. R. Apte.Schedule Overrun And Cost Overrun In The
Construction Of Private Residential Construction Project: Case Study Of Pune India.
[12] Ms. Leena Mali1, Mr. A. A. Warudkar. Causes of Delay in the Construction Industry in Pune region
of India.
22