Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2017 Part 1 Section 2 Salary by Asq and Exemplar Global Certification
2017 Part 1 Section 2 Salary by Asq and Exemplar Global Certification
Certification Certainty
If you’re earning more than other for full-time employees in the United
quality professionals holding similar States. In the
U
job titles, there’s a good chance that an The annual salary survey has Cana nited State
da (co s and
ASQ certification is among the factors always addressed the variable of qualit mbin
y eng ed) a
that put you in that higher-paid position. certifications and salaries, and an AS in
Q-cer eer who is
Each year, the Quality Progress Salary 2011’s report provided a deeper of qu tified
ali ma
Survey report shows that ASQ certifica- analysis of how certifications and excel ty/organiz nager
lence ation
tions tend to have a positive influence higher pay interact. In short, 19.4% ea al
more rns a sizab
on the paychecks of those who hold certifications bring the greatest engin than q le
ee ua
them. rewards when they belong certifi rs without lity
cation that
While a single certification is good, to professionals whose work .
many professionals find that, up to a corresponds to a certification
point, more is better. Figure 1 shows they hold.
how an increasing number of ASQ The best proxy the salary survey
certifications correlates with higher pay gives for the nature of a professional’s
Table 1 includes results for: x Full-time employees, Part‑time employees, x U.S. employees,
x Canadian employees, International employees
Note: Because U.S. and Canadian salaries are being viewed together, Canadian salaries have been converted to U.S. dollars using
the exchange rate in effect July 1, 2017.
Canadian respondents together for that became Exemplar Global was earlier called RABQSA, and that set
this and other analyses. We made this of initials resulted when, in 2004, the Quality Society of Australasia
decision after finding that by adding (QSA) acquired the U.S.-based Registrar Accreditation Board (RAB).
the Canadian results to those from the As you might guess, some of Exemplar Global’s certifications are tied
United States, we had larger signifi- to compliance requirements of Australia and some Asian countries.
cance values (due to larger numbers Exemplar Global’s certifications, however, also are held and valued
in our subsets), without changing the in North America. We show the average salaries of holders of those
direction of the correlation. certifications by job title in the United States (Table 4, pp. 42-43) and
We broke apart the responses for the Canada (Table 5, p. 43).
two countries to build Tables 2 (U.S.
respondents, pp. 38-39) and 3 (Cana-
dian respondents, pp. 40-41), in which
we show average salaries by job title
and ASQ certification.
Of course, ASQ is not the only
certifying body in the world of quality. An auditor who is also
The affiliated organization Exemplar an ASQ-certified quality
Global also provides certifications auditor outearns other
respected worldwide, and several that auditors by $9,915, or
are specifically designed for countries 13.2%.
outside of North America. The body
TA B L E 2 – P A R T A
All respondents $118,91968 $74,87352 $94,959 41 $117,187487 $123,64823 $100,095936 $103,715872 $74,096177 $72,955157
Analyst — — 53,500 2
72,740 5
— 73,395 21
81,423 11
72,364 4
62,5002
Associate — — — — — 69,02120 86,750 4 50,48512 —
Auditor 114,7717 — 67,0002 99,1676 110,0002 84,76577 106,81916 66,30412 81,3336
Black Belt n=1 95,5002 n=1 112,9229 — 97,30010 96,10012 132,5002 86,2502
Calibration — 57,62414 — — — — — — 48,6673
technician
Champion — — — 110,5002 — — — n=1 —
Consultant n=1 n=1 n=1 124,547 11
n=1 132,850 20
116,002 7
92,500 2
n=1
Coordinator — 83,9002 — 93,091 3 — 64,33917 n=1 47,89813 69,1605
Director 149,46213 — 136,8336 141,604 89 162,0745 138,65393 141,04869 110,6949 133,0007
Educator/ — — — 106,575 4 — 96,9836 100,2005 n=1 n=1
instructor
Green Belt — — — — — — n=1 n=1 —
Inspector — 46,000 2
— 92,500 2
— 82,975 6
72,600 5
55,487 11
53,55536
Manager 112,88514 98,6899 96,79915 109,041187 112,10510 101,549270 108,075220 86,639 42 86,07621
Master — — — 165,7508 — 154,9867 134,36810 — —
Black Belt
Other 73,5002 — 82,500 4 117,925 4 — 90,32711 109,57010 n=1 65,0003
Process/
manufacturing/ 108,0002 84,7572 — 113,7605 n=1 109,05010 101,18028 78,5297 67,671 3
project engineer
Quality engineer 107,35317 84,0836 n=1 101,34977 n=1 93,887168 91,976308 79,21924 91,44930
Reliability/ n=1 — — 126,500 4 — 117,1676 121,35116 — n=1
safety engineer
Software quality — — — 129,3758 — 120,2527 108,8007 n=1 —
engineer
Specialist 98,0405 88,0003 62,0002 104,60715 100,8333 81,79555 85,73116 70,7276 61,4005
Statistician — — — n=1 — 125,000 2
133,633 7
— —
Supervisor — 77,167 3
55,581 4
80,725 5
— 83,787 27
91,669 18
61,720 10
63,5717
Supplier quality
engineer/ 114,7502 n=1 89,5002 101,34719 — 96,66955 95,02771 80,2174 81,2147
professional
Technician — 53,5947 — n=1 — 52,13026 55,50011 50,12713 45,61617
Vice president/ 152,6673 — n=1 173,64822 — 179,72722 178,71119 n=1 —
executive
Table 2 includes results for: x Full-time employees, Part‑time employees, x U.S. employees, Canadian employees, International employees
n = 1 indicates that data in a cell are from a single respondent and were suppressed to shield personally identifiable information.
All rows for which no cell had data from more than one respondent have been suppressed to shield personally identifiable information.
Superscript numbers denote the number of respondents.
GMP = good manufacturing practice
HACCP = hazard analysis and critical control point
All respondents $78,24472 $75,568296 $122,922101 $147,05319 $114,414337 $90,853267 $84,12828 $125,384 82 $87,7482,223
Analyst 61,500 4
n=1 — — 86,300 10
77,698 13
51,500 2
118,500 2
70,67885
Associate 45,1673 — — — n=1 65,6673 — — 55,49436
Auditor 88,2992 64,4005 92,5002 — 94,0003 85,7508 54,7502 101,5002 71,58566
Black Belt n=1 86,250 2
n=1 — 108,279 54
99,778 9
— n=1 93,54231
Calibration — 62,5562 — — — — — — 52,37212
technician
Champion — — — — 115,0002 — — — 102,2138
Consultant n=1 n=1 — — 131,56715 107,000 4 — 123,9003 108,26340
Coordinator 30,1333 59,9229 n=1 — n=1 68,3869 — — 57,20374
Director 122,500 2
116,988 13
152,182 11
171,667 6
142,187 34
110,455 15
105,000 2
160,850 10
129,020190
Educator/ n=1 n=1 n=1 — 90,9202 114,0006 n=1 — 92,37023
instructor
Green Belt — n=1 — — n=1 62,2879 — — 65,84222
Inspector 38,8002 62,13219 — — — n=1 — — 44,39966
Manager 97,05016 91,74766 117,21620 117,4005 116,04178 97,63676 94,1655 124,70914 94,847611
Master — n=1 154,0005 154,0005 144,96621 — — 132,5002 137,48613
Black Belt
Other n=1 n=1 n=1 — 77,5002 59,500 4 86,7842 n=1 79,541 33
Process/
manufacturing/ 117,5002 68,7887 115,3336 — 105,95922 94,83911 n=1 120,750 4 83,67570
project engineer
Quality engineer 82,75916 80,22966 114,51012 — 95,34650 87,61551 79,7005 96,36613 81,658328
Reliability/ — n=1 119,51231 — 105,000 4 94,0002 — 123,5002 109,26712
safety engineer
Software quality — n=1 — — n=1 132,5002 — 124,28523 104,21819
engineer
Specialist 78,2147 69,19312 127,250 4 — 97,5205 80,32914 78,760 4 — 70,627163
Statistician — — 147,095 4
n=1 133,345 4
— — n=1 129,19418
Supervisor 63,0955 80,21311 — — 83,9005 69,638 4 63,3833 n=1 69,76882
Supplier quality
engineer/ — 88,87512 97,8122 — 87,7229 97,31318 n=1 — 85,11650
professional
Technician 52,4276 48,344 63 — — 55,0003 51,3676 — n=1 48,119102
Vice president/ — n=1 — 134,0002 180,56710 200,0002 — 247,5002 166,884 68
executive
TA B L E 3 – P A R T A
Table 3 includes results for: x Full-time employees, Part‑time employees, U.S. employees, x Canadian employees, International employees
n = 1 indicates that data in a cell are from a single respondent and were suppressed to shield personally identifiable information.
All rows for which no cell had data from more than one respondent have been suppressed to shield personally identifiable information.
Salaries are noted in Canadian dollars. Superscript numbers denote number of respondents.
HACCP = hazard analysis and critical control point
MONEY TALKS
“Trends come and go. New methods come every two or three
years. Basics never changed: Deliver a good product in the
amount, price and time established in the contract.”
Cesar Gonzales
Quality Manager
Curtiss-Wright
Windsor, CT
MONEY TALKS
TA B L E 4 – P A R T A
Table 4 includes results for: x Full-time employees, Part‑time employees, x U.S. employees, Canadian employees, International employees
All rows for which no cell had data from more than one respondent have been suppressed to shield personally identifiable information.
HAACP = hazard analysis critical control point
IPC = integrated process control
mfg. = manufacturing
OHS = occupational health and safety
QMS = quality management system
Superscript numbers denote number of respondents.
MONEY TALKS
Process/
mfg./project — — — — — 108,0002 — — — —
engineer
Quality — — 79,5002 — $90,6273 104,3336 80,59526 137,8502 — —
engineer
Specialist — — — — — 67,750 4 70,5206 — — —
Supervisor — — — — — 73,075 2
63,750 4
— — —
Supplier
quality — — — — — 109,825 4 84,2337 — — —
engineer/
professional
Technician — — — — — — 46,4002 — — —
Vice
president/ — — 163,0002 — 228,0002 — — — — —
executive
Table 4 includes results for: x Full-time employees, Part‑time employees, x U.S. employees, Canadian employees, International employees
All rows for which no cell had data from more than one respondent have been suppressed to shield personally identifiable information.
IPC = integrated process control
OHS = occupational health and safety
QMS = quality management system
Superscript numbers denote number of respondents.
TA B L E 5
Table 5 includes results for: x Full-time employees, Part‑time employees, U.S. employees, x Canadian employees, International employees
All rows for which no cell had data from more than one respondent have been suppressed to shield personally identifiable information.
QMS = quality management system
Salaries are noted in Canadian dollars. Superscript numbers denote number of respondents.