Crafting a dissertation on the determinants of capital structure is no small feat.

The process involves

extensive research, critical analysis, and the synthesis of complex financial theories. As aspiring
scholars embark on this academic journey, they often encounter various challenges that can be
overwhelming. From navigating through a vast sea of literature to formulating a clear research
question, the road to completing a dissertation on determinants of capital structure is fraught with
obstacles.

One of the primary difficulties lies in the exhaustive nature of the research required. Scholars must
delve deep into academic journals, books, and other scholarly sources to grasp the intricacies of
capital structure theories. Additionally, sifting through a multitude of empirical studies to extract
relevant data can be time-consuming and mentally taxing.

Another challenge is the formulation of a well-defined research question. Determining the right angle
to approach the study of capital structure and identifying the specific determinants to investigate
requires a nuanced understanding of the subject matter. This process demands a keen analytical mind
and a comprehensive grasp of financial concepts.

Furthermore, the compilation of a coherent literature review poses its own set of challenges.
Synthesizing the existing research, identifying gaps in the literature, and contextualizing the chosen
determinants within the broader academic landscape requires a high level of critical thinking and
academic prowess.

In light of these challenges, many students find themselves seeking assistance to alleviate the burden
of dissertation writing. For those navigating the complexities of a dissertation on determinants of
capital structure, considering professional help can be a prudent decision.

Helpwriting.net emerges as a reliable platform where individuals can avail themselves of expert
assistance in crafting their dissertations. The platform offers a team of experienced writers well-
versed in financial theories and adept at navigating the intricacies of capital structure research. By
entrusting the writing process to seasoned professionals, individuals can alleviate the stress
associated with dissertation writing and ensure a high-quality, well-researched final product.

In conclusion, the journey of writing a dissertation on determinants of capital structure is

undoubtedly challenging. From extensive research to formulating a clear research question and
synthesizing existing literature, the process demands dedication and expertise. For those seeking
support in this academic endeavor, ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ stands as a reliable resource to streamline
the writing process and deliver a dissertation that meets the highest academic standards.
Determinants of Intrinsic Value: The Present Value Equation. The standard deviations of the book
leverage ratios show that they vary most. German and Japanese firms not only have easier access to
debt finance, but they also need to rely less on. Leverage refers to the degree to which a business or
entity uses borrowed money as funding capital. The discussion in preceding paragraphs confirm that.
Finally, the relatively weaker protection of creditors in France (table 1) may lead. The firms with
more asset collateral value of assets are more capable of issuing secured debt and revealing less
information about future profits. In summary, the strength and the nature of the effect of firm
specific as well. Study of the Static Trade-Off Theory determinants vis-a-vis Capital Structure. This
finding differs from the positive relation reported by. Profitability F. Volatility G. Industry
Classification A. Therefore, the lessons learned from one environment cannot be. The role of
collateral value of assets is ranked as an important factor, only secondary to profitability, in the
financing decision. These are measures of: (i) profitability, (ii) growth. Capital structure decisions,
cost of capital, weighted average cost of capita. Smaller businesses may have to apply for
commercial debt or borrow privately from individuals. If company has power to control its expenses
and earn more from its sale, then company can use more debt resources in the capital structure.
France 314.4 1,475 25.9 103 9.6 53.8 n.a 62.4 578 968 106.1 103.1. Therefore, in the following sub-
section each sample country. Optimal Capital Structure”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative
Analysis, 40 (2005), 259-281. Harris, M., and A. Raviv. “ Capital Structure and the Informational
Role of Debt.” Journal of Finance, 45. This conclusion holds in all countries irrespective of their
differences in. Germany 355.1 1,432 22.2 67.8 21.4 64.3 39.3 107.5 413 933 108.5 146.9. Firms
could reduce tax payments by using more debt rather than equity in financing their investments. It
assumes the observable proxies to be the exact measures of the theoretical constructs, though this
may not be true due to measurement errors. Depending on economic conditions the cost of capital
can be considered either high or low for a particular business. Ju, N., R. Parrino, A. M. Poteshman,
and M. S. Weisbach. “ Horses and Rabbits. Section IV states the methodology of structure equation
modeling and MIMIC model. Jensen and Meckling (1976) also argue that the agency costs will be
reduced if firms issue convertible debt. Maddala and Nimalendran (1996) further state that detecting
weak indicators in the presence of several instruments is still an unresolved issue.
Capital structure should be as capable of being adjusted according to the needs of. Maritime Freights
1: Determinants 2: Fluctuations 3: What can we do. Capital structure and eps a study on selected
financial institutions listed o. However, as noted by TW (1988), though growth opportunities are
capital assets that may add value to a firm, they can neither collateralize nor generate current taxable
income. A business may face multiple determinants of capital structure when they are making the
decision. The more of its capital that is borrowed the greater the mandatory interest payments that it
must make. The relatively larger coefficients for Japanese and British firms suggest that the presence
of information. These are measures of: (i) profitability, (ii) growth. Investment Decisions in an
Industry Framework.” European Finance Review, 2 (1999), 251-271. We also use third-party cookies
that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. Among the G5 countries the payout
ratio of British firms is the highest with a relatively smaller negative. Value Traded: The total value
of shares traded during the period. Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 41 (2006), 221-243. His
study confirms the traditional theory that the objective of minimizing the cost of capital leads to an
optimal level of financial structure. Thus convertible debt ratios should be positively related to
growth opportunities too. A. The Determinants of Leverage: Pooled Data for All Countries. On the
other hand, the French system encourages retention. There are many determinants of capital
structure, some of them are:-. Panel A: Banking sector and stock market indicators of sample
countries. Size also affects the ability of a business to attract long term debt financing. The criteria
used for sub-sampling are: (i) firm size, (ii) growth. The trade-off theory implies that a major
borrowing. Germany 355.1 1,432 22.2 67.8 21.4 64.3 39.3 107.5 413 933 108.5 146.9. Therefore, the
collateral value of assets can be a proxy for agency and financial distress costs. At times when long-
term interest rates are expected to rise, managers are. Maddala and Nimalendran (1996) indicate that
the problematic model specification causes the poor results in TW’s research. IUHH,I WKHUH LV
QR DGMXVWPHQW LQ OHYHUDJH 7KH DEVHQFe of adjustment is possible when
adjustment. However, different measures result in different signs of the loadings of growth and
profitability. The growth has a negative effect on leverage when we measure it with the market-to-
book assets (MBA) ratio, while positive if it’s measured with market-to-equity (MBE) ratio. In terms
of relative impact on capital structure, growth is the most influential determinant on capital structure
when we measure the growth as either the market-to-book assets ratio or the market-to-book equity
ratio.
Maritime Freights 1: Determinants 2: Fluctuations 3: What can we do. Volatility is measured with the
standard deviation of the percentage change in operating income (STDGOI), the coefficient of
variation of ROA (CV(ROA)), the coefficient of variation of ROE (CV(ROE)), and the coefficient
of variation of operating income divided by total assets (CV(OITA)). Cookie Settings Accept All
Reject All Privacy Policy Manage consent. Panel data are used because this increases the degrees of
freedom. In terms of relative impact on capital structure, growth is the most influential determinant
on capital structure when we measure the growth as either the market-to-book assets ratio or the
market-to-book equity ratio. Similarly, due to the absence of an optimal way of choosing the
instrument set for GMM-SYS estimator. The ordinary least squares (OLS) method is incapable of
dealing with either cause-effect relationships or multiple dependent variables. The sample size
consists of 13,887 firm-year observations in sixteen years. Ball, R., S. P. Kothari, and A. Robin. “
The Effect of International Institutional Factors on Properties of. Yesterday, we have taught the steps
of determination of optimal capital structure. Stuart Briers - Undergraduate Research Paper Stuart
Briers - Undergraduate Research Paper Capital structure decisions Capital structure decisions An
Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of Corporate Debt Policy of Nigeria. The authors claim that
the differences are caused by differing methodologies. Secondly, due to the strategic informational
advantage over. Most importantly, a Multiple Indicators and Multiple Causes Model (MIMIC) is
proposed to examine the determinants capital structure choice. Therefore no separate industry and
time dummies are included in the model. In the interest of brevity, the estimates using book. MA
activity. An inverse relation between book leverage and equity premium is possible when firms retain
more. Werner Economics, Business 2011 76 Save The Capital Structure of Swiss Companies: An
Empirical Analysis Using Dynamic Panel Data Philippe Gaud Elion Jani Martin Hoesli Andre Bender
Economics, Business 2003 In this paper, we analyze the determinants of the capital structure for a
panel of 106 Swiss companies listed in the Swiss stock exchange. Determinants of Capital Structure:
A Study on Some Selected Corporate Firms i. Due to their private interests, managers do not want
their company to be. Market Capitalization: The share price times the number of shares outstanding.
However, if the business owners enter into an agreement that provides to the finance to the business
with fixed repayment amount you will find as time goes by the repayments become very small.
Furthermore, the correlation of Yi,t-1 ZLWK i would result in. Jarrel and Kim (1984) find no clear
evidence, Trezevant (1992) find support for this theory. The. MacKay, P., and G. M. Phillips. “ How
Does Industry Affect Firm Financial Structure?” Review of. Sidra Amjad Hailey Semantic Scholar
Semantic Scholar's Logo Figure 1 of 4 Stay Connected With Semantic Scholar Sign Up What Is
Semantic Scholar. This cost has to be considered by the business because the investors or lenders
would expect this return to be met. International Data.” Journal of Finance, 50 (1995), 1421-1460. In
keeping with our first purpose, we successfully specify an acceptable model based on the overall
model fit evaluation and re-establish the potential of applying structure equation modeling in
corporate finance. On the other hand, the French system encourages retention.
The positive effect of creditors’ rights on leverage is self-explanatory as. Booth, Aivazian, Demirguc-
Kunt, and Maksimovic (2001) further contend that profitable firms might be able to finance their
growth by using retained earnings while maintaining a constant debt ratio. Mohammed Jasir PV
What's hot ( 20 ) FINANCING DECISIONS FINANCING DECISIONS Types of dividend policy
Types of dividend policy Factors affecting capital structure Factors affecting capital structure
Operating, financial and combined leverage Operating, financial and combined leverage 1. With the
capital structure measured simultaneously by the ratios of long-term debt, short-term debt, and
convertible debt to the market value of equity, our results show that growth is the most important
determinant of capital structure choice, followed in order by profitability, collateral value, volatility,
non-debt tax shields, and uniqueness. On the other hand, the lower leverage ratios of American and
British. The evaluation of the model fit evaluation assures that the model-implied covariance is
within an acceptable range of the population covariance such that the interpretation of parameter
estimates can be more informative about the population. It causes measurement error problem and
hence leads to inconsistent research results. When this risk will get out, you can increase the debt
proportion in your capital structure. Marsh, P. “ The Choice between Equity and Debt: An Empirical
Study.” Journal of Finance, 37 (1982). Rajan and Zingales (1995), among others, empirically confirm
this prediction. The speed of adjustment varies across sample countries, being fastest among French
firms, followed by. Determinants of Intrinsic Value: The Present Value Equation. Stuart Briers -
Undergraduate Research Paper Stuart Briers - Undergraduate Research Paper Capital structure
decisions Capital structure decisions An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of Corporate Debt
Policy of Nigeria. There are private, government and regional development banks. Overall, the
evidence suggests that the earlier findings are robust. Secured creditors first is one if secured
creditors are ranked first in the distribution of. Section VI concludes the study. II. Measures and
Determinants of Capital Structure A. Growth B. Uniqueness C. Non-Debt Tax Shields D. Booth et
al. use ROA as a profitability measure and find that high profitability is associated with low debt in
10 developing countries. Khan Economics, Business 2007 Using two variants of panel data analysis,
we attempt to find the determinants of capital structure of KSE listed none-financial firms for the
period 1994-2002. So, all financial company can give the loan to soft drink companies because they
know that sale of soft drink company is enough to repay the loan during the sale season time. 2.
Profitability Profitability is the second determinants of capital structure. American, British, German
and Japanese firms respectively.35 This is consistent with the view that the. In addition, we re-
estimate the equation without the payout ratio, the results. The trade-off theory implies that a major
borrowing. Introduction to UML: Structural Modeling and Use Cases. Leverage refers to the degree
to which a business or entity uses borrowed money as funding capital. Myers, S. C. “ Determinants
of Corporate Borrowing.” Journal of Financial Economics, 5 (1977), 147-. Therefore, in the following
sub-section each sample country. Kraus, A., and R. H. Litzenberger. “ A State-preference Model of
Optimal Financial Leverage.” Journal. Table 1 Constructs, Causes and Effects in MIMIC Model
Table 1 Constructs, Causes and Effects in MIMIC Model (Cont.) Load More. The covariance matrix
instead of the correlation matrix is used as an input to estimate the parameters in LISREL since the
analysis of the correlation matrix is problematic in several ways (Cudeck (1989)).
Capital structure and eps a study on selected financial institutions listed o. Until 1997 the British tax
system favored dividend payments. Capital structure and eps a study on selected financial
institutions listed o. In addition, this study tries to unravel the relative impact of determinants of
capital structure in a cause-effect simultaneous framework. The factors to be considered whenever a
capital structure decision is taken are. They perform both the cross-sectional studies among different
industries and the inter-temporal studies within each industry. If there is a big company who can sell
large quantity within one day, that company can keep more proportion of debt and less proportion of
capital in his capital structure because such companies are of big size. Evidence from France,
Germany and the UK.” European Financial Management, 12 (2006). An Assessment of Capital
Structure Decisions by Small and Medium Enterprises. European countries, the coefficient is the
largest in France and this could be explained by a combination. Kester, C. W. “ Capital and
Ownership Structure: A Comparison of United States and Japanese. However, as noted by TW
(1988), though growth opportunities are capital assets that may add value to a firm, they can neither
collateralize nor generate current taxable income. Company Panel Data.” Journal of Business Finance
and Accounting, 28 (2001), 175-198. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are
stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website.
Capital structure while split between debt or equity can get complex as equity instruments such as
preference shares have all the characteristics of debt and therefore are considered debt in the balance
sheet. However, the unresolved issue that different indicators for the same construct may have
different signs still persists. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent.
Equally, the role of effective tax rate on market leverage is not statistically. It assumes the observable
proxies to be the exact measures of the theoretical constructs, though this may not be true due to
measurement errors. As for the independent variables, it allows several observable variables as
indicators of the theoretical constructs without causing multicollinearity problems, which is a
common problem when using regression analysis in financial studies. One important implication of
this model is that the different levels of non-debt tax shield found in different industries can explain
the observed differences in financial leverage across industries. Concentration.” Economic Policy, 31
(2000), 239-267. German and Japanese firms not only have easier access to debt finance, but they
also need to rely less on. MA activity. An inverse relation between book leverage and equity
premium is possible when firms retain more. Capital structure decisions, cost of capital, weighted
average cost of capita. Inviting new equity holders to the business means the additional equity
holders will also have a say in business decisions. The standard deviations of the book leverage ratios
show that they vary most. So, all financial company can give the loan to soft drink companies
because they know that sale of soft drink company is enough to repay the loan during the sale season
time. 2. Profitability Profitability is the second determinants of capital structure. I can give the
example of soft drink, its sale is summer season. For instance, regression analysis doesn’t control
measurement errors and can only deal with one dependent variable at a time.
When this risk will get out, you can increase the debt proportion in your capital structure. Cookie
Settings Accept All Reject All Privacy Policy Manage consent. Debt and equity will be decided on
the basis of profitability. The relatively larger coefficients for Japanese and British firms suggest that
the presence of information. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. An
Assessment of Capital Structure Decisions by Small and Medium Enterprises. Therefore, we discuss
the results from this method of estimation. France 314.4 1,475 25.9 103 9.6 53.8 n.a 62.4 578 968
106.1 103.1. The firms with large non-debt tax shields tend to have relatively less debt in their capital
structure. Chang and Rhee (1990) and the inverse relation reported by Rozeff (1982). Mohammed
Jasir PV What's hot ( 20 ) FINANCING DECISIONS FINANCING DECISIONS Types of dividend
policy Types of dividend policy Factors affecting capital structure Factors affecting capital structure
Operating, financial and combined leverage Operating, financial and combined leverage 1. Large
companies can access debt through securities such as preference shares, these are equity holdings
which command a fixed interest percentage like debt. For convenience, all variables are taken to
have expectation zero. Profitable firms carry a larger amount of debt due to the benefits of tax
deductibility. Semantic Scholar is a free, AI-powered research tool for scientific literature, based at
the Allen Institute for AI. The speed of adjustment depends on the cost of adjustment relative to the
cost. Fischer, E. O., R. Heinkel, and J. Zechner. “ Dynamic Capital Structure Choice: Theory and
Tests.”. Company Panel Data.” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 28 (2001), 175-198. If
there is high tax rate in your country, you can save tax by keeping more proportion of debt in your
capital structure. This suggests a positive relationship between leverage and. Swoboda, P. and J.
Zechner. “ Financial Structure and the Tax System.” In R. Jarrow et al., eds. These cookies track
visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads. Due to their private
interests, managers do not want their company to be. Japan 2,918 4,546 98.2 104.6 54 42.5 43.8 52.5
2,071 2,470 266.8 142.4. We find that all firm-specific factors, including the dividend. It is important
because it affects matters of cost of capital, internal rate of return, liquidity and internal growth rate.
Capital structure decisions, cost of capital, weighted average cost of capita. There are many
determinants of capital structure, some of them are:-. Alexander Decker Stuart Briers -
Undergraduate Research Paper Stuart Briers - Undergraduate Research Paper Stuart Briers Capital
structure decisions Capital structure decisions phuongthao6689 An Empirical Analysis of the
Determinants of Corporate Debt Policy of Nigeria. Since the model is fairly complex, they constrain
105 coefficient entries to be zero in order to have the model identified.
These observable indicators or proxies can then be viewed as measures of latent variables with
measurement errors. However, they find poor correlations in that only four out of eight constructs are
statistically significantly different from zero. Ju, N., R. Parrino, A. M. Poteshman, and M. S.
Weisbach. “ Horses and Rabbits. Inflation is, therefore, a determinant of capital structure. Larger
businesses which meet requirements can list and access equity from the public through listing their
shares. Data. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7 (2001), 77-99. States, while it is positively affected in
Japan and the United Kingdom.30 The positive effect suggests. First Principles. Invest in projects
that yield a return greater than the minimum acceptable hurdle rate. Similarly, due to the absence of
an optimal way of choosing the instrument set for GMM-SYS estimator. The same is not available to
smaller businesses which can incorporate but would access equity through private investors. Finding
capital at a cost that is within the reach of the business is very important. In terms of relative impact
on capital structure, growth is the most influential determinant on capital structure when we measure
the growth as either the market-to-book assets ratio or the market-to-book equity ratio. Antoniou, A.
Y. Guney and K. Paudyal. “ The Determinants of Debt Maturity Structure. For more information
about the conference please visit the conference website: ABSTRACT This study seeks to explore
the factors determining the capital structure of banking sector of Pakistan. We attempt to re-advocate
the use of structure equation modeling in corporate finance, following TW’s (1988) seminal work on
determinants of capital structure over a decade ago. The problem of poor instruments apparently
exists in the TW model. Joreskog and Goldberger (1975) show the method to obtain maximum
likelihood estimates of parameters for MIMIC model with a single latent variable. Determinants of
Capital Structure: A Study on Some Selected Corporate Firms i. By clicking “Accept All”, you
consent to the use of ALL the cookies. Ferri, M. G., and W. H. Jones. “ Determinants of Financial
Structure: A New Methodological Approach.”. The estimates show a positive effect of equity
premium on market leverage implying that firms raise. Therefore, firms with less than five
consecutive annual observations and missing variables are excluded. Jarrel and Kim (1984) find no
clear evidence, Trezevant (1992) find support for this theory. The. Table 4 presents the findings for
the three versions. Ubiquitous Powerful influence on health Underlie: Differences between
individuals within countries. In keeping with our first purpose, we successfully specify an acceptable
model based on the overall model fit evaluation and re-establish the potential of applying structure
equation modeling in corporate finance. Baker, M., and J. Wurgler. “ Market Timing and Capital
Structure.” Journal of Finance, 57 (2002), 1-32. As stated in the previous section, in the MIMIC
model, the total effect includes merely the indirect effect, which is a product of loadings. Heaton, J.
B., “ Managerial Optimism and Corporate Finance.” Financial Management, 31 (2002), 33-45.
Contrary to the predictions of the trade-off theory, the estimates reveal an inverse.