THE HIGH COURT OF MADIIYA PRADESH : JABALPUR

NOTIFI CATI0N

No.124/Exam/DRHJS/2023 Dated 03 -12-2023

The High Court of M.P. has been pleased to publish the Proposed
Model Answer Keys for the Question Paper (Objective Type) of Online
Preliminary Exam, District Judge (Entry Level) Direct Recruitment from
Bar, Exam-2023, held on 03-12-2023. High Court of M.P. intends to use
the Proposed Model Answer keys in the evaluation of the aforementioned
question paper.
If any candidate wishes to make any objection regarding any Model
Answer Key, he/she may, submit objection(s) in writing & signed by
him/her, to the Examination Section, High Court of M.P., Jabalpur by
registered post / by hand in Receipt Section, High Court of M.P.,
Jabalpur (M.P.), or through e-mail at (pregexamhcjbp@mp.gov.in)
within 07 days from the date of uploading / publication of the proposed
Model Answers Keys, mentioning his/her Name, Application No. along-
with self attested photo copies of source document(s)/proof, on the basis of
which he/she has submitted the objection(s).
Objections received within aforesaid time and in aforesaid manner,
shall be taken into consideration. Objection received without any authentic
proof/source or after aforesaid stipulated period/time shall not be
entertained / considered on any ground whatsoever and shall stand rejected
without assigning any reason.

After declaration of result of Online Preliminary Exam, no

representation in respect of finalized Answer Keys shall be entertained on
any ground.

Registrar(FHfam)

Attached :- Question Paper alongwith Proposed Model Answer Keys and

format for submitting objection.
 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR

Online Preljminarv Exam of District Judcle (Entrv Level) Direct Recruitment from
Bar. Exam-2023
Question Paper a onc]with Proposed Model Answer Keys
Q.NO. ProposedAns
Question Text Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4

Law / fan (Total llo Questions) (Q,No. 1 to llo)

1 .P.C., Cr.P.C. & Evidence Act -Under 4 Exception 1 of Exception 2 of Explanation 2 Explanation 3
which one of the following provisions of the section 300 section 300 of section 299 of section 299
ndian penal code the causing of the death rm 300 ffl rm 300 tFT rm 299 ffl rm 299 ffl
eyFT 1 dtqFT 2 ..`...,
of child in the mother's womb is nothomicide?rm.I.ti.,I.q.ti.Taeneq3tfrm-tTTthdctili TtFi rTfanedft lfa5iH\{chuidqtt- I-:.-==f=-f==3=f`f-f .- i-_-+I- -i.i- -i- - F7tiiRT 3

2 .P.C., Cr.P.C. & Evidence Act -Voluntarily 3 326 325 326-A 326-a
causing grievous hurt by use of acid etc. isof enceunderwhichsectionoftheIndianPenalCode,1860?rm.I.tinI.H.ti.TaFTGq3tfrm-Tfisa7rfugTITchiPr{uerfuq5i]TeTRthisgil,1860chf u€/TITathch3TqITua7 3Qi 331\ 3i!a-q5- 33a-RT

3 .P.C., Cr.P.C. & Evidence Act -"Adultery" 1 497 397 390 409
is no longer an offence as Section . . . .oftheIndianPenalCode,1860has beendeclaredunconstitutionalbytheSupremeCourt.#EfiE#UiE¥graeTftyirfu'=rty'th,186o#.. . . .€mTchrfuamTenlictca€TTfirtPrfhaq5TfanaI ¥\® 3q® 3\0 ¥0\

4 .P.C., Cr.P.C. & Evidence Act -ln which 1 1920 1936 1950 1964
year description eleventh and Explanation3wereinsertedinSection21oftheIndianPenalCode?£EdrF#HriqF;TEqurfutlfrmin#RItw3fedofi3jd:¥TTfhafcarria 7 t\?O ?q3i 3\1\0 ?\a¥

Page 1 of 26
Q.No. ProposedAns
Question Text Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4

5 .P.C., Cr.P.C. & Evidence Act -lt which 1 Surendran v/s Kumar Sunil Kumar v. Rajesh alias
case Supreme Court has observed that in State of Kerala, Ghimirey v. State of Kerala Sarkari and
some circumstances evidence of a 2022 SCC State of Sikkim] and another, another v. State
deceased wife with respect to cruelty could Online SC 621 AIR 2019 SC AIR 2022 SC of Haryana,
be admissible in a trial for a charge under giv FT 2011 3007 AIR 2020 SC
Section 498 A of the lpc under Section
32(1 ) of the Evidence Act... as long as the
fu rna, 2o22 FTfaffl±
enGff-di FTfen stFT
FTfroma wh*
5561

cause of her death has come into question, ", I ut 3TR iT T5} 3tT, T HdiqFT
whether the charge relating to death isprovedornotis mmaterialwithrespect oadmis ibil ty.in.F.ti„€.q.ti.qa"en3tfrm-3iatFTapTqTf lif undfiz7E3Tr+iT]ufuafsFgrTELELFiFTrfuthriE#3E,f lSGtwhOTRthdsgilaltTRT498Ta7¥RE¥RE¥SF TREngFEL#giv 621 2019 di 2011 ut un 2o22di3oo7 rm irmthma,Tutrm2o20THth5561

6 .P.C., Cr.P.C. & Evidence Act -By which 3 Act XXV of 1955 Act XXIV of Act Xxvl of Act Xxvll of
one out of the following Act, the words 1955 FT 1955 1955 1955
"imprisonment for life" were substituted for 3tfrm xxv 1955 ffl 1955 ffl 1955 ffl
the words "transportation for life" in theIndianPenalCode?Th.a.ti.,a.H.ti.Taenap3tf fl-RTffitr¥FqTtlTRE3tfrmfifeFTinait2mq{nGtTRE5T¥TaTH"¥TiFHfaFTThafinTTqTa? 3tfrm xxiv tlfrm xxvi ofrm xxvi I

7 .P.C., Cr.P.C. & Evidence Act -Who may 4 By the person n cross n further cross By a Judge.
ask question about any irrelevant fact to the who call the examination. examination. "ehaFT
witness during the trial ? witness in REen fl. 3tfth
+TT.I.ti. , i.q.ti. qa enGH 3rfun _ ffro
-a5 an FTch a fawn day ai ri i}. th evidence. REena'
H qerif ap
"fasanTZFfflHffla7 fRE "ch ch"griIFT€,
8 .P.C„ Cr.P.C. & Evidence Act -ln which 4 Aashis jain vs Pattu Rajan vs Vinod Natesan Mahender
judgment Supreme Couh held that "it hardly Makrand Singh State of Tamil vs State of Chawla and
needs to be emphasised that one of the and others Nadu (2019) 4 Kerala and others vs Union
main reasons for witnesses to turn hostile (2019) 3 SCC SCC 771 others (2019) 2 of India and
is that they are not accorded appropriate 770 q¥FTFT SCC 401 others (2019)
protection by the state" ? rfu a] iFT rfuTTEma fafraRE 14 SCC 615
in.E.ti. , I.H.ti. qa HTeq 3tfrm . fed FgivferTa (2019) 4 iFT a5RT rna FfaFTan
fifea.FTfflsiEiFTapTZTTaqEi¥TqE Orq (201 9) 3 RE771 FTrmth
thma ffu iTqT fS u€H qT i]tT fan ffli ch Ten 77o Z:ffi22::) Ta rm (201 9)
cffl¥qq5iTT Ta. a fS HTfaSrffi a TT&Tan an ar5HE¥fiaFTFTH.a#*F7FT i4en6i5

9 .P.C., Cr.P.C. & Evidence Act -ln which 1 Mithu vs State Sushil Kumar Raghbir vs Harchand
case it was declared by the Supreme Court of Punjab AIR Mehrotra vs State of Singh vs State
that section 303 Indian Penal Code,1860 is 1983 SC 473 State of U.P. Haryana AI R of Punjab AIR
unconstitutional ?
- iFT
AIR 1984 SC 1981 SC 2037 1982 SC 650
Th.a.ti. , E.H.ti. giv engr ctfrm -ffu twma 1232 whirm givfasFT
F"ai¥EifflFapTqTFTgTuqgrfufin
TTqT VI fs +tTth is en, 1 860 ch tTRT
T.3rfe.3tR.
1983 qH.ffi. 473 ch"
givFT thma
I. . 3tR.
inma
T. . 3tR,
303 3Tcaenffa a 7 RTrfumau.ut.rm.1984RT.th.1232 1981 W.th.2037 1982 qH.th. 650

Page 2 of 26
Q.No. ProposedAns
Question Text Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4

10 .P.C., Cr.P.C. & Evidence Act -Under 3 Section 71 Section 72 Section 73 Section 70
Indian Penal Code,1860 which one of thefol owingsectionmakesprovisionof'SolitaryConfinement'?Th.€.ti.,a.TT.ti.qa"RIcrf fi.OTTthqu5th,1860a7ctwhffiHfREiachtheTRT'T5TiTqRIertFTTmaemeda? rm71 rm72 rm73 rm70

11 .P.C., Cr.P.C. & Evidence Act -Which of 1 Section 268 Section 258 Section 298 Section 195
the fol owing provision of the Indian PenalCode,1860mayberesortedtoabatethepollution?#€*a€HfiTrfuFrfuRIEf i3,-iFai@fiHf fi af uTmaem5THEiiTfin"-a? "268 rm 258 rm 298 mT 195

12 .P.C., Cr.P.C. & Evidence Act -Who

amongst the following is not competent
under section 92 of Criminal Procedure
4 District
Magistrate
finFfaifr
Chief Judicial
Magistrate VI- #rfu
Session Court Judicial

Code,1973 to order the postal or telegraphauthoritytodeliverthedocument,parcelort#.n{:±r:=.#i%ir#siofayha- .-. . .,.-.',-.ditinT92a7cjrfui5i FqT2thqrfun#cTr+Ranach,qTfaf lrfuq5TqRFTedq5T3tTaiITa fiHerTTT®.%7 EREJfa

13 .P.C., Cr.P.C. & Evidence Act -Procedure 1 Section 305 Cr. Section 387 Cr. Section 280 Cr. Section 289 Cr.
when corporation or registered society is an P.C. P.C. P.C. P.C.
accused, is prescribed in which section ?in.E.ti.,E.H.ti.qatmeq3rfrm.ffi,-===-=f-`=.3====-.==----`=:= -i-.- rm 3o5 €.H.ti. rm 387 €.u.ti. rm 297 I.H.ti. rm 289 I.H.ti.

14 .P.C., Cr.P.C. & Evidence Act -under 1 Sec. 280 Sec. 279 Sec. 278 Sec. 281
which section of Code of CriminalProcedure,1973Magistratecanrecordremarksrespectingthedemeanourofwitnes ?".a.ti.,a.u.ti.givengretf fl-au5ffien,1973#fedunita73trfuEL"ch5{@#-axpSata.fanth® rm 280 rm 279 rm 278 rm 281

15 .P.C., Cr.P.C. & Evidence Act -To tender 3 The witness He shall cross- The person Any offence
pardon under Section 306 of the Code of must not be examine the getting pardon punishable with
Criminal Procedure,1973 - directly accused. need not be in Imprisonment
VI.a.ti. , a.H.ti, Ta even 3tfrm -<u5 concerned in qEutquffl police custody. which shall not
rfu en, 1 973 # emT 306 a cjrfu the offence. ENeruT th I ap-an fan extend to more
en-an a7 fan . ench ch 3tquer whrmrfu than 7 years.
fi 3T" a ch`NIena. ch€ "er ch
maer FT a 3tFTRE 07 of a rfu
ifeT@'givTTRTl Ta'%l a7q5T-ausadiTal

Page 3 of 26
a.No. ProposedAns
Question Text Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4

16 .P.C., Cr.P.C. & Evidence Act -Which of 1 Mohan Singh Lennart Mangilal V. Lallu

the following case is related to "Unlawful and anr. V. Schussler and Sirgan Chand Yaeshwant
assembly" ?in.€.ti.E.H.ti. Ta fflor crfrm _ fir # a State of another V. Rathi AIR 1965 Singh V. Rao
Punjab, AIR Director of SC 101 Jagdish Singh
then'FTRET"ffifafai€qFiF'affitoa 1963 SC 174 Enforcement FiTflffltl Pro AIR 1968 SC
?` haferTa and another fin i? rfe 620
T5rmfao AIR 1970 SC Tut3tR 1965
iFTma, 549 giv 1 ol EF"qrminfae
Tut3tR 1963 wi QTTun ut fee Tut3TR
di 174 3tap fro3Tfa rfe-qaF3rfe¥i970di549 1968 di 620

17 .P.C., Cr.P.C. & Evidence Act -ln which 1 Navtej Singh Hansmukhlal D State of Goa V. State of
case it was held that Section 377 Johar and ors. Vora V. State of Fouziya lmtiaz Maharashtra V.
criminalises consensual sexual acts of V. Union of Tamil Nadu, Sheikh & Maroti
adults (i.e. Persons above the age of 18 ndia Through 2022 Livelaw Others, (2021) Pimpalkar,
Secretary (SC) 1033 8 SCC 401 2022 Livelaw
years who are competent to consent) in
Tin " flo
private, is violative of Articles 14,15,19
and 21 of the Constitution ?
Ministry of Law
and Justice] •..a.' . qrmen
rfu qa rna,
(SC) 898

REUFTfro
in.I.ti. , I.TI.ti. qa fflor tlfrm -ffu AIR 2018 SC UH'
qFTa a. qg €+qeTTRiT fan iiqT 8 fS etRT 377 4321 2022fflFTV (2021) 8 ffiT©, 2022
Trfu fee jt5{Ta3fflfao (Tfty 1 033 qen4ol dTgrv(giv898
#rfe¥±8u*a©%ffl£EF
I:-:=`-=-::==---iI=-I-:--:-i---:
EL#is3ifeenuteqfed,T3ng3tR2018di4321

18 .P.C., Cr.P.C. & Evidence Act - 2 Section 154 Section 319 Section 321 Section 433
Consti ution Bench of Supreme Court in'Harde pSinghvsStateofPunjab'(2014)3SCC92clarifiedtheambitandscopeofsection. . .ofcodeofcriminalProcedure.in.E.ti.,I.H.ti.tieneFcrfRE-t3itFTapTqTf l#f i€mtfliIiIREfe iFTH## Ot4,3TprRE¥¥#RTfinaI rm 1 54 rm 3 1 9 rm 321 rm 433

19 .P.C„ Cr.P.C. & Evidence Act -ln which 1 Rakesh Kumar Girish Kumar Vasant Rao Satvinder Singh
judgment of Supreme Court it was held that Paul vs State of Suneja vs CBl Guhe vs State Saluja vs State
"ln all cases where the minimum sentence
Assam AIR AIR 2017 SC of M.P. 2017 of Bihar (2019)
is less than 10 years but the maximum 2017 SC 3948 3620 SCC Online 7 SCC 89
chFTTma fthFT HdPefer
##
sentence is not death or life imprisonment SC 893
then section 167(2)(a)(ii) will apply and the FT 3TFT rna rfu vI
accused will be entitled to grant of 'default
bail' after 60 days in case charge-sheet is
T3tT€3tR2017
en 3948 T3TRrm2oi7
FTFgrrfu
ma2017
RT#
(2019) 7
not filed" ? un 3620 . .. '`
giv89
in.€.ti. , I.p.ti. Ta eneq crfffl -GiFdF ofTenETen
qiqTen gTIT fed f fi i qE qfan f uH#anFT¥¥T*TH#T,cTrinqarfuTa.f uf lf la'7 893

Page 4 of 26
Q.No- ProposedAns
Question Text Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4
20 .P.C., Cr.P.C. & Evidence Act -Evidence 3 The witness The witness is his presence his presence
glven by a witness in a judicial proceeding cannot be kept out of the can be cannot be
is relevant for the purpose of proving in a found. way by adverse obtained with obtained
subsequent Judicial proceeding, the truth of "chfhara. party. reasonable without
rfuch ap
the facts which it states, except when -
Th.a,ti., a.H.ti. giv eney ¢Trm -ITFT @
tli75"%l

¥±fflS
di
delay. unreasonable
expenses.
fan an i fan TTqT a, Sit ddi #
tlRltTT @, @ sH HTeF i alha a, fan
`+¥cn`TddT i+ilDch oT2idr® fl imfai] qir{i S
7TqTal 9F_E diGqfae
"dial affl,fflan#
Htina7fckgra.,finrfu- Ta'#ffldil
21 .P.C., Cr.P.C. & Evidence Act -Section 3 Protection to Withdrawal Legal aid to the Order to
304 of Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 accused from accused at release on
deals with - against double prosecution. State expense probation of
in.€.ti. , €.q.ti. ti FTer crfrm -E3 prosecution for drREEN in certain cases. good conduct.
rfu en, 1 973 di era 304 fflha a - the sameoffence.FTarmv a7fatactrfurmartychFTrm' aFTl flis Grr" #qREenqTftyedqFTrfuI
F¥F"EchEaVlfafaiFiTqui

22 .P.C„ Cr.P.C. & Evidence Act -Previous 4 is irrelevant. is relevant in is relevant only is relevant in
Good Character - fautal Civil Cases. when evidence criminal
in.a.ti. , a.u.ti. Ta ever etfrm -qtr fRE fflFdi fi as to previous proceedings.
3ti5T rfu - giv%, bad character#e£#thFTq{agivt, ffi•..-' .give,

23 C.P.C., T.P. Act & Contract Act -Where in 1 Not exceeding Not exceeding Not exceeding Not exceeding
any suit, in which an arrest under section Rs. 50000 Rs. 25000 Rs.10000 Rs 5000
94 of Code of Civil Procedure,1908 has ¥. 5oooo a i. 25ooo a 5.1 oooo a F.5ooo a
been af ected on insuf icient grounds, thea:#rt iTaifewa#CELntdf iu3tfrm.givfanqTaif firfuERE9###:#vrmch€5{diTT€a,givTTqTFTT5TT3tfma5Tdr diTPe diTfde tlTRT5J 3trfe

Page 5 of 26
a.No. ProposedAns
Question Text Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4

3 An appeal shall An appeal may A appeal shall No appeal shall

24 C.P.C., T.P. Act & Contract Act -Which
ie from every ie from an ie from a ie, except on a
statement is incorrect in respects of section
96 of Code of Civil Procedure 1908 ? decree passed original decree decree passed question of law,
ftr u.ti. th giv tlfrm'Ta ffl by any Court passed ex party. by the Court
from a decree in
any suit of the
jrfrfu . anlT 96 faniT rfu gil, 1 908 exercising FTdr qTRtT with the
nature
Sffiq#thFT5t+TTTaa%? Original RIfan# consent of
jurisdiction to rfuaenl parties.
cognizable by
Courts of Small
the Court verEN #
authorized to enaul Causes, when

hear p ealsfromthed cisonsofsuchCourt.lTunofaruflrfuedrifan-apqTRIHdrfan 7fa lTFrfuap-a'#rm,whap-SfaREafrofuRE F fani-anqTRiT# adirfuanl theamountorvalueofthesubject-materoftheorignalsuitdoesnotexce dtenthousandELirE fan asrfu,qf±enfan#RTqT#¥dourfuTa.3al, 5iTufa arnaqTa7ftwTa. nl

25 C.P.C., T.P. Act & Contract Act -Which is 1 Standing A lease of land. Surface of land River on
not the immovable property under the timber, rooted Ti dn un "@trdE Surface of land
Transfer of Property Act,1882 ? in the earth. id#FT#
fa.TT.ti. , th ctFT etfth giv th rdi? Tt Efty in
ctfffl . th etFT ctfrm, 1 882 ScirfuRE3fflflffiid.a7 ENRE
26 C.P.C., T.P. Act & Contract Act -Which 2 Section 12 Section 13 Section 14 Section 15
one of the fol owing sections of TheTransferofPropertyAct,1882isrelatedwiththetransferforbenefitofunbornfaer;OHO,9thgivofrmTathcrfrm.firfiaf icj"crf fl,1882dithdiemT3fflfr fuatrfeafckrfuauna7 rm12 rm13 rm14 tJTIT 1 5

27 C.P.C., T.P. Act & Contract Act -under

Section 104 of The Transfer of Property
Act,1882 . . . . may make rules forcar yingouttheprovisionsofMortgages offu##i:f i=ggRTt,fiH*ffiS(aiTqaaqi whbchi{ifdnSlai!tiufti3jFTetfrm,1882@emT104aJdiefl]. . finFTthI
2
Court
i3iREi-
ca-
The Supreme The High Court The State
Government
maiTen
The Central
Government
er tffl

Page 6 of 26
a.No. ProposedAns
Question Text Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4
28 C.P.C., T.P. Act & Contract Act -Who 4 Reserve Bank Central GovernorTTck each party
warrants the genuineness of the money on of India Government ET T55. qtlan
exchange under Section 121 of theE:qns€:r#ro#Arfe#faf i#5¥drgrmTFTEL8&2*3tdianqftREana7 RE as 3ifeen fatrRT

29 C.P.C., T.P. Act & Contract Act -Which is 1 a promise any act fitted to the suggestion the active
not a "Fraud" as defined under the Indian made with an deceive. as a fact, of concealment of
Contract Act,1872 ? intention of rfuedrfu that which is a fact by one
fir.H.ti. , th cjFT 3rfth giv th performing it. aechl not true, by one having
Gtfrm . fflT OTTch ffl ctfth, #fflth who does not knowledge or
1 872 a ctrfe qft.Trha uFTi id. a - G" qTFT believe it to be belief of the fact.
ed a7 CTTRT a true. fan tTap ffl
fanTTqT®i @ rm RI id.a,t3f ldqaJFTj¥GurfugrqgrEgrf rormT@'trmdiapFT%'l FT " faREwindrfuENINtrapfflHf uFTFTl

30 C.P.C., T.P. Act & Contract Act -Whether 4 yes, if such yes, in all cases yes, even if yes, if it was
objection as to competence of the objection was where issues there has not taken in
executing Court with reference to the local taken in the are settled at or been a executing Court
imits of its jurisdiction shall be allowed - Court of first before such consequent at the earliest
fS.u.ti. , thfa ejan eTrm giv th instance. settlement. failure of Possible
3rfffl . fflT fan fha qiqTen # Fv,qf±giv F-, F Hm ffla Justice. opportunity and
crf© 5? FTrit theft a cmTT{ TT{ Ongiv TTqu iFT a.FT®faffltTF Fv, va a wh consequent
diHtlFtTTa7ria. c+T c+grTd a7 qTqTen ai fatfanut ., 11 I i U I I H tq P 11 failure of justice.
fanwh- FTer fin TTqT apfaTthS rm 5Pr Fu, qft tr
ml RTqTTf, fans-T#al ondrf iqTHif lrm#qvTinwhrmOrFTTRfinTinur3irwhqRurmRIFTRT@farspf lg€thI

31 C.P.C., T.P. Act & Contract Act - 2 misrepresentation coercionfry undue influence fraudFT
Threatening to commit suicide with theintentionofcausinganypersontoenterfat.°FaHg:ef in#mffigivf l3tfrm.=H3m!itTafSfanrfua givq5¥R¢ITqTqTq,c+m€iqT#eTFdiana- 3fflTqiF 3tFT
•..

32 C.P.C., T.P. Act & Contract Act -A 1 not voidable llegal voidRT voidable
.. , .
contract was caused by a mistake as to anyfawq'nti: #n#tRE-qaenqRffi#Rg¥#gHthfafafflSapa- . ,.. . 3Tav

Page 7 of 26
a.No. ProposedAns
Question Text Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4

4 Absolutely void Valid agreement voidable Void to the

33 C.P.C. T.P. Act & Contract Act -Under
Section 28 of Indian Contract Act,1872 3tRIFaiffl: RT aer tin contracts extent of
agreements in restrain of legal proceedingsare- restrainutqS farm
'%'. , .

fa.u.ti. , un ctFT Orfrm Ta ffltlfrm.OtRththcrfrm,1872 chi.`-.....-..3trdtl555"a- ffi qu

3435 C.P.C. T.P. Act & Contract Act -When the 3 illegal contract void contract voidable valid contract
consent of an agreement is caused by utq ffl RTffl contract Bet ffl
faa#ri:|ffie#trfuTafflutffl-ffl3rfffl.qafSzFiilarfckHTFfa55T]Earfua,aTqEi75ii{3- RE`u„q

C.P.C., T.P. Act & Contract Act -Which 1 Appeal from Appeal from Revision Review
.-..
remedy is available against rejection ofplaintunderCodeofCivilProcedure,1908?fa.u.ti.,f ieiFTGTrmqath3tfrm.f firfuen,1908afflrfuGFTaTFT_ng,fcafflaSfaFEth decreefan@ rfu Order3tTaH @ rfu givgr

36 C.P.C., T.P. Act & Contract Act -Where a 3 only all decree any one of such Any one, or Any one, or
decree has been passed jointly in favour of holders can persons may more of such more of such
more persons than one - apply for the not apply for persons may persons may
fa.H.ti. , th ciFT crfffl giv ffl execution of the the execution of apply for the apply for the
tlfrm_dyfanpq7aGTfirfflfREa7 whole decree the whole execution of the execution of the
qerfitryFtTaqTRiT#Tts%dy- for the benefit decree for the whole decree decree for his
of them all. benefit of them for the benefit benefit only.
-==-;-:--:.-f=--f=---I-:rfufro all. of them all. fana7fha
-i-i-i..==-: a far 3TraiFQaaTfREa a
ELfanSSftr
Huh fan enTan rfuee enaH se ch!qqiqT
FT nd Huh a aTfRE a. a dTfRE # a chin fro
TFTqt ai fan fanFTRT ingFT" ndtrfeS
ffu ffl th I wi Huh aJTrfeSfarra.finfflthl rfuwiwhatrfearfanFTchI ftrq5Teni

37 C.P.C., T.P. Act & Contract Act -Under 4 125 128 122 129
which Section of Code of Civil Procedure,1908HighCourthasthepowertomake#,eu:Hg:f ieELjnELp%9#,arfrm.fRErfuen,1908#fede+RTacjrfeEiFiqTqTanal3Tqi}a+T{fi`3li r!"€lt>11;lfS;<+Iviti itltlI:1<111.I.11:I#rfua? `3\ ?3C 8R3 !3\

38 Constitution of India -The case of Maneka 3 23 20 21 22

Gandhi v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597wasrelatedwithwhichconstitutionalprovision-e+Ra5Tffi€tFT-froTTtthiF]mrmiathT.on€.e+R.1978TH.th.597fflFTHfflf uch€TTPrq7rfutTafflharm- R3 RO Rq 3Q

Page 8 of 26
a.No. ProposedAns
Question Text Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4
39 Constitution of India -The matter of 4 Right to work or Protection of Right of speedy Prohibiting the
Bachpan Bachoo Andolan v. union of India ivelihood. Juvenile under trial of cases of employment of
& ors judgement dated 18.04.2011, is rfFT trial. Juvenile. Children in
related with the issue of - tlTRE S fa- a5. dith fan a} q"di Circuses.
rm¥a 5T ffierm -aTUT ifflch erian fa. tlfinl fan a ckgr fi rfu fa" rfu fi ffi a
rm th a cffl fife fas 1 8.04.201 1 . ffl al a tlfin I fife q{
q"fflFTE±arfu%. rfutJ rri I
40 Constitution of India -The Right to move to 3 Article 226 of Article 136 of Article 32 of Article 133 of
the Supreme Court for enforcement of the Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution
tifin aJ ffirm aJ ffirm aJ ffirm a
ftda5mTe#a#'9h#g#9#ifeeda7ftrGiEtFTqTqTfflfiHFTaHedffl3tfinFTHfinTma- cT5dr 226 # tlgiv 136 a' Or5dr 32 a. qgiv , 33 a.

41 Constitution of India -Which is not related 4 To manage its To own and To own and To impose tax
to Freedom to manage religious affairs own affairs in acquire acquire on property of
under the Constitution of India - matters of movable immovable religious
i"a 5T them - vTca a ffi€rm 3J ejwh reljg,On. property. property. institution.
th ffl at tTTfife an a rriu # Rlch a ut ut faFT rfu ffi a FtTH di S eTTfife tw di
fflap'a- ndfflHaer chth ch 3Pr{ ffi tR q5T
ed ffl I rfu ffl I wh d5T I 3Tfrmed55Tl

42 Constitution of India -Which Article of the 3 48 49 50 51

Constitution of India deals with separation#d#a##m.effiut#erirmqFTthffl1..=`,.,..``-...I..-.. ¥C ¥\ \0 \?

43 Specific Relief Act -A suit filed under the 1 12 months form 18 months form 12 months from 18 months from
provisions of Specific Relief Act, 1963 shall the date of the date of the date of filing the date of filing
be disposed of within a period of - service of service of of suit of suit
summons to thedefendant summons to thedefendant
#RE#2 HRE#8
REF&3ffuffl*=utngffiqu- REchFTdiffi$12qTH#3trfuaife REchRE#fflTrma18rm#rfuSife FTH a miR FT a5 mtR

44 Specific Relief Act -When a contract or 2 Cancellation of Rectification of Rescission of mpounding of

other instrument in writing does not express instrument instrument instrument instrument
their real intention due to fraud or mutual finSFrma5 ffro di fir ar farfuca fir ch qRiFa
mistake of the parties, then either partyEL¥itELis3EL±;Hf i_faetrtr5qtRTid.di,aaqngthuarqTzthq5TtTf la- qRgivaE edte

45 Specific Relief Act -Which Chapter of the 3 lv¥ V\ Vla VII

Specific Relief Act, 1963 deals withRE#3e#th¥"ELfanifflanerffla- to

46 Specific Relief Act -Which Section deals 2 41 42 43 44

with "Injunction to perform negativeRE++se-fflth#FTfflrfuereda7 ¥? ¥3 ¥3 ¥¥

Page 9 of 26
a.No. ProposedAns
Question Text Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4

47 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic 1 State of Punjab Ramprasad vs State of Powanammal

Substances Act,1985 -Which one of the vs Baldev State of Madhya vs State of
following case is related to section 50 of Singh (1999) 6 Maharashtra Pradesh & Tamil Nadu
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic SCC 172 (1999) 5 SCC another vs (1999) 2 SCC
Substances Act 1985 ?
ii]iti€fir3;itqfachFT:uunqtITrf3rfaiiqF,
1985-ETa.arfuenFmfflRITq5efrrfu
chmaFT
rfufer
(1999) 6
-FT
30

FETngma
Babulal (1999)
9 SCC 101
Frfu"
413
qq-rm
rfuTrEma
3fr{ FT:H.Tffi q<T2f ctfrm, 1 985 5Pr fiiTT TRE 172 (1999) 5 Ta TF 3ffl (1999) 2
5o a ffi a ? giv30 FTaTRTffi91ol RE413

48 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic 3 Security for Offence to be presumption of Offences by

Substances Act,1985 -Section 35 of abstaining from cognizable and culpable mental companies
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic commission of non-bailable state 5ffi an
Substances Act 1985 provide that - offence rmch ffl gil 3TrqTTfie rmq
ti]irqtrirG;it.qfachFT:HunqiITrfctftrPrqF- rmer a7 fan Ta diqFTrfu TFTfha an @
tiIT5 crm 3flT FT:HiTffi uaT2f 3tfffl wl a qfaH giv FTeTTrm
di rm 35 rmrm di a - ca aJ farthRrda

49 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic 3 Public Hotel, shop place not Place
Substances Act, 1985 -Which of the Conveyance fro, FT intended for accessible to
following is not a "Public Place" under deudFT use by the the public
Section 43 of the Narcotic Drugs and public RT fro tT57
RT ch GT"aprfufca
#o5ELc%b#:nHcffiAfa±9EL, EEqHa
1 985- iqTqiF efrrfu eft{ FT:H+TT@ qqTtf ch a7 fan
erfch, 1 985 @ eTTIT 43 a ejwh fir EathFTIIdrRTtra.a7 onrfuid.€i
50 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic 2 41 50 50A 51
Substances Act,1985 -Which Sectiondealswith"Conditionsunderwhichsearch#sash#bi=%n#ct#ir'Ofanfro,1985."ndfas3t fl]aTfRE#didianiq5TrfuuththemTdia7 ¥q 1\0 1\05 1\8

51 Limitation Act -Which one of the following 1 Abul Rahim and Malwa Strips Anu Kaul vs Babu Lal
case is, related to article 59 of schedule of others vs Pvt. Ltd. vs Rajiv Kaul Sharma vs
Limitation Act, 1963 ? S.K.Abdul Jyotj Ltd. (decided on 23 State of
qftth 3rfffl . fir a. a rfu HT FTmaT Zabar and (decided on 18 March 2009) M.P.(decided
others (decided December rfuFT on 07 July 2009)
¥ELEL9$37dieyiH@S on 06 March 2009) rfu FrRmawh
2009) qTmgiv tfThfas23 FTFtFrfu
3tgrtrti ".fa. iFT qTj2oog) rna (fife
rmFT iffifa.tffi fas o7
TH.aJ.xpE¥#o6 fas 1 8 far2009) 2009)

52 Limitation Act -Within how many days will 1 30 days 45 days 60 days 90 days
appeal from a decre or order of any HighCourt othesameCourtbefiledfromthedateofthedecre ororder?qrmdtfrm-fan3i5]apTqTffl@fanFTctTdra7ftF€diqiqTOua.ct ha,fanZTT3tTaIT#rfuafanfaTaifean? 30 fir 45RI 6o ftr 9o fat

Page 10 of 26
a.No. ProposedAns
Question Text Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4
53 Negotiable Instrument Act -When no rate 3 at the rate of at the rate of at the rate of at the rate of
of interest is specified in the instrument, six per centum twelve per eighteen per twenty four per
interest on the amount due thereon shall, per annum centum per centum per centum per
notwithstanding any agreement relating to 5Eqffro annum annum annum
interest between any parties to the HfaofffiHa FT Pfin 3t5TF thin ENHfaRE
instrument,becalculatedatwhatratesfromthedateatwhicht esameoughtohaveb enpaidbythepartycharged,untilendero realization ftheamountduether on,oruntilsuchdateafterheinstiution fasuitorecoversuchamountastheCourtdirects?qlf iFfirc f i.qFfS ina.iHTqdi5*€IRET@'a iFsHTI ThFT¥q5F aiHq#T UTFT,fina7fca.qctan 7thHTqtihfan 5iT¥a7 e¥ELrfu inainfREqTRT FGHU#gqa3Hq¥mqitFTfi aRIqTc+ltdainELRTt 5?# REgFH soaman? ffl#fla EN5PrHa ffl#gra

54 Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 3 State Board of CommissionertlTg5a Collector5JaiRT

1959 -Who is competent to transfer a Government Revenue
revenue case from one District to anotherinsamedivisionunderSection29oftheMadhyaPradeshLandRevenueCode,1959?=trfudiT¥9HEL9259 €U#T5u-if lHHq5iuTalditimaptFfca 5TfcafiRTtdRdedafarthHFT matTRT TTRI RE

55 Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 2 Forty five days Sixty days Ninety days
1959 -How much period of limitation wasprovidedforappealundersection47ofMadhyaPradeshLandRevenueCode,1959?ke8TqaH#TT=9#EL945795=rfurfuu-aiatTTRthfed:ftoilTi€t7 ##ays aanfaT Th faT rd fir

56 Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1 30 days 60 days 90 days 45 days

1959 -A Bhumiswami may relinquish hisrights,bygivingnoticeinwritingofnotlessthenhowmanydaysbeforethedateofFfa¥frLREiRE¥;#wi#7 3oRT 6o faT 9o ftr 45 fir

57 Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1 25.09.2018 25.08.2019 12.02.2020 05.01.1998

0\.O!.!\\C
1959 -When did Section 172 of MadhyaPradeshLandRevenueCode,1959omit ed?±rfudiT¥9FEL9t5792-#¥u-farfufanTTqTa7 el\.O\.RO!C 3|\.OC.3O?\ 3?.o3.3o3o

Page 1 1 of 26
a.No. ProposedAns
Question Text Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4

3 one fifth of the one tenth of the one twelfth of equal to the
58 Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control
rent payable by rent payable by the rent rent payable by
Act 1961 -If the landlord fails to make,
within a reasonable time after notice in tenant for that tenant for that payable by tenant for that
writing any repair which he is bound to year. year. tenant for that year.
makeJndersub-Section(1)ofthesection37oftheMadhyaPradeshAc om odationControlAct,1961,thet na tmaymakethesamehimselfand educthe xpense ofsuchrepairsfromther ntor therwiser coverthemfromlandlordandthat mountsode uctedor ecoverableina yirfeife+tf i+f #ifeifeu-tin,tq;ifecht:\Stch!qdT tz]u:±sti :rm` :i` -i :-. -If `_i:=f `-:f= `-=`-f =f ` :.f =-i = -:` - i=: f=- ±i=:i?-ig=J# SngEg%i_a,chfSofTvtT fl T5qrfua FT giv a year. € a chfro
3Tftora.ani rfuT®.ani id'anl
RIfflfil

59 Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control

Act,1961 -An ap eal shal lie from everyorderoftheRentControl ingAuthoritymadeunderMadhyaPradeshAc ommodationControlAct,1961tothedtrfut2+FTfrfucrfrm,1961_Ftrfuenifrfu3rf fl,1961a7#3trfurfungf flqrfena7uiatFrfu. .chanI
1 District Judge
fin"
Collector5Jaffl Commissioner
3TrB5d ffl-
High court

60 Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control 2 one month two months three months fifteen days
Act,1961-Nosuitshal befiledagainstatenantforhisevictionfromanyac om odation,unles thet nanthasneitherpaidnortender dthewholeofthear earsofther ntlegal yrecoverablefromhimwithin. . ofthedateonwhichanoticeofdemandforthear earsofrenthasbe nservedonhimbytheLa#jREef icrEL:nTegr61.fancTrquendaf i73,fanFinaREREaqT€tifar T©.finrfu,qiFtTqifS- -f=:f=: ireafina: q5 7TTH aTTRI thrm qHffro

Page 12 of 26
Q.No. ProposedAns
Question Text Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4
61 Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control 2 Section 17 Section 18 Section 19 Section 20
Act,1961 -Which provision of MadhyaPradeshAc ommodationControlAct,1961glvesright othetenantre-entryinthepremises?7TgivenTfin3rfrm,1961-7TrfuRIFTfin3tfrm,19615TrfumiencTrwendchURFTiF:rfuf l3TREFTtFT€? rm17 rm18 ttTIT 1 9 rm20

62 Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control 2 Section 24 Section 25 Section 26 Section 27

Act,1961 -under which provision ofMadhyaPradeshAccommodationControlAct,1961,tenanthastodepositrent,if fi+fi#faREinREri¥:6¥@Su-f uTITfma73trfurmgTqT]Tq5THa5i]Ta7 rm24 rm25 rm26 rm27

63 Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 -An application 3 Thirty days Forty five days Sixty days from Ninety days
under section 24 of The Hindu Marriage from the date of from the date of the date of from the date of
Act,1955 shall, as far as possible, be servlce of service of service of service of
disposed of within : notice on the notice on the notice on the notice on the
ifegrfaapEffingrm#£4,-=F#faFTma wife or the
husband, as
wife or the
husband, as
wife or the
husband, as
wife or the
husband, as
the case may the case may the case may the case may
be. be. be. be.
qfa qT qdi, an qfa qT qffi, an qfa qT qdi, an qfa qT qdi, an
fan a, ch fan a, ch fan a, al fan a, ch
EN qft rfu jtRI # fflRE itRI ffl rfu jifeH # fflrfu
arfufanfii aathrfufan#1 atmafan#i aTafani].I

64 Hindu Succession Act,1956 -Which 4 Section 20 Section 22 Section 23 Section 25

section of Hindu Succes ion Act,1956providesthatapersonwhocommitsmurdershal bedisqualifiedfrominheritingEL##J#: ie#P6:ife=a#f iagREiFaifeEridriTF rm20 rm22 rm23 rm25

65 Hindu Marriage Act,1955] Hindu 2 father of her her brother. mother of her all in similar
Succession Act,1956 & Hindu Adoption & husband. chrfechi husband. share.
Maintenance Act, 1956 -Hindu widow 'A' wh qfa aJ at qfa # ti dichHm
got property in suc es ion from her mother.•A'diesintestate.Sheleavesafterherabrotherandherhusband'sfatherandmother.Asperlawherpropertywouldbeife#ri+f i feife=#Ff i-=`-i f ±- : -f= - -= .-`f:i- =`:i-f=aIdif ifafac+5HT{f iHchqT Tdan- finjl1 chl 3jiITi]'I

Page 13 of 26
Q.No. ProposedAns
Question Text Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4

66 Hindu Marriage Act,1955 -A husband 4 where where wife is where parties where he is
cannot present a petition for divorce under marriage was residing on the of the marriage residing on the
Hindu Marriage Act,1955 against his wife, solemnized. date of ast resides date Of
who is alive - givfaFTffl presentation of together. presentation of
3tT5itFT gun the petition. qti ffiFT a the petition.
ELfachFTchrmng5i5`g5inFT&ifefadi t[erEN a rfu qtingqTfaH
# €tdi:, €tffi qfa a7 ftF€, ch rna a,
anl
---=-=.I.i®1
rd qfa qTfaiFT
en aft iFT FT env andi
Ht5d T@. 5T Hrh - fin fin in I RTalHT5Tal

67 Hindu Adoption & Maintenance Act, 1956 - 4 She is not She is not She is a widow She is married
Under the Hindu Adoption and married and minor. and have two but without the
Maintenance Act,1956 a female Hindu has one qE 3fiqiqJ ap. or more than consent of her
does not have the capacity to take a son or adopted al two son or husband living.
qErm%ffach
ifeg#'=ad#o_#3Tfrm,1956_ #uELT@. #u#teE,rna
RE{iTqiHBUT3fr{i+quT_tin3tfrm, a ck di qtF 3Pr{ ed a TIT REqfa#
apgfl%, enSfanl
£5£Sgfl¥a]T5qftREFTFT@REfi- Etr#,gr has, for a
68 Hindu Marriage Act,1955, Hindu 4 that the other of irretrievable that the other
Succession Act,1956 & Hindu Adoption & party has, after breakdown of party has been period of not
Maintenance Act,1956 -Any marriage, on the suffering from ess than two
a petition presented by either the husband solemnization E#a#e.ut venereal years
or the wife, may not be dissolved by a of the marriage, thl disease in a immediately
decree of divorce on the ground - had voluntary communicable preceding the
sexual form. presentation of

ifefaELFTasT¥'6¥=ife:ffiTF
3te+qTqfagTtTanTTRI3Tffq{ffing
intercourse withanyperson

other than his

EE#Th
FTathdr
the petition,beensuffering

from a virulent
fads di fan gTiT €H cm+TI vT faqfEd T@. or her spouse. a flfca FT a I and incurable
fin ffl ch _ fS ae TTertFTtfaFTaJHwi=EfinfanrfuaJent af laIrfina, form of leprosy.RE;Ff tria3trfu= ±E=+5Tanaura3ft#{#¥F

69 The Scheduled Castes and The Scheduled 3 Section 14 Section 15 Section 16 Section 17
Tribes (Prevention of Atrocit es) Act, 1989 -WhichsectionofTheScheduledCastesandtheScheduledTribes(PreventionofAtrocit es)Act,1989dealswiththe"PowerofStateGovernment oimposecol ectivefine"?REifeck*¥gdiwhf igEFedq,3tfuned#rfu,f l rm14 rm15 rm16 rm17

Page 14 of 26
Q.No- ProposedAns
Question Text Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4
70 The Scheduled Castes and The Scheduled 4 Section 324 Section 325 Section 332 Section 379
Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 -lnwhichsectionofIndianPenalCodesection3(2)(va)oftheScheduledCastesandtheScheduledTribes(Preventionof- -:-:i==-f==--= rm 324 un 325 rm 332 rm 379

71 The Scheduled Castes and The Scheduled 2 n Section 15 n Section 15 n Section 14 n Section 16
Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - rm 1 5 a (A) (A) rm 1 6 H
Where are the provisions made in theScheduledCastesandtheScheduledTribes(PreventionofAtrocities)Act,1989regardingtherightsofthevictimsandwitnesses?rmREfaF:FREwhffa rm 1 5 (ap # rm 1 4 (ap a

72 Motor Vehicle Act, 198 - As per the caseofNationalinsurancecompanylimitedVsPranaySethi,(2017)16SCC680inacaseofdeath,ifdeceasedagewas32thenwhatmultiplierbeusedforthedeterminationof#P#atifef iTtg-8 .aif lENanfasiFT Trmqant2O17i16RT#fi=2S=¥#= 3 fourteenrfe fifteenqH sixteenrfe seventeentFT6

73 Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 -Under which 3 Section 2(33) Section 2(36) Section 2(38) Section 2(40)
section of Motor Vehicle Act,1988 'Route'isdefined?7ini]T5]etfrm,1988-TfrETqTFTctfffl,1988#ffoemTi.wialqftrfufinTina7 rm 2(33) rm 2(36) tJRI 2(38) rm 2(40)

74 Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 -Claims Tribunal 1 one thousand Five thousand Ten thousand Twenty Five
may make an order for the payment ofspecialcostsundersub-section(1)of rupees.qfaFT wl I rupees.RTFTwh1 thousand
#e#wi, rupees.
qrfuFT
section 172 of Motor Vehicle Act,1988 for
chl
#a#njrf#;ete€:n8g.-aporfrfuHrm=#¥#ffi%#T@#i:

Page 15 of 26
Q.No. ProposedAns
Question Text Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4

75 Court Fees Act,1870, Indian Registration 3 Section 24 of Section 22 of Section 21 of Section 23 of

Act,1908 & Indian Stamp Act,1899 -No The The The The
non-testamentary document relating to Registration act Registration act Registration act Registration act
immovable property shall be accepted for 1908. 1908. 1908. 1908.
registration, unless it contains a description
lE., ., .., H.I
of such property along with a map andphotographs howingitslocation&nature,suf ic ent oidentifythesame.Thisgf ij§PoELH#;3=f i=,189 .t2+f lf iarfuch€thfarmEwh,iFiFt] FfSanapE*qFTrfeftr3fl{E LEf lFTf it mtfiafanaHT2T3Trfeia,-=-i, = - =f:.- :- f`=.i- :.-i:- : - :-`:-i.:I-i I- =- 1908 1908 1908 1908
# rm 24 fi # un 22 fi # enu 21 a. # rm 23 a.

76 Court Fees Act,1870, Indian Registration 1 four months six months three years one year
Act,1908 & Indian Stamp Act,189 -Nodocumentotherthanawil shal beac eptedfor egistrationunles presentedforthatpurposetotheproperof icerwithin. .fromthedateofitsexecution.RE#oELEL7°dre rfu"rfufin,189 .failar+Plch€th±:-` =:i=.:`=i:- I- ±= =:i . -` ?if- .: -.f= _- - i- .=`- :i-: - =`-i=- i-: - =I:i -:`- fi - =- -i=`=a. . tur Fan i5EFan thof qa5at

77 Court Fees Act,1870, Indian Registration 1 Javer Chand & Brij Raj Singh v. State of Ravindra Nath
Act,1908 & Indian Stamp Act,1899 -ln others v. Laxaman Singh Madhya v. Raghbir
which case Supreme Court held that Pukhraj Surana AIR 1961 SC Pradesh v. Haji Singh and
"Where an instrument has been admitted in
AIR 1961 SC 149 Hasan Dada Another AI R
evidence, such admission shall not, except 1655 fha"fer AIR 1966 SC 1968 SC 300
as provided in Section 61, be called in cktrFT FT tier fee 905 ifemuFT
question at any stage of same suit or Fen€rm 1 961 qgr rfu rna whfeeFTF
proceedings on the ground that the IronFT{FT6'f en 149 FTanFT 3fflT3tT€rm
instrument has not been duly stamped." qHdi 1655 ant rm 1968 TH# 300
1966 di 905
RE#oELEL7°edrfuwhrfufir,189 .f und#ufaf lqTf lactfirf}€f itTf u%fSnqtifan±chvTeFa7atqTtfro5Tfin7TqT€,givf iFT¥FT¥=#FTS¥infaFgRT

Page 16 of 26
Q.No. ProposedAns
Question Text Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4
78 Court Fees Act,1870, Indian Registration 1 4 months 6 months 1 month validity period
Act,1908 & Indian Stamp Act,1899 - 4rm 6 7TTH 1IN of such
When a document purporting to have been document
executed by all or any of the parties out of awh@arm
India, it has be n presented for egistrationwithin. . afteritsar ivalinIndia.RE#of EL7°edTf i{inGfro,189 -mtTaiaT6{f iqTRI±,froHipqcf lfiqTanafan.ab-giTTO+Rda T6{f lrfufin7iqTgivdf lf a:?- `-:-f=- :i-:f=i-?=f-:I:- .: .-=f=- - i: di orrfu

79 Court Fees Act,1870, Indian Registration 1 according to according to according to according to

Act,1908 & Indian Stamp Act,1899 -The one half of the the full value of one fourth of one fourth of
amount of fee payable under the Court value of the such property, the value of the value of the
Fees Act, 1870 in the suits for partition plaintiff's share if on the date of such property, plaintiff's share
shall be computed as - of the property. presenting the if on the date of of the property.
a]TqTdq trfu tlfrm, 1 870, © anSwhS plaint the presenting the ffla S ffi a7
crfrm, 1 908 3fi{ HTwh tErn crfth, RE a on¢ plaintiff is in plaint the esSFT
1 899 . qTqTflq life tlfrm, 1 870 a7 HFT$3t5FT1 possession of plaintiff is out of @utRIaJ
3ttflT farmqiT a7 FTa i ffl life # tiTTuffl the property. possession of eyFTl
th an -
¥FFREFFT@fflaf lENHHTfaqTq5fflETali3HHFTPrSRTSurFT1
#p#LfawldTdiwlNIwhqTif lT@alGHHrfua7FT@rfeTRIS3tFTl

80 Protection of Children from Sexual 3 Punishment for Designation of Period for Presumption of
Offences Act, 2012 -Section 35 of The storage of Special Courts. recording of culpable mental
Protection of Children from Sexual pornographic fact TrqTan evidence of state.
Offences Act, 2012 deals with material riulS fin child and GrmuffroqTfroan #
ife ctq{Tch a RE tFT cke4uT involving child. rml disposal of
20 1 2 - as cniTdi a RE ffl ckem iFTRE ch Case. i3Term I
ctfun 2012 di en¥T 35 ffl tlfEN ed iiiiT5 aJ engr
rfuerffiai anwhwhaJri5T-afatE5I chofS-edckF"aFTfinedafck3TrfuI

81 Protection of Children from Sexual 2 Section 13 Section 14 Section 17 Section 15

Offences Act, 2012 -Which section of TheProtectionofChildrenfromSexualOf encesAct,2012dealswiththePunishmentforusingchildforpornographicEL°S#tf aREtit hquorfrm,2012.ifec+TTITtf aREfflckc+uTcrfrm,20125?at h€mTetrfu-, `= - - = - := : I:I- - - - .-+-3-.i-= .3-.=`f-i enU 1 3 rm14 rm17 rm15

Page 17 of 26
Q.NO. ProposedAns
Question Text Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4

82 Protection of Children from Sexual 1 Section 30 Section 33 Section 42 Section 29

Offences Act, 2012 -Which section of TheProtectionofChildrenfromSexualOf encesAct,2012dealswiththe#m#3[o€c#]=m±nELsjEL,2012-ifeG+q{TdiaREfflgiveruTctfrm,2oi2@ththtrm3rmofhaqf lisq¥TTch3tTeJTxpTTfflHTF€mdi% ? rm30 rm33 en" 42 rm29

83 Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of 2 mprisonment mprlsonment mprisonment mprisonment

Children) Act, 2015 -Any person who has up to 3 months up to 6 months up to 1 year or up to 1 month
committed an offence under section 33 or fine of ten or fine of ten fine of ten or fine of ten
shall be liable to - thousand thousand thousand thousand
fan apiq tRE @ ae_te 3fr{ -wiqu> rupees or both. rupees or both. ru ees or both. rupees or both.
difrm 201 5 _ at rfu fan €mT 33 a ap q5iiTrm a, ee fflTTEN a, i5,t"H a, ee q5iEN a,
3t€haatcffliTufin%FE'rmgiv- fRE 3trfu 3 RE 3trfu 6 fRE rfu 1 fRE 3Tala 1
rmrfe@a rmd5@@ OfdqJdi© rm ffi 5@ a
en qT apenqTH en qT ae enqTH
FTedaiF FTedffi FTedif FTedffi
Sorfflq, SorfflqT aJenq5TqT
8#J#IfflqT ajTffl1 anffll anfflI
84 Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of 4 The n case of a A single male is A single or
Children) Act, 2015 -Which is false about prospective couple, the not eligible to divorced
adoptive consent of both adopt a girl person can not
#"#f(p#9C#V#:£t,#P#e#? parents, shall the spouses for child. adopt.
3tfrm] 201 5 . itffl EidiF ITm fin di atRTtIT
qTrm a wiv F ffl Stun a -
be physically fit, the adoption
financially shall be
sound, mentally required.
#RTffi¥
REFTaJ
fafflEfafaFT
rfuRE
alert and highly anqfrani}., fckqT*ra.%i ngT@'q5T
motivatedtoadoptachildforpovidngago dupbringingtohim. @EidFrm-finFTapch3tflqTfltinFTedaJfcktrmREFTedaJfck-FTarfu,athFTa¥ 6ft{3Trfu anI Hfflal
EFqfTaqfaaJan#en3fflREani

Page 18 of 26
Q.No. ProposedAns
Question Text Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4
85 Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of 4 has any past ls part Of has been has been
Children) Act, 2015 -No person shall be record of management of removed or removed or
eligible for selection as a member of the violation of a child care dismissed from dismissed from
child welfare committee, if he - human rights or institution in a service of a service of a

ELF2!i#ie5Pr¥tetma3Prj{:tluD
maEHaRI$5tTfifflTa7fatTTHT@.
-rna
child rights.

3Tfin"
District.
fcafifflffi
aedcha7
corporation
owned by the
State
private
corporation.
fan fan
an qfa - qTFT dTfro wiVI ffl rm a I Government. G"#dra
a7 3rfa" q5TndRE€, maHTifSRITfinthfanGruRTdidraFTFTFTfinTFT
EFEFT

86 The Information Technology Act, 2000 - 2 two years One year six years
The maximum term of imprisonment forwhichaconvictmaybepunishedfortheof encepunishableundersection71oftheELREdi#dA#'o£°|#cjatanermrvSfarfenri3tftrctana5Sq5T¥raTHqFTau6fanf ltT5 f la,qEa- #e*years aof qa}Of i5i of

87 The Information Technology Act, 2000 - 2 Damages not Damages by Damages not Damages not
The liability of a person who damages ess than Rs. way of ess than Rs. ess than Rs.
Computer, Computer systems under one Crore by Compensation. fifty Lakh by twenty five
Section 43 of the Information Technology
Act,2ELbin,2000.RT
way of
compensation.
...I
en,
qfaq5{ a FT a. way Of
compensation.tTrmmawi
Lakh by way of

ffie#tion
tlfrm, 2000 # rm 43 a a3fHha a 3tH HfaiFT
•f-ff=--I---.:==i=f*se aJ FT a. SRT# %aSTHa.
88 .P.C., Cr.P.C. & Evidence Act -under 1
5RE,
the prosecutor the State & the
5an,
the union & the
FT,
either State or
section 33 of the Indian Evidence Act,1872 & the accused accused accused the Union & the
the Criminal trial or inquiry shall be deemed 3tGrfro ck rm ch{ thckutvgr accused
to be a proceeding between - ulsvFT utt,Bqa " qT ch a' a
in.I.ti. , €.p.ti. ti FTFT 3TPrPrqF - emT 33 at 3flT
9TTrfu ener crfrm, 1 872 a 3trfurferfuqTwhgivRE5PrREdian- utvFT

89 .P.C., Cr.P.C. & Evidence Act - 1 is admissible in IS not section 9 of section 8 of

dentification of a suspect by photograph - evidence. admissible in evidence act evidence act
in.I.ti. , I.H.ti. Ta FTor ctfrm . TjtarmtF enera.FT€l evidence. excludes excludes
aq5th@qFT- "era."T@. identification by identification by
€1
#OEL5@rm9 #OEL@rm8
qPrfro anqFT5}tluffidi%1 qPrarm apqFT@3Tqffidi€1

Page 19 of 26
a.No. ProposedAns
Question Text Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4

4 When it relates When it relates When it relates Both 2 & 3

90 .P.C. Cr.P.C. & Evidence Act -Under
to cause of to cause of to options are
Secti:n 32(1 ) of the Evidence Act
death of death of person circumstances correct.
statements written or verbal, of relevant
facts made by a person who is dead are another person making the of transaction PrFT 2 Tq 3
themselves relevant in the following cases:- in other incident. statement. which resulted anH@¥l
" €.ti. I.H.ti. Ta ener 3rfrm -ener ffiTEFT rfuF6q7ffl, in the death of
FTannd
fan 3ffl trEFT the person
d*EE##¥qTTchgrqffa
-.I ' . . ----.
a.5¥FapRap5t
=FffiF
making the
statement.
a.whgiva':- RETFTTai ffuTTqTal ifeqFFT,Fqlatnd-- ===i- IqftfaeardrHfinTTqT%i

91 .P.C. Cr.P.C. & Evidence Act -'A' 2 No, as per Yes, as per Evidence may None of the
Section 91 of Section 92 of be admitted if above.
produces a sale deed to prove the fact of
purchase of suit property from '8' for Rs. 5 Evidence Act, Evidence Act, sale deed is Gqrfu a a
akhs. '8' offers oral evidence to prove that oral evidence is oral evidence in aeT®l
at the time of execution of sale deed he inadmissible. this case is #efa#rfu
was minor. Whether evidence offered by '8' Ta', ITgr admissible. 3rriftyaal
is admissible in evidence ? 3tfrm 5Pr ti, enFT "RIth
VI a ti a H ti Ta fflgr erfch - `T` i]ii{ rm 91 a ulrm 5Pr fin"iTan%l
tiirfii ch ifei Tdii tl 5 ctitg +in ti a,ti i@;€r 3T5FT, life rm 92 S
wh a aap ch HTfatT ed a fan faffl faed engr 3tma a I tlFT, H
pnIa5TaT%i'@`qEHTRIedSfaefs FTnd i¥ Tire
farfu fade S ffiuTrFT S HTFT aE c+ffli57RT,RE"enin5it7TaIfflT`@'gTuHirfuthfatFenGqnga7 engrFT€l

92 .P.C., Cr.P.C. & Evidence Act -lf the 2 Prosecutor Court or officer Advocate None of the
forgery was committed while the document utrfu authorized in General above
was in the custody of a Court, then this behalf. T5itfr qRE ETha#a
cognizance of the offence of forgery can betakenonlyonthebasisofwrit encomplaintmadebythe-Th.a.ti.,a.H.ti.Taeven3rfrm-5iF±qiqTan#cfiRenifrmqfadiF=:i=-.:==.-.:,+: ±=.:-:-f-i-`:-:-i=- : qTafinf lch. TTqTFT " EH q# ra.
ELF
93 C.P.C„ T.P. Act & Contract Act -Which 2 rejection of a any order of both (1) and (2) none of these
one of the following is not a decree under plaint dismissal for t 1 ) Ta t2i an ETa.aqngT@.
Code of Civil Procedure,1908 ? qiiFTfflTriiF default
fa.H.ti. , th etFT ctfrm Ta ffl finrm qfaRT a far
3rfrm . faT© a. a rfu frm rfu rfuediTm
gil, 1 908 $ 3tfro fan T@. a 7 5ng endr
94 C.P.C., T.P. Act & Contract Act -Living 4 a company Associationrm Body Of All of the above
person as defined in Section 5 of The FTan individuals Gqtw Huh
dTfRE fflfin
##ife3#inffiife##sa±
95 C.P.C., T.P. Act & Contract Act -A 2 valid voidRT voidable Both 1 & 2
av .. '`. 1 qa 2 an
promises to obtain for 8 an employment inthepublicservice,and8promisestopayRisH|€:°ifeA#agJf it£-th3tmu.HafatdranifRE#FTwl¥==qanJ¥itr3Pr{£@a¥i

Page 20 of 26
a.No. ProposedAns
Question Text Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4
96 C.P.C„ T.P. Act & Contract Act -Where 1 Satisfaction parties shall be satisfaction both 2 & 3
applications are made to a court for the shall be liable to deposit may enter upon 2 a 3 an
execution of cross decrees in separate entered upon the amount of the both
suits for the payment of equal sums of both the decree in the decrees with
money passed between the same parties decrees. Court. the consent of
and capable of execution at the same time anfana. qgr apTqTFT parties.
by such Court then - q@ Hfafa 5{ a fan # rfu qeran di
fa.H.ti., th cjrm ctfrm giv th
crfrm . rfu qTqTffl a ctTaH Qfl rfufanSfiqTFTarfcafannd3chaa¥ieTrdSFTS=rfu=##¥%rm*¥ rml FT rd aJ
rfuthani
enaan
EL:dien¥

97 C.P.C„ T.P. Act & Contract Act -Under 4 execution proceeding Proceedings both 1 & 3
Section 141 of Code of Civil Procedure, under Article under Order lx. 1 a 3 an
1908 the expression "proceedings'' ffid,ngs. 226 of the rfu lx aJ
ncludes -
fa.H.ti. , th eiFT 3trm giv th
•J.. Constitution. 3tth"l
ffirm a
etfrm . frm rfu gil, 1 908 @ €iTIT
1 4 1 a ctefl] ""' a. HfRE a -
98 Constitution of India -"Law" under Article 4 Custom or
or-I 226 aJ

Ordinance, bye- Both 1 & 3

13 of the Constitution includes - usage having faaty aw 1 i 3 an
rm=a5Tffi€rm-ffiermaJct5ati3aJth"faftr,a- force of lawfafa5THrhwianffititrm 3trfu, rna

99 Constitution of India -For any purposes 4 Only directions only order or Neither directions,
other than those mentioned in clause (2) of frofrm writs directions nor orders or writs
article 32, Parliament may be law confer on fa rfu qTRE orders or writs or any of them
the Supreme Court power to issue - TtftfiaHfl® frm, rfu qT
rmiiT iFT caem - tw fafa gRI EiFdFREachrvG]tgivfca3*grSt#i#edafarrfuTizi]q5{en. rfu qT ftE RE qT ed. achf

100 Constitution of India -Right to freedom of 4 on the ground on the ground on the ground None of these.
of morality. of public order. of health. enaqngra.I
#g#n#n#t.bdrre#r#fflofaiFTqfaREid.fin"Htrm- Ham aJ enrmtRl driFanSenurTRI t5TRI a entiRq{l

101 Constitution of India -Who can make laws 2 Parliamentdr Staterna 1 and 2 Both Neither 1 nor 2
on the subject of "Treasure Trove" as perscheduleVll-,ELffl#ginfflffiq{ffiis#th- 1 iI 2 an i al 1 FT a 2

102 Specific Relief Act -ln which of the 3 Farooqi Begum State of Odisha Katta Sujatha None of the
following judgment the Supreme Court laid (D) by LRs. v & Others v. Reddy and above
down that the effect of Specific Relief State of Uttar Sulekh another v. 3qrfu i]' a
(Amendment) Act, 2018 would have Pradesh, Chandra Siddamsefty chf Ta.
pros ective ? (2022) 10 SCC Pradhan and nfra Projects

RE¥¥a-¥##rfu
f#in#i2#qFTffiffFEan7
399
TFidi aTFT
'-ap-,-.iGanfafha
Others (2022) 7 Private Ltd.
SCC 482
fflrfuma,T*quT#:O€3,399 givmagiv
And others
(2023) 1 SCC
3ffl fao HaRIj¥utrmTa#O#8fa26z82 355Fq5gr3fflanfa¥

:-I:=-I--i--,i: faeqa3fflSo33Oal0355

Page 21 of 26
a.No. ProposedAns
Question Text Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4

103 Limitation Act -A suit was filed by 'A' 2 Section 5 Section 14 (3) Section 15(2) None of the
against heGovernmentwithoutgiv ngnoticeundersection80ofCodeofCiv lProcedure,1908.Thesaidsuitwas l owedtobewithdrawnunderOrderXxl CodeofCiv lProcedure,1908withleavetofileafreshsuit.Underwhichsectioncanthef ix#e_t,jFe#P#ed±nfaera8of laET{rfugil,19o8f lirRHELfinx Tf ¥ELTFT#¥o¥S=:f -.= .- = -3Tqf ia5T©a7 rm-5 rm-14 (3) emu-1 5 (2) above3qtr a' achfid.

104 Negotiable Instrument Act -Whether 2 Yes NO May be None of the

accused can give his evidence on anaffidavitinatrialforanoffenceunder u® Ta. FT aboveEqtrHa

section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act,1881?T5gTqTFTfin7qfineyfrminffiTt¥¥orffietq¥"a7farma.¥iTTvt75rqTcTmTeveraHFTa? #Ta.

105 Negotiable Instrument Act -Nature of 2 conclusive rebuttable irrebuttable both 2 & 3
presumption in favour of holder undersection139ofNegotiableInstrumentAct,1881is-t7¥ffl7zTfhaetfrm-emT139qif iHfincrfth.1881a7cirfutmiFaiqer##TisurtlTFT#HFfa€- fiirdiuch tqurfu tlirfu 2 i 3 an

106 Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 4 section 31 section 71 section 126 none of them
1959 -under which section of MadhyaPradeshLandRevenueCode,1959revenueofficerisempoweredtograntf`.:i=` :.`=:i.?-.i `i- iI.i.-`. :=- `-I:- =:`-:3: - `: .`:-.-.-ITmaof"rfui]€FTedeeHerTTa 7 rm31 ttTIT 7 1 rm 126 ana*T®.

107 Hindu Adoption & Maintenance Act,1956 - 4 The adopter the natural both 1 and 2 neither 1 nor 2
An adoption which has been validly made TPrE aa nd an parents 1 Ta 2 an an i al 1 3Pr{ i a
under the provisions of the HinduAdoptionsandMaintenanceAct,1956 canEL¥=#jb*Hffi#56:ariTEfinfflHiana- 2an
Effanrm-

Page 22 of 26
Q.No. ProposedAns
Question Text Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4
108 Court Fees Act,1870, Indian Registration 3 Chief Justice of Such Judge of 1 & 2 both.
Act,1908 & Indian Stamp Act,1899 - such High the High Court #iREfflcer. 1 a 2 an I
When any difference arises between the
officer, whose duty is to see that any fee is
paid under the Chapter-2 and any suitor or
ffl-a
Court.

Eprrmth
as the Chief
Justice shall
appoint either
3TENqPr1

attorney, as to the necessity of paying a fee aPrl generally or

or the amount thereof, the question shall, specially in this
when the difference arises in any of the behalf.
High Courts, it shall be referred to the - ERI"th
apHte"eJTrm:qT
RE#off#7°drTfenjfialin.
1 899 . GTi! 5H tlfen a7, ffro fa qganafSOreqiq-2acjrfujt€tirea RI: Prgfflfflffl-
ch 3Pr{ fan th qT di a rfu TrfuSch@cffl¥qt75aTtITdi¥aJq@Ftrasffl7TItdf iagiv#Finqfa#a@aEq¥]f ianfinwh. aJ ruth ch I

109 Court Fees Act,1870, Indian Registration 1 Full amount Half amount one fourth None of them.
Act,1908 & Indian Stamp Act,1899 - Tfl un urch RT amount anaaeTa.
Wher theCourt ef rsthepartiestotheSuitoanyofthemcldeofsetlementofdisputer fer edtoinSection89oftheCodeofCivlProcedure,1908,theplaintif shalbe ntiledtoacertifcatefromtheCourtauthoriznghimtorec ivethe. amountofthef epaidnrespectofsuchplaint,#ngF#f iFT#7u°*TRTwhFTfa arfu fl,19085Pr€mT89a.ife aFTafrma na. al€chf iq5if la,dyrna,qTqTFTaQat]TEadiu#rfuqfro#. . i]TqHqTa fckutry ful T57autFT

110 The Information Technology Act, 2000 - 4 ns ector Deputy Superintendent All of the above
Which of the following police officer is #er5 superintendent Of police GTha Huh
competent to investigate the offenses Of police Efed 3ttherF
under the Information Technology Act,2000?RET¥ffRETRE##Heda7fckHuna7
Fth¥

General Knowledge / H"TH FIT ( Total 10 Questions ) (Q.No.111 to 120)

111 General Knowledge -The first successful 3 Operation Operation Operation Operation
nuclear bomb test in the Pokhran test nuclear energy Ginger Smiling Buddha Black Tornado
3rmfis
range is known as -HinTaFT-tfro qfletoT qRdr E uEenHTFtlqz7ngFTqfle+DTqi]Ttlrma- lL!Et!1E:

qnIed FTgivgiv an
112 General Knowledge - The hero of the 1 The Sunga Pallava Dynasty Magadha Vakataka
"Malvikagnimitram" of Kalidas is associated Dynasty TTRIrfu Dynasty Dynasty .
•.i:i,-i::--:=-::i----f=f::i:i:f=--i- givch ITV- qT55lt5-

Page 23 of 26
Q.NO. ProposedAns Option 4
Question Text Option 1 Option 2 Option 3

3 Shri Amit Shah Shrl Subhash C Shri Ramnath Smt Pratibha

113 General Knowledge -Who is the chairman
of the Commit ee set up to assess theviabilityofthe"onenation,oneelection"concept?¥+=#ng.#ffiitapTTfan-# ch 3tfin FT Kovindfflumqae PatilrmrfuVIqTfro
#%h#pdi55iRT

114 General Knowledge -Winner of the chessworldcup2023MagnusCarlsonbelongsto#c#ry±froq5T2023Sfadrrfurfuffroanaffivwha.7 2 Canadaq5TT3l SwedentRE Switzerland

#rvay 1tqCq<Cl6

115 General Knowledge -Who was President 3 Dada Bhai A. 0. Hume Lord Reay
of the first session of Indian National Naoroj, T. ch. ur #3ion#e ddt
Congress, which was held in 1885 :REFTJfa#T¥5#en¥SSorUq¥#a. FTutRE

116 General Knowledge -Quit India movement 3 in response to in response to in response to in response to
was launched - Cabinet Mission Simon Cripps Proposal Wavell Plan
HrmT qFT - ema RE crian crfev fin Plan Commission ffro qRT aiTa tan ar
TTqT an - rmfin
TFTaiqFTa.
Report (ffro
Sqi8RTa.
qigRTfi

RTS¥a'
Andhra Pradeshchefrfu
117 General Knowledge -Which is the firstStateinindependentIndiaformedonlinguisticbasis?HmTapgrT-wiviTaEaTuten€tTTTRiFTqT7iz]TtTEffliTevthHTa? 2 MaharashtraFT5TnI
#nd #alaya

118 General Knowledge -The point where 4 lndira point Kibithu Tiranga point Shivshakti point
lndia's Chandrayan-3 landed of moon'sSouthpole,isknownas:ESFTaehaqEqufa%GLTFLF¥¥T-3 en tFTF fae% fan TFT finREtaTF

General Knowledge -Which among the 4 Pandit Atal Bihari Maithili Sharan Harishankar
119
following writer of Madhya Pradesh Makhanlal v#affiRE Gupt Parsa'
received 'Sahitya Academy Award' for his Chaturvedi atrdi-Ttd ERtrqut
ifir 7TRITmaF5ra
#w#n.g=#ngs#dadh#a#r"'EpqTRorfurfe"#ifa#giv'S

120 General Knowledge -Which among the 4 Only 1 Only 2 & 3 Only 1 & 3 None of the
following pairs of names of shiftingcultivationandtheareasis/arecorrectly a5Ta 1 asia 2 3fr{ 3 fro 1 3flT 3 above3qha fi a

matched?1.Podu- Kerala2.Bewar-Oris a3.Jho m-Madhya PradeshSelect hecor ectoptionfrom the optionsgivenbelow:enqf leni-i2Tr fuena7TIP3Pr{dr af if igf la.ath-mdtlautfha ¢'?#E=rfuEa cafrof lf lqR: q*ra.

Page 24 of 26
 a.NO- ProposedAns
Question Text Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4

Computer Knowledge And General English ( Total 20 Questions ) (Q.No.121 to 140)

121 Computer KnowoperatingsysteGraphicalUserI ledge - Which of theseindoesnothaveanterface? 4 Windows 95 Mac OS Ubuntu Ms Dos

122 Computer Knowledge - A word in a webpagethat,whenclicked,opensanotherdocumentiscalled- 2 Anchor Hyperlink Reference URL

123 Computer Knowledge - Which of the 2 SQL Injection Firewall Hashing Cross Server
following options acts as a barrier betweenlocalAreaNetwork(LAN)andtheInternet? Scripting

124 Computer Knowledge - What is the fullformoflpinlpaddress? 3 International pin Identification pin I nternet protocol Internet pin

125 Computer Knowledge -Which command isusedtoselectthewholedocument? 3 CTRL+V CTRL+W CTRL+A CTRL+C

126 Computer Knowledge -Who invented 2 DOuglas Vinton Cerf and Tim Berners- Charles
internet ? Engelbart Robert Kahn Lee Babbage
127 Computer Knowledge -What is the full 2 chat general chat generative chat global pre- chat global
form of Chat GPT ? pre-test pre-trainedtransformer test Primary-test

128 Computer Knowledge - Digilocker is : 4 Story Search enginefordocuments Bond Repository

129 General English -It my brother. 2 Is ages that I is ages since I was ages that I was ages since
didn't see Saw haven't seen Saw
130 General English - The fire engine camerushingdownthehill.-lnthissentence"down"isthe------------ 2 Adverb Preposition Adjective Noun

131 General English -We tried hard, but did notsucceed-inthissentence"But"is- 4 Adverb Preposition Adjective Conjunction

132 General English -Choose correct sentence 1 The Head The Head The Head The Head
Master wants Master wanting Master was Master is
to speak to you. to speak to you. wanting tospeaktoyou. wanting tospeaktoyou.

133 General English - listening is alsocalledcriticallistening. 4 Therapeutic Discriminative Empathetic Evaluative

134 General English - Identify the type of 3 Simple sentence Compound Complex Passive
sentence, "The pwholootedtheinolice caught the criminalsall.„ sentence sentence sentence

135 General English - The English _ won theworldcl'p. 3 is has have are

136 General English - One word substitution -"Onewhodoesnotcareforbeautyofliteratureorart"- 3 Primitive Dictator Philistine Hypocrite

137 General English - Choose the mostappropriatewordandfillintheblank:Heiscareless......hisduties. 4 for with from about

138 General English - I ---------------English for 3 study am studying have been None of them
five year.Choosecorrect words - studying

139 Computer Knowledge - who is known asfatherofmoderncomputer? 2 John Mauchly Alan Turing Tommy Flowers None of Them

140 Computer Knowledge - Which of these 3 WAN MAN LAN All the networks
networks is usually the fastest ? are equally fast

Law Lexicon and Maxims And Medical Jurisprudence ( Total 10 Questions ) (a.No.141 to 150)

141 Law Lexicon & Maxims - "nemo daf quod 4 Not twice for He gives To be unwilling No one can
non habet" mean - the same. nothing whohasnothing. to prosecute. give a bettertitlethanhehas.

Page 25 of 26
a.NO. ProposedAns
Question Text Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4

142 Law Lexicon & Maxims - ``Spo//.afus debef 1 One who has Something Who wishes to He who has no
ante omnia restitui" mean - been despoiled definite ought be deceived, let power Of
ought to be to be brought to him be alienation must
restored beforeanythingelse. judgment. deceived. retain.

143 Law Lexicon & Maxims -"Vo/un fas 1 The will of a The last will of The will of When two
testatoris est ambulatoria usque ad testator is testator is to be testator is not conflicting will

extremum vite exitum" mean - ambulatory thoroughly revocable at are found, the
(changeable) fulfilled the latest last prevails.
until death. according to hisrealintention. moment of life.

144 Law Lexicon & Maxims - "res /.nfegra " 1 an untouched an adjudicated a matter which the reason for
mean - matter. matter shall bedeemedcorrect has beenadjudicated isacceptedorreceivedastrue deciding.

145 Medical Jurisprudence - Tissue bridges areseenin- 3 Abrasion Contusion Laceration Stab wound

146 Medical Jurisprudence-What is the age ofanabrasion,iftheinjuriesaredarkredcolourwithscabformation. 2 fresh 12-48 hours 49-72 hours 5-8 days

147 Medical Jurisprudence -ln a gunshot injury,blackeningseenaroundtheentrywoundisdueto- 2 Flame Smoke Unburnt powder Hot gases

148 Medical Jurisprudence -Loss ofconsciousnessinducedbyatemporarilyinsufficientflowofbloodtothebrain.Itisknowninmedicallanguageas.. . 4 Spondylosis Osteoporosis Metastasis Syncope

149 Law Lexicon & Maxims - "Acftjs me /.nvt.to 1 An act done by An act done by An act done by None of the
factus non est meus actus" mean - me against mywillisnotmyact. me with my willIsnotmyact. me js myact. above.

150 Medical Jurisprudence - The blood vesselwhichcarrybloodfromorganstotheheartarecalled: 3 Arteries Capillaries veins both (1 ) & (2)

ZZZ

I-..,.,..

Registrar (Exam)

le7.`1

Page 26 of 26
 Online Preliminarv Exam to the Dost of District Judge (Entrv Level) Direct Recruitment
From Bar Exam -2023
Format for submitting objection on proposed Model Answers

Application No Name of Applicant

Q.No. in which objection is to be raised:

Objection :-
1111111111
(Tick which is applicable):

1. Provided answer is wrong

2. More than 1 answer is correct
3. Question is wrong

4. All answers are incorrect

5. Other Please specify

Objection in Brief for Q.No.

Source Annexed as
Objection in Brief for Q.No.
Source Annexed as
Objection in Brief for Q.No.
Source Annexed as
Objection in Brief for Q.No.
Source Annexed as
Objection in Brief for Q.No.
Source Annexed as
Objection in Brief for Q.No.
Source Annexed as
Objection in Brief for Q.No.
Source Annexed as
Objection in Brief for Q.No.
Source Annexed as
Objection in Brief for Q.No.
Source Annexed as
Objection in Brief for Q.No.
Source Annexed as

Signature:

Date:

Note: Please annex 2nd sheet if required

Please mention Q.No. in top of source material provided for that Question.
Highlight the particular portion or line on which objection is based.