Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tác dụng bảo vệ gan của chiết xuất lá atisô so với silymarin đối với nhiễm độc gan do acetaminophen gây ra ở chuột
Tác dụng bảo vệ gan của chiết xuất lá atisô so với silymarin đối với nhiễm độc gan do acetaminophen gây ra ở chuột
Ghada Elsayed Elgarawany, Asmaa Gaber Abdou, Doha Maher Taie &
Shaimaa Mohammed Motawea
To cite this article: Ghada Elsayed Elgarawany, Asmaa Gaber Abdou, Doha Maher Taie
& Shaimaa Mohammed Motawea (2019): Hepatoprotective effect of artichoke leaf extracts
in comparison with silymarin on acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity in mice, Journal of
Immunoassay and Immunochemistry, DOI: 10.1080/15321819.2019.1692029
ABSTRACT KEYWORDS
Acetaminophen is a common analgesic-antipyretic agent, Artichoke; silymarin;
which is safe in therapeutic doses but in higher doses can acetaminophen;
produce hepatic necrosis. The aim of this study is to hepatotoxicity; PCNA;
investigate the hepatoprotective effects of artichoke, sily- immunohistochemistry
marin, and both agents in acetaminophen-induced liver
damage in mice. Forty male mice were divided into five
main groups, (1) control (2) Acetaminophen (APAP) (3)
Artichoke leaf extracts (ALE) and APAP (4) silymarin and
APAP group (5) ALE, silymarin and APAP groups. Blood
samples were collected for the measurement of liver
enzymes (ALT, AST, and ALP). The liver was excised,
weighed and dissected into two parts, one used for mea-
surement of malondialdehyde (MDA) and glutathione
reductase, and the other part used for histopathological
examination and assessment of proliferative cell nuclear
antigen (PCNA) immunohistochemical expression. APAP
group showed a significant increase in liver weight, ALT,
AST, ALP, MDA, and PCNA expression with a significant
decrease in glutathione reductase in comparison to control
group. All these parameters were significantly improved in
the three treated groups when compared to APAP
group. APAP group showed marked portal inflammation
and parenchyma necrosis. Co-administration of ALE and/
or silymarin to acetaminophen treated mice showed
a significant reduction in PCNA expression compared to
APAP group. Both ALE and silymarin co-treatment showed
a significant decrease in PCNA percentage to a level near
to control group. Artichoke and/or silymarin are suggested
to protect against acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity
in mice by ameliorating liver enzymes, antioxidant effect,
decreasing liver damage and proliferation.
Abbreviation: ALT, alanine transaminase. AST, aspartate trans-
aminase. ALP, alkaline phosphatase.MDA, malondialdehyde.
PCNA, proliferative cell nuclear antigen
Introduction
The liver is a crucial organ, which plays an important role in maintaining
homeostasis, physiological, biochemical activity, growth, and nutrition.[1] It is
one of the important organs in the metabolism and detoxification of drugs and
chemicals. Many toxic drugs can cause liver damage such as acetaminophen,
chloroform, galactosamine, and dimethylnitrosamine.[2] Acetaminophen (para-
cetamol) is one of the most pharmaceutical drugs poisoning in the USA.[3] It is
used as an analgesic and an antipyretic drug. It is safe at a therapeutic dose, but
in overdose, it causes hepatic necrosis and acute liver damage.[4]
Artichoke (Cynarascolymos) is a plant that has been used as a food in
traditional medicine. It contains many minerals like iron and calcium, vitamins
like A, B, and C and bioactive agents as luteolin and cynarine.[5] Cynarine is the
biologically active chemical constituent of artichoke and is located in the pulp
of the leaves.[6] It was used as anti-inflammatory, anti-allergic and anticancer
and for treatment of hyperlipidemia.[7] Silymarin is used for the treatment of
chronic liver disease and pretreatment with silymarin prevents hepatic injury
and liver fibrosis caused by toxins (i.e., ethanol, and CCl4).[8]
The hepatoprotective effect of artichoke is not widely studied[9,10], there-
fore the present study investigates this effect of artichoke leaf extract in
comparison with silymarin in acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity of
male albino rats and their possible underlying mechanisms.
Experimental design
Forty male albino mice of C57BL/6 weighing30 ± 10 g were fed with standard
laboratory diet and water “adlibitum” and housed in the animal house at the
Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, under normal light/dark cycle and
room temperature. The animals were acclimatized to these conditions for 7 days
before the experiment. The animals were classified into five groups, eight animals
for each one.
Group 1: Control group
Group 2: Acetaminophen (APAP) group: Acetaminophen was given in
a dose of 300 mg/kg intraperitoneally (I.P) as a single dose.[11]
Group 3: Artichoke leaf extracts (ALE) and APAP(ALE+APAP) group:
Artichoke leaf extract was dissolved in distilled water and given in a dose of
JOURNAL OF IMMUNOASSAY AND IMMUNOCHEMISTRY 3
Reagents
Silymarin: Legalon capsule (140 mg) (Chemical Industrial Development,
Giza, Egypt). Acetaminophen: Perfalgan (Paracetamol) solution 10mg/ml
(Bristol-Myers Squibb, LOC,
Fontana del Ceraso, Anagani, Italy).
Statistics
Values were measured as the mean ± standard error of the mean (S.E.M).
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post hoc (Tukey’s) test using
SPSS version 16. P < .05 was significant.
JOURNAL OF IMMUNOASSAY AND IMMUNOCHEMISTRY 5
Results
Liver weight (g)
Liver weight increased in acetaminophen treated group (1.63 ± 0.028) when
compared to control group (p < .0001). Co-administration of ALE or silymarin
or both to acetaminophen treated group significantly showed a decrease in liver
weight (1.46 ± 0.024, 1.32 ± 0.057, and 1.2 ± 0.029, p < .05, p < .0001 and p <
.0001, respectively) compared to APAP group (Figure 1a).
Figure 1. (A): The changes in liver weight/g among the different studied groups [control, APAP,
(ALE + APAP), (Silymarin+APAP), and (ALE+ Silymarin +APAP)]. (B): The difference in the level of
MDA (nmol/gm) among the studied groups [control, APAP, (ALE + APAP), (Silymarin+APAP), and
(ALE+ Silymarin +APAP)]. (C): Glutathione reductase (mg/gram tissue) in control, APAP, (ALE +
APAP), (Silymarin + APAP), and (ALE+ Silymarin + APAP) groups.
6 G. ELSAYED ELGARAWANY ET AL.
Table 1. ALT, AST, and ALP (U/L) in control, APAP, (ALE + APAP), (Silymarin + APAP), and (ALE+
Silymarin +APAP) groups.
Groups
Liver
enzymes Control APAP ALE+APAP Silymarin+APAP ALE+Silymarin+APAP
ALT(U/l) 75.82 ± 17.78 334.2 ± 20.18* 128.8 ± 19.78#& 66.9 ± 21.77# 40.86 ± 20.56#
AST(U/l) 132.7 ± 30.3 467.8 ± 31.3* 135.7 ± 17.23# 96.5 ± 30.4# 76.3 ± 16.36#
ALP(U/l) 52.5 ± 5.43 321.9 ± 40.38* 140.5 ± 6.44*# 150.6 ± 4.1*# 61.7 ± 6.9$%#
Values are measured as mean ± S.E.M. *Significant when compared to the control group.# Significant when
compared to APAP group.$ Significant when compared to ALE + APAP group.%Significant when compared
to Silymarin + APAP group.&Significant when compared to (ALE+ Silymarin+ APAP) group.
ALP: ALP level was significantly increased in APAP group (321.9 ± 5.43,
p < .0001) in comparison to other groups. (ALE +APAP) and (Silymarin+
APAP) showed a significant decrease in ALP level (140.5 ± 6.44 and 150.6 ±
4.1, p < .0001, respectively) compared to APAP group while they showed
significant increase in ALP level (p < .05, p < .01, respectively) when
compared to control and (ALE+ silymarin +APAP) groups.
MDA (nmol/gm)
APAP group showed a significant increase in MDA level (38.49 ± 2.9, p < .0001)
compared to other groups. Co-administration of ALE to APAP and silymarin to
APAP and both ALE and silymarin to APAP significantly showed a decrease in
MDA (15.5 ± 2.66, 16.4 ± 2.63 and 14.9 ± 1.64, respectively) compared to APAP
group. No significant differences were detected among (ALE + APAP),
(Silymarin+ APAP) and (ALE+ silymarin +APAP) groups (Figure 1b).
Histopathology
Normal control rat’s liver showed preserved lobular architecture. Regarding
necro-inflammatory activity, APAP group showed marked portal inflamma-
tion and parenchymal necrosis compared to other groups where there was
a recognized decrease in the degree of necro-inflammatory activity (Figure 2)
JOURNAL OF IMMUNOASSAY AND IMMUNOCHEMISTRY 7
Figure 2. a, Normal control mouse liver showing classic hepatic lobule (H&E, x 200). b&c,
Acetaminophen treated mice livers showing b, portal tract inflammation (red arrow). c, perivenular
necrosis and ballooning swelling of hepatocytes (yellow arrows) together with multiple foci of spotty
necrosis (green arrows) (H&E, x 200). d, ALE and APAP treated group, where liver showing minimal portal
inflammation (red arrow) (H&E, x 200). e, Silymarin and APAP treated group, liver showing focal spotty
necrosis (red arrow) (H&E, x 200). f, ALE, Silymarin and APAP treated group, liver showing minimal
parenchyma inflammation(H&E, x 200).
Discussion
Acetaminophen overdose caused severe hepatotoxicity, acute liver damage, and
death.[20,21] In our study, we investigated the role of artichoke and silymarin as
8 G. ELSAYED ELGARAWANY ET AL.
Figure 3. a: Control group showed hepatocyte with few nuclear positive cells for PCNA (2%). b:
APAP group showed increased nuclear positivity (black arrow) and strongly stained PCNA
expression (25%) c:ALE +APAP group showed decrease nuclear positivity of PCNA expression
(15%).d: Silymarin +APAP group showed decrease nuclear positivity of PCNA expression (7%). e:
ALE+silymarin +APAP group showed a few positive cells for PCNA (5%).(IHC x 200).
Table 2. PCNA expression (%) in control, APAP, (ALE + APAP), (Silymarin + APAP), and (ALE+
Silymarin +APAP) groups.
Control APAP ALE+APAP Silymarin+APAP ALE+Silymarin+APAP
PCNA (%) 2.1 ± 0.18 25.8 ± 1.1* 14.5 ± 0.75*#%& 7.2 ± 0.52*# 4.9 ± 0.37*#
The number of rats in each group was 8. Values are measured as mean ± S.E.M. *Significant when compared
to the control group. # Significant when compared to APAP group.$ Significant when compared to ALE +
APAP group.% Significant when compared to Silymarin + APAP group.&Significant when compared to
(ALE+ Silymarin+ APAP) group.
ORCID
Ghada Elsayed Elgarawany http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5435-4205
References
[1] Mahmood, N. D.; Mamat, S. S.; Kamisan, F. H.; Yahya, F.; Kamarolzaman, M.F.F.;
Nasir, N.; Mohtarrudin, N.; Tohid, S.F.; Zakaria, Z.A. Amelioration of paracetamol-
induced hepatotoxicity in rat by the administration of methanol extract of
Muntingiacalabura L. leaves. Bio. Med. Res. Int. 2014, 1–10.
[2] Abdou, H. S.; Salah, S. H.; Booles, H. EA AR.Antioxidant Effect of Celery against
Carbontetrachloride Induced Hepatic Damage in Rats. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2012, 6
(27), 5657–5667. DOI: 10.5897/AJMR12.637.
[3] Litovitz, T. L.; Klein-Schwartz, W.; Rodgers, G. C.; Cobaugh, D. J.; Youniss, J.;
Omslaer, J. C.; May, M. E.; Woolf, A. D. Benson BE.2001 Annual Report of the
American Association of Poison Control Centers Toxic Exposure Surveillance
System. Am. J. Emergency Med. 2002, 20(5), 391–452. DOI: 10.1053/ajem.2002.34955.
[4] James, L. P.; Mayeux, P. R.; Hinson, J. A. Acetaminophen-induced Hepatotoxicity.
Drug Metab. Dispos. 2003, 31(12), 1499–1506. DOI: 10.1124/dmd.31.12.1499.
[5] Hosseini, S. E.; Mousaei, S.; Tavakoli, F. Effect of Hydro Alcoholic Extract of Artichoke
on Diabetes Treatment and Liver Enzymes in Diabetic Adult Male Rats. Adv. Herbal
Med. 2015, 1(1), 17–21.
[6] Ceccarelli, N.; Curadi, M.; Picciarelli, P.; Martelloni, L.; Sbrana, C.; Giovannetti, M.
Globe Artichoke as a Functional Food. Mediterr. J. Nutr. Metab. 2010, 3(3), 197–201.
DOI: 10.3233/s12349-010-0021-z.
[7] Heidarian, E.; Jafari-Dehkordi, E.; Seidkhani-Nahal, A. Lipid-lowering Effect of
Artichoke on Liver Phosphatidatephosphohydrolase and Plasma Lipids in
Hyperlipidemic Rats. J. Med. Plant Res. 2011, 5(19), 4918–4924.
[8] Ferenci, P.;. Silymarin in the Treatment of Liver Diseases: What Is the Clinical
Evidence? Clin. Liver Dis. 2016, 7(1), 8–10. DOI: 10.1002/cld.v7.1.
[9] Aksu, Ö.; Altinterim, B. Hepatoprotective Effects of Artichoke (Cynarascolymus).
BilimveGenclik Dergisi. 2013, 1(2), 44–49.
[10] Ramadan, A.; Afifi, N. A.; Yassin, N. Z.; Abdel-Rahman, R. F.; Hassan, A. H.; Hany, M.
Hepatoprotective Effect of Artichoke Extract against Pre-cancerous Lesion of
Experimentally Induced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Rats. Life Sci. J. 2014, 4(1),
1546–1562.
[11] McGill, M. R.; Williams, C. D.; Xie, Y.; Ramachandran, A.; Jaeschke, H.
Acetaminophen-induced Liver Injury in Rats and Mice: Comparison of Protein
Adducts, Mitochondrial Dysfunction, and Oxidative Stress in the Mechanism of
12 G. ELSAYED ELGARAWANY ET AL.