Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Causes of Separation of East Pakistan
Causes of Separation of East Pakistan
Introduction:
President Ayub abrogated his own constitution and suddenly resigned from the presidency. On 25 th March 1969, Gen
Yahya Khan declared Martial law. He held the positions of Army chief, the president and Chief Martial law
administrator.
Yahya dissolved the One Unit and restored the pre-1955 provinces of West Pakistan.
He promised free fair (direct one-man one-vote) elections.
The new administration formed a committee of deputy and provincial martial law administrators that functioned above
the civil machinery of government. The generals held power.
East Pakistan’s separation was a tragedy, countdown to which began right from 1948 after the death of Quaid-e-Azam
and cracks in the federation of Pakistan had started to appear. This separation was a tremendous loss. It was the
outcome of the failure of the ruling generals and greedy politicians to arrive at a political settlement. By 1970, the
sentiments for national unity had weakened in East Pakistan to the extent that constant conflicts between the two
wings erupted into mass civil disorder. This tragically resulted in the brutal separation of Pakistan’s Eastern wing. There
are multi-dimensional causes for the breakup of Pakistan.
The reasons for this sad event were many. The important ones are as follows:
1. Geographical distance:
The two wings of Pakistan were peculiarly situated, and were non-
contiguous territories, 1000 miles apart. In between them laid the
hostile India. Due to this distance, there was no interaction and
contact between the two branches. The absence of this essential
factor weakened the bond of unity and so was the feeling of
belonging to a single nation.
2. Political factor:
Pakistan started as parliamentary democracy. But due to the
dictatorial trends of some leaders, this experience was a failure.
The failure to have a new constitution in its early years gave the
dictators a chance to act upon their wishes. The ruling class was
mostly composed of senior bureaucrats, most of whom were West
Pakistanis. Secondly, the civil military leadership at will installed
and dismissed governments at the center and in the provinces. The
dismissal of the government of Khwaja Nazim-ud-din, M. A. Bogra
and Hussain Shaheed Suhrawardy convinced the people of East
Pakistan that an East Pakistani was not tolerated as head of state (or government) by West Pakistani leadership.
3. Representation factor:
East Pakistan often bitterly complained that there were few East Pakistani officers at the highest level of civil services.
The representation of Bengalis in the armed forces was also very low, comparing it with their 56% strength of the entire
population of Pakistan. Keeping this in view, their share in the government was 15%, and it was little more than 20% in
the armed forces. The East Pakistanis also wanted representation in the parliament on the basis of population, which
entitled them to greater representation in the parliament than entire West Pakistan provinces. The demand was never
met and instead the ‘parity proposal’ was imposed on them. The grievance of low representation coupled with the
arrogant attitude of West Pakistan’s politicians, military men, and civil servants, created much bitterness among the
people of East Pakistan.
2 [SIR UMAR KHAN DAWAR (0325-2512225)]
4. Distinct culture:
It is said that there was nothing common between the people of West Pakistan and East Pakistan, except that they had
the same religion, and they struggled in common to achieve a separate homeland, and the culture, tradition,
civilization, dress, cuisine and language all separated the Eastern branch from the Western branch. Their love for
Bengali language, the consequent struggle of Bengalis to get it declared as an official language and initial resistance of
West Pakistani leadership to it also created much bitterness.
5. Economic factors:
The situation was much aggravated by a sense of economic deprivation on the part of Bengalis. One of the main
grievances of the Bengalis was that money and resources had been systematically transferred from East to West, and
development of West Pakistan has been at the expense of East Pakistan. Industrial development took place at a faster
rate in the Western wing than in the Eastern wing. The deficit in the balance of trade faced by West Pakistan was
financed by East Pakistan’s surplus money. The economic disparity increased between the two wings during Ayub’s
decade of development.
6. Mujib’s 6 points:
The extent to which the feelings for a federation had weakened was shown by Mujib’s 6 points that he gave in 1966.
These points were aimed at giving all powers to the provinces except for defense and foreign affairs. The reason for
proposing the Six Points was to give the East greater autonomy in Pakistan.
Fatima Jinnah, Sheikh Mujib and Maulana Bhashani during Jinnah's presidential election campaign.
The Awami League won a victory: 160 of the 162 seats in the east (all seats from East Pakistan) , and thus gained a
majority of the 300 directly elected seats in the National Assembly (plus the thirteen indirectly elected seats for
women, bringing the total to 313 members) without winning a seat in the West Wing. The PPP won a large majority in
the West Wing, especially in Punjab and Sindh, but no seats in the East Wing.
Negotiations started for the formation of the government between Mujib and Bhutto.
In his role as intermediary and head of state, Yahya Khan tried to persuade Bhutto and Mujib to come to some kind of
accommodation. This effort proved unsuccessful as Mujib insisted on his right as leader of the majority to form a
government--a stand at variance with Bhutto, who claimed there were "two majorities" in Pakistan. It was clear that
Yahya Khan and Z.A.Bhutto didn’t want to hand over power to Awami League.
On 28 February 1971, Yahya Khan, under the pressure of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto's, postponed the national assembly
meeting scheduled for March. Upon hearing the news of the suspension of the National Assembly, Dhaka city erupted
in anger and hundreds of people rushed to the streets in a spontaneous display of anger.
Bangladeshi Mukti Bahini fighters capture Razakars (collaborators) in the 1971 Bangladesh liberation war.
Pakistan army commander Lt Gen AK Niazi signing the surrender in Dhaka stadium.
[SIR UMAR KHAN DAWAR (0325-2512225)] 5
Events: