You are on page 1of 5

Make the bill more simple, user friendly and easier to understand

Sponsor: PERSON Owner: PERSON Kickoff: 19Q4 Duration: Long


Hypothesis Potential Solution Activity timeline Status Owners
Perform assessment of bill to
understand improvement  -
§ Currently there are ~18K calls each month to the contact opportunities
center related to bills § Identify opportunities to make the bill Identify system / technology
§ There is an opportunity to make the bill more simple, user more simple and easier to understand, dependencies that impact bill format  -
friendly, and easier to understand without making significant changes that
Propose billing changes based on
§ A simpler bill that is easier to understand could reduce the drive additional billing inquiries or
impact and feasibility  -
number of customer inquiries (e.g. calls, live chats) related to customer contact volume
understanding their bill Implement changes by working with
 -

◔ ◕
internal/external stakeholders
 Need identified Owner defined
◑ Work initiated Early rollout
● Full rollout

Risks Dependencies Impacts


M Cost (e.g. materials, systems, labor) M Benefits (customers, employees, business)
§ Significant technological / system
dependencies, as capabilities may limit § Resource costs required to perform
§ Any design changes to the bill present initial assessment, identify § Reduction in customer inquiries
possibilities of any visual changes to
the risk of increased call volume improvement opportunities, and regarding billing
bill
§ CCA billing still under consideration support any changes to bill format § Increase in customer sentiment /
§ Potential regulatory implications when
making billing changes § Potential investments in systems if effort score
additional capabilities are required

We put customers first and provide an effortless service experience

66
Introduction Executive Summary Vision & alignment High-level design Operational improvement CS Transformation KPIs People & culture Next Steps Appendix

Simplify the credit card payment process for customers

Sponsor: PERSON Owner: PERSON Kickoff: 20Q1 Duration: Medium


Hypothesis Potential Solution Activity timeline Status Owners
Understand customer pain points with
existing credit card payment process  -
§ Customers are increasingly opting for credit card payments, § Provide deeper integration of credit
with average monthly number of credit card payments card payments with ENTITY and Design and develop solutions to
increasing 16% from 2017 to 2018 BillMatrix (e.g. My Account integration, addressing customer pain points  -

§ Currently, ENTITY offers credit card payments exclusively ESS payments over the phone) Work with appropriate stakeholders
through BillMatrix, which charges a convenience fee for each § Look to new platforms that could and teams to deliver the solution  -
transaction, limits autopay and offering options, and requires support more convenient payment Measure customer sentiment and
payment through an external channel options for customers effort for payments / credit card  -

 Need identified
◔ Owner defined
◑ Work initiated
◕ Early rollout
● Full rollout

Risks Dependencies Impacts


H Cost (e.g. materials, systems, labor) H Benefits (customers, employees, business)
§ Customer adoption of more costly
§ IT resources to support and systems § Operational costs vary depending on
credit card payments likely if made
changes that could be required solution, but could be significant if § Lift in customer sentiment and
more convenient
§ Solution(s) dependent on payment change requires new systems or customer effort
§ No other major risks identified, but
processing companies (e.g. BillMatrix, absorption of convenience fees § Potential reduction in late payments,
any specific risks dependent on
SpeedPay) § Resource costs required to support bad debt, etc.
solution(s) developed
implementation of initiatives

We put customers first and provide an effortless service experience

67
Introduction Executive Summary Vision & alignment High-level design Operational improvement CS Transformation KPIs People & culture Next Steps Appendix

Route customer to the correct agent through the IVR

Sponsor: PERSON Owner: PERSON Kickoff: 19Q3 Duration: Medium


Hypothesis Potential Solution Activity timeline Status Owners
Identify root-cause of incorrect agent
routing through the IVR  -

§ There is an opportunity to increase the effectiveness of IVR § While additional work is required to Develop solution based on root-cause
routing when the customer calls the contact center identify a solution, a potential initiative analysis  -

§ Currently, a number of calls are being routed to the incorrect could include re-vamping the existing Work with appropriate stakeholders to
agent resulting in additional call transfers and longer wait IVR to better service customers and implement changes outlined  -
times for customers support their needs Measure effectiveness of solution
implemented  -

 Need identified
◔ Owner defined
◑ Work initiated
◕ Early rollout
● Full rollout

Risks Dependencies Impacts


M Cost (e.g. materials, systems, labor) H Benefits (customers, employees, business)

§ Timing of changes should align to § Potentially requires integration with


ENTITY roadmap IVR systems § Initial investment of resources § Reduction in number of customer
§ Updating IVR presents additional risk § Resources required to assess existing required to perform assessment and transfers
for maintaining system uptime and IVR tree, identify painpoints, and design proper solution § Reduced customer wait time when
latency develop solution (e.g. updated IVR) § Systems investments potentially calling contact center
required if changes are significant § Potential increase in IVR containment

We put customers first and provide an effortless service experience

68
Introduction Executive Summary Vision & alignment High-level design Operational improvement CS Transformation KPIs People & culture Next Steps Appendix

Build flexibility to achieve 1-hour field appointment windows

Sponsor: PERSON Owner: PERSON Kickoff: 19Q2 Duration: Long


Hypothesis Potential Solution Activity timeline Status Owners
Assess customer impact of existing
field appointment windows ◔ LD


§ Existing Customer Services field operations appointment
§ Build flexibility across ENTITY’s
windows are considered a significant customer pain point Assess financial impact to shifting
Customer Service organization to LD
given the broad appointment window slots when customers toward 1-hour appointment window
support more convenient appointment
request an appointment
windows, with time slots as short as 1- Develop formal business case,
§ As customer preferences and needs evolve, the need for
hour for both emergencies and non- including detailed rollout & timeline  -
shorter, more convenient appointment windows will become
emergencies Communicate and execute rollout plan
essential to achieve the ENTITY TOM
 -

◔ ◕
for shorter appointment windows
 Need identified Owner defined
◑ Work initiated Early rollout
● Full rollout

Risks Dependencies Impacts


H Cost (e.g. materials, systems, labor) H Benefits (customers, employees, business)

§ Potential for operational costs to § IT enablers and technologies (e.g. § Significant impact to number of FTEs
significantly exceed budget WAM, proactive notifications) and field resources required § Customer sentiment and satisfaction
§ Increased customer expectations § Resources required for business case § Technology and system updates lift
require improved forecasting and development and feasibility potentially required § Faster responses times for other
dispatch capabilities assessment § Significant overhaul likely required for operational field / emergency requests
field service dispatch process

We put customers first and provide an effortless service experience

69
Introduction Executive Summary Vision & alignment High-level design Operational improvement CS Transformation KPIs People & culture Next Steps Appendix

Deliver a consistent experience across channels (e.g. Mobile App and


MyAccount) for customers
Sponsor: PERSON Owner: PERSON Kickoff: 20Q2 Duration: Long
Hypothesis Potential Solution Activity timeline Status Owners
Identify experience gaps between
Mobile App and My Account; develop  -
§ ENTITY customer usage of online service functionality such as business case based
Mobile App and My Account continue to rise as web and § Deliver a consistent experience across Refine solution requirements and
mobile become increasingly popular channels channels (e.g. Mobile App and capabilties required  -
§ The current customer experience of using the ENTITY website MyAccount) for customers by closely
Work with IT/digital teams to integrate
varies compared to the mobile app (e.g. different functionality aligning capabilities between web and
changes across channels  -
and capabilities). As a result, there is an opportunity to deliver mobile
a more consistent experience across these channels Measure and assess performance  -

 Need identified
◔ Owner defined
◑ Work initiated
◕ Early rollout
● Full rollout

Risks Dependencies Impacts


H Cost (e.g. materials, systems, labor) M Benefits (customers, employees, business)
§ Significant dependence on IT and § Potential lift in customer sentiment /
§ Initiative could become costly to
associated systems to support desired § Significant IT and digital resources customer effort score
maintain on an ongoing basis as
capabilties across both channels required to align capabilties and § Drives adoption of cheaper, more
capabilties grow on both channels
§ ENTITY roadmap and capabilties need experience between the two channels efficient digital channels
§ Performance and latency could be
to be considered as part of this § Additional resources required to § Supports training proficiency with a
impacted as customer volume grows
initiative support initiative on an ongoing basis consistent set of capabilties across
channels

We prioritize digital solutions for our team and our customers

70

You might also like