Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aim: Dendrimers dendritic structural design holds vast promises, predominantly for drug delivery, owing to their unique properties.
Dendritic architecture is widespread topology found in nature and offers development of specific properties of chemical substances.
Dendrimers are an ideal delivery vehicle candidate for open study of the effects of polymer size, charge, and composition on biologi-
cally relevant properties such as lipid bilayer interactions, cytotoxicity, bio-distribution, internalization, blood plasma retention
time, and filtration. This article reviews role of dendrimers in advanced drug delivery and biomedical applications.
Key Words: dendrimers, drug delivery vehicle, lipid bilayer interactions, dendritic architecture.
Dendrimers are exceedingly branched, globular is promising [7]. Nanomedicine plays a vital role
macromolecules with many arms emanating from to advance drug delivery, cancer treatment, and
a central core [1, 2]. The atomistic feature of den- so on. Dendrimers are nano-sized, radially symmet-
drimer structure has lagged behind this fast prog- ric molecules with fine-defined, homogeneous and
ress in synthesis and design [3]. To date, more than monodisperse composition consisting of tree-like
fifty families of dendrimers exist, possessing unique arms or embranchment [8, 9]. Dendrimers are iden-
properties, since the surface, interior and core can tified by unique properties like globular shape, well
be tailored to diverse types of applications [4].The defined three dimensional structure, cavities, high
derivatization of low molecular weight and protein- functionality and small size. These properties make
based therapeutics with polymers has been shown them unique for using in nanotechnology and diverse
to advance their pharmacokinetic and pharmaco-
biomedical applications [10–12]. Dendrimer struc-
dynamic properties [5, 6]. One of the most talented
tures are formed with a fundamental atom or group
applications of nanotechnology is in the field of medi-
of atoms tagged as the core. From this central struc-
cine. Certainly, a whole novel field of “nanomedicine”
ture, branches of other atoms called “dendrons” raise
Submitted: March 15, 2018 through diverse chemical reactions [8].
*Correspondence: E-mail: hrovshan@hotmail.com; Dendrimers show considerably enhanced physical and
kavetskyy@yahoo.com chemical properties compared to traditional linear poly-
Abbreviations used: DTPA — diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid;
mers. A number of significant properties of dendrimers
MRI — magnetic resonance imaging; NSAIDs — nonsteroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs; PAMAM — polyamidoamine; PDT — photody- are: (1) monodispersity; (2) nano-size and shape; (3)
namic therapy; PEG — polyethylene glycol; RNAi — RNA interfe biocompatibility; (4) periphery charge; (5) dendrimer-
rence; siRNA — small interfering RNAs. membrane interaction; and (6) pharmacokinetics [13–17].
Experimental Oncology 40,
�����������������������������
178–183, ���������������
(September) 179
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Recently As a result PAMAM dendrimers have been tested
the use of dendrimers as a new class of macromo- as a genetic material vector [72]. Dendrimers were
lecular MRI contrast agents has been explored. discovered in 1970 by Tomalia and co-workers [1]. The
The most generally used MRI contrast agents are first article using the term “dendrimer” and describing
gadolinium-based contrast agents [59, 60]. The in detail the preparation of poly(PAMAM) dendrimers
covalent attachment of Gd(III) complexes to PAMAM was presented in 1984. They are polymeric symmet-
dendrimers to generate unique macromolecular con- ric monodisperse complexes that comprise of well-
trast agents for MRI have been reported by several defined branches around a small molecule, called
research groups. Kojima et al. [61] have prepared core. Dendrimers of lower generations (0, 1, and 2)
fully PEGylated PAMAM dendrimers loaded with have highly asymmetric shape and have more open
Gd-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA). For structures as compared to higher generation [73–75].
conjugation of Gd-DTPA to the side chain, Lysine Dendrimers become densely packed as they extend
(Lys) was attached before the PEG modification [62]. out to the periphery, which forms a closed membrane-
Their results showed that PEGylation of a Gd-labeled like structure [76]. Dendritic copolymers are a specific
PAMAM dendrimer decrease the relaxivity and plasma group of dendrimers, two different types of copolymers
clearance, and variations susceptibility to temperature. were recognized: Segment-block dendrimers are ob-
Even though PEGylation decreases relaxivity by re- tained by attaching different wedges to one polyfunc-
ducing access to water, by using a bigger dendrimer tional core molecule. Layer-block dendrimers consist
(G5 vs G4) this effect can be improved with intrinsic of concentric spheres of differing chemistry [76].
higher relaxivities because of slower molecular tum- DNA molecules are well suited for these purposes
bling rates. The calculation of PEG to a dendrimer because of their unique molecular detection fea-
increased retention in the vascular pool, a feature tures. Linear DNA chains can assemble into a range
that could be useful for vascular imaging in cancer, of non-linear structures: branching of the double helix
atherosclerosis, and inflammatory disorders, as well
is induced by breaking the run of the complementarity
as for improving drug delivery [61].
of the part strands. Dendrimers with arms terminat-
Photodynamic therapy (PDT). PDT is a talented
ing in oligonucleotides of the same or of different
approach to treat certain kinds of cancer. PDT was
sequences could be used to build cages, cryptands,
planned as a helpful oncology tool more than 30 years
tubes, nets, scaffolds and other more complex three-
ago, but it has restrictions. The success of PDT de-
dimensional (3-D) structures [76–80]. An important
pends mostly on photosensitizers and improvement
characteristic of nucleic acids is the sharp melting
of an effective second generation is continuing. PDT
transition of the base-paired double strand. It is im-
is a hopeful treatment methodology whereby diseased
portant to know how dendrimerisation affects this
cells and tissues are destroyed by reactive oxygen
behavior in order to understand how branched nucleic
species by using a combination of light and photosen-
acids may be used as molecular building blocks [81].
sitizers. Dendrimers possess architecture appropriate
Recognition features ability to deliver pieces
for incorporating particular functional moieties and
of DNA to the required parts of a cell includes many
are a hopeful venue for further researches [63, 64].
Delivery of bioactive. The core and the interior challenges. To maintain the activity of DNA during
branches of a dendrimer can be synthetic or based dehydration, the dendrimer/DNA complexes were
on natural peptide or saccharide structures. When encapsulated in a water-soluble polymer, and then
adorned with peptide or carbohydrate ligands deposited on or sandwiched in functional polymer
throughout surface functional groups, dendrimers are films with a fast degradation rate to mediate gene
endowed with the bioactivity to mediate the interac- transfection. Based on this method, PAMAM den-
tion with cell surface receptors. Bioactive dendrimers drimer/DNA complexes were used to encapsulate
can attach with particular receptors on cell mem- functional biodegradable polymer films for substrate
brane [65–70]. When linking peptides or carbohy- mediated gene delivery. Research has shown that the
drates, the general ligation strategies can be applied fast degrading functional polymer has great potential
directly to generating bioactive dendrimer conjugates. for localized transfection [82, 83]. Apart from small
However, there are at least two factors characteristi- drug particles dendrimers are thoroughly examined
cally related with the ligation of dendrimer scaffolds: for the delivery of DNA. PAMAM dendrimers, and
one of them is the type and generation of dendrimer polycationic molecules can form complexes with DNA
trellis that would ascertain the shape and size of final through sequence-independent electrostatic interac-
products and another one is the number of peripheral tion between anionic phosphate groups of nucleic acid
branches and modification level that could affect the and cationic primary amino surface groups. These
multivalent spatial arrangement and receptor binding opposite charges neutralize; therefore, the net charge
properties of bioactive ligands [71]. modifications result in changes of physicochemical
Dendrimers in gene delivery. Dendrimers can and biological properties. The nature of “dendriplexes”
be used as a transporter in gene therapy. For instance, are affected not only by concentration of the DNA
PAMAM dendrimers have terminal amino groups phosphate groups and dendrimers surface amino
which interact with phosphate group of nucleic acid. groups, also by the shape of dendritic polymers and
Experimental Oncology 40,
�����������������������������
178–183, ���������������
(September) 181
20. Abbasi E, Aval SF, Akbarzadeh A, et al. Den- 40. El-Sayed M, Kiani MF, Naimark MD, et al. Ex-
drimers: synthesis, applications, and properties. Nanoscale travasation of poly (amidoamine)(PAMAM) dendrimers
Res Lett 2014; 9: 247. across microvascular network endothelium. Pharm Res
21. Solassol J, Crozet C, Perrier V, et al. Cationic phos- 2001; 18: 23–8.
phorus-containing dendrimers reduce prion replication both 41. Jevprasesphant R, Penny J, Jalal R, et al. The influ-
in cell culture and in mice infected with scrapie. J Gen Virol ence of surface modification on the cytotoxicity of PAMAM
2004; 85: 1791–9. dendrimers. Int J Pharm 2003; 252: 263–6.
22. Barth RF, Adams DM, Soloway AH, et al. Boronated 42. Jevprasesphant R, Penny J, Attwood D, et al. Engineer-
starburst dendrimer-monoclonal antibody immunoconju- ing of dendrimer surfaces to enhance transepithelial transport
gates: evaluation as a potential delivery system for neutron and reduce cytotoxicity. Pharm Res 2003; 20: 1543–50.
capture therapy. Bioconjug Chem 1994; 5: 58–66. 43. Jevprasesphant R, Penny J, Attwood D, et al. Trans-
23. Klajnert B, Bryszewska M. The interaction of trypto- port of dendrimer nanocarriers through epithelial cells via the
phan and ANS with PAMAM dendrimers. Cell Mol Biol Lett transcellular route. J Controlled Release 2004; 97: 259–67.
2002; 7: 1087–94. 44. D’emanuele A, Jevprasesphant R, Penny J, et al. The
24. Menjoge AR, Kannan RM, Tomalia DA. Dendrimer- use of a dendrimer-propranolol prodrug to bypass efflux trans-
based drug and imaging conjugates: design considerations porters and enhance oral bioavailability. J Controlled Release
for nanomedical applications. Drug Discovery Today 2010; 2004; 95: 447–53.
15: 171–85. 45. Kitchens KM, El-Sayed MEH, Ghandehari H. Tran-
25. Keshar wani P, Jain K, Jain NK. Dendrimer sepithelial and endothelial transport of poly (amidoamine)
as nanocarrier for drug delivery. Prog Polym Sci 2014; dendrimers. Adv Drug Delivery Rev 2005; 57: 2163–76.
39: 268–307. 46. Kambhampati SP, Kannan RM. Dendrimer nanopar-
26. Mehra NK, Jain K, Jain NK. Pharmaceutical and ticles for ocular drug delivery. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2013;
biomedical potential of surface engineered dendrimers. Drug 29: 151–65.
Discov Today 2015; 20: 750–9. 47. Vandamme TF, Brobeck L. Poly (amidoamine)
27. Jain NK, Asthana A. Dendritic systems in drug delivery dendrimers as ophthalmic vehicles for ocular delivery of pi-
applications. Expert Opin Drug Delivery 2007; 4: 495–512. locarpine nitrate and tropicamide. J Controlled Release 2005;
28. Kukowska-Latallo JF, Candido KA, Cao Z, et al. 102: 23–38.
Nanoparticle targeting of anticancer drug improves therapeutic
48. Desai PN, Yang H. Synthesis and characterization
response in animal model of human epithelial cancer. Cancer
of photocurable polyionic hydrogels. Mater Res Soc Symp
Res 2005; 65: 5317–24.
Proc 2008; 1095: 1095–EE05–05.
29. Lee CC, MacKay JA, Frechet JMJ, et al. Designing
49. Kandekar Y, Chaudhari PD, Tambe VS, et al. Den-
dendrimers for biological applications. Nat Biotechnol 2005;
drimers: Novel Drug Nanocarriers. International Journal
23: 1517–26.
of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research (IJPSR) 2011;
30. Dwivedi DK, Singh AK. Dendrimers: A novel carrier
2: 1086–98.
system for drug delivery. J Drug Delivery Ther 2014; 4: 1–6.
50. Reddy YK, Reddy DM, Kumar MA. Transdermal drug
31. Asadi N, Annabi N, Mostafavi E, et al. Synthe-
delivery system: a review. Res J Pharm Dos Forms Technol
sis, characterization and in vitro evaluation of magnetic
2013; 5: 202–12.
nanoparticles modified with PCL-PEG-PCL for controlled
51. Escobar-Chavez JJ, Rodriguez-Cruz IM, Dominguez-
delivery of 5FU. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol 2018;
https://doi.org/10.1080/21691401.2018.1439839. Delgado CL. Nanocarriers for transdermal drug delivery.
32. Zhu J, Shi X. Dendrimer-based nanodevices for INTECH 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/50314.
targeted drug delivery applications. J Mater Chem B 2013; 52. Svenson S. Dendrimers as versatile platform in drug de-
1: 4199–211. livery applications. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2009; 71: 445–62.
33. Twibanire JAK, Grindley TB. Polyester den- 53. Yiyun C, Na M, Tongwen X, et al. Transdermal
drimers: smart carriers for drug delivery. Polymers 2014; delivery of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs mediated
6: 179–213. by polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers. J Pharm Sci
34. Cheng Y, Xu Z, Ma M, et al. Dendrimers as drug car- 2007; 96: 595–602.
riers: applications in different routes of drug administration. 54. Tolia GT, Choi HH. The role of dendrimers in topical
J Pharm Sci 2008; 97: 123–43. drug delivery. Pharm Technol 2008; 32: 88–98.
35. Wiwattanapatapee R, Carreno-Gomez B, Malik N, 55. Svenson S, Tomalia DA. Dendrimers in biomedical
et al. Anionic PAMAM dendrimers rapidly cross adult rat applications — reflections on the field. Adv Drug Deliv Rev
intestine in vitro: a potential oral delivery system? Pharm Res 2012; 64: 102–15.
2000; 17: 991–8. 56. Malik N, Evagorou EG, Duncan R. Dendrimer-plat-
36. Tajarobi F, El-Sayed M, Rege BD, et al. Transport inate: a novel approach to cancer chemotherapy. Anti-Cancer
of poly amidoamine dendrimers across Madin-Darby canine Drugs 1999; 10: 767–76.
kidney cells. Int J Pharm 2001; 215: 263–7. 57. Patri AK, Kukowska-Latallo JF, Baker JR Jr. Targeted
37. El-Sayed M, Ginski M, Rhodes C, et al. Transepithelial drug delivery with dendrimers: comparison of the release
transport of poly (amidoamine) dendrimers across Caco-2 cell kinetics of covalently conjugated drug and non-covalent
monolayers. J Controlled Release 2002; 81: 355–65. drug inclusion complex. Adv Drug Delivery Rev 2005;
38. El-Sayed M, Ginski M, Rhodes CA, et al. Influ- 57: 2203–14.
ence of surface chemistry of poly (amidoamine) dendrimers 58. Madaan K, Kumar S, Poonia N. Dendrimers in drug
on Caco-2 cell monolayers. J Bioact Compat Polym 2003; delivery and targeting: drug-dendrimer interactions and toxic-
18: 7–22. ity. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2014; 6: 139–50.
39. El-Sayed M, Rhodes CA, Ginski M, et al. Transport 59. Langereis S, A Dirksen A, TM Hackeng TM, et al.
mechanism(s) of poly (amidoamine) dendrimers across Dendrimers and magnetic resonance imaging. New J Chem
Caco-2 cell monolayers. Int J Pharm 2003; 265: 151–7. 2007; 31: 1152–60.
Experimental Oncology 40,
�����������������������������
178–183, ���������������
(September) 183
60. Zhou Z, Lu ZR. Gadolinium‐based contrast agents polyesters and novel block copolymers. J Am Chem Soc 1992;
for magnetic resonance cancer imaging. Wiley Interdiscip Rev 114: 8405–13.
Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2013; 5: 1–18. 77. Winfree E, Liu F, Wenzler LA, et al. Design and self-
61. Kojima C, Turkbey B, Ogawa M, et al. Dendrimer- assembly of two-dimensional DNA crystals. Nature 1998;
based MRI contrast agents: the effects of PEGylation on re- 394: 539–44.
laxivity and pharmacokinetics. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol 78. Seeman NC. DNA nanotechnology: novel DNA
Med 2011; 7: 1001–8. constructions. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 1998;
62. Mostafavi E, Ataie A, Ahmadzadeh M. Characteriza- 27: 225–48.
tion of nano-structured multiferroic bismuth ferrite produced 79. Newkome GR, Moorefield CN, Vogtle F. Dendritic
via solid state reaction route. Adv Mater Res 2014; 829: 683–7. molecules: concepts, syntheses, perspectives. John Wiley &
63. Mostafavi E, Ataie A. Destructive interactions between Sons, 2008.
pore forming agents and matrix phase during the fabrication 80. Shchepinov S, Udalova IA, Bridgman AJ, et al. Oligo-
process of porous BiFeO3 ceramics. J Mater Sci Technol 2015; nucleotide dendrimers: synthesis and use as polylabelled DNA
31: 798–805. probes. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25: 4447–54.
64. Mostafavi E, Ataie A, Ahmadzadeh M, et al. Synthesis 81. Shchepinov MS, Mir KU, Elder JK, et al. Oligonucle-
of nano-structured Bi1-xBaxFeO3 ceramics with enhanced magnetic otide dendrimers: stable nano-structures. Nucleic Acids Res
and electrical properties. Mater Chem Phys 2015; 162: 106–12. 1999; 27: 3035–41.
65. Lee RT, Lee YC. Affinity enhancement by multivalent 82. Fu HL, Cheng SX, Zhang XZ, et al. Dendrimer/DNA
lectin — carbohydrate interaction. Glycoconjugate J 2000; complexes encapsulated in a water soluble polymer and sup-
17: 543–51. ported on fast degrading star poly (DL-lactide) for localized
66. Klajnert B, Rozanek M, Bryszewska M. Dendrimers
gene delivery. J Controlled Release 2007; 124: 181–8.
in photodynamic therapy. Curr Med Chem 2012; 19: 4903–12.
83. Dutta T, Garg M, Jain NK. Poly (propyleneimine)
67. Lundquist JJ, Toone EJ. The cluster glycoside effect.
dendrimer and dendrosome mediated genetic immunization
Chem Rev 2002; 102: 555–78.
against hepatitis B. Vaccine 2008; 26: 3389–94.
68. Boas U, Heegaard PMH. Dendrimers in drug research.
84. Dutta T, Jain NK, McMillan NA J, et al.
Chem Soc Rev 2004; 33: 43–63.
RETRACTED: Dendrimer nanocarriers as versatile vectors
69. Chabre YM, Roy R. Recent trends in glycodendrimer
in gene delivery. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med 2010;
syntheses and applications. Curr Top Med Chem 2008;
6: 25–34.
8: 1237–85.
85. Sato N, Kobayashi H, Saga T, et al. Tumor targeting
70. Liu J, Gray WD, Davis ME, et al. Peptide-and saccha-
ride-conjugated dendrimers for targeted drug delivery: a con- and imaging of intraperitoneal tumors by use of antisense
cise review. Interface Focus 2012; 2: 307–24. oligo-DNA complexed with dendrimers and/or avidin in mice.
71. Mihov G, Grebel-Koehler D, Lubbert A, et al. Poly- Clin Cancer Res 2001; 7: 3606–12.
phenylene dendrimers as scaffolds for shape-persistent mul- 86. Kukowska-Latallo JF, Bielinska AU, Johnson J, et al.
tiple peptide conjugates. Bioconjug Chem 2005; 16: 283–93. Efficient transfer of genetic material into mammalian cells
72. Svenson S, Tomalia DA. Dendrimers in biomedical using Starburst polyamidoamine dendrimers. PNAS 1996;
applications — reflections on the field. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 93: 4897–902.
2005; 57: 2106–29. 87. Szymanski P, Markowicz M, Mikiciuk-Olasik E.
73. Koo OM, Rubinstein, Onyuksel H. Role of nanotech- Nanotechnology in pharmaceutical and biomedical applica-
nology in targeted drug delivery and imaging: a concise review. tions: Dendrimers. NANO 2011; 6: 509–39.
Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med 2005; 1: 193–212. 88. Liu X, Rocchi P, Peng L. Dendrimers as non-viral
74. Caminade AM, Laurent R, Majoral JP. Charac- vectors for siRNA delivery. New J Chem 2012; 36: 256–63.
terization of dendrimers. Adv Drug Delivery Rev 2005; 89. Sheikhi Mehrabadi F, Fischer W, Haag R. Dendritic
57: 2130–46. and lipid-based carriers for gene/siRNA delivery (a review).
75. Caminati G, Turro NJ, Tomalia DA. Photophysical Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 2012; 16: 310–22.
investigation of starburst dendrimers and their interactions 90. Doshi M. Dendrimer and its application. Int J Pharm
with anionic and cationic surfactants. J Am Chem Soc 1990; Sci Rev Res 2011; 7: 104–11.
112: 8515–22. 91. Medina SH, El-Sayed MEH. Dendrimers as carriers
76. Hawker CJ, Frechet JMJ. Unusual macromolecular for delivery of chemotherapeutic agents. Chem Rev 2009;
architectures: The convergent growth approach to dendritic 109: 3141–57.