You are on page 1of 7

Are you struggling with writing a literature review? You're not alone.

Crafting a literature review can


be a daunting task for many, requiring extensive research, critical analysis, and eloquent writing
skills. It's a crucial component of academic and research papers, often serving as the foundation for
the entire study.

A literature review involves summarizing and synthesizing existing research and publications related
to your topic. It requires meticulous attention to detail to identify relevant sources, analyze their
findings, and present them coherently within the context of your study. Additionally, it involves
critically evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of each source to provide a comprehensive
understanding of the topic.

The complexity of writing a literature review lies in navigating through vast amounts of literature,
selecting the most pertinent sources, and effectively integrating them into your own work. It
demands both time and expertise to sift through numerous articles, books, and other scholarly
materials to extract relevant information and insights.

For those who find themselves overwhelmed by the intricacies of crafting a literature review, ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers a solution. Our experienced team of writers specializes in assisting students
and researchers in producing high-quality literature reviews tailored to their specific needs. By
entrusting your literature review to us, you can save time and energy while ensuring that your paper
meets the highest academic standards.

Don't let the challenges of writing a literature review hinder your academic success. Order from ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ today and experience the difference our expertise can make in your research
journey.
Critically evaluate: mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources. Hearing that professor’s
task is to deliver a literature review, students imagine sharing their viewpoints about favorite books
and authors. Works or End. Note MS 640: Introduction to Biomedical Information. Development of
the Literature Review Four Basic Stages of Writing 1. Is contrary data considered or is certain
pertinent information ignored to prove the author's point. A literature review is a survey of scholarly
sources on a specific topic. As such, it is important to know how to know when you have uncovered
the key conceptual categories underlying your research topic. Unlike a dissertation research question,
this question has to be answerable without collecting original data. Some people do this in a word
document, others use index cards so they can shuffle them. Gordon Serverless Computing Serverless
Computing Damian T. Gordon Designing Teaching: Pause Procedure Designing Teaching: Pause
Procedure Damian T. The research team started with an exploratory review of background
documents and research studies to identify ways in which patient portals may contribute to health
service delivery and patient outcomes. This will give you a better understanding of the author’s
argument and what to focus on in your own review. 2. Not critically evaluating the sources. Cite this
Scribbr article If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite
this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator. If the
literature review is part of your dissertation or thesis, reiterate how your research addresses gaps and
contributes new knowledge, or discuss how you have drawn on existing theories and methods to
build a framework for your research. When you review multiple studies in one paragraph, group
them according to key. Findings from eight rct s involving 6,615 participants were pooled into meta-
analyses to calculate the magnitude of effects that mobile text message reminders have on the rate of
attendance at healthcare appointments compared to no reminders and phone call reminders.
Literature Search Search across multiple databases and information resources. ? It’s not adequate to
use Medline as your one and only resource Read the literature throughout the search process. ? What
you read will guide your subsequent searches and refine your topic. Related items that provide
additional information, but that are not key to understanding the research problem, can be included
in a list of further readings. This step will help you work out the structure of your literature review
and (if applicable) show how your own research will contribute to existing knowledge. A
chronological model has different paragraphs for different time. The content will look slightly
different in each case, but the process of conducting a literature review follows the same steps. As
established by Csikszentmihalyi (Yair 2000, p. 2) 'the more. The Writing Center. University of North
Carolina; Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. The purpose of a literature review is to: -Identify gaps in
existing research on a topic -Provide an overview of existing research on a topic -Critique existing
research on a topic -Identify areas for further research on a topic Why write a literature review. For
professionals, they are useful reports that keep them up to date with what is current in the field.
Literature Review. A literature review should provide an overview of concepts that will be discussed
in your study. To help you come up with an overall organizational framework for your review,
consider the following scenario: You’ve decided to focus your literature review on materials dealing
with sperm whales. There are several guidelines you ought to adhere to when writing. One of the
most important benefits of writing a literature review is that it can help you to identify gaps in the
existing research.
The introduction should: define your topic and provide an appropriate context for reviewing the
literature; establish your reasons - i.e. point of view - for. Usually, the reference list (or bibliography)
is not included in the word count of the research proposal. Begin composing Once you’ve settled on
a general pattern of organization, you’re ready to write each section. The icse paper was followed up
by an article in ieee software and a paper at metrics05. 2 writing a systematic literature review. Often
this form is used to help establish a lack of appropriate theories or reveal that current theories are
inadequate for explaining new or emerging research problems. The unit of analysis can focus on a
theoretical concept or a whole theory or framework. This is called citation tracking and there are a
number of sources that can help you identify who has cited whom, particularly scholars from outside
of your discipline. Depending on the length of your literature review, you might want to divide the
body into subsections. Lastly, and very importantly, you need to discuss the existing theories that are
relevant to your research aims and research questions. Let's take a closer look at each of these. 1: The
Introduction Section Just like any good introduction, the introduction section of your literature
review should introduce the purpose and layout (organisation) of the chapter. For example, what
might cultural anthropologists say about the continuing conflict in the Middle East. A literature
review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books, journal articles, and theses) on a particular
topic. It’s also a good idea to state any assumptions that are inherent in these definitions and why
these are acceptable, given the purpose of your study. In other words, you do not want to delve into
idle speculation. Notice that Falk and Mills weave references to other sources into their own text, but
they still maintain their own voice by starting and ending the paragraph with their own ideas and
their own words. At this point consider: Does your study extend current research. Instead, organize
the literature review into sections that present themes or identify trends, including relevant theory.
Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge. How to organise the review As with
any piece of writing, your literature review should include an introduction and a conclusion. Gordon
Evaluating Teaching: MERLOT Evaluating Teaching: MERLOT Damian T. A chronological model
has different paragraphs for different time. We highly recommend that prospective authors of
narrative reviews consult these useful sources before embarking on their work. For example, if you
are writing a traditional overview paper, you might structure your literature review like this:
Introduction: -Provide an introduction to the topic, and explain why it is important. -Introduce the
existing knowledge on the topic, and identify any gaps in that knowledge. -Explain how your
literature review will fill those gaps. Mention(s) Mullins (1994) mentions two common general
criticisms of. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use. Doing
Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques. All references in the reference list,
must appear in the body of the research proposal. But these articles refer to some British biological
studies performed on whales in the early 18th century. The following sections present these
components in a suggested template for you to follow in the preparation of your research proposal.
Given this, the purpose of a literature review is to: Place each work in the context of its contribution
to understanding the research problem being studied. This will give you a better understanding of the
author’s argument and what to focus on in your own review. 2. Not critically evaluating the sources.
You can also use this method to consider what is currently of interest to scholars in this field and
what is not. Formative assessment and contingency in the regulation of learning processes. If UW
students are going to succeed in business and higher education, they need to first understand the
importance of time management. This article summarizes some pivotal information on how to write a
high-quali ty dissertation literature review. Pdf Research Review A Systematic Literature Review On
The Quality What is a not a literature review. Sitemap case study creative writing presentation
problem solving rewiew prompts websites tips. Lamb, Sandra E. 1998. How to Write It: A Complete
Guide to Everything You’ll Ever Write. Identifies major themes, concepts, and researchers on a topic.
These authors reviewed the existing literature on personal health record ( phr ) systems including
design, functionality, implementation, applications, outcomes, and benefits. A literature review is a
survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. From proactively monitoring and fixing your system
remotely to enabling you to reset your own system easily, we have you covered. In this section, it
evaluates and summarizes the field’s current insight and knowledge. Your interpretation of the
available sources must be backed up with evidence to show that what you are saying is valid. A
literature review has an important role in the structure of a thesis. You can start organizing those
papers based on the patterns. Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text Be assured that
you'll submit flawless writing. This section is where you’ll present a critical discussion of the existing
empirical research that is relevant to your research aims and questions. A review organized in this
manner would shift between time periods within each section according to the point made. The
focus of a literature review, however, is to summarize and synthesize the arguments and ideas of
others without adding new contributions. At this point consider: Does your study extend current
research. Or you might highlight how there’s a fair deal of mixed findings and disagreement
regarding a certain matter. It can be overwhelming getting into the literature of a field of study. The
only difference here between a “chronological” and a “thematic” approach is what is emphasized the
most: the development of the harpoon or the harpoon technology.But more authentic thematic
reviews tend to break away from chronological order. The evidence can be in the form of a quote,
example, fact, statistic, etc. Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge. This saves
time when you want to redo, or modify, the searches. To circumvent these limitations, Pawson,
Greenhalgh, Harvey, and Walshe (2005) have proposed a new approach for synthesizing knowledge
that seeks to unpack the mechanism of how “complex interventions” work in particular contexts. For
example, Some researchers think x causes y, others that x is only a moderating variable (Carroll,
2006) MS 640: Introduction to Biomedical Information 16. Does the research use established
frameworks or take an innovative approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998; Jesson,
Jill.
A literature review is a comprehensive summary of previous research on a topic. As a piece of
writing, the literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (e.g., your research objective, the
problem or issue you are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). Integrative Review Considered a
form of research that reviews, critiques, and synthesizes representative literature on a topic in an
integrated way such that new frameworks and perspectives on the topic are generated. For a research
proposal (Burge, 2005) MS 640: Introduction to Biomedical Information 4. After the introduction, it
grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical framework or
methodology. A review by method may group literature such as case studies in one section and
interviews in another. In other words, your discussion in those sections needs to start laying the
foundation for the research gap. For example, what might cultural anthropologists say about the
continuing conflict in the Middle East. The only difference here between a “chronological” and a
“thematic” approach is what is emphasized the most: the development of the harpoon or the harpoon
technology.But more authentic thematic reviews tend to break away from chronological order.
Gordon Containers and Docker Containers and Docker Damian T. Do not forget to explain how and
in what ways your proposed research builds upon previous related research. APA7 Style resources
APA Style Blog - for those harder to find answers 1. When you are going to the university, there two
types of reviews (of the literature) that will be asked for doing: the one that is a part for research or
thesis report (this is generally done for longer work) and the one that is assigned to students as an
introduction or preparation. Lastly, and very importantly, you need to discuss the existing theories
that are relevant to your research aims and research questions. In other words, a complete
understanding the research problem requires you to deliberately examine how knowledge and
perspectives have changed over time. In other words, a chronological review would have subsections
for each vital time period; a thematic review would have subtopics based upon factors that relate to
the theme or issue. Try writing a simple statement that lets the reader know what is your main
organizing principle. Instead, organize the literature review into sections that present themes or
identify trends, including relevant theory. Ask your professor questions such as: “If you had to read
only one book from the 90’s on topic X, what would it be?” Questions such as this help you to find
and determine quickly the most seminal pieces in the field. Purpose: It serves to provide a
comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge within a particular field. Darlow and Wen
(2015) provide a good example of a highly structured narrative review in the eHealth field. A
literature review can be a part of a research paper or scholarly article, usually falling after the
introduction and before the research methods sections. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications,
1998; Jesson, Jill. Literature reviews are most often part of a larger work, like a research article, but
may also be written as their own piece to demonstrate a student's understanding of a concept. How
to organise the review As with any piece of writing, your literature review should include an
introduction and a conclusion. An example of this approach in the eHealth domain is offered by
DeShazo, Lavallie, and Wolf (2009). A literature review is not simply a summary of the sources you
have read. Avoid making uncited or overly generalized claims. If you feel a generalization is
warranted, you must follow it up with multiple, specific examples to justify such generalization. Key
Concepts (one main section per theme and then sub sections as necessary to help organize your work
and make it easier to read) 5. Literature reviews are written occasionally in the humanities, but
mostly in the sciences and social sciences; in experiment and lab reports, they constitute a section of
the paper.
You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts. Selection
Methods: Criteria you used to select (and perhaps exclude) sources in your literature review. As a
piece of writing, the literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (e.g., your research
objective, the problem or issue you are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). Steps in
Conducting a Literature Review A literature review is an integrated analysis-- not just a summary-
- of scholarly writings and other relevant evidence related directly to your research question. It is not
just a descriptive list of the material available, or a set of summaries. The purpose is to place research
in a historical context to show familiarity with state-of-the-art developments and to identify the
likely directions for future research. If UW students are going to succeed in business and higher
education, they need to first understand the importance of time management. What types of sources
(books, journal articles, websites). Look at how the review is done by covering key information from
the study while. We'd also love to have you visit our showroom to experience what we could install
in your home soon. Trying to define your research problem: finding a gap, asking a question,
continuing previous research, counter-claiming 2. Don’t be afraid to do more research if you discover
a new thread as you’re writing. What you include in each depends on the objective of your literature
review. There is no preconceived plan to systematically review all of the literature although this can
be done. You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts.
Literature Review. A literature review should provide an overview of concepts that will be discussed
in your study. Debates, conflicts and contradictions: where do sources disagree. Hart, Chris. Doing a
Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. It should be a fair
representation of the perspectives and voices of a range of scholars across the field. Instantly correct
all language mistakes in your text Be assured that you'll submit flawless writing. Essentially, this
section should only be one or two paragraphs in length. For example, a literature review that focuses
on continuing research about the emergence of German economic power after the fall of the Soviet
Union. State how you will actually do the methods (i.e. coding interview text, running regression
analysis, etc.). Anticipate and acknowledge any potential barriers you may encounter when
undertaking your research and describe how you will address these barriers. This is because literature
reviews provide an overview of the latest thinking in a particular subject area. Should you
summarize, synthesize, or critique your sources by discussing a common theme or issue. You should
have a rough idea of your strategy before you start writing. A literature review creates a “landscape”
for the reader, giving her or him a full understanding of the developments in the field. Cook,
Kathleen E. and Elise Murowchick. “Do Literature Review Skills Transfer from One Course to
Another?” Psychology Learning and Teaching 13 (March 2014): 3-11; Fink, Arlene. Thematic:
Thematic reviews of literature are organized around a topic or issue, rather than the progression of
time. Guidelines have been developed to help organizations manage electronic records and ensure
their accessibility over time.
A good strategy is to begin by searching the USC Libraries Catalog for recent books about the topic
and review the table of contents for chapters that focuses on specific issues. Or it might trace the
intellectual progression of the field, including major debates. Most lit reviews use a basic
introduction-body-conclusion structure; if your lit review is part of a larger paper, the introduction
and conclusion pieces may be just a few sentences while you focus most of your attention on the
body. How To Structure A Literature Review (Free Template) At a minimum, it should have three
essential components - an introduction, a body and a conclusion. However, it is also important to
acknowledge that researchers often find themselves returning to the literature as they collect and
analyze their data. Make a list of keywords Start by creating a list of keywords related to your
research question. A good literature review doesn't just summarise sources - it analyses, synthesises,
and critically evaluates to give a clear picture of the state of knowledge on the subject. Define(s)
Eunson (1987, p. 67) defines motivation as 'what is important. Typically you’ll cover a few things
within the theoretical framework: Firstly, you’ll need to clearly define the key constructs and
variables that will feature within your study. Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open
publishing practices. Then, just as you would for most other academic forms of writing, rewrite or
rework the language of your review so that you’ve presented your information in the most concise
manner possible. While the study focuses on one topic, the Internet’s impact on American
presidential politics, it would still be organized chronologically reflecting technological
developments in media. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101117. Lyons, K. (2005). UCSC
library - how to write a literature review. Literature Review Basics Literature review basics A
literature review synthesizes and analyzes previous research in a field to inform an audience and
establish background knowledge. These are just random examples, but as you can see, research gaps
can emerge from many different places. If you’ve taken notes before, the common themes are more
easily identifiable. Literature reviews can take two major forms. The most prevalent one is the
“literature review” or “background” section within a journal paper or a chapter in a graduate thesis.
Thematic literature reviews are organized around a particular topic or issue. Your professor will
probably not expect you to read everything that's available about the topic, but you'll make the act of
reviewing easier if you first limit scope of the research problem. As a piece of writing, the literature
review must be defined by a guiding concept (e.g., your research objective, the problem or issue you
are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). Search lit to see what other work in the area of interest
has already been published. ? Gives a preview of the number of articles available on the topic. ? If
your topic is already written about, select a slightly different topic or modify the focus of the
objective. It's usually a bad sign to see every paragraph beginning with the name of a researcher.
Under this method, you would combine the recent studies on American whaling in the 19th century
with Moby Dick itself in the 1800-1899 category, even though the authors wrote a century apart.
Any lit review is only as good as the research it discusses; make sure your sources are well-chosen
and your research is thorough. The literature on writing literature reviews is generally useful in three
areas. This guide will A Guide to Writing the Dissertation Literature Review Justus J. Like any other
academic text, your literature review should have an introduction, a main body, and a conclusion.
Even when paraphrasing an author’s work, you still must provide a citation to that work. V. Common
Mistakes to Avoid These are the most common mistakes made in reviewing social science research
literature. It should not feel like a glorified annotated bibliography. ( ). Chapter V, “ The Literature
Review,” describes a variety of methods to help you organize the themes.

You might also like