Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Riley Ameel
Dr. Isaacson
23 September 2021
For many years, the conflict between the literary and scientific cultures has been very
apparent. Why is there such a big debate regarding the two studies that the world relies on most?
Both bring positive attributes to the table, so what good does pining the two cultures against each
other do? From the article, The Two Cultures: and a Second Look, Snow states that there are,
“Two polar groups: at one pole we have the literary intellectuals, at the other scientists, and as
the most representative, the physical scientists. Between the two, a gulf of mutual
incomprehension” (Snow 4). Neither the scientist, nor literary intellectuals understand the
importance of each other. During the period of time that Snow was living in, often the two
groups would snark at one another and many times, refuse to socialize because they did not
appreciate each other’s studies. They would degrade the importance of each other and look down
upon the other’s research. Realizing the differences between the two groups is the first step to
Without science, our society would be in a lot of trouble. The past few decades,
scientists have completed a lot of successful research that helps our world tremendously. From
the recent search for a COVID vaccine, to finding new ways to save our planet from climate
change, scientists have been making a huge contribution to keeping our citizens alive and well.
In The Educated Imagination, The Motive for Metaphor, Frye states, “ You can see why we tend
to think of the sciences as intellectual and the arts as emotional; one starts with the world as it is,
Ameel 2
the other with the world we want to have… Science learns more and more about the world as it
goes on: it evolves and improves'' (Frye 24). Understanding the important role that science plays
in our society is the key to understanding why science is useful. Frye said that science evolves
and improves with our world. The evolution of science is crucial to the innovations in modern
medicine, technology, research on space, and many more. Scientists view the world as what we
have and how to live in it successfully; they love making new discoveries but a vast majority of
their research is focused on how we can survive on this planet the longest. They dedicate a lot of
their time to helping cure diseases, figuring out how we can reproduce, store and protect
necessities such as food, air, and water. They are dedicated to finding ways to keep this planet
On the other hand, humanistic individuals bring color into the world; we can learn from
them the importance of imagination. Frye mentions the idea of how imagination pushes
humanists in their work, “So we begin to see where imagination belongs in the scheme of human
affairs. It is the power of constructing possible models of human experience. In the world of the
imagination, anything goes that’s imaginatively possible, but nothing really happens. If it did
happen, it would move out of the world of imagination into the world of action” (Frye 22).
Literary intellectuals are pushed by their imagination. Almost all of great literature (excluding
biographies), started with an intellectual with an idea made up from their imagination. These
ideas brought us great works: from books such as To Kill a Mockingbird, to classic films such as
The Wizard of Oz, to amazing pieces of art such as The Mona Lisa by Leonardo da Vinci and
Starry Night by Vincent Van Gogh. These are just a few examples of humanistic pieces of work
that changed the world. Self-expression through the amazing work of a humanist creates depth to
the world. It helps guide other humans through life lessons, experiences or hard times. Life
Ameel 3
without humanists would be dull. Humanists help change the world, they bring light to issues
that need to be addressed. Art, poetry, photography, and more can all be contributing factors to
creating movement and improving social justice issues. Humanists bring color and light into a
Both humanists and scientists are important, but how do they differ? Frye pointed out
how humanists tend to follow the heart and scientists follow facts. Their differences are what
make each one important. Without science, it would be hard for this world to advance and
prosper physically. At some point, if we stopped following science, living would be a lot harder.
We would face more disease, pollution, and much more. Having a life without the humanistic
point of view would be like living a life without color. Both play their own role in helping our
Both humanists and scientists are important to society and culture. Snow’s article was
written in 1965 and his response on how to end the divide between the two societies was,
“There is only one way out of all of this: it is, of course, by rethinking our education” (Snow 18).
I believe that schools understand the importance of teaching both subjects, even if a student
excels in a specific one. Throughout public school and in college, students are required to take a
variety of different subjects. This not only expands their knowledge of different topics, it also
helps them create an appreciation for them. In their scientific classes, students will learn how to
think using data and research and in their literary classes, they will learn to use their imagination
and how to express themselves. In Physical Education classes, they will learn the importance of
taking care of and exercising their bodies. Students who take a broad assortment of classes will
be more knowledgeable on a wide variety of topics. The more subjects kids know, then there is
more room for innovation in specific issues. They can use their knowledge from each subject
Ameel 4
studied, and combine them to problem solve and come up with more solutions. For a brighter
future, we need to keep pushing ourselves to study challenging and different topics. If the world
appreciates both scientific and humanistic views, it will continue to evolve and improve.