Title: Unlocking the Complexity of Writing a Literature Review

Crafting a comprehensive literature review is a formidable task that demands meticulous attention to
detail, thorough research, and adept synthesis of information. As a critical component of scientific
research, a literature review serves as the foundation upon which new discoveries are built. However,
delving into the depths of existing literature can often prove to be a daunting endeavor for many
researchers.

At its core, a literature review involves the systematic examination and analysis of scholarly articles,
books, and other sources relevant to a particular research topic. It requires the identification of key
concepts, theories, and methodologies within the field, as well as the evaluation of the existing
literature's strengths and limitations.

One of the primary challenges of writing a literature review lies in navigating the vast expanse of
available literature. With an ever-expanding body of research publications, sifting through numerous
sources to extract pertinent information can be both time-consuming and overwhelming. Moreover,
discerning the reliability and credibility of sources amidst the abundance of information poses an
additional hurdle for researchers.

Furthermore, synthesizing the information gathered from various sources into a coherent narrative
requires a keen analytical mindset and strong writing skills. Effective organization and structuring of
the literature review are essential to ensure clarity and coherence, enabling readers to grasp the
significance of the reviewed literature within the context of the research topic.

In light of these challenges, seeking assistance from professional writing services such as ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ can provide invaluable support to researchers undertaking the task of writing a
literature review. With a team of experienced writers well-versed in academic research and writing,
⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers personalized assistance tailored to meet the specific requirements of each
client.

By entrusting the task of crafting a literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, researchers can alleviate
the burden of this intricate process and ensure the production of a high-quality, meticulously
researched review. With a commitment to excellence and client satisfaction, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔
empowers researchers to focus their time and energy on advancing their research endeavors,
confident in the knowledge that their literature review is in capable hands.

In conclusion, while writing a literature review may pose significant challenges, the expertise and
support offered by professional writing services like ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ can streamline the process
and enhance the quality of the final output. By leveraging the assistance of seasoned professionals,
researchers can navigate the complexities of literature review writing with confidence and precision,
ultimately contributing to the advancement of scientific knowledge in their respective fields.
However, the same principle applies regardless of the number of papers reviewed. Literature reviews
give an overview of knowledge on a subject, helping you identify relevant theories and methods, as
well as gaps in existing research. We have more BELS-certified (Board of Editors in the Life
Sciences) and CMPP-certified (Certified Medical Publication Professional) editors and writers than
any other company in the world. As a researcher, you should use it to set the context, build your
argument, and establish the need for your study. They are also published in peer reviewed journals,
but seek to synthesize and summarize the work of a particular sub-field, rather than report on new
results. Writing a summary does not involve critiquing or if the text is a scientific paper that follows
a standard empirical structure, it is for example, in a literature review or research paper, you may
want to briefly summarize this study as. This square may be circled by discussing the wider
implications of the reviewed topic for other disciplines. They provide historical context for a field
while offering opinions on its future trajectory. Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a
browser version with limited support for CSS. To conduct research that adds value to the field,
precise awareness of the level of wisdom on a subject is required. Such work is outside the scope of
this article, which focuses on literature reviews to inform reports of original medical education
research. Article title, Name of journal, Volume number, Pages. Also, don't be afraid to ask your
adviser for literature recommendations. The literature review is an important part of any research
project because it allows the writer to look at previous studies on a topic and determine existing gaps
in the literature, as well as what has already been done. I am looking exactly for this handy of
recommendation. Here’s more on how you can use it: Find the right information Find what you want
quickly and easily with comprehensive search filters that let you narrow down papers according to
PDF availability, year of publishing, document type, and affiliated institution. We argue that
systematic reviews are a key methodology for clarifying whether and how research findings replicate
and for explaining possible inconsistencies, and we call for researchers to conduct systematic reviews
to help elucidate whether there is a replication crisis. This means drawing connections between
sources to create a picture of the scholarly conversation on a topic over time. The theoretical
literature review helps to establish what theories exist, the relationships between them, the degree the
existing approaches have been investigated, and to develop new hypotheses to be tested. This article
has been adapted into lecture slides that you can use to teach your students about writing a literature
review. A scientific literature review is a crucial account of what has been. This usually is done by
following the permissions instructions on the website of the journal in which the original figure
appeared. How to Write a Good Scientific Literature Review Here you have a to-do list to help you
write your review: A scientific literature review usually includes a title, abstract, index, introduction,
corpus, bibliography, and appendices (if needed). It tests your research question against what already
is %nown about your subject. Scientific review articles are comprehensive, focused reviews of the
scientific literature written by subject matter experts. When the findings of the investigations related
to a particular theme are inconsistent (e.g., one study shows that caffeine effects performance and
another study shows that caffeine had no effect on performance) you should attempt to provide
explanations of why the results differ, including physiological explanations. You can also choose the
type of access each user has on an individual basis. It can range from a basic book summary or
simple performance summary examples up to a business summary essential for corporate processes. A
scientific literature review paper should include. This model was tested with ordinary least squares
for a pooled sample covering nine provinces for the years 1975 to 1982, with no fixed effects for
provinces or years.
The literature represents background and research developments related to a specific research
question, interpreted and analyzed by you in a synthesized way. Final tips on how to write a
literature review A massive chunk of time and effort is required to write a good literature review. It is
highly encouraged to create an outline and solicit feedback from co-authors before writing begins.
With research accelerating at an unprecedented speed in recent years and more and more original
papers being published, review articles have become increasingly important as a means to keep up-to-
date with developments in a particular area of research. When it is just a chapter, sources should
equal the total number of pages in your article's body. For instance, in the humanities, authors might
include more overt argumentation and interpretation of source material in their literature reviews,
whereas in the sciences, authors are more likely to report study designs and results in their literature
reviews; these differences reflect these disciplines’ purposes and conventions in scholarship. The
Following are Reasons how literature review adds. Learn how to write a research summary,
including the structure and steps involved. A literature review is important because it: Explains the
background of research on a topic. While finding information is less of a problem to them, discerning
which paper or publication has enough quality has become one of the biggest issues. Does the
research use established frameworks or take an innovative approach. We provide a short summary of
the various databases and search engines in an earlier Research Smarter blog. Glad you enjoyed it:-)
Delete Replies Reply Reply Add comment Load more. A summary can come in different forms as
there are a lot of reading materials and documents that can be summarized. You need to follow the
below-mentioned steps, to write a literature review: Outline the purpose behind the literature review
Search relevant literature Examine and assess the relevant resources Discover connections by
drawing deep insights from the resources Structure planning to write a good literature review 1.
Theoretical Review This form aims to examine the corpus of theory accumulated regarding an issue,
concept, theory, and phenomenon. Title, Edition number, Publisher, Location: Example: Holmlund,
C. (1969). Fried, Avionic Navigation Systems, 1st edition, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
USA 2. Conference Proceedings: Author(s), (Year). Given such mountains of papers, scientists
cannot be expected to examine in detail every single new paper relevant to their interests. With a
few paragraphs divided up with subheadings, the writing gets higher readability as people can find
the needed information in the chosen sections. Also, highlight the potential for future studies and
provide closure to the readers. Journal List. Perspect Med Educ. v.7 (2); 2018 Apr. PMC5889378. As
a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Pivotal publications: are there any influential
theories or studies that changed the direction of the field. Additionally, you should know that the
narrower your research topic is, the swifter it will be for you to restrict the number of sources to be
analyzed. 2. Search relevant literature Dig deeper into search engines to discover what has already
been published around your chosen topic. So I have a set time once a week, on Mondays, to look at
the output of my literature searching tools. Example of an Effective Table From a Scientific Review
Article About Screening MRI in Women at Intermediate Risk of Breast Cancer. Most journals also
consider proposals for review article topics. You can consult our example of scientific literature
review to see how to achieve all this while maintaining the reader’s interest. Therefore, considering
your experience as a researcher can help you understand how to write a scientific literature review.
Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by
NLM or the National Institutes of Health. It is a process of reviewing the literature, as well as a
form of writing.
Please read all of these boxes to make sure you are following. Abstract.this is a concise summary of
the paper. (PDF) How undertake a literature review through. from i1.rgstatic.net Do not put in your
opinion of the issue or. Use a citation manager, such as EndNote as the repository for your citations.
Mention the Challenges Researchers Face While Developing a Theoretical Frame. The body of the
text is where you as a writer and researcher are the most active. Stakeholders can be identified,
mapped, and contacted without the need for large budgets for feedback and inclusion. Here is the
most commonly accepted scientific literature review format. Assess credibility of papers quickly
When doing the literature review, it is critical to establish the quality of your sources. For example,
Read-Write access means a select colleague can add and delete references, annotate PDF articles and
create custom groups. Writing and Publishing Scientific Papers: A Primer for the Non-English
Speaker by Lovei, Gabor L. A literature review provides context, informs methodology, maximizes
innovation, avoids duplicative research, and ensures that professional standards are met. The end
result will likely be a low mark or an unpublished manuscript, neither of which will do justice to your
many months of hard work. But I do find it difficult to integrate this task into my daily routine. On
the one hand, if you take several years to choose, several other people may have had the same idea in
the meantime. Plenty of information mentioned years ago remains relevant, so it’s better not to miss
it. The chances are high that someone will already have published a literature review ( Figure 1 ), if
not exactly on the issue you are planning to tackle, at least on a related topic. Select Process, Cycle,
Hierarchy, or Relationship to see templates. If you have the opportunity, discuss your topic with your
professor and your class mates. 2. Decide on the scope of your review How many studies do you
need to look at. Although scientific review articles are not expected to be as figure-rich as
educational review articles, figures can be beneficial to illustrate complex concepts and summarize or
synthesize relevant data ( Figure 2 ). Once you have your topic and have accessed the literature, the
next stages (analysis, synthesis and evaluation) are challenging. However, the same principle applies
regardless of the number of papers reviewed. Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations
for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. A solution can be to involve a set of complementary
coauthors: some people are excellent at mapping what has been achieved, some others are very good
at identifying dark clouds on the horizon, and some have instead a knack at predicting where
solutions are going to come from. The lit review is an important genre in many disciplines, not just
literature (i.e., the study of works of literature such as novels and plays). In addition to critical
thinking, a literature review needs consistency, for example in the choice of passive vs. Next, we
look at these important cognitive skills student scientists will need to develop and employ to
successfully write a literature review, and provide some guidance for navigating these stages. How
to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper by Barbara Gastel; Robert A. As researchers review
references they will start noticing a repetition of the same articles with few new articles appearing. In
many cases, the topic (e.g., web services in computational biology) will automatically define an
audience (e.g., computational biologists), but that same topic may also be of interest to neighbouring
fields (e.g., computer science, biology, etc.). Rule 2: Search and Re-search the Literature After
having chosen your topic and audience, start by checking the literature and downloading relevant
papers. This guide focuses on issues around publishing research journal articles in the sciences. Get
our high-caliber English paper editors to help you reach your publication goal.
Scientific review articles provide a focused and comprehensive review of the available evidence
about a subject, explain the current state of knowledge, and identify gaps that could be topics for
potential future research. The book also addresses other, rarely discussed areas of scientific writing
including dealing with rejected manuscripts, the reviewer’s perspective as to what they expect in a
scientific article, plagiarism, copyright issues, and ethical standards in publishing scientific papers.
Example of an Effective Table From a Scientific Review Article About Screening MRI in Women at
Intermediate Risk of Breast Cancer. Our experts know the sequence in which the hypothesis topic is
followed by the broad subject, the issue, and the background. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Office of Management. These include the Web of Science, Science.gov and the Directory of Open
Access Journals (DOAJ). A number written in scientific notation has the form c x 10 n where c is
between 1 and 10 and n is an integer. Below are the general guidelines on which this part is usually
based. They form the top 1% of papers based on the number of citations received, compared to other
papers published in the same field in the same year. It is a critical summary of existing research on a
specific topic in a specific field. Then, your search could start from a general source, such as a
boo%, and wor% its way from those references to the specific topic you want. A scientific literature
review is a crucial account of what has been. As a researcher, you should use it to set the context,
build your argument, and establish the need for your study. The best reviews synthesize studies to
draw broad theoretical conclusions about what a literature means, linking theory to evidence and
evidence to theory. Sitemap case study creative writing presentation problem solving rewiew prompts
websites tips. During this process, researchers will likely identify other researchers writing on aspects
of their topic. Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Blackmore H, Kitas GD. To get the most out of an article
for the least amount of effort, reading a research article should be done strategically. Well-written
and logical, it provides clear step-by-step instructions to enable readers to become more effective at
writing articles, and navigating difficulties related to journal submission, the review process, editing
and publication. A summary or an outline is a succinct account of all informational highlights from
essential sources, whereas synthesis is the restructuring or rearrangement of the material to guide the
dissertation’s plan of exploring the research subject. The expansion of scholarly journals has made
the task extremely difficult, and can potentially delay the publication of your work by many months.
Pubrica How many patients does case series should have In comparison to case reports.pdf How
many patients does case series should have In comparison to case reports.pdf Pubrica An analysis of
recent advancements in computational biology and Bioinformatic. Most lit reviews use a basic
introduction-body-conclusion structure; if your lit review is part of a larger paper, the introduction
and conclusion pieces may be just a few sentences while you focus most of your attention on the
body. The Following are Reasons how literature review adds. Scientific notation is a way of
expressing really big numbers or really small numbers. However, if there are some points that need
clarification or are missing from the overall context, they should be mentioned. Review articles tend
to be 4000 to 5000 words in length, with 80% to 90% devoted to the body. Communication between
researchers Historical record of progress of scientific research Avoids duplication of results and
methods. Available:. Accessed May 2013. View Article Google Scholar 7. Literature reviews take
time, are iterative, and should continue throughout the research process.