CHAPTER 6

https://taxguru.in/company-law/independent-director-section-1496-companies-act-
2013.html#:~:text=Independent%20Director%20under%20Section%20149(6)%20of%20Companies
%20Act%2C%202013,-Jyoti%20Mittal&text=An%20independent%20director%20is%20a,individual
%20or%20special%20interest%20group%20.

CHAPTER 7

file:///C:/Users/PARICHAYA%20REDDY%20B/Downloads/Audit%20Committee-%20Section
%20177%20_%20Companies%20Act,%202013%20&%23038%3B%20Rules-%20taxguru.in.pdf

Meta (formerly Facebook):

1. Board Structure:
 A more decentralized corporate governance model might involve a diverse
board structure, representing various stakeholders such as users,
employees, and shareholders. This could lead to a broader range of
perspectives in decision-making.
2. User Representation:
 Considering the impact on users, a decentralized approach could involve
mechanisms for user representation in decision-making processes,
especially in matters related to privacy, content moderation, and platform
policies.
3. Transparent Decision-Making:
 Transparency is a key aspect of decentralized governance. Meta could
enhance transparency in decision-making processes, providing
stakeholders with clear insights into how key decisions are reached.
4. User Empowerment:
 Enabling users to have more control over their data and privacy settings
can be a step towards decentralized governance. Users could have more
say in how their information is used and shared on the platform.

Amazon:

1. Stakeholder Involvement:
 A decentralized governance model for Amazon could involve greater
involvement of various stakeholders, including employees, customers, and
suppliers, in decision-making processes that impact them.
 2. Supply Chain Transparency:
 Given Amazon's extensive supply chain, a decentralized governance
approach might focus on improving transparency. Blockchain or other
technologies could be employed to create a more transparent and
accountable supply chain.
3. Worker Representation:
 Decentralization could involve mechanisms for workers to have a more
direct role in corporate decision-making. This might include representation
on the board or through other channels.
4. Ethical Considerations:
 A decentralized governance model could emphasize ethical considerations
in decision-making, not only focused on financial performance but also on
social and environmental impact.

Challenges:

1. Resistance to Change:
 Existing corporate structures may resist decentralization due to the
potential disruption it can bring. Resistance from within the organization
may be a significant challenge.
2. Legal and Regulatory Compliance:
 Adapting to a decentralized governance model must comply with existing
legal and regulatory frameworks. This includes ensuring that the company
remains compliant with securities laws and other regulations.
3. Balancing Stakeholder Interests:
 Balancing the interests of various stakeholders in a decentralized model
can be challenging. Striking the right balance between profitability and
social responsibility is a delicate task.

Decentralization in corporate governance is an evolving concept, and companies are

exploring various approaches to strike the right balance between centralized control and
decentralized decision-making to create more inclusive and responsible governance
structures.