 You cannot have "Character Change" without first Changing the System that shapes the

characters and behaviors of the people within that system.

 The biggest flaw in thinking of all these anti-Constitutional Reform obstructionists who
supposedly call first for a "Character Change" is that they have absolutely ZERO
UNDERSTANDING OF HUMAN PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR.
 They do not know at all that there are systems that govern human behavior. At the genetic
level, that's a given that you're born with and can't really change, but external systems
like a person's own systemic attempts at self-discipline, the systems that shape behavior
within that's person's family, the systems that shape behavior within that person's
village/community, the systems of the wider society, and even systems related to the
ecosystem or general environment ALL COMBINE TOGETHER to shape a person's
behavior.
 The Constitution of a country is what defines the parameters of what is permissible and
what isn't at the country level of the society's system.
 If you have a faulty societal system at the country level, where there is so much
inefficiency and business and commerce (especially those owbes and operated by
international investors) are not sufficiently encouraged to come in and create jobs, then
you create a system in which jobs are so scarce, salaries are so low, ordinary people are
forced to find employment overseas in order to send money back to their families, and a
general culture of mendicancy and begging for money gets created.
 Worse, some people in positions of authority get tempted by this prevailing culture of
mendicancy created by the lousy economic system dictated by the flawed Constitution to
take advantage of poor people or ask those with some money for a part of that money for
services that should normally be already free to be rendered to them. It's the general
System that is causing people to act the way they do.
 After a long knew of behaving in a certain way, they get used to it so much that it
becomes a part of their character. So now these Clueless anti-reform
OBSTRUCTIONISTS call for "Character Change" but they actually are totally ignorant
of the fact that they actually need "Charter Change" (better known as Constitutional
Reform) for such Character Change to happen in the first place! Once again...
 You cannot have Character Change without Charter Change. Whether you like it or not,
we really need Constitutional Reform!!!! So stop all this nonsense of going against what
we needed back in the 1990s after Lee Kuan Yew already told us what was wrong with
our System (and yeah, what's wrong with the 1987 Constitution) during that famous
November 1992 speech he delivered at the Philippine Business Conference. NOW YOU
KNOW!
 HINDI DAPAT MATAKOT O MANGAMBA sa PEOPLE'S INITIATIVE 2024 or
CHARTER CHANGE (Constitutional Reforms)
 Ang Charter Change o ang tamang tawag talaga is CONSTITUTIONAL REFORMS ay
HINDI POLITICAL PROJECT ng kahit anumang sektor ng gobyerno. - walang nakasaad
kahit saan man sa mga proposals na gawing PRIME MINISTER si Speaker Martin
Romualdez.
 Hindi rin ito matatawag na originally galing sa KONGRESO, kung hindi galing talaga ito
sa TAUMBAYAN na mga PROPOSALS na REPORMA. Hindi ito project ng isang tao
lang kundi proposals po ito ng karamihan na nagsimula pa sa kapanahunan ni
PFVRamos, at nangyayari rin sa panahon ni PEstrada, PGMA, Pnoy, at PRRD at patuloy
na itinutulak ng mga taong napagtanto nila na ang TUNAY NA DAHILAN sa
KAHIRAPAN AT KORUPSYON sa PILIPINAS ay nagmumula sa 1987
KONSTITUSYON.
 Ang UNANG HAKBANG para MASOLUSYUNAN ang mga problemang ito ay ang
PAGREPORMA sa 1987 KONSTITUSYON (CONSTITUTIONAL REFORMS) or ang
tinatawag sa media na CHARTER CHANGE. Kasama na dito ang mga terms na
ECONOMIC CHACHA, FEDERALISM, PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM,
CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION (CONCON), CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY
(CONASS)
 Ang ating mga kasama sa SENADO at KONGRESO na syang tumutulong sa atin na
maging katotohanan ito ay sina SENATOR ROBIN PADILLA, REPRESENTATIVES
RUFUS RODRIGUEZ, RICHARD GOMEZ, STELLA QUIMBO, JOEY SALCEDA,
DONG GONZALES at marami pang iba...Si Speaker MARTIN ROMUALDEZ ay
pinakinggan naman ang mungkahi ng taumbayan about Constitutional Reforms. Kasama
rin sa pagsulong ang ibang ekonomista, mga lawyers, mga political scientist at mga
pribadong mamamayan katulad nila PROF. CLARITA CARLOS, ATTY. TONY ABAD,
ORION PEREZ D. at marami pang iba tulad ng PIRMA at CoRRECT Movement.
 Ang proseso sa PEOPLE'S INITIATIVE ay nagsisimula pa lang sa pagkuha ng mga
signatures. Ito ay dadaan pa sa PAGSUSURI ng COMELEC at ang FINAL STAGE ay
iyong tinatawag natin na PLEBISCITE kung saan pagbobotohan ng taumbayan kung
YES or NO sila sa Amendments na sinasabi sa PEOPLE'S INITIATIVE. Lahat ng mga
amendments na nakalatag ay isasapubliko at bibigyan ng MASSIVE INFORMATION
CAMPAIGN bago mangyayari ang plebisito. WALANG DAPAT IPANGAMBA DAHIL
IMPOSIBLE AT WALANG PAGKAKATAON NA MAGKAKAROON NG MGA
PATAGO na mga PANUKALA katulad ng NO ELECTION or TERM EXTENSION at
kung ano paman na sinasabi na dapat katakutan sa PAGREPORMA ng 1987
KONSTITUSYON. Lahat yan ay gawa-gawa lamang ng mga kontra sa pagbabago upang
magkaroon ng kalituhan sa mamamayan. MULI, WALANG DAPAT IKATAKOT O
IPANGAMBA sa REPORMA SA KONSTITUSYON, sa PEOPLE'S INITIATIVE, sa
CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION or kahit na sa CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY.
 Sa CoRRECT Movement naman, tatlong reporma naman ang kanilang isinusulong.
CoRRECT MOVEMENT THREE POINT AGENDA:
 REMOVAL of the CONSTITUTIONAL ECONOMIC PROVISIONS Provisions
(Articles 12, 14, 16) - ito ang DAAN natin para makaahon sa KAHIRAPAN dahil sa
pagpasok ng mas maraming FDIs na magbibigay ng maraming trabaho, kapital, at
makabagong teknolohiya.
 Shift to PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM (Articles 6 & 7) - ito ang kasagutan sa
PAGSUGPO or pag MINIMIZED sa KORUPSYON
  Adapt EVOLVING FEDERALISM - Article 10 - ito ang kasagutan para sa MAS PATAS
NA PAGLAGO ng mga rehiyon sa bansa.
 TUNGKOL sa mga ALLEGATIONS na PERA para sa PIRMA, ang nangyayari is
nabahiran lang ang PEOPLE'S INITIATIVE dahl sa mga fake news. Nagkakataon lang na
sa ibang mga baryo, naibibigay ang mga ayuda kasabay ng pagpapaliwanag sa People's
Innitiative na isinusulong din ng kanilang kongresista. Sa madaling salita, pag pumirm
man - may ayuda na matatanggap. Kung hindi pipirma - may ayuda parin na natatanggap
dahil para ito sa taumbayan.
 Klarong- klaro sa instructions ano ang nilalaman ng PEOPLE'S INITIATIVE at may mga
pamphlets pa na ibinibigay at based sa leaked video, tama naman ang pagkasabi na
malamang uunlad ang buhay natin pag nabago ng KONSTITUSYON.
 If hindi man masyadong detalyado ang explanation sa video , nandun na lahat sa
pamphlets at sa form ang information. Inuuwi ito ng mga tao kasama ang kanilang mga
ayuda - pumirma man sila o hindi Wlang sapilitan o ginamitan ng dahas para pirmaha ang
form.
 Ang pagbibigay ng ayuda ay matagal na rin na kalakaran at hindi lang dahil sa
PEOPLE'S INITIATIVE. Kahit pa walang People's Initiative, mayroon na talagang
ganyan na sistema na tinatawag natin na PADRINO SYSTEM (or ayuda system).
 Ang PEOPLE'S INITIATIVE 2024 ay suportado rin ng mga REPRESENTATIVES, mga
GOBERNADOR , mga MAYORS, hanggang sa mga BARANGAY KAPITAN kung
kaya't ito at pinadaan nila sa kanilang Constituents.
 Hindi naiiba ang People's Initiative sa boses ng taumbayan. Dahil ito talaga ang boses ng
mamamayan.

There is one saying “ If not now, Then when” “If not Us then Who” the call for amending the
1987 Constitution is not an act of ruining the Philippine Constitution but to change the existing
wrongness of the 1987 constitution, but rather a strategic move to adapt to the dynamic needs of
the present and secure a promising future for the Philippines.
First and foremost, the 1987 Constitution was crafted during a period of political transition,
emerging from the dark era of martial law. While it successfully restored democracy and
established fundamental rights, the circumstances surrounding its inception meant compromises
were inevitable.
Decades later, the Philippines faces new challenges, both domestically and globally, requiring a
constitutional framework that aligns more seamlessly with contemporary realities. Economic
progress is paramount, and constitutional amendments can address impediments to growth.
Provisions related to foreign investment, economic liberalization, and fiscal policies can be
revisited to foster a more conducive environment for business and innovation. By adapting to
current economic trends, the Philippines can attract foreign investments, create job opportunities,
and elevate its standing in the global market.
Moreover, regional autonomy and decentralization are key components of sustainable
governance. Amending the constitution allows for a reevaluation of the distribution of powers
between the central government and local units, ensuring a more effective and responsive
administration. Tailoring governance to the unique needs of diverse regions can promote
equitable development and empower local communities. The current political landscape also
demands a more nuanced approach to representation. Proposals for electoral reforms, such as the
shift to a federal system or modifications to the party-list system, can enhance the inclusivity and
diversity of voices within the government. This is crucial in a society marked by pluralism,
where various groups deserve fair representation. We need to ammend the Constitution for better
Philippines. For Better Lives. Dahil sa CHACHA nagsisimula ang pag-indak at pagsayaw ng
Pagbabago ng Mamamayang Pilipino.

The call for amending the 1987 Constitution is not an endeavor to erase the past but a pragmatic
step towards securing a healthy and adaptable future. By embracing change and addressing
contemporary challenges, the Philippines can lay the groundwork for a more prosperous,
inclusive, and resilient nation. Constitutional amendments are not a betrayal of history but a
commitment to progress, ensuring that the foundations of governance remain relevant and
effective in the face of evolving circumstances. We are able to see. The Better Philippines.
Reflecting on the evolution of our society, it becomes evident that certain constitutional
provisions may no longer be aligned with the current needs and aspirations of our citizens. A
constitution, after all, should be a living document that grows and adapts to the dynamics of a
changing world. Charter change provides the avenue to recalibrate our fundamental laws,
ensuring they remain relevant, responsive, and reflective of our collective values. Let us
approach it with a spirit of inclusivity, mindful of the diverse perspectives that enrich our
national dialogue. The journey towards charter change is not merely a constitutional matter; it is
a collective endeavor to shape a future that reflects the aspirations of all Filipinos.

In contemplating the prospect of charter change in the Philippines. We are drawn to the
potential positive impacts that such amendments could bring to our nation. As we stand at the
crossroads of governance, revisiting and reevaluating the very foundation that shapes our
political, economic, and social landscape.
One of the central tenets of Charter Change lies in the realm of economic possibilities.
The current constitutional provisions, though designed with noble intentions, may inadvertently
act as barriers to foreign investments.
By embracing charter change and easing restrictions on foreign ownership, we open the
door to a surge in investments that can stimulate economic growth, create job opportunities, and
foster innovation.
 Another compelling facet of the charter change discourse revolves around the structure of
our governance. The call for a shift towards federalism resonates with me, as I consider the
potential benefits of empowering local governments. Distributing authority more evenly across
regions could pave the way for tailored solutions to regional challenges, promoting inclusive
development and ensuring that no corner of our archipelago is left behind.
The very essence of democracy lies in the responsiveness of governance to the will of the
people. If there is a palpable desire for constitutional amendments, a commitment to democratic
principles compels us to heed that call. Engaging in an open, transparent, and inclusive process
of charter change ensures that the aspirations of the populace are woven into the fabric of our
governing principles.