Navigating through the complexities of writing a literature review can be a daunting task for many

students and researchers alike. The process involves extensive research, critical analysis, and
synthesis of existing literature on a particular topic. Crafting a literature review requires not only a
deep understanding of the subject matter but also exceptional writing skills to present a coherent and
insightful narrative.

One of the primary challenges in writing a literature review is the sheer volume of existing research
and scholarly articles available. Sifting through numerous sources to identify relevant studies,
theories, and methodologies can be time-consuming and overwhelming. Additionally, evaluating the
credibility and validity of each source is crucial to ensure the quality and reliability of the literature
review.

Furthermore, organizing the gathered information into a cohesive and logical structure poses another
hurdle. Creating a framework that effectively presents the key concepts, debates, and findings in the
field requires careful planning and attention to detail. Without a clear roadmap, literature reviews can
become disjointed and fail to provide a comprehensive overview of the topic.

Moreover, maintaining objectivity while synthesizing diverse perspectives and arguments is essential
in producing a balanced literature review. It requires the ability to critically analyze and evaluate
different viewpoints without bias, which can be challenging for inexperienced researchers.

Given the complexities involved, many students and researchers opt to seek assistance from
professional writing services like ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔. With a team of experienced writers who
specialize in various disciplines, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers customized literature review writing
services tailored to meet the specific requirements of clients. By entrusting the task to experts,
individuals can save time and ensure the quality and coherence of their literature reviews.

In conclusion, writing a literature review is a challenging endeavor that requires extensive research,
critical thinking, and writing skills. For those who find the process overwhelming or time-
consuming, seeking assistance from reputable writing services like ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ can be a
viable solution. With their expertise and support, individuals can confidently navigate the
complexities of literature review writing and produce high-quality academic work.
Decision trees can also quickly become overwhelming and too complex to be helpful when there are
too many options and possible outcomes. In general, when you’re using a decision tree, there’s no
reason to include decisions you can’t actually make, even if they sound nice in theory. These Striving
Reader Decision Trees can be utilized to determine the appropriate focus for interventions and to
support designing high quality interventions for students that are demonstrating deficits in reading.
From this decision tree analysis, we see that even inaction can have profound consequences. It's
called a decision tree because it starts with a single box (or root), which then branches off into a
number of solutions, just like a tree. Cropley, 2006 ). Well-known models of creativity account for
both convergent and divergent thinking, such as Campbell’s (1960) blind variation and selective
retention model of creativity (see also Simonton, 2011 ) or the creative problem-solving framework
that is used in educational settings ( Treffinger et al., 2006 ). Baer and McKool, 2009 ), there are
downsides to its administration, such as the number of judges required, the expertise of the judges,
and a requirement that judges should not be trained. At each node, each candidate splitting field
must be sorted before its best split can be found. The training process we follow with our coders (see
Examples of Coded Data at Each Level of Originality) allows them to recognize original creative
products. Cheng et al. (2001) concur with the cognitive offloading that is afforded by an external
representation, and suggest that the most effective diagrams limit the size and complexity of the
search that would be necessary to solve a problem or make a decision. The decision nodes represent
the dataset’s features, branches denote the decision rules, and each leaf node signifies the outcome.
This replicated features measure of fixation is common in the literature: over half of the studies
included in Vasconcelos and Crilly’s (2016) meta-analysis used a replicated features measure of
fixation. A series of simple mathematical operations lead us progressively to the results of the
prediction. For example, Jeffries (2017) reports varying levels of inter-rater reliability depending on
the target graphic design task that is used with the CAT. There are all kinds of tools available for
doing so. Identify each user and visualise the steps they take. They represent the different choices,
options, or courses of action that could be made. Overall, we have found that the senior mechanical
engineering students have a higher originality score than freshmen, reinforcing studies by others
reported in the literature ( Cross et al., 1994; Ball et al., 1997; Atman et al., 1999 ). This provides
some order of validity to our method of analysis. Most decision tree software is as easy to use as
traditional pen and paper, plus your decision trees won’t take up any physical space. It formalizes the
brainstorming process into a graphical representation of possible solutions to a decision based on
certain conditions. KH-O and SB assisted with the interpretation of the results of these analyses.
Making a decision tree also forces one to employ a systemic thought process and think through each
possible choice and the outcomes of each. The circles represent chance nodes, and you’ll see why
they’re called that momentarily. As you begin your journey and rise through the ranks in the field of
data, you’re highly likely to encounter this technique. The visuals in front of you offer crystal clear
mapping of where your decisions will end up. Thus, 419 freshman concepts and 317 concepts were
analyzed. With a decision tree, your weekend plans are made, even though there are a number of
factors that could impact your plans. The underlying logic of using the data remains mostly difficult
to understand. On each node of the tree is applied a calculation operation that leads to a division of
the data set. If your parents don't come to town, you need to decide what you are going to do.
Twelve RAT items were chosen from Mednick (1962) and Smith and Blankenship (1991). These
differences have to be carefully considered and accounted for in. To find out, you should calculate
the expected value (EV) score of each decision. Moreover, with a rapidly changing technology
landscape, a definition of dynamic creativity that accounts for “potential” originality rather than a
fixed scale should be accounted for, as described by Corrazza (2016). The training process we follow
with our coders (see Examples of Coded Data at Each Level of Originality) allows them to recognize
original creative products. According to Plucker and Makel (2010), evaluation of creative products is
the “gold standard” of creativity assessment. But, what about if your parents don't come to town. If
the number is not what you’re looking for, then decline the offer. The first choice to make would be
the season, whether to go in the summer or the winter. However, those two choices lead to two more
outcomes, which then lead to two more choices before getting to the most and least expensive
options. What will determine if you go shopping or go see a movie? Money. We also use third-party
cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. They are also not necessary in
making very simple decisions, such as what to eat for lunch or which color shirt to wear in the
morning. Here’s why some project managers may find these often efficient diagrams unhelpful.
Other than trash cans and litter pickers, most litter collection systems are not meant for an individual
consumer. This process was then repeated at the individual level for each concept. All authors edited
all sections of the manuscript, responded to reviewer comments, and approved the final version. In
decision analysis, a decision tree can be used to visually and explicitly represent decisions and
decision making. In selecting the concepts for this re-analysis, we chose concepts produced by
students in the spring of their respective year. The decision tree helps to display all of the possible
courses of action and outcomes. In addition to a marketing survey it is becoming imperative for
companies to test the “coolness” factor of many consumer products. Similarly, a coder with no prior
engineering knowledge would be able to identify highly creative engineering design for a common
product like alarm clock or litter collection system (as opposed to a guided missile system). This is
true even for an intuitive analysis method such as a decision tree. For analysis purposes, only the
concept originator scores were used for those concepts collected using the 6-3-5 method. Once again,
you have 2 outcomes - to decline or accept. There are, however, alternative methods for evaluating
creative products within the engineering literature. If you choose any other attribute, the decision
tree constructed will be different. Based on the computed values of Entropy and Information Gain,
we choose the best attribute at any particular step. In contrast, the concept shown in Figure 9 had a
high novelty score (9.88) because the use of suction within the garbage interface feature was rare. For
the freshmen, this would be the first course that focused on their specific sub-field of mechanical
engineering.
Thus, for our next paper ( LeGendre et al., 2017 ), students generated litter collection system
concepts individually, i.e., they completed individual ideation but did not work in groups nor make
contributions to other concepts within a group. While our preliminary work was done following the
6-3-5 procedure, some of our more recent work involved individuals designing on their own with no
inputs from others after the preliminary design (cf. Essentially, decision trees mimic human thinking,
which makes them easy to understand. This concept received an originality score of 7.5 using the
DTOAD metric because it shows system-level integration of multiple features, including the use of
water currents for powering the device and enabling filtration. Baer and McKool, 2009; Beaty et al.,
2013; Kaufman et al., 2013, Study 1). If one analyzes creativity in literature or art, a novice is
usually able to identify a high degree of creativity without understanding all the details of the
process. For each of those choices, there would be desired destinations, perhaps the costs associated
with each, and the time necessary for the trip. The litter picker is identical to the design of a standard
picker, except the flexibility to extend or contract the length of the shaft to desired length. First, a
coder must decide if the concept achieves design goals that are beyond the industry norm. As noted
in Section “Examples of Coded Data at Each Level of Originality,” this concept received an
originality score of 2.5, thus illustrating the negative relationship that LeGendre et al. (2017) and
Simmons et al. (2018) found between fixation and originality. The ideas circulate through the group
five times, or until they come back to the concept originator. Not to mention that gaining such skills
as working with decision trees is a great way to boost your career outlook and gain a competitive
advantage. If the nature of the new feature is minor, isolated from the rest of the design, or
peripheral to the function of the product, then it would receive a 2.5. For example, Figure 3 shows a
personal litter picker that can extend. So, take our Machine Learning with Decision Trees and
Random Forests course and enhance your skills. SEARCH Background Remover Search Trends
Categories. The DTOAD shows discriminant validity with other measures of creativity, such as the
Remote Associates Test (RAT) ( Mednick, 1962; Smith and Blankenship, 1991 ). Decision trees are
an excellent component of your decision making toolkit, and just like with other decision making
tools, should be used in conjunction with common sense - not in place of it. A recent paper
questioned the need for expert judges: Kaufman et al. (2013) found that expert judges (professional
writers) provided ratings of short stories that were highly correlated with quasi-expert judges
(creativity researchers, advanced elementary education or English majors, and English teachers) and
moderately correlated with novice judges (college students). Since it's spring time, you know it will
either be rainy, sunny, or windy. A class variable is the final output which leads to our decision. The
research assistants then coded the remaining concepts. Dollinger and Shafran, 2005; Storme et al.,
2014 ). If the coders have reached a sufficient level of inter-rater reliability with the established
codes, they are ready to move onto the next step. They also require a systemic thought process,
which helps ensure that all aspects of the decision are being considered. This floating drone skims
trash from the water and compacts it, and then returns to a docking station to deposit the trash and
recharge. Storme et al. (2014) contrasted trained novice judges and control novice judges (all
students in an introductory psychology course) with expert judges (elementary school art teachers).
Fleiss, 1981 ). In Kershaw et al. (2015), 90 of the 569 concepts produced by the participants were
coded by three raters, yielding a kappa of 0.73. After this training round, the remaining concepts
were coded by a research assistant. The success of this type of crowdsourcing effort may also
depend on the raters’ familiarity with the design problem and the raters’ incentives for rating the
concepts carefully and thoughtfully. KH-O and SB assisted with the interpretation of the results of
these analyses. It is a flow chart that creates a graphical representation of possible solutions to a
decision based on certain conditions. This result shows us that the DTOAD can be used when
concepts are produced by individuals or by groups, and when students are provided with an example
product or not prior to ideation. But, regardless of the complexity, decision trees are all based on the
same principles.
The device in Figure 6 is designed specifically for water use, filters trash rather than vacuuming it,
and uses geolocation to return to its “home.” We have not seen a comparable design concept among
all the concepts we have coded so far. TK, SB, and a research assistant completed the originality
coding for the thermometer concepts. It is a flow chart that creates a graphical representation of
possible solutions to a decision based on certain conditions. This basic example can be expanded to
include specific details, such as associated costs, travel time for each option, etc. Instead, it lays out
all of the options and possible outcomes, but the ultimate decision of what to do must still be made.
It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website. Divergent
thinking frequently leads to the production of multiple solutions, or multiple perspectives on a
situation or problem. Nowadays, decision tree analysis is considered a supervised learning technique
we use for regression and classification. As mentioned above, all coders were blind to condition
during the coding process. Include branches for each possible choice and leaves for the outcomes of
those choices. PFOA OR PFNA OR PFDA OR PFDeA OR PFDcA OR PFUnDA OR PFUnA OR
PFUA OR. This concept does not include any means for trash treatment or removal within it. This
evaluation is often related to creative design. It allows an individual or organization to weigh
possible actions against one another based on their costs, probabilities, and benefits. The litter picker
is identical to the design of a standard picker, except the flexibility to extend or contract the length
of the shaft to desired length. What will determine if you go shopping or go see a movie? Money.
The Info (D) is calculated for these 3 categories of people, which is represented in the last column.
For example, Sarkar and Chakrabarti (2011) critique Shah et al.’s (2003) reliance on uniqueness to
measure novelty. If the mode of alarm is highly unique within the set (e.g., waking a user with a mist
of water on the face) it receives a higher novelty score than a mode of alarm that is common with the
set (e.g., waking a user with music or a beep). Shah et al.’s (2003) novelty metric can express the
uniqueness of a particular feature within a set of creative products, or can combine the uniqueness of
the features of a creative product to provide an overall measure of a creative product’s novelty. Since
it's spring time, you know it will either be rainy, sunny, or windy. As described in Section “Training
Coders to Use the DTOAD,” the protocol followed by Kershaw et al. (2015) involved coding of
concepts using the DTOAD by multiple coders (three in this case), followed by discussion and
clarification to reach convergence. The tree maps out each possible scenario and a potential outcome,
allowing you to clearly see and evaluate your options for the best possible outcome. To mimic
limited vision, participants wore blindfolds while interacting with the thermometers. All students
were given up to 30 min to interact with the thermometers to understand their function. This concept
received an originality score of 7.5 using the DTOAD metric because it shows system-level
integration of multiple features, including the use of water currents for powering the device and
enabling filtration. We have also used Shah et al.’s (2003) technical feasibility metric to rate each
concept. In addition, visualizing the model is effortless and allows you to see exactly what decisions
are being made. Storme et al. (2014) contrasted trained novice judges and control novice judges (all
students in an introductory psychology course) with expert judges (elementary school art teachers).
Customise, add or remove tree elements, to make it relevant to your specific meta-analytic question
and stage of screening. To the left of each branch will be your starting choice node, which is a square.
Mapping out a situation (the roots) and all the paths you could take to address it (the branches) help
you make confident decisions. In decision analysis, a decision tree can be used to visually and
explicitly represent decisions and decision making. Therefore, considerable effort was expended
during the training process of the coders to establish an understanding of the state of the art of the
product, its features, and their integration. LeGendre et al., 2017 ). The reason for this change in
procedure is that Kershaw et al. (2016) found that the concept originator contributed most to the
overall originality of a concept. One aspect of divergent thinking is how well individuals can make
connections between disparate ideas. Those studies were carried out in accordance with the
recommendations of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the University of Massachusetts
Dartmouth. Cronbach and Meehl, 1955 ) with other evaluation instruments of creative products:
fixation scores ( Jansson and Smith, 1991; Vasconcelos and Crilly, 2016 ) and Shah et al.’s (2003)
novelty metric. But, what about if your parents don't come to town. While not every litter collection
system is complex, this design problem requires individuals to generate ideas for creative products
for which they have less familiarity as consumers. Genco et al., 2011; Kershaw et al., 2014 ), we
were able to establish inter-rater reliability, thus providing some confidence in using the DTOAD for
evaluation of engineering creativity. This is the box that includes the event that starts your decision
tree. For winter, the choice is to go skiing or visit family for Christmas. These predetermined rules
are supposed to ensure the meta-analysis’. Another reason for the low levels of agreement could be
due to this list of litter collector features and its use in evaluation of the concepts. Essentially, the
model performs so well on the training data that it compromises the decision-making process.
Decision trees are a common tool in business, medicine, and machine learning ( Goodwin and
Wright, 2004 ) to assist in problem solving. Students in a control group simply interacted with the
thermometers without using the disabling devices. Article types Author guidelines Editor guidelines
Publishing fees Submission checklist Contact editorial office Submit your research Search Download
article. It shows the overall decision to be made and each possible choice, along with the outcomes
of those choices. Because of their structure, which follows the natural flow of human thought, most
people will have little trouble interpreting them. The top of the decision tree is called the root node.
Master’s thesis, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, North Dartmouth, MA. Therefore,
developing creativity measuring tools for engineering design continues to be an important goal in
design research (cf. It is our goal to use the data generated from the studies using the decision tree to
propose active measures within the curriculum. If not, this process is repeated until a sufficient level
of inter-rater reliability is achieved (cf. The RAT was administered to a subset of senior mechanical
engineering students who generated the concepts that were part of Kershaw et al. (2015). We
correlated RAT scores with the average originality across the litter collection concepts these students
produced. The DTOAD can be applied to concepts produced using different ideation procedures,
including concepts produced both with and without a baseline example product, and concepts
produced when individuals are primed to think of different users for their designs. First, it is a
reliable instrument for the measurement of creativity, as shown through the high levels of inter-rater
agreement reached between coders (see Summary of Previously Published Results). New raters are
required to evaluate subsets of concepts and compare their results with expert ratings, and to repeat
the procedure until sufficient inter-rater reliability is achieved. Thus, 419 freshman concepts and 317
concepts were analyzed.