Crafting a Literature Review for a Research Paper: The Challenge and Solution

Embarking on a literature review for a research paper is akin to navigating a labyrinth of scholarly
texts, theories, and critiques. It's a daunting task that demands meticulous attention to detail, critical
analysis, and comprehensive understanding of the subject matter. Yet, amidst the complexities, there
exists a beacon of assistance – ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔.

Why is Writing a Literature Review So Challenging?

1. Information Overload: The sheer volume of academic literature available can be

overwhelming. Sifting through countless articles, books, and journals to find relevant sources
is a Herculean feat.
2. Synthesis of Ideas: A literature review isn't merely a summary of existing research; it requires
synthesizing diverse perspectives, identifying patterns, and offering insights into the current
state of knowledge.
3. Critical Analysis:Evaluating the credibility and validity of sources is crucial. Distinguishing
between reputable studies and biased opinions is a delicate balancing act.
4. Structural Precision: Organizing the review in a coherent manner, ensuring logical flow, and
maintaining academic rigor pose significant challenges.

Why Choose ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔?

1. Expert Assistance: Our team comprises seasoned academics with expertise across various
disciplines. They possess the knowledge and skills necessary to conduct thorough literature
reviews.
2. Customized Approach: We understand that every research topic is unique. Our writers tailor
each literature review to meet the specific requirements and objectives of your study.
3. Plagiarism-Free Content: We uphold the highest standards of academic integrity. Our
literature reviews are meticulously researched and crafted from scratch, ensuring originality
and authenticity.
4. Timely Delivery: We recognize the importance of deadlines. Whether your project is due in
a week or a month, we guarantee prompt delivery without compromising on quality.
5. 24/7 Support: Our dedicated customer support team is available round-the-clock to address
any queries or concerns you may have. We strive to provide personalized assistance at every
stage of the writing process.

In conclusion, writing a literature review for a research paper is undeniably challenging, but with the
right support, it becomes a manageable task. Trust ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ to alleviate the burden and
deliver a literature review that exceeds your expectations. Contact us today to embark on your
academic journey with confidence.
Source: slideplayer.com What the literature review does not do: Source: wordvice-wp-static.s3-ap-
northeast-1.amazonaws.com Learn more about the format, writing style and outline of a proper
review of literature. Read them to get a sense of the types of themes you might want to look for in
your own research or to identify ways to organize your final review. Literature reviews are designed
to provide an overview of sources you have used in researching a particular topic and to demonstrate
to your readers how your research fits within existing scholarship about the topic. You should be able
to answer it based only on a review of existing publications. Characteristics of Literature Review
Some Characteristics of Literature Review are as follows: Identifying gaps in knowledge: A
literature review helps to identify gaps in the existing knowledge and research on a specific topic or
research question. Initiating coproduction The initiation of coproduction entails recognizing the need
for coproduction, dedicating resources, inviting and establishing relevant multi-stakeholder
coproduction networks, and coproducing a vision and goals. A rapid QES may require strict date and
setting restrictions 17 and language restrictions that accommodate the specific requirements of the
review. Lack of original data: Literature reviews do not generate new data, but rather rely on the
analysis of existing studies. Does your paper have a focus, and how clearly has it been stated. Lit
reviews can take many different organizational patterns depending on what you are trying to
accomplish with the review. The template structure reflects the overall research process, ensuring
your paper will have a smooth, logical flow from chapter to chapter. Use quotes sparingly Falk and
Mills do not use any direct quotes. There are five key steps to writing a literature review: Search for
relevant literature. The proper sequence allows moving from one question to another, avoiding chaos
in writing. E.g., a body part in the standard literature review samples often is organized
chronologically, moving from the older findings to the newest research. Theories may be unearthed
within the topic search or be already known to team members, fro example, Theory of Planned
Behaviour. 29 Options for managing the quantity and quality of studies and data emerge during the
scoping (see above). Here are some examples: Chronological: The simplest approach is to trace the
development of the topic over time, which helps familiarize the audience with the topic (for instance
if you are introducing something that is not commonly known in your field). Competing interests
AB is co-convenor of the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group. However, if
you feel like you whether you are writing a literature review within the framework of a large
research project (e.g. In two to four paragraphs discuss set the context for your literature review and
discuss what you will cover or accomplish in this chapter. You are a high schooler who deals with a
literature review for the first time. Studies were not excluded in this updated overview based on
methodological quality as we aimed to reflect the full extent of current research into this topic. What
the literature review does not do: And review of current literature, design a plan of action that will
allow you to make a change and to. Four key articles were chosen due to the diversity of leadership
ideas they exhibit and the depth of the explicit text on leadership they provided. In what ways might
geographers view the need for better distribution of social service agencies in large cities than how
social workers might study the issue. Try writing a simple statement that lets the reader know what is
your main organizing principle. Try to analyze the patterns, turning points, and key debates that have
shaped the direction of the field. After the introduction, it grounds your research in a scholarly field
and leads directly to your theoretical framework or methodology. If you have limited time to
conduct research, literature reviews can give you an overview or act as a stepping stone. For
example: Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative research Discuss how
the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship Divide the literature into
sociological, historical, and cultural sources Theoretical A literature review is often the foundation for
a theoretical framework. Narrow the Topic The narrower your topic, the easier it will be to limit the
number of sources you need to read in order to obtain a good survey of relevant resources. For the
teacher in the classroom it can provide opportunities for reflection and improvement, a testing
ground for improving the teacher's practice.
Reviews in Schools, paper on the internet, accessed 10 July 2005. However, some important
exceptions should be noted. Back to top Research Paper Structure Formatting Research Papers Using
Databases and Finding References What Types of References Are Appropriate. It is shorter than a
stand-alone review because it must be limited to very specific studies and theories that are directly
relevant to the current study. Identifying key concepts and theories: A literature review can help to
identify key concepts and theories that are relevant to the research question, and provide a
theoretical framework for the study. What the literature review does not do: And review of current
literature, design a plan of action that will allow you to make a change and to. You dust off a novel
and a book of poetry, settle down in your chair, and get ready to issue a “thumbs up” or “thumbs
down” as you leaf through the pages. “Literature review” done. The introduction should clearly
establish the focus and purpose of the literature review. The review explored how these affected
professional practice and patient outcomes. As you can see, reviewing the literature is part of the
practice of becoming an authority in your area. Some strategies that did not fit easily within the
EPOC categories were also included. The literature review in a dissertation or thesis is both
comprehensive and helps make up a larger work. Writing the conclusion In the conclusion, you
should: Summarize major contributions of significant studies and articles to the body of knowledge
under review, maintaining the focus established in the introduction. In the reporting of this review,
the PRISMA guidelines were followed (Additional file 2 ). The stand-alone literature review The
literature review published as a stand-alone article presents and analyzes as many of the important
publications in an area of study as possible to provide background information and context for a
current area of research or a study. Decisions on relevance are challenging—precautions for swine
influenza may inform precautions for bird influenza. 28 A smoking ban may operate similarly to seat
belt legislation, etc. Inverting the patient involvement paradigm: defining patient led research. This is
presented differently from the introduction chapter. Turn recording back on Connect with NLM
National Library of Medicine 8600 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20894 Web Policies FOIA HHS
Vulnerability Disclosure Help Accessibility Careers What’s Included: Research Paper Template If
you’re preparing to write an academic research paper, our free research paper template is the perfect
starting point. If there are conflicts or gaps in existing literature, you can also discuss these in your
review, as well as how you will confront these missing elements or resolve these issues in your study.
The purpose is to develop a body of literature that establishes a contrarian viewpoint. Stand-alone
reviews are an excellent resource for researchers when they are first searching for the most relevant
information on an area of study. Your hypothesis, argument, or guiding concept is the “golden
thread” that will ultimately tie the works together and provide readers with specific insights they
didn’t have before reading your literature review. All literature reviews have a fundamental structure.
Summarize and synthesize Remember to summarize and synthesize your sources within each
paragraph as well as throughout the review. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to
jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Try to analyze patterns, turning
points and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. We excluded papers that: Focused
on changing patient rather than provider behaviour Had no demonstrable outcomes Made unclear or
no reference to research evidence The last of these criteria was sometimes difficult to judge, and
there was considerable discussion amongst the research team as to whether the link between research
evidence and practice was sufficiently explicit in the interventions analysed. The format of a review
of literature may vary from discipline to discipline and from assignment to assignment. Clarke et al.’s
(2017) review identified the lack of managerial authority and leadership as a key barrier to the
implementation of coproduced interventions but did not explore the implications of this finding for
future practice.
Have you written a stellar literature review you care to share for teaching purposes. So, make your
job easier by narrowing your scope and selecting the most relevant sources. The Balanced Scorecard
has been applied, initially by private teaching institutions. In the template, we cover every section
step by step, with clear, straightforward explanations and examples. A research paper assigned in a
course A thesis or dissertation A grant proposal An article intended for publication in a journal All
these instances require you to collect what has been written about your research topic so that you can
demonstrate how your own research sheds new light on the topic. According to that, nobody is
allowed to share your information with those from outside. Nor is it a matter of simply describing
what you think about an issue, depicting an interesting project or unit you have created, or
explaining a pedagogical method that works well in your classroom. However, it is also where you
get to learn about the topic in great detail. As explained above, systematic reviews seek to identify
causation. For instance, most science-based subjects demand that the evidence you consult be from
the latest studies and updated theoretical frameworks. The authors declare that they have no
competing interests. It’s needed to give potential readers an overview of the writing content, helping
to decide whether their research determines it. Finally, choose for literature review in a research
paper peer-reviewed journal articles and data from reliable sites. The main procedures of a systematic
review involve: Formulating a review question and developing a search strategy based on explicit
inclusion criteria for the identification of eligible studies (usually described in the context of a
detailed review protocol). Keep your own voice While the literature review presents others’ ideas,
your voice (the writer’s) should remain front and center. Be Selective Select only the most important
points in each source to highlight in the review. Qualitative research paper 45 literature review the
literature review begins with a preamble, which is not indicated with a heading. A multitude of
practices must be implemented throughout the coproduction process. Springer Nature remains neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. In the last 36
months, he received royalties from Systematic Approaches To a Successful Literature Review (Sage
3rd edition), honoraria from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and travel support
from the WHO. Wrong’s model, the employee’s behaviour is best influenced out of a belief in the.
As a piece of writing, the literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (e.g., your research
objective, the problem or issue you are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). London: SAGE
Publications; 1998. Higgins J. P. T., Green S., editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of
interventions: Cochrane book series. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( )
applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Service users and community members play leadership roles in coproduction initiatives related to
health or well-being. They’ll be glad to develop new custom literature review examples for your
personally. For a stand-alone literature review, this may mean highlighting the concepts in each
article and showing how they strengthen a hypothesis or show a pattern. Analyzing and synthesizing
data: As a final step, members of the review team must collate, summarize, aggregate, organize, and
compare the evidence extracted from the included studies. A systematic review of the use of social
media for dissemination of clinical practice guidelines. Resolve conflicts amongst seemingly
contradictory previous studies.
The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the literature review. A relevant
review of the literature (RRL) is an objective, concise, critical summary of published research
literature relevant to a topic being researched in an article. The purpose is to develop a body of
literature that establishes a contrarian viewpoint. All authors revised and approved the final
manuscript. Importantly, we found that many of these systematic reviews are attuned to, and
comment upon the contextual distinctions of pursuing evidence-informed interventions in health care
settings in different economic settings. This is the most common form of review in the social
sciences. This is called citation tracking and there are a number of sources that can help you identify
who has cited whom, particularly scholars from outside of your discipline. Your literature review
will not only cover publications on your topics but will include your own ideas and contributions.
For instance, first you would talk about the British biological studies of the 18th century, then about
Moby Dick, published in 1851, then the book on sperm whales in other art (1968), and finally the
biology articles (1980s) and the recent articles on American whaling of the 19th century. For
example, if you are reviewing literature about inequalities in migrant health outcomes, key themes
might include healthcare policy, language barriers, cultural attitudes, legal status, and economic
access. In this paper, we made a systematic literature review of the authentication systems based on
PPG. But there’s no need to worry about the quality of the writing if you get inspired by the
examples presented here. Development of the Literature Review Four Basic Stages of Writing 1.
There are four points which may help account for the differences in findings in this regard. We
collected and filtered more than 700 papers, giving us 44 relevant papers. The pool of writers on this
platform encompasses experts in every literature review type. A realist process evaluation within the
Facilitating Implementation of Research Evidence (FIRE) cluster randomised controlled international
trial: an exemplar. This handout will explain what literature reviews are and offer insights into the
form and construction of literature reviews in the humanities, social sciences, and sciences. It should
be noted that the lack of reporting bias assessment and certainty assessment represents a limitation of
this study. Then, synthesize the information from the sources, identifying patterns and themes in the
literature. Learn how to write a review of literature Sample 1 (PDF) A brief literature review within
a political scientists' National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship grant Sample 2
(PDF) A several-page literature review at the beginning of a published, academic article about
philosophy Sample 3 (PDF) What is a Literature Review. Sustainability. 2018;10(11):4148. Cooke J,
Langley J, Wolstenholme D, Hampshaw S. Embed Host your publication on your website or blog
with just a few clicks. Victoria (BC): University of Victoria; 2017 Feb 27. Computer-generated
reminders delivered on paper to healthcare professionals: effects on professional practice and
healthcare outcomes. Processes in an experience-based co-design project with family carers in
community mental health. SAGE Open. 2018;8(4):2158244018809220. Examples of action research
projects, literature reviews, action research a sample literature review. Often this form is used to help
establish a lack of appropriate theories or reveal that current theories are inadequate for explaining
new or emerging research problems. The unit of analysis can focus on a theoretical concept or a
whole theory or framework. Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science,
free to your inbox daily. You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key
concepts.
A consistent and welcome finding is that the overall quality of the systematic reviews themselves
appears to have improved between the two reviews, although this is not reflected upon in the papers.
That overview is typically known as a literature review. The template’s structure is based on the tried
and trusted best-practice format for formal academic research papers. Your review must be defined
by a guiding concept, such as the research objective, the issue being discussed, or the argumentative
thesis. Literature Reviews Literature reviews also provide a solid background for a research paper's
investigation. Google Scholar Squires JE, Sullivan K, Eccles MP, et al. Very little evidence has been
reported concerning individual service users’ or citizens’ leadership of (as distinct from involvement
in ) coproduction. Save all of your applicable resources as you will need to include them in your
paper. Or it might trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates. Read
through the articles and books that you have found, and as you do, take notes. For example, if your
research paper is describing an experiment on fear conditioning, then you will probably need to
provide an overview of prior research on fear conditioning. The typology of literature reviews we
used herein will allow eHealth researchers, graduate students and practitioners to gain a better
understanding of the similarities and differences between review types. The literature review gives
you a chance to: Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic and scholarly context Develop a
theoretical framework and methodology for your research Position yourself in relation to other
researchers and theorists Show how your dissertation addresses a gap or contributes to a debate You
might also have to write a literature review as a stand-alone assignment. A literature review, like a
term paper, is usually organized around ideas, not the sources themselves as an annotated
bibliography would be organized. Lamb, Sandra E. 1998. How to Write It: A Complete Guide to
Everything You’ll Ever Write. This information will present analysis and writing ideas to assist
college students full a literature evaluate project. Usually, a literature review can be described as an
objective, concise, and critical summary of published research literature pertinent to the subject being
researched in an article. The stage was set for a more balanced style of evaluation. You'll get your
paper on time, even if it is due in 3 hours. Under this method, you would combine the recent studies
on American whaling in the 19th century with Moby Dick itself in the 1800-1899 category, even
though the authors wrote a century apart. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 17th European
Conference on Information Systems ( ecis 2009); Verona, Italy. 2009. Webster J., Watson R.T.
Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. Orchestration involves
recruiting the appropriate actors as noted above as well as directing and coordinating activities,
thereby ensuring that the whole is more than the sum of its parts. Something to be conducted at the
end of your research. The MeSH term analysis also suggested a strong interdisciplinary trend. A
multitude of practices must be implemented throughout the coproduction process. Future studies
featuring a thoughtful choice of leadership and complexity models as well as a broader
methodological repertoire are thus necessary (see Table 2 for an overview). We note a distinction
between theoretical and atheoretical systematic review discussion sections. Current Cochrane
guidance informs selection of tools for quality assessment and of synthesis method. Frameworks,
Warwick: Warwick Business School Research Paper. A good strategy is to begin by searching the
USC Libraries Catalog for recent books about the topic and review the table of contents for chapters
that focuses on specific issues.
This allows them to develop new research questions and hypotheses to fill those gaps. Adobe
Express Go from Adobe Express creation to Issuu publication. Informing research design and
methodology: A literature review helps to inform research design and methodology by identifying
the most appropriate research methods, techniques, and instruments. After an overview of similar
strategic measuring tools in industry (Fitzgerald et al. However, it’s also essential to remember
examples of older studies and keep the balance between them and the newer research. But few
scientists are trained in how to write a review — or in what constitutes an excellent one. Adobe
InDesign Design pixel-perfect content like flyers, magazines and more with Adobe InDesign. Make
sure to read the abstract to find out whether an article is relevant to your question. Use evidence In
the example above, the writers refer to several other sources when making their point. Educational
strategies The overview identified three systematic reviews focusing on educational strategies. Co-
production in healthcare: rhetoric and practice. To promote coproduction, four stakeholders were
strategically selected through the personal networks of one of the authors, SK. Usually you will
need to synthesize research rather than just summarizing it. A literature review is a comprehensive
overview of all the knowledge available on a specific topic till date. Step 6: Identify relationships in
the literature and develop and connect your own ideas to them. Use a range of keywords to search
databases such as PsycINFO and any others that may contain relevant articles. The review
conducted by Bussu and Galanti (2018) stands alone in its focus on leadership, although the
empirical cases explored by those authors were restricted to the context of local government in the
UK. The second type of coverage consists of presenting materials that are representative of most
other works in a given field or area. It is used to identify trends, debates, and gaps in the research.
Twenty-three studies scored 7, six studies scored 6, one study scored 5, one study scored 4 and one
study scored 3. It also helps to justify the significance of their findings in relation to existing research
and literature. Even inadvertent content matching with some literature piece won’t be there in the
text written by professionals. Social Posts Create on-brand social posts and Articles in minutes. An
instance of a pupil literature evaluate in psychology and lecturer’s feedback is right here. “”
Guideline collection is coordinated by Helen Mongan-Rallis of the Schooling Division on the
College of Minnesota Duluth. It is often used when time and resources are limited. Pivotal
publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the field.
Fifteen articles were conceptual papers, and four were literature reviews. Use Caution When
Paraphrasing When paraphrasing a source that is not your own, be sure to represent the author's
information or opinions accurately and in your own words. The practice of coproduction leadership
is a complex activity pertaining to interactions among people, encompassing nine essential practices:
initiating, power-sharing, training, supporting, establishing trust, communicating, networking,
orchestration, and implementation. Failures of implementation run the risk of stakeholder
disillusionment; thus, the management of expectations is important.