Professional Documents
Culture Documents
100
Key Points
80 10
Relatively Inelastic Demand Curve: Management stated its intent to remain a low 60
5
cost leader. With that said, we think TEAM can keep raising prices over the next few 40
years without impacting unit demand, thus meaningfully helping total revenue growth. 20
Oct Apr Oct Apr
0
TEAM announced “Premium” SKUs on several products, and we think most, if not all, LHS: Price ($) / RHS: Volume (mm) Source: FactSet
products/services will have premium SKUs over time, and that net like for like prices
Company Data in $
will increase.
Dividend $0.00 Shares O/S (mm) 239.5
Larger Opportunity: TEAM announced that it has 175k starter customers, who are Yield 0.0% Market Cap (mm) $27,001
paying customers under $10/month. This compares to a customer base paying > EV (mm) $24,412 AD Vol. (mm) 1.71
$10/month of 138k. In 2015, TEAM had 51k >$10/month customers and 78k starter
BMO Estimates in $
customers. We think TEAM will have continued success in increasing monetization of
(FY- Jun .) 2018A 2019E 2020E
its starter customers, since these customers are already paying some nominal amount
to TEAM. We also note that TEAM has millions of unpaying customers, although we Revenue (mm) $881 $1,198 $1,522
think starter customers are significantly more likely to become full paying customers EPS $0.51 $0.82 $1.03
compared to existing free users. CFPS $1.15 $1.53 $1.91
Jira Align, Good Opportunity: Customer and channel feedback was positive on Align. Consensus Estimates
We think that Jira Align, which was recently acquired by TEAM as AgileCraft last month, 2018A 2019E 2020E
is most appropriate for large enterprise customers. We note that AgileCraft’s revenues EPS $0.82 $1.02
were very small (likely $6-8 million), and the acquisition is dilutive to TEAM’s margins. Valuation
However, we think that large enterprises are increasingly using TEAM’s products as part
2018A 2019E 2020E
of their strategic imperatives, rather than the more traditional bottoms-up expansion
P/E NM NM NM
pattern for the company. Also, we note that Align has much higher ARPU compared to
TEAM's traditional products. Hence, we think Align can be additive to revenue growth in EV/FCF NM NM 49.9x
FY20 and FY21. EV/Revenue 27.7x 20.4x 16.0x
QTR. EPS Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2018A $0.13 $0.13 $0.09 $0.15
2019E $0.20a $0.25a $0.18 $0.19
2020E $0.24 $0.26 $0.25 $0.28
Our Thesis
We like a lot about Atlassian, including what we
believe is a compelling product suite, as well as an
innovative distribution and pricing strategy. However,
we don’t believe the current valuation creates a
Please refer to pages 4 to 6 for Important Disclosures, including Analyst's Certification. favorable risk/reward.
Atlassian Corp. Plc Class A - Block Summary Model
Growing ITSM/ITOM Competitor: We think Jira Service Desk, OpsGenie, and Statuspage is increasing
competition in the ITSM/ITOM market segment. That being said, we think TEAM’s target market is more
down market from NOW’s focus on the G2K. We believe TEAM has been successful in building these
capabilities, and 16% of new customers in FY19 YTD have landed via Jira Service desk, which
demonstrates the stand-alone interest in TEAM’s ITSM and ITOM.
Greater Emphasis on Cloud: We think TEAM created a bit more emphasis on cloud migrations at the
latest user group event. TEAM will now be able to support 10k users per customer on cloud versus 5k
previously. We think that larger customers are increasingly demanding cloud deployment at a larger
scale, so we expect TEAM to continue to increase the limit to support growth in large enterprise
customers. We note that TEAM generates greater revenue per customer after three years in cloud versus
license models, though at lower margins. More than 90% of new customers are starting in cloud. We
thought it was interesting that TEAM offered free cloud subscriptions for all user group attendees, up to
2k users.
Tighter Integration, More Upsell: We think one of the main messages was importance of upsell to the
broad base of existing customers. To help in this effort, management is focused on ensuring that
products work well together. We attended a session on Confluence. We believe that part of the value
proposition of Confluence is that it works well with many other products, which thus eases cross sell.
High Retention: Management stated that retention is above 98% for customers above $50k in revenues.
Elevated Valuation: We have liked TEAM’s fundamentals for some time, but have remained Market
Perform due to valuation. This has proven to be a poor decision given share price performance, but we
still struggle with valuation at current levels. Based on our recent note, Snapshot on Valuation, published
on April 1, TEAM’s NTM EV/revenue multiple of 18.0x is 1.6 and 2.2 standard deviations above the one-
and three-year averages and sits near an all-time high of 19.3x. The company has the highest NTM
EV/revenue multiple in our software coverage. TEAM’s (EV/rev) / (revenue growth) of 0.60 based on
CY2019 estimates is the second-highest among the Growth software segment and compares with the
Growth universe average of 0.39x. However, TEAM's model is uncommon among the growth software
universe, particularly considering its 30%+ revenue growth potential over the next two CYs and its
strong cash flow generating capabilities. If we look at CY2020 (EV/revenue) / (rev growth + FCF
margins), TEAM trades at 0.25x, which compares to the Growth software group average of 0.19x-0.22x.
$100
$80
$60
$40
$20
Jul 2016 Oct 2016 Jan 2017 Apr 2017 Jul 2017 Oct 2017 Jan 2018 Apr 2018 Jul 2018 Oct 2018 Jan 2019 Apr 2019
Mkt :$100.00
01/17/2019
Out perform (OP); Market Perform (Mkt ); Underperform (Und); Speculat ive (S); Suspended (Spd); Not Rat ed (NR); Rest rict ed (R)
Source: Fact Set , BMO Capit al Market s
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES
Analyst's Certification
I, Keith Bachman, hereby certify that the views expressed in this report accurately reflect my personal views about the subject securities or
issuers. I also certify that no part of my compensation was, is, or will be, directly or indirectly, related to the specific recommendations or views
expressed in this report.
Analysts who prepared this report are compensated based upon (among other factors) the overall profitability of BMO Capital Markets and
their affiliates, which includes the overall profitability of investment banking services. Compensation for research is based on effectiveness in
generating new ideas and in communication of ideas to clients, performance of recommendations, accuracy of earnings estimates, and service
to clients.
Analysts employed by BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc. and/or BMO Capital Markets Limited are not registered as research analysts with FINRA. These
analysts may not be associated persons of BMO Capital Markets Corp. and therefore may not be subject to the FINRA Rule 2241 and 2242
restrictions on communications with a subject company, public appearances and trading securities held by a research analyst account.
Methodology and Risks to Target Price/Valuation for Atlassian Corp. Plc Class A (TEAM-NSDQ)
Methodology: Our target price is based on 13x EV/FY2020E revenues and 42x EV/FY2020E FCF.
Risks: Risks to our target price include slower revenue from increased competition, price sensitivity, and lack of product diversification. If
these risks are greater than we expect, the stock could have difficulty achieving our target price. Likewise, if these risks are less than we
expect, the stock could trade above our target price.
* Reflects rating distribution of all companies covered by BMO Capital Markets Corp. equity research analysts.
** Reflects rating distribution of all companies from which BMO Capital Markets Corp. has received compensation for Investment Banking services
as percentage within ratings category.
*** Reflects rating distribution of all companies from which BMO Capital Markets Corp. has received compensation for Investment Banking
services as percentage of Investment Banking clients.
**** Reflects rating distribution of all companies covered by BMO Capital Markets equity research analysts.
***** Reflects rating distribution of all companies from which BMO Capital Markets has received compensation for Investment Banking services
as percentage of Investment Banking clients.
~ As of October 4, 2018.