Crafting a comprehensive literature review can be a daunting task, especially when undertaking

academic or research projects. One vital tool in this process is the Prisma Flow Chart, which helps
researchers streamline their literature review process and ensure thoroughness and transparency in
their methodology. However, executing a literature review effectively requires significant time,
effort, and expertise.

The complexity of literature reviews lies in the extensive research required to identify relevant
sources, critically analyze existing literature, and synthesize findings coherently. Researchers often
face challenges in organizing vast amounts of information, navigating through diverse perspectives,
and maintaining objectivity throughout the review process.

Moreover, adhering to established guidelines, such as those outlined by the Prisma Flow Chart, adds
another layer of complexity. Researchers must meticulously follow these protocols to ensure the
integrity and credibility of their review.

In light of these challenges, many individuals seek professional assistance to navigate the intricacies
of literature reviews. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers specialized services tailored to assist researchers in
crafting high-quality literature reviews. By leveraging their expertise and experience, individuals can
alleviate the burdens associated with literature review writing and enhance the overall quality of
their research.

For those embarking on literature review endeavors, considering professional support from ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ can streamline the process, ensuring a comprehensive and well-structured review
that meets academic standards and contributes meaningfully to the research landscape.
MML is supported by The Ottawa Hospital Anaesthesia Alternate Funds Association and a Faculty
of Medicine Junior Research Chair. A template PRISMA flow diagram is provided, which can be
modified depending on whether the systematic review is original or updated (Fig. 1 ). ?PRISMA
2020 flow diagram template for systematic reviews. Finding what works in health care: standards
for systematic reviews. Nurses' time allocation and multitasking of nursing activities: a time motion
study. Across settings and nursing roles, effective decision-making is fundamental to excellent
nursing and patient care. Synthesizing and presenting findings using other methods. Ultimately, we
hope that uptake of the guideline will lead to more transparent, complete, and accurate reporting of
systematic reviews, thus facilitating evidence based decision making. The GRADE working group
clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence. Scoping review on interventions to improve
adherence to reporting guidelines in health research. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e026589.. Charters E. The
use of think-aloud methods in qualitative research: an introduction to think-aloud methods. Impact
of an online writing aid tool for writing a randomized trial report: the COBWEB (Consort-based
WEB tool) randomized controlled trial. BMC Med. 2015;13:221.. Chauvin A, Ravaud P, Moher D, et
al. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance
that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. Data extraction
tools PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) provides a
structured approach to reporting systematic reviews (and meta-analyses). The PRISMA 2020
statement has been designed primarily for systematic reviews of studies that evaluate the efects of
health interventions, irrespective of the design of the included studies. J Clin Epidemiol.
2021;134:103-112. Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated
guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj. 2021;372:n71. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt
PM, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ.
2019;366:l4898.. Sterne JA, Hernan MA, Reeves BC, et al. In this article, we present the PRISMA
2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item,
the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated
reviews. PRISMA 2020 Flow Diagrams The flow diagram depicts the flow of information through
the different phases of a systematic review. Consider including a Plain Language Summary (PLS)
when you publish your systematic review. Presenting and summarising characteristics of studies
contributing to a synthesis allows healthcare providers and policy makers to evaluate the
applicability of the findings to their setting. All content related to the PRISMA guidelines are open
access for the purposes of disseminating its utilization. The final step is to subtract the number of
excluded articles or records during the eligibility review of full-texts from the total number of
articles reviewed for eligibility. The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective
register of systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2012;1:2.. Moher D, Stewart L, Shekelle P. In this article,
we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded. Nurse leaders must appraise digital
technologies to determine whether the technology supports the direct care nurses’ information needs,
ensure that it is easy to use and does not add to nursing workload as well as providing a return on
investment. The purpose of this article is to discuss decision-making and information needs among
nurses across roles and explain how technology and implementation science approaches can
complement effective decision-making interventions. PRISMA-S Group PRISMA-S: an extension to
the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021;10:39..
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. PRISMA Flow Diagram PRISMA is an evidence-based
minimum set of items for reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Complete the right side
of the template, Identification of studies via other methods, using the steps below.
Available from Book Google Scholar Dekkers OM, Vandenbroucke JP, Cevallos M, Renehan AG,
Altman DG, Egger M. How to properly use the PRISMA Statement Using the PRISMA statement
and its extensions to write protocols or the completed review report, and completing the PRISMA
checklists are likely to let reviewers and readers know what authors did and found, but also to
optimize the quality of reporting and make the peer review process more efficient. Useful Books for
Literature Reviews Asking the Library for Advanced Help Once you have selected the most reliable
and relevant studies and extracted information from them, you will need to pull all the findings
together using textual or statistical methods. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19:25.. Page MJ,
Moher D, Bossuyt PM, et al. Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of
the PRISMA 2020 statement. Prisma Flow Diagram This link will take you to downloadable Word
and PDF copies of the flow diagram. UNC HSL Systematic Review Manuscript Template
Systematic review manuscript template(.doc) adapted from the PRISMA 2020 checklist. Complete
reporting allows readers to assess the appropriateness of the methods, and therefore the
trustworthiness of the findings. ACT is supported by a Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in Knowledge
Synthesis. There is also a PowerPoint version of the document but the file size is too large to upload
here. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement.
An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success. This
document provides authors with template for writing about their systematic review. PRISMA stands
for Preferred Reporting Instrument for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. PRISMA Links The
PRISMA Flow Diagram is a tool that can be used to record different stages of the literature search
process--across multiple resources--and clearly show how a researcher went from, 'These are the
databases I searched for my terms', to, 'These are the papers I'm going to talk about'. I would
recommend printing the diagram off and writing on it as you complete the PRISMA process.
Context matters in implementation science: a scoping review of determinant frameworks that
describe contextual determinants for implementation outcomes. COSMOS-E: guidance on
conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies of etiology. PLoS Med.
2019;16:e1002742.. Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JV. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated
guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj. 2021;372:n71. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt
PM, et al. Technology can play a role in supporting nurses’ decision making, but understanding the
complexity and current challenges in nurse decision-making is needed to guide the implementation of
technology interventions focused on supporting effective decision-making in practice and leadership.
Search Process Checklist Systematic Searches Video Series This series of videos was created by
librarians at Yale University. However, technologies that fail to adequately address information
needs, or are difficult to use, will have limited adoption. This should be the total number of reports
you obtain from other sources. To avoid these issues in systematic review writing, the Preferred
Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) group, which mainly
consists of Cochrane authors, has developed the PRISMA guidelines in 2009 ( 6 ). You have now
completed your PRISMA flow diagram, unless you have also performed searches in non-database
sources. PRISMA Flow Diagram PRISMA Flow Diagram Generator Screening Results Screening
your results. Those reading an article should pay attention to inclusion and exclusion criteria, and
how authors determined articles for inclusion in their final research. The final step is to subtract the
number of excluded articles or records during the eligibility review of full-texts from the total
number of articles reviewed for eligibility.
You can provide the numbers in the data entry section of the 'Create flow diagram' tab (click on the
button at the top of the page). Consulting the explanation and elaboration paper is recommended if
further clarity or information is required. Synthesising quantitative evidence in systematic reviews of
complex health interventions. Establishing a new journal for systematic review products. Syst Rev.
2012;1:1.. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. This process is usually done by 2-3
independent reviewers so as to control selection bias and minimise the risk of excluding any relevant
studies. For example, the Iowa Implementation Model for Sustainability Framework provides an
organized approach for selecting an implementation strategy based upon phases of implementation.
33 For example, after nurses have obtained knowledge about a practice change, audit and feedback
may be one implementation strategy to promote adoption. Version 1 of PRISMA 2020 includes
databases and clinical trial or preprint registers. Numbers of articles are recorded at the different
stages. This distinction was introduced in the PRISMA 2020 flow diagram based on our observation
that the jump from the number of reports assessed for eligibility to the number of studies included in
the review (as was prompted in the original PRISMA flow diagram) sometimes resulted in some
reports not being accounted for. Click to view the step-by-step explanation of review update portion
of the PRISMA flow diagram Step 1: Preparation Download the flow diagram template version 2
PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for updated systematic reviews which included searches of databases
and registers only or the version 2 PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for updated systematic reviews
which included searches of databases, registers and other sources. Over the past decade, advances in
systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline.
Clinical intuition in the nursing process and decision-making-A mixed-studies review. Throughout
2019 and 2020, we circulated an initial draft and five revisions of the checklist and explanation and
elaboration paper to co-authors for feedback. This tool allows you to produce a flow diagram for
your own review that conforms to the PRISMA2020 Statement. Sections of a Scientific Manuscript
Scientific articles often follow the IMRaD format: Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion.
If you would like a copy, please email the Academic Librarians' mailbox from your university
account to ask for it to be sent to you. These items cover all aspects of the manuscript, including
title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and funding. You have now completed your
PRISMA flow diagram, unless you have also performed searches in non-database sources. The
PRISMA checklist can be downloaded in PDF or Word files. In such cases, if the relevant
information for some items already appears in a publicly accessible review protocol, referring to the
protocol may suffice. We encourage journal editors and publishers to raise awareness of PRISMA
2020 (for example, by referring to it in journal “Instructions to authors”), endorsing its use, advising
editors and peer reviewers to evaluate submitted systematic reviews against the PRISMA 2020
checklists, and making changes to journal policies to accommodate the new reporting
recommendations. For example, nurses in patient care roles often spend more time with patients than
any other health discipline and frequently need to make decisions about when to inform the health
care team with changes in a patient’s condition. A systematic review of creativity evaluation and
creativity selection The current systematic literature review, conducted according to the PRISMA
(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines, (a) provides a
comprehensive overview and critical assessment of the available idea evaluation and idea selection
performance measures and (b) offers a theoretical framework and practical. Each table contains a
PRISMA checklist item that should be written about in that section, the matching PRISMA Item
number, and a box where authors can indicate if an item has been completed. This is commonly
referred to as evidence-based practice: applying the best available evidence along with patient
preferences in making clinical decisions and is a foundation of high-quality nursing care. 15
However, there is a persistent gap of 15 to 17 years between current best evidence and daily practice.
16,17 Studies of information needs and information use for evidence-based practice offer additional
perspectives for understanding barriers to routinely using evidence in practice. The Creative
Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( ) applies to the data made available in this article,
unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. The PRISMA Checklist will help you report the
details of your systematic review. Revisiting time to translation: implementation of evidence-based
practices (EBPs) in cancer control. The website also includes a scientific report authored by the
PRISMA group that gives examples to a systematic review in line with the guidelines, as well as
detailed explanations and descriptions ( 8 ). Impact of an online writing aid tool for writing a
randomized trial report: the COBWEB (Consort-based WEB tool) randomized controlled trial. BMC
Med. 2015;13:221.. Chauvin A, Ravaud P, Moher D, et al.
Conflict of Interest: The author has no conflicts of interest to declare. Step 7: Writing it up PRISMA
(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) provides a structured
approach to reporting systematic reviews (and meta-analyses). The series of videos from Yale are
particularly helpful for both types of reviews. Nurse managers describe short-term information needs
about patients related to throughput and staffing needs and long-term information needs focused on
meeting organizational priorities, such as quality improvement initiatives and nurse retention. 20, 21
Whereas short-term information was commonly reported to come from the EHR and situational
awareness, or understanding of the local environment, long-term information needs require leaders
to search for information across sources. MML is supported by The Ottawa Hospital Anaesthesia
Alternate Funds Association and a Faculty of Medicine Junior Research Chair. Abstract Technology,
such as clinical decision support, can play a role in supporting nurses’ decision making, but
understanding the complexity and current challenges in nurse decision-making is needed to guide the
implementation of technology interventions focused on supporting effective decision-making in
practice and leadership. The GRADE working group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence.
Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e78.. Liberati
A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;134:103-112. Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt
PM, et al. Sections of your manuscript are shown as bold headings in the PRISMA checklist. For
more information about updating your systematic review, see the box Updating Your Review. It
maps out the number of records identified, included and excluded, and the reasons for exclusions. To
avoid reviewing duplicate articles, you need to remove any articles that appear more than once in
your results. In order to encourage dissemination of the PRISMA 2020 Statement, it has been
published in several journals. Systematic reviews. 2021;10(1):117-117. Sohrabi C, Franchi T, Mathew
G, et al. Journals and publishers might impose word and section limits, and limits on the number of
tables and figures allowed in the main report. Write an Abstract describing your study and a
Conclusion summarizing your paper. We anticipate that the PRISMA 2020 statement will benefit
authors, editors, and peer reviewers of systematic reviews, and different users of reviews, including
guideline developers, policy makers, healthcare providers, patients, and other stakeholders.
Technologic Considerations for Supporting Direct Care Nurses’ Information Needs Nurses need
timely, patient-specific clinical information to provide care. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019;4:12.. Blanco
D, Altman D, Moher D, Boutron I, Kirkham JJ, Cobo E. Systematic Reviews: Step 8: Write the
Review You will: Review the reporting standards you will use, such as PRISMA. We plan to
disseminate the research widely, including to community participants in evidence synthesis
organisations. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. I
believe that wider adoption of these guidelines in our country will significantly contribute to the
otorhinolaryngology reports published in Turkey. MJP, JEM, PMB, IB, TCH, CDM, LS, and DM
conceived this paper and designed the literature review and survey conducted to inform the
guideline content. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate
implementation. Machine learning for identifying randomized controlled trials: an evaluation and
practitioner’s guide. We thank Abigail H Goben, Melissa L Rethlefsen, Tanja Rombey, Anna Scott,
and Farhad Shokraneh for their helpful comments on the preprints of the PRISMA 2020 papers.
Digital technologies (e.g., clinical decision support, telehealth, monitoring systems, artificial
intelligence) can provide important new sources of information and address limitations to existing
information sources, such as organizing EHR data to efficiently identify a patient’s risk for clinical
deterioration. See the Prisma2020 site for more information including all available downloads for
Statement and Flow Diagram.
Narrative synthesis Guidance from the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination for creating a textual
summary of the relevant studies and analysing their robustness. The completed checklist can be
exported to Word or PDF. Tricco Methods Centre, Bruyere Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario,
Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa,
Ottawa, Canada Vivian A. ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was
developed. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences This book provides practical, step-by-step
advice on conducting a systematic review and can be used for health sciences as. Stewart EPPI-
Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK James Thomas Li
Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19:25.. Page MJ, Moher D,
Bossuyt PM, et al. Information needs in day-to-day operations management in hospital units: A
cross-sectional national survey. The electronic health record (EHR) is the primary source of patient
data, however substantial documentation demands have significantly impacted nurse workload and
workflows for finding relevant information. TL is supported by funding from the National Eye
Institute (UG1EY020522), National Institutes of Health, United States. The website also includes a
scientific report authored by the PRISMA group that gives examples to a systematic review in line
with the guidelines, as well as detailed explanations and descriptions ( 8 ). PRISMAHarms Group
PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews. BMJ. 2016;352:i157..
McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD, the PRISMA-DTA Group, et al. Across settings and nursing
roles, effective decision-making is fundamental to excellent nursing and patient care. Applying
clinical decision support design best practices with the practical robust implementation and
sustainability model versus reliance on commercially available clinical decision support tools:
randomized controlled trial. Meta-analyses indexed in PsycINFO had a better completeness of
reporting when they mention PRISMA. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews
and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000100.. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. Box 2 summarises
noteworthy changes from the PRISMA 2009 statement. Technology can play a role in supporting
nurses’ decision making, but understanding the complexity and current challenges in nurse decision-
making is needed to guide the implementation of technology interventions focused on supporting
effective decision-making in practice and leadership. Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the
eMERGe reporting guidance. Start using the flow diagram as you start searching the databases
you've decided upon. Version 1 of PRISMA 2020 includes databases and clinical trial or preprint
registers. Revisiting time to translation: implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in cancer
control. Reporting your review with PRISMA To write your review, you will need the data from
your PRISMA flow diagram. If you would like to use EndNote, here is a great video on how to
integrate PRISMA with EndNote (more information on Endnote can be found here ). Alternatively,
placing detailed descriptions of the methods used or additional results (such as for less critical
outcomes) in supplementary files is recommended. London: Cochrane; 2019.. Chapter Google
Scholar Higgins JPT, Lopez-Lopez JA, Becker BJ, et al. Step 7: Writing it up PRISMA (Preferred
Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) provides a structured approach to
reporting systematic reviews (and meta-analyses). JMT received salary from Evidence Partners,
creator of DistillerSR software for systematic reviews; Evidence Partners was not involved in the
design or outcomes of the statement, and the views expressed solely represent those of the author.
Systematic Reviews: Step 8: Write the Review You will: Review the reporting standards you will use,
such as PRISMA. Consulting the explanation and elaboration paper is recommended if further clarity
or information is required.
Consider including a Plain Language Summary (PLS) when you publish your systematic review. List
the number of articles for which you are unable to find the full text. To capture these advances in the
reporting of systematic reviews necessitated an update to the PRISMA 2009 statement. The purpose
of this article is to discuss decision-making and information needs among nurses across roles and
explain how technology and implementation science approaches can complement effective decision-
making interventions. PRISMA-S Group PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for
reporting literature searches in systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021;10:39.. Higgins JPT, Thomas J,
Chandler J, et al. Apply all your limits (such as years of search, English language only, and so on). A
template PRISMA flow diagram is provided, which can be modified depending on whether the
systematic review is original or updated (Fig. 1 ). ?PRISMA 2020 flow diagram template for
systematic reviews. Establishing a new journal for systematic review products. Syst Rev. 2012;1:1..
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. Examples include wrong setting, wrong patient
population, wrong intervention, wrong dosage, etc. User involvement in the design and development
of patient decision aids and other personal health tools: a systematic review. Synthesizing and
presenting findings using other methods. It initially records the number of articles found and then
makes the selection process transparent by reporting on decisions made at various stages of the
systematic review. It could be a journal article, preprint, conference abstract, study register entry,
clinical study report, dissertation, unpublished manuscript, government report, or any other
document providing relevant information Record —The title or abstract (or both) of a report indexed
in a database or website (such as a title or abstract for an article indexed in Medline). Describing the
certainty in the body of evidence for an outcome and the implications of findings should help policy
makers, managers, and other decision makers formulate appropriate recommendations for practice or
policy. We thank the following contributors who provided feedback on a preliminary version of the
PRISMA 2020 checklist: Jo Abbott, Fionn Buttner, Patricia Correia-Santos, Victoria Freeman, Emily
A Hennessy, Rakibul Islam, Amalia (Emily) Karahalios, Kasper Krommes, Andreas Lundh, Dafne
Port Nascimento, Davina Robson, Catherine Schenck-Yglesias, Mary M Scott, Sarah Tanveer and
Pavel Zhelnov. Gather your completed data tables and PRISMA chart. Springer Nature remains
neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Systematic
Reviews: Step 8: Write the Review You will: Review the reporting standards you will use, such as
PRISMA. Many innovations in the conduct of systematic reviews have occurred since publication of
the PRISMA 2009 statement. Covidence does not include the number of results from each database,
so you will need to keep track of that number yourself. We anticipate that the PRISMA 2020
statement will benefit authors, editors, and peer reviewers of systematic reviews, and different users
of reviews, including guideline developers, policy makers, healthcare providers, patients, and other
stakeholders. MJP, JEM, PMB, IB, TCH, CDM, LS, and DM conceived this paper and designed the
literature review and survey conducted to inform the guideline content. Another critical area is
related to nurses’ expectation to incorporate research into decision-making. Impact of a short version
of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled
trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open.
2020;10:e035114.. Stevens A, Shamseer L, Weinstein E, et al. COSMOS-E: guidance on conducting
systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies of etiology. PLoS Med.
2019;16:e1002742.. Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JV. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated
guideline for reporting systematic reviews. According to the common opinion, a review type article
is the interpretation, synthesis and assessment of the scientific reports and studies printed in scientific
publications by authors experienced in the area ( 5 ). Throughout 2019 and 2020, we circulated an
initial draft and five revisions of the checklist and explanation and elaboration paper to co-authors
for feedback. Enter this information in the top left box of the PRISMA flow chart. JEM is supported
by an Australian NHMRC Career Development Fellowship (1143429).