Professional Documents
Culture Documents
C
LITERATURE
REVIEW
Theauthorscalculateprivateandsocialcostsfornineseparatepaymentsinstruments.Theyfindthat,
from a social cost perspective, cash is the cheapest payment instrument, followed by various
electronic payment methods. From a private perspective, cash and checks emerge as the cheapest
payment methods.
HumphreyandBergerarguethatbecausepayersusingcreditcardsandchecksbenefitfromfloat,they
tend to "overuse" this payment methods-a market failure that could be overcome with government
intervention.3 Humphrey and Berger's analysis focuses exclusively on costs. Although they
acknowledge that "convenience and acceptability" may playaroleinpaymentinstrumentchoice,in
their calculations they omit the benefits that accrue from using different payment systems.
Wells (1996) extends the Humphrey-Berger study. She argues that Humphrey and Berger
underestimate the social cost of checks. She also observes thatcheckusedidnotfallbetween1987
and 1993, even though the value of float fell, calling into question the overuse hypothesis. Like
HumphreyandBerger,Wellsfocusesoncostsandacknowledgesthatbenefitsmatter-particularlyin
her discussion of why checks are used more frequently than less costly alternatives - but does not
attempttomeasureanyofthesebenefits...Humphreyetal.(1996)analysedpatternsintheuseofcash
andotherpaperandelectronicpaymentinstrumentsin14developedcountries,includingtheU.S,for
1987-1993.Theyfindthatthecalculatedpricesofpaymentinstrumentsfailtoexplaindifferencesin
instrument use that "institutional variables” in particulartheviolentcrimerate-explainanon-trivial
portionoftheobserveddifferencesinusageacrosscountries.Crimecouldbeinterpretedinsteadasan
indirect cost.
Unlike payment cards and cheques, which bear the owner's name and therefore requireadegreeof
sophistication to use without authorisation stolen cash is perfectly
transferable. The author finding confirms the importance of considering probabilistic costs like the
perceivedriskofthenTheauthorssuggestthatacountrycouldsave1percentofinsGDPannuallyby
shifting from a fully paper based to a fully electronic-based System. Costs are presented at
countryspecificinstrumentspecificaveragetransactionsizes,however,cross-instrumentcomparisons
difficult Someofthecomparisonsalsoomitcertainpartiestotransactions,namelycentralbanksand
consumers, most likely due to missing data. Finally, because de literature does not quantify benefits.
Why“Cashless”maybethenewnormal?GSampath,THEHINDU,December14TH2016,thearticle
isaslightlydifferenttakeoncashlesseconomy.Theauthorcoverstheconceptofacashlesseconomy,
first by tackling the outcomes of such an economy. The article covers the concept of a Cashless
Society with understanding the beneficiaries, and who will face difficulties, if implemented.
Accordingtotheauthor,oneimmediateoutcomeofacashlessIndia,wouldbeasharpriseinindirect
taxes compliance. Traders, Small Businesses, Shopkeepers and Consumers, use cash as means to
trade,sothattheycanavoidpaying,servicetaxes,salestaxes,VATandanynumberofindirecttaxes
and fees. The author also suggests that, on enforcing a cashless payment system, 86%ofthepaper
money will be sucked out, and will let people flounder for a period in a condition of acute money
scarcity, but that is perhaps the quickest means way to gather.
THE COUNTRIES THAT WOULD PROFIT MOST FROM A CASHLESS WORLD,
BHASKAR CHAKRAVORTI,
2016.
It’s been nearly 300 years since paper money became accepted as legal tender. While much has
changedabouthowwemake,sell,andbuygoods,cashhasstuckaround.It’sbeenonlyrecentlythat
the road to a wider cashless society has started to really take shape. From apps such as PayPal,
Venmo, or Square Cash are signs that Cash is following the path of other “information goods,” such
as printed photographs, cassette tapes, and DVDs in being replaced by digital alternatives. Cash,
accordingtoarecentMasterCardstudy,accountsfornearly85%oftheglobalconsumertransactions.
Cash has stubbornly resisted going the way of digital extinction. Paper currency is ubiquitous. Itis
alsountraceableanduniversallyaccepted.Formanyusers,cashequatestoasenseofsecurityandfor
many it is a sense of independence from government oversight. The rise of
cyber-crimeandgrowingconcernsabouttheabilityofpublicagenciestolookthroughdigitalrecords
willaddtotheunwillingnessamongmanytoletgoofpapermoney.Countriesthatarehighlydigitally
evolvedarebestpositionedtounlockvaluebyfocusingonmigratingtodigitalalternativesfromcash.
Forthosecountrieslaggingintheirdigitalevolution,thepathtocashlessnirvanaisthroughinvesting
in digital inclusion first. This sequencing is crucial to success.