Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4 Engineering Properties and Performance of Asphalt Mixtures Incorporating Steel Slag
4 Engineering Properties and Performance of Asphalt Mixtures Incorporating Steel Slag
h i g h l i g h t s
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Lack of natural stone and costly expense of purchasing high-quality aggregate promote the utilization of
Received 18 October 2015 steel slag. Asphalt mixtures incorporating basic oxygen furnace (BOF) steel slag as coarse aggregate were
Received in revised form 17 September prepared and subsequently subjected to laboratory tests to determine the engineering properties of
2016
asphalt concrete. Results showed that the addition of steel slag into asphalt mixtures had high resistance
Accepted 6 October 2016
Available online 21 October 2016
to permanent deformation and moisture-induced damage. Steel slag included angular and rough textured
particles that would enhance the interlocking mechanism and provide good mechanical properties.
According to the laboratory results, a test road was constructed in 2012 by using three different types
Keywords:
Steel slag
of asphalt mixtures as follows: stone mastic asphalt with BOF (SMA-BOF), dense-graded asphalt concrete
Asphalt mix with BOF (DGAC-BOF), and dense-graded asphalt concrete with natural aggregate (DGAC-NA). The rut
Field performance depth of the SMA-BOF section was lowest among the three sites even though it was subject to high stress
induced by braking, accelerating and turning vehicles. Surveys for pavement performance were
conducted at scheduled intervals. The ride quality and the friction characteristics of both BOF sections
performed as well as or better than the section constructed using natural aggregate. Field data indicated
that steel slag could be used as a surface course aggregate in locations where traffic is expected to per-
form heavy braking and cornering maneuvers. No rutting, cracking, or other failures have been observed
to any significant extent on the BOF sections since they opened to traffic throughout the three-year per-
iod. Test results suggest that the use of steel slag as coarse aggregate substitute in surface courses be
technically appropriate.
Ó 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.027
0950-0618/Ó 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
J.-S. Chen, S.-H. Wei / Construction and Building Materials 128 (2016) 148–153 149
annually [4]. Approximate 97% of BOF steel slag is recycled in the Table 1
same ways in the U.K. [5]. Mechanical properties of BOF steel slag and limestone.
BOF steel slag, a by-product of the conversion of pig iron to Type Tests BOF Limestone Spec.
steel, has existed since the development of the oxygen converter (%) (%) (%)
in the 1950s. BOF steel slag is one the main by-products of an inte- Coarse LA Abrasion 11 25 <30
grated steel plant with rates amounting to around 100 kg per met- aggregate Flat and elongated 3:1 4 14 <15
ric ton of steel [4,5]. The slag primarily contains calcium silicates Flat and elongated 5:1 1 4 <5
Absorption 1.8 1.1 <2
together with oxides and compounds of iron, manganese, alumina Soundness 4.2 5.6 <12
and other trace elements. It was first used in agriculture as a soil One fracture face 100 100 100
amendment to neutralize soil acidity, stabilize soil structure, and Two fracture faces 100 93 >90
increase plant resistance, but its main valorization has concerned Dry bulk specific 3.41 2.62 –
gravity
road works [6–12].
Nevertheless, two factors negatively affect the widespread use Fine aggregate Soundness na 7.9 <15
Sand equivalent value na 94 >50
of BOF steel slag: its possible expansion and its relatively high
specific gravity (often between 3.2 and 3.6), which is due to a cer- Note: na = not applicable because BOF was only used as coarse aggregate in this
tain amount of iron oxides it contains. This leads to some issues for study.
the transport of the material and thus limits the geographical zone
where it can economically be used. The second problem with BOF
concerns the expansion of the material, which is attributed to the strong because it is primarily responsible for carrying traffic loads
hydration of free lime in the form of calcium and magnesium oxi- in an HMA mix. The Los Angeles abrasion value of coarse aggregate
des. The use of steel slag in asphalt mixtures could generally result should be less than 30% to possess sufficient toughness. BOF steel
in a binder film coating the steel slag and limiting potential expan- slag possessed a better LA abrasion value than natural aggregate.
sion [2,6,7]. Furthermore, few studies of its use may have discour- Flat and elongated proportions must be limited to be a maximum
aged highway engineers from better understanding the value. Both BOF steel slag and limestone met the current criteria of
engineering properties and performance of asphalt mixtures incor- no more than 15 percent 3–1 and no more than 5 percent 5–1 flat
porating BOF steel slag. and elongated particles. Steel slag is highly angular in shape, and
This study was motivated by concerns that asphalt pavements tends to be cube-like with very low percentages of flaky and
mixed with BOF steel slag might not perform well under environ- elongated particles.
mental and traffic conditions. It was concerned that the rut resis- Coarse aggregate is required to provide fracture faces with high
tance, friction, and durability benefits of hot-mix asphalt internal friction to carry the load. If the crushed content is signifi-
mixtures with BOF would be lost due to demanding and heavily cantly less than 100% for the coarse aggregate, an HMA mix is likely
trafficked situation at high risk sites such as junction and crossing to be less resistant to shoving and rutting. Although BOF and
approaches. Prior to this study, little research has been performed natural aggregate were 100 percent crushed, steel slag had more
on the performance of asphalt mixtures incorporating BOF steel fracture and rough surfaces that would be beneficial to provide
slag as a surface course aggregate. The use of less traditional sec- microtexture and interlocking mechanism. The most significant
ondary materials in road construction requires the assessment of difference between BOF and natural aggregate is its high specific
their physical and mechanical performance to ensure that the gravity, which is a consequence of the presence of iron compounds
structures built using them are durable and sustainable. Long- in BOF. The dry bulk specific gravity of BOF and limestone used in
term performance, however, especially the influence of steel slag this study was 3.41 and 2.62, respectively. The binder employed in
under field conditions, is often difficult to predict. All aspects of this study was grade AC-20 according to ASTM D 3381. This mate-
using BOF steel slag in asphalt pavements will be evaluated, rial, supplied by the China Petroleum Cooperation, is the usual
including: bitumen grade used for asphalt pavements in Taiwan. The selec-
tion of AC-20 cement is to emphasize the performance of steel slag
Evaluate the effect of steel slag on the engineering properties of used as coarse aggregate in asphalt mixtures.
hot-mix asphalt mixtures in the laboratory,
Construct a test road to compare the field performance obtained 2.2. Asphalt mixture design
from the use of steel slag and the use of traditional aggregate,
and A total of three mix designs were performed as follows: stone
Compare the field performance of asphalt pavements con- mastic asphalt with BOF (SMA-BOF), dense-graded asphalt con-
structed with steel slag with that of a test section constructed crete with BOF (DGAC-BOF), and dense-graded asphalt concrete
with conventional aggregate. with natural aggregate (DGAC-NA). The master aggregate grada-
tion bands listed in Table 2 were based on the field test road
2. Materials selected. The 19-mm maximum aggregate size gradation is gapped
on the 4.75-mm sieve for SMA mixtures. The percentage of mineral
2.1. Aggregate and binder fillers used for SMA mixtures was 9.5 percent. The job mix formula
was decided using the Marshall mix design method to determine
Two types of aggregate were used as follows: limestone the volumetric properties of the asphalt mixtures. The asphalt con-
obtained from the Kao-Ping River, and BOF steel slag supplied by tent of all mixtures was determined as that resulting in 4% air
the CHC Resources Corporation. Steel slag was stockpiled outdoors voids.
for three months to expose the material to moisture from natural Both the control mix (i.e., DGAC-NA) and the slag mix (i.e.,
precipitation. The purpose of aging was to allow potential hydra- DGAC-BOF and SMA-BOF) were fabricated by the Marshall mix
tion and its associated expansion to take place prior to use of design procedure according to ASTM D1559. The Marshall com-
BOF steel slag in asphalt mixtures. The mechanical properties of pactor was used to compact the DGAC samples 75 times each side,
BOF steel slag and natural aggregate are summarized in Table 1. but 50 times each side for the SMA samples. The optimum binder
Steel slag was employed in this study to replace the coarse faction content was determined to be 5.1%, 4.3% and 5.2% for DGAC-NA,
of hot-mix asphalt mixtures (HMA). Coarse aggregate must be DGAC-BOF and SMA-BOF mixtures, respectively. The bulk specific
150 J.-S. Chen, S.-H. Wei / Construction and Building Materials 128 (2016) 148–153
Table 2 2.5
Asphalt mixture design. DGAC-NA DGAC-BOF SMA-BOF
Strength or Modulus
Characteristics DGAC-NA DGAC-BOF SMA-BOF 2
Sieve (mm)
100 (25) 100 100 100.0 1.5
3/400 (19) 95.1 97.4 94.9
1/200 (12.7) 82.5 78.3 57.9 1
3/800 (9.5) 74.2 70.6 45.4
#4 (4.75) 51.7 47.0 24.9
#8 (2.36) 37.2 31.5 18.6 0.5
#16 (1.18) 31.8 25.4 16.6
#30 (0.6) 22.3 18.7 14.7 0
#50 (0.3) 12.5 11.7 12.5 IDT (MPa) M r (GPa )
#100 (0.15) 7.9 7.3 11.0
#200 (0.075) 5.0 4.9 9.5 Fig. 1. Indirect tensile strength and modulus of BOF steel slag and control mixes.
Binder content (%) 5.1 4.3 5.2
Bulk gravity 2.36 2.81 2.88
Voids (%) 4.0 4.0 4.0 100
90
5
Port Area
DGAC-NA DGAC-BOF SMA-BOF
4
Rutdepth (mm)
SMA-BOF
250 m
2 N
0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 DGAC-BOF DGAC-NA
LoadRepetitions 250 m 250 m
Fig. 3. Rut depth results of BOF steel slag and control mixes.
Fig. 4. Layout of test road (not to scale).
Government began construction of a full-scale test road in January, and left wheel paths. The IRI guideline of 3.5 m/km for acceptable
2012. Three test sections were constructed as follows: stone mastic ride quality is recommended by highway agencies in Taiwan. This
asphalt with BOF (SMA-BOF), dense-graded asphalt concrete with IRI level is in good agreement with drivers’ acceptability [16].
BOF (DGAC-BOF), and dense-graded asphalt concrete with natural Fig. 6 shows that roughness of the three test sections remained
aggregate (DGAC-NA). These test sections are located adjacent to relatively constant over the first five months. Then, after ten
each other on an urban roadway with each section approximately months, the DGAC-NA section had an increase in the IRI values.
250 m in length as shown in Fig. 4. The BOF sections showed little change in roughness over time.
The SMA-BOF test section is situated in an intersection near a The BOF sections appear to be smooth while the DGAC-NA section
commercial port, and connected with the other two test sections. rough.
The SMA-BOF section is located at a high risk site with heavily- A closer examination of the data shown in Fig. 6 indicates that
trafficked and left-turn movements. Each section consists of a variability in the time-sequence roughness on the test road occurs
10-cm asphalt surface course over a 30-cm coarse aggregate base due to the following factors: (1) variation in the profiled path, and
course. The surface course was constructed with two 5-cm lifts (2) seasonal effects. There is considerable transverse variability,
thickness including tack coat and prime coat sprayed in between which can cause variation in roughness, depending on the wheel
to achieve smooth requirements. Following construction, distress path that was followed. Changes in roughness also occur in pave-
surveys were conducted on each section during trafficking. Surveys ments due to changes in profile caused by seasonal effects. Each
for rutting, ride quality, and skid resistance were performed at section tends to follows a cyclic pattern through the year, with
scheduled intervals. rough values in the summer (such as 15 mo and 28 mo) and
smooth values in winter (such as 10 mo and 22 mo). The DGAC-
4.2. Permanent deformation NA section with roughness in excess of 3 m/km exhibited larger
increases in roughness over time as compared to the BOF sections.
Permanent deformation in the wheel path was measured
according to ASTM E1703. This test road has an average traffic vol-
4.4. Friction
ume of 27,500 vehicles per day with approximately 23% truck traf-
fic. Rutting is a common phenomenon on the test sections because
In order to assess whether any changes in skid resistance
they are subjected to frequent passes of traffic and heavy loadings
measured on the BOF sections were related to variation that would
of vehicles. Each bar in Fig. 5 represents the average rut depth of
have occurred on the test road, the three test sections were period-
three replicates, and the error bars indicate one standard deviation
ically surveyed for friction. Pavement skid resistance was mea-
from the average value. The graph in Fig. 5 shows average rut
sured by the British Pendulum Tester according to ASTM E303
depth measured on in-service mixtures of SMA-BOF, DGAC-BOF
and expressed by a British Pendulum number (BPN). This test mea-
and DGAC-NA sections. The rut depth of the DGAC-NA section
sures frictional properties by determining the loss in kinetic energy
was highest among the three sections, that of SMA-BOF the lowest,
of a sliding rubber shoe when it is in contact with the pavement
and that of DGAC-BOF in between. The severity level is considered
surface. All the measurements were taken when the air tempera-
to be low when the mean rut depth is less than 12.5 mm, moderate
ture reached about 25 °C. Changes in BPN values over time are
when rutting is between 12.5 and 25 mm, and high when rutting is
shown in Fig. 7. Test data were averaged for each section and for
higher than 25 mm.
a longitudinal position (left and right wheelpaths) for the British
Test results indicate that SMA-BOF and DGAC-BOF test sections
pendulum test device.
possesses good resistance to plastic deformation since both sec-
Fig. 7 shows an initial BPN value of 46–51. Skid resistance was
tions had rut depth lower than 12.5 mm. In particular, the SMA-
relatively low just after construction because of an asphalt binder
BOF section provides a good example of performance in locations
film coating aggregate at pavement surfaces. As a consequence of
where frequent braking, accelerating and turning occurs. Rutting
the disappearance of the binder film covering the surface of the
ranged from 4 mm for the SMA-BOF section to 20 mm for the
aggregate, skid resistance improved after test sections opened to
DGAC-NA section after three years in service as shown in Fig. 5.
traffic. After the initial period of wearing in, road surfaces eventu-
The SMA-BOF section has a coarse gap-graded gradation that could
ally reach an equilibrium state of polishing. Since the traffic level is
result in stone-on-stone contact. The presence of BOF steel slag on
almost constant for all test sections, skid resistance fluctuated
the approach to the traffic light junction could be seen as a sharp
through seasonal weathering and polishing cycles, but remained
reduction in permanent deformation. The angularity and tough-
at about a constant level. ANOVA at a significance level of 0.05
ness of BOF is shown to improve the rutting resistance of SMA mix-
was used to test the significance of the aggregate types on the
tures. According to field observations, BOF is well encapsulated by
a rich mortar binder in SMA. The SMA-BOF section with a greater
proportion of mastics would be expected to be durable. The use
of BOF steel slag as coarse aggregate is shown to present appropri-
ately technical solutions for road applications, which could provide
an excellent level of resistance to permanent deformation.
BPN value. The test results showed the aggregate type was not a The authors are grateful for the National Science Council project
statistically significant factor, with a p-value of more than 0.05. (NSC 101-2221-E-006-214-MY3), the Tainan City Government, and
In addition, the mix type was determined to be not statistically sig- the CHC Resources Corporation for providing financial and field
nificant at the 95% confidence level. It seems that the aggregate supports to complete this study.
and mix types were not different enough to influence the mea-
sured BPN value. References
The influence of weather fluctuation and the evolution of
frictional characteristics over time are presented in Fig. 7. During [1] J.J. Emery, Slag Utilization in Pavement Construction. Extending Aggregate
seasons with warmer temperatures (such as 15 mo and 28 mo), Resources, ASTM STP 774, 1982. pp. 95–11.
[2] P. Kandhal, G. Hoffman, Evaluation of steel slag fine aggregate in hot-mix
skid resistance decreased, and during seasons with cold tempera- asphalt mixtures, Transp. Res. Rec. 1583 (1997) 28–36.
tures (such as 10 and 22 mo), skid resistance increased. It is likely [3] Federal Highway Administration, User Guidelines for Waste and By-Products
that runoff of rainwater tends to bring surface contaminants such in Pavement Construction, FHWA-RD-97-148, 1998.
[4] M. Legret, P. Chaurand, A. Benard, Y. Capowiez, D. Deneele, J. Reynard, L.
as dust and sand on the road surface. In the summer when the Lassabatere, D. Yilmaz, J. Rose, J. Domas, B. Bechet, D. Richard, Y.J. Bottero, A
rainfall in Taiwan is high, runoff is at its highest and deposition multidisciplinary approach for the assessment of the environment behavior of
of contaminants tends to increase; hence, at this time, skid resis- basic oxygen furnace slag used in road construction, in: 6th European Slag
Conference, 2010, pp. 77–88.
tance would be low. On the other hand, during the winter months, [5] P.G. Roe, Basic Oxygen Steel Slag as Surface Course Aggregate: An Investigation
detritus roughens aggregate surfaces; as a result, skid resistance of Skid Resistance, TRL566, 2003.
would be high at that time of year. [6] G.D. Aiey, A.C. Collop, N.H. Thom, S.E. Zoorob, A. Shiratori, Laboratory
evaluation of secondary aggregates in bituminous mixtures, J. Assoc. Asphalt
Skid resistance on the test sections not only varies from year to
Paving Technol. 73 (2004) 731–769.
year, it also occurs during different periods. The pattern for both [7] A.S. Noureldin, R.S. MacDaniel, Performance evaluation of steel furnace slag-
BOF steel slag and the control sites is similar, and this indicates natural sand asphalt surface mixtures, J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol. 59
(1990) 276–303.
that BOF steel slag coarse aggregate performs similarly to natural
[8] U. Bagampadde, H.I. Al-Abdul Wahhab, S.A. Alban, Optimization of steel slag
aggregate in terms of skid resistance. A BPN value higher than 45 aggregates for bituminous mixes in Saudi Arabia, J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 11 (1999)
is considered sufficient and safe for roadway pavements [17]. The 30–35.
BPN value of test sections built with BOF appears to provide good [9] P.Y. Mahieux, J.E. Aubert, G. Escadeillas, M. Measson, Quantification of
hydraulic phase contained in a basic oxygen furnace slag, J. Mater. Civ. Eng.
skid resistance after three years in service. 26 (2014) 593–598.
No raveling, cracking or other failures have been observed on [10] D. Deniz, E. Tutumluer, J.S. Popovics, Evaluation of expansive characteristics of
the BOF sections to any significant extent since opening to traffic reclaimed asphalt pavement and virgin aggregate used as base materials,
Transp. Res. Rec. 2167 (2010) 10–17.
in 2012. According to the results obtained from field surveys, the [11] A. Coomarasamy, T.L. Walzak, Effect of moisture on surface chemistry of steel
positive features of BOF steel slag in hot-mix asphalt mixtures slags and steel slag-asphalt paving mixes, Transp. Res. Rec. 1492 (1995) 85–95.
included good frictional properties, high stability, and resistance [12] B. Fronek, P. Bosela, D. Delatte, Steel slag aggregate used in Portland cement
concrete – U.S. and international perspectives, Transp. Res. Rec. 2267 (2012)
to rutting. 37–42.
[13] B. Prowell, L.A. Cooley, R. Schreck, Virginia’s experience with 9.5-mm nominal-
5. Conclusions maximum-aggregate-size stone matrix asphalt, Transp. Res. Rec. 1813 (2002)
133–141.
[14] E. Brown, J. Haddock, Method to ensure stone-on-stone contact in stone matrix
On the basis of the test results and the performance survey con- asphalt paving mixtures, Transp. Res. Rec. 1583 (1997) 11–18.
ducted in this study, the following conclusions can be drawn. Basic [15] B. Choubane, R.L. McNamara, G.C. Page, Evaluation of high-speed profiles for
measurement of asphalt pavement smoothness in Florida, Transp. Res. Rec.
oxygen furnace (BOF) steel slag could meet the specification 2002 (1813) 62–67.
requirements set by highway agencies as road construction aggre- [16] K. Shafizadeh, F. Mannering, Acceptability of pavement roughness on urban
gate. The use of steel slag as a coarse aggregate substitute could highways by driving public, Transp. Res. Rec. 2003 (1860) 187–193.
[17] J. Donbavand, Skidding Resistance of Road Surfaces – Implication for New
enhance the engineering properties of asphalt mixtures. BOF steel Zealand, 1989. Transit New Zealand.
slag included angular and rough textured particles that would
increase the interlocking mechanism. The tensile strength ratio