You are on page 1of 8

Available online at www.sciencedirect.

com
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
ScienceDirect
ScienceDirect
Procedia Manufacturing
Available 00 (2018) 000–000
Availableonline
onlineatatwww.sciencedirect.com
www.sciencedirect.com
Procedia Manufacturing 00 (2018) 000–000 www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia
www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia
ScienceDirect
ScienceDirect
Procedia Manufacturing 17 (2018) 531–538
Procedia Manufacturing 00 (2017) 000–000
www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia
28th International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing
28th International ConferenceJune
(FAIM2018), on Flexible Automation
11-14, 2018, and Intelligent
Columbus, OH, USA Manufacturing
(FAIM2018), June 11-14, 2018, Columbus, OH, USA
Cloud Kanban Framework for Service Operations Management
Cloud Kanban
Manufacturing Framework
Engineering for Service
Society International Operations
Conference Management
2017, MESIC 2017, 28-30 June
2017, Vigo
a (Pontevedra), Spain
Krishnan Krishnaiyer *, F. Frank Chen , Hamed Bouzarya
a
Krishnan Krishnaiyera*, F. Frank Chena, Hamed Bouzarya
Costing models for capacity optimization in Industry 4.0: Trade-off
The University of Texas at San Antonio, 1 UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX,78023 USA
a

The University of Texas at San Antonio, 1 UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX,78023 USA
a

between used capacity and operational efficiency


Abstract
A. Santanaa, P. Afonsoa,*, A. Zaninb, R. Wernkeb
Abstract
As continuous improvement tools evolve, a so does the complexity and the size of data. With the ubiquity of data and the scale of
University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal
machine
As automation,
continuous abilitiestools
improvement for rapid decision
evolve, making
sobUnochapecó,
does and handling
the complexity
89809-000 and of
theever
Chapecó, increasing
size
SC, of complexity
data. With
Brazil of system
the ubiquity become
of data necessary.
and the scale of
Kanban
machineisautomation,
on the robust tool tofor
abilities visualize any process.
rapid decision In this
making andpaper, we propose
handling a cloud Kanban
of ever increasing framework
complexity that enables
of system becomedeployment
necessary.
of process
Kanban excellence.
is on the robustThe
tool study addresses
to visualize two research
any process. In thisquestions:
paper, we (1) how acan
propose a robust
cloud cloud-based
Kanban frameworkKanban decision
that enables support
deployment
framework work for a service
of process excellence. industry,
The study particularly
addresses in operations?
two research (2) (1)
questions: howhowcancan
an evolutionary algorithm,Kanban
a robust cloud-based specifically Ant support
decision Colony
Abstract
Optimization
framework work (ACO),
for a augment a cloud-based
service industry, Kanban
particularly in decision support
operations? framework?
(2) how can an evolutionary algorithm, specifically Ant Colony
Optimization (ACO), augment a cloud-based Kanban decision support framework?
Under
© 2018 the concept Published
The Authors. of "Industry 4.0", B.V.
by Elsevier production processes will be pushed to be increasingly interconnected,
© 2018
2018
This
© The
information
is an
The Authors.
based
open access
Authors. Published
on article
Published by
by Elsevier
a realunder
time basis
the B.V.
and,
B.V. necessarily,
CC BY-NC-ND
Elsevier licensemuch more efficient. In this context, capacity optimization
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
This is an open access article under the scientific
CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/)
goes
This beyond
Peer-review
is an open the
under traditional
responsibility
access aimofof
article under thecapacity maximization,
CC BY-NC-NDcommittee contributing
of the
license 28th Flexible also for organization’s
Automation profitability
and Intelligent and value.
Manufacturing
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the 28th Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing
(FAIM2018)
Indeed,
Peer-review leanConference.
management
under responsibility and
of continuous
the scientific improvement
committee of the approaches
28th Flexible suggest
Automation capacity
and optimization
Intelligent instead
Manufacturing of
(FAIM2018) Conference.
(FAIM2018) Conference.
maximization. The study of capacity optimization and costing models is an important research topic that deserves
Keywords: Kanban, Cloud-based Service Operations Management,Ant Colony Optimization
contributions from both the practical and theoretical perspectives. This paper presents and discusses a mathematical
Keywords: Kanban, Cloud-based Service Operations Management,Ant Colony Optimization
model for capacity management based on different costing models (ABC and TDABC). A generic model has been
developed and it was used to analyze idle capacity and to design strategies towards the maximization of organization’s
1. Introduction
value. The trade-off capacity maximization vs operational efficiency is highlighted and it is shown that capacity
1. Introduction
optimization might hide operational inefficiency.
Cloud based consumption of technology resources and services are essential part of the next generation of service
© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
operations
Peer-review
excellence.
Cloud based Sugimori
underconsumption
responsibility of
et.al.,[1]
technology
of the
introduced
scientific resources
the
committee and
Kanban concept
of theservices
developed
are essential
Manufacturing part by
Engineering
Taiichi
ofSociety
the next Ohno where
generation
International
theservice
of focus
Conference
was (1) needed
operations
2017. part at the
excellence. time and
Sugimori neededintroduced
et.al.,[1] quantity and
the (2) empower
Kanban workers
concept to reach
developed bytheir fullOhno
Taiichi capacity by the
where allowing
focus
was (1) needed part at the time and needed quantity and (2) empower workers to reach their full capacity by allowing
Keywords: Cost Models; ABC; TDABC; Capacity Management; Idle Capacity; Operational Efficiency

* Corresponding author.
1.E-mail address:author.
Introduction
* Corresponding krishnankrishnaiyer@gmail.com
E-mail address: krishnankrishnaiyer@gmail.com
2351-9789 © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
This
The cost ofaccess
is an open
idle capacity isthe
a fundamental information for companies and their management of extreme importance
2351-9789 © 2018 Thearticle under
Authors. CC BY-NC-ND
Published license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
by Elsevier B.V.
in modern
Peer-review
This
production
under
is an open
systems.
responsibility
access
In
of the
article under
general,
the scientific
CC BY-NC-ND
it is defined
committee of the
license 28th Flexiblecapacity
as unused orand
Automation production potential and(FAIM2018)
Intelligent Manufacturing
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
can be measured
in several
Conference. ways: tons of production, available hours of manufacturing, etc. The management of the idle capacity
Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the 28th Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing (FAIM2018)
* Paulo Afonso. Tel.: +351 253 510 761; fax: +351 253 604 741
Conference.
E-mail address: psafonso@dps.uminho.pt

2351-9789
2351-9789©©2017
2018The
TheAuthors.
Authors. Published by Elsevier
Published B.V. B.V.
by Elsevier
Peer-review underaccess
This is an open responsibility
article of the scientific
under committee oflicense
the CC BY-NC-ND the Manufacturing Engineering Society International Conference 2017.
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/)
Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the 28th Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing
(FAIM2018) Conference.
10.1016/j.promfg.2018.10.093
532 Krishnan Krishnaiyer et al. / Procedia Manufacturing 17 (2018) 531–538
2 Author name / Procedia Manufacturing 00 (2018) 000–000

them to continuously manage and improve their work. In Japanese, the word “Kanban” means a visual board or visual
display. The applications can be classified in two major categories (1) Manufacturing Focus – for inventory
optimization [2-5] and (2) Information Technology Focus – for managing software development [6-13]. There is a
growing need to leverage both the inventory control and the visualization aspects of Kanban, in-service operations.
Johnston [14] paints the picture of interlinking Operations Management, Marketing, and Human Resource
Management in the four stages of Service Operations Management (SOM). In the next evolution of SOM,
organizations are moving their production and consumptions of resources into “as-a-service” model. This movement
is accelerated by the exponential advancement of technologies. One such enablers is the cloud-based systems. For
organizations to embark on “as-a-service” model, particularly a cloud-based operation, there are multiple challenges
presented, such as scale, model, service availability and Total Cost of Ownership. Cornel Levy, [15] highlights small
office/home office businesses perception of cloud services by a qualitative study indicating that the users do not
understand the reliability of these services on their business growth. In this paper we propose, a cloud-based Kanban
framework for SOM augmented by an Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) decision support system. We first start with
a brief literature review of Kanban and its use, advantages and dis-advantages, followed by the overview of the cloud
Kanban model and ACO. The next section covers the implementation process of the cloud-Kanban process followed
by results and conclusion.

2. Literature Review

One of the key tools that form the foundation of Value Stream Mapping (VSM) is Kanban. It is used to control
work-in-process (WIP) inventory levels. In the production and operations world, there exist various types of Kanban
and optimization approaches. Junior and Filho [16] presented a broad classification of the different adaptations of
Kanban along with their relative strengths and weakness[16]. The original concept of Kanban has four components:
(1) use of two communication signals (dual card Kanban system), (2) pulled production, (3) decentralized control, and
(4) limited WIP [16]. Silva et al. [17] provide a DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control)
implementation for a constant order-cycle system, also known as a milk run Kanban systems [17]. In their DMAIC
based approach, they highlight that a successful design of Kanban system is dependent on various factors (such as
route time, and number of boxes that are beyond the production workstations), and therefore needs continuous system
enhancements [17]. In a production Kanban system, where there is a decoupling point to separate the inventory
supermarket from the workstation. The transfer of inventory happens via the signals to withdraw or to produce parts.
Resent research of the Kanban supermarkets considers a typical Kanban card system [18]. Lolli et al. [19] propose a
Matlab™ based simulation approach to reducing the total daily cost (inventory cost and the operator cost for line)
along with providing 100% service in a multi part-feeder Kanban supermarket. The supermarket loads two inline
feeders with dead freight. The simulation helps to pick the best scenario with least total cost [19]. A condition-based
preventative maintenance process uses a Kanban system with a continuous-time Markov chain model [20]. Based on
a different inspecting schedule, an augmented lagrangian genetic algorithm and a brute-force procedure were used to
solve the model that strives to optimize the Kanban policy, preventative maintenance policy [20]. A typical 2-stage
Kanban system with two-card Kanban system used one card for finished parts and one card to control the Work In
Process (WIP). The monthly plan from the customer is translated into a daily plan for a supplier, who delivers the
materials once a day to meet the client's demand [21]. There are various models of Kanban used in operations
engineering. A Petri net to integrate purchasing, production and packaging were developed using LINGO
software[22]. In campaign manufacturing environments where the setup time varies drastically between products, a
discrete event simulation based Kanban model is proposed that has successfully implemented in a self-medication mid
volume pharmaceutical production process [23]. A Kanban system was used to minimize the total inventory cost in a
hypothetical Just-in-Time (JIT) multistage production system [24]. A multi objective genetic algorithm was proposed
to optimize the Kanban number and size in JIT system, hence minimizing the total WIP inventory [21]. Various
performance measures, such as a number of cards or throughput are used to determine the efficiency of a Kanban
based production process [25]. Utilizing Petri net theory, the deadlock issues in a Kanban can be analyzed [26]. A
knowledge Kanban model is proposed to improve knowledge flow efficiency of a virtual enterprise research and
development process [27].
Krishnan Krishnaiyer et al. / Procedia Manufacturing 17 (2018) 531–538 533
Author name / Procedia Manufacturing 00 (2018) 000–000 3

One of the most recent adaptations of Kanban is the field of software development [28-31]. Nakazawa and Tanaka
[32] propose the use of Kanban as task boards for agile software development to track “issues,” “backlog,” “to-do,”
“doing,” “review,” and “done” activities for small projects. A survey on the effectiveness of their web-based Single
Page Application (SPA) Kanban reported a 20% increase in the motivation for software developers to complete their
task. Another type of Kanban used in the software industry is the Open Kanban, based on five principles of “respect
for people, courage, focus on value, communication, and collaboration, holistic or systemic approach to change” [33].
Faria de Souza et al., [34] combines Kanban and business process modeling notation to monitor the software
developers progress in the developmental of distributed software. A conceptual Kanban scheduling system for system
of systems is proposed to manage work queues across large enterprise-wide projects [35]. It also introduces a concept
of classes of service, a JAVA based prioritization algorithm to simulate and schedule the work across various
stakeholders [35]. Heidenberg and Porres [36] proposed a theoretical process metrics based approach called Kanban
guards that acts as a decision support system to enhance the software quality. Hui [30] proposes an enterprise Kanban
model using Kotter’s eight principles and the minimum viable changes for managing agile teams. Utilizing
ServiceNow ™ software, a Kanban based approach was implemented to reduce the backlog and improve Service
Level Agreement (SLA) of security risk assessment in an e-commerce business[37].
Disadvantages of a Kanban systems, when used to control inventory, is the lack load balancing capabilities [38].
In a vintage flow shop where there are a high variety and significant time variability of the job, an alternative system
called control of balance by card-based navigation help to control the work [38]. In production situations where there
is significant variation in demand and has multiple products a shared Kanban allocation policy is proposed [39]. There
are many disadvantages of using paper Kanban, including unfriendliness to the information system, complex to
maintain for a small production run, and not being real-time [40]. E-Kanban systems store information that is
transmitted between suppliers to reduce cost and control WIP [41, 42]. They are developed to overcome the challenges
of managing paper/card-based systems, where there is a situation of lost cards and manual errors [41-46]. An eight
step implementation framework with critical successes factors at each stage is provided to address the operational
issues of implementation of such system [47]. The chief benefits of the e-Kanban are its ability to integrate with the
existing ERP system and provide a visual interface [40].

3. Cloud Kanban (CK)

3.1. Overview

We define Kanban – as a visual tool to monitor and control resource consumption and production of an enterprise.
Figure 1 shows the six foundational elements of the Cloud Kanban framework. (1) The Service Plan is the license key
for the system that determines the size and scale of the system. (2) The database holds the needed production, and
planning data. Based on the application need the database server can be configured. (3) The Application Server is the
cloud-based server that has all the web pages and items. (4) The Active Directory (AD) forms the base of user
authentication. This layer eliminates the need of separate user name and password for the application access. The end
users can log in via the organization’s email credentials. (5) The User Interface is the front-end screens for end user
interactions that contains the menu, and buttons. (6) Finally, the Logic is the Business Logic encompass the needed
business rules to accomplish the data entry and reporting tasks. All these six elements of the cloud model can be
switched on and off, scaled up and from any modern web browsers. In our example, our active directory was
user@cloudkanban.onmicrosoft.com, the database was a Microsoft SQL server, App service was Microsoft Azure
Web Service, Service Plan was Microsoft Imagine, the User Interface was built in Model-View-Controller .Net
Framework and the business logic was written in c#.

3.2. Ant Colony Optimization

Figure 2 the five steps of the Ant Colony Systems (ACS) algorithm. The five stages are (1) Input Stage – Captures
the parameters for the algorithm, (2) Initialization – Computes the job volume due date matrix, calculates the tour
length, initiates the pheromone matrix, (3) Ant Generation – Ants are randomly generated and placed in the location
and the tour array matrix is initiated, (4) Ant Walk – Ants are moved from one node to another based on the local
4 Author name / Procedia Manufacturing 00 (2018) 000–000
534 Krishnan Krishnaiyer et al. / Procedia Manufacturing 17 (2018) 531–538

Figure 1 Cloud Kanban Framework

pheromone update. When the tour is completed the total completion, time is calculated, and the global pheromone is

Figure 2 Ant Colony System [48]


Krishnan Krishnaiyer et al. / Procedia Manufacturing 17 (2018) 531–538 535
Author name / Procedia Manufacturing 00 (2018) 000–000 5

updated. Top three best path for the iteration is stored. (5) The four steps above are repeated until the maximum
iteration is reached and the best path is computed and displayed.

4. Implementation

In a typical service, there is a job order that constitutes multiple activities. The first step is to build the estimated
total amount of the job and individual activities with the job. For all the activities (n=1,2,3 to N) for the job, an
estimated amount per shift (s =1 to 3) is build. The amount per shift estimate is computed based on the “Standard Rate
Per Hour” (SRPH) for the activity. The second is to establish a rough-cut schedule. Typically, a “Capacity Vs.
Requirement” analysis is done based on existing resources. Various factors such as number of machines available,
number of employees and raw material availability. The third step is a decision support system simulation. For priority
jobs, an Ant Algorithm based simulation is run to understand the optimization feasibility of the rough-cut schedules.
Based on the results, if needed, fine tuning of rough cut schedules is performed. The fourth step is to gather the actual
production quantities. The labour hours used, number of bad quality product and production hours lost due to down
time is also entered. Over time production data gathered helps to refine and set SRPH. The final step is the display the
job and activity progress based on the Estimated Actual and Total Kanban system [48].

5. Results

Figure 3 shows the Microsoft Azure Architecture. Based on the Figure 1 the AppService, Microsoft Azure SQL server
and the Active director is configured. It also depicts the Service Heath of the system that can be easily monitored for
any updates and maintenance. Figure 4 shows the cloud-based Kanban system main menu. The Kanban decision
support system has features for entering production data and has an ACS based simulation for the schedulers to

Figure 3 Microsoft Azure Architecture


536 Krishnan Krishnaiyer et al. / Procedia Manufacturing 17 (2018) 531–538
6 Author name / Procedia Manufacturing 00 (2018) 000–000

validate their rough-cut capacity planning. Three are seven modules (Production, Scheduling, Performance Indicators,
Decision Support, System Setup, Quality and Customer Service) in the system. These can be completely customized
based on the user roles. The sample run of ACS in the cloud infrastructure showed promising results. Marked
difference is the reduction in computing time for the benchmark Burma 14 Travelling Salesman Problem (TSP) was
noticed. The run time to obtain the best path with 200 iterations was 1.16 seconds compared to 6 seconds in legacy
systems.

6. Conclusion

The research shows that the cloud-based Kanban performs much better and faster than the traditional systems. CK
provides flexibility to scale as demand grows thereby reducing the Total Cost of Ownership. The ACS provided a
robust decision support system. This research work is part of a larger research project at The Center for Advanced
Manufacturing and Lean systems at The University of Texas at San Antonio, TX

Figure 4 Cloud-Kanban

References

[1] Y. Sugimori, K. Kusunoki, F. Cho, and S. Uchikawa, "Toyota production system and Kanban system Materialization of just-in-time and
respect-for-human system," International Journal of Production Research, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 553-564, 1977/01/01 1977.
[2] R. Piplani and A. W. H. Ang, "Performance comparison of multiple product kanban control systems," pp. 1-14, 2017.
[3] O. Olaitan, G. Fragapane, E. Alfnes, and J. O. Strandhagen, "A Nested Configuration of POLCA and Generic Kanban in a High Product Mix
Manufacturing System," in IFIP WG 5.7 International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems, APMS 2017,
September 3, 2017 - September 7, 2017, Hamburg, Germany, 2017, vol. 513, pp. 518-526: Springer New York LLC.
[4] A. P. V. De Noronha, E. Venson, R. M. Da Figueiredo, and A. Modesto, "Applying kanban to manage outsourced maintenance Services: An
action research in a Brazilian government agency," in 20th Ibero-American Conference on Software Engineering, CIbSE 2017, May 22,
2017 - May 23, 2017, Building San Jose Auditoriums UCA, Av. Alicia M. de Justo 1600, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2017, pp. 183-196:
Ibero-American Conference on Software Engineering.
Krishnan Krishnaiyer et al. / Procedia Manufacturing 17 (2018) 531–538 537
Author name / Procedia Manufacturing 00 (2018) 000–000 7

[5] H.-d. Wan and F. F. Chen, "A Web-based Kanban system for job dispatching, tracking, and performance monitoring," The International
Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, journal article vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 995-1005, September 01 2008.
[6] H. Lei, F. Ganjeizadeh, P. K. Jayachandran, and P. Ozcan, "A statistical analysis of the effects of Scrum and Kanban on software
development projects," Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 43, pp. 59-67, 02/ 2017.
[7] I. M. Bacea, A. Ciupe, and S. N. Meza, "Interactive kanban - blending digital and physical resources for collaborative project based
learning," in 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 3-7 July 2017, Los Alamitos, CA,
USA, 2017, pp. 210-11: IEEE Computer Society.
[8] N. B. Ali, K. Petersen, and B. B. N. de França, "Evaluation of simulation-assisted value stream mapping for software product development:
Two industrial cases," Information and Software Technology, vol. 68, pp. 45-61, 2015.
[9] M. O. Ahmad, L. E. Lwakatare, P. Kuvaja, M. Oivo, and J. Markkula, "An empirical study of portfolio management and Kanban in agile
and lean software companies," Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, vol. 29, no. 6, p. e1834 (16 pp.), 06/ 2017.
[10] M. O. Ahmad, D. Dennehy, K. Conboy, and M. Oivo, "Kanban in software engineering: A systematic mapping study," Journal of Systems
and Software, vol. 137, pp. 96-113, 2018.
[11] R.-U. Modlich and B. C. Cousins, "Digital Kanban boards used in design and 3D coordination," in 25th Annual Conference of the
International Group for Lean Construction, IGLC 2017, July 9, 2017 - July 12, 2017, Hersonissos, Crete, Greece, 2017, pp. 663-670: The
International Group for Lean Construction.
[12] S. Shafiq and I. Inayat, "Towards Studying the Communication Patterns of Kanban Teams: A Research Design," in 2017 IEEE 25th
International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW), 4-8 Sept. 2017, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 2017, pp. 303-6: IEEE
Computer Society.
[13] A. Harzl, "Can FOSS projects benefit from integrating Kanban: a case study," Journal of Internet Services and Applications, journal article
vol. 8, no. 1, p. 7, June 06 2017.
[14] R. Johnston, "Service operations management: return to roots," International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 19, no.
2, pp. 104-124, 1999.
[15] C. L. Levy, "SOHO users' perceptions of reliability and continuity of cloud based services," 3745475 D.B.A., Capella University, Ann
Arbor, 2016.
[16] M. Lage Junior and M. Godinho Filho, "Variations of the kanban system: Literature review and classification," International Journal of
Production Economics, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 13-21, 2010.
[17] C. Silva, L. M. Ferreira, M. Thurer, and M. Stevenson, "Improving the logistics of a constant order-cycle kanban system," Production
Planning & Control. The Management of Operations, vol. 27, no. 7-8, pp. 650-9, / 2016.
[18] M. M. Savino and A. Mazza, "Kanban-driven parts feeding within a semi-automated O-shaped assembly line: a case study in the automotive
industry," Assembly Automation, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 3-15, / 2015.
[19] F. Lolli, R. Gamberini, C. Giberti, B. Rimini, and F. Bondi, "A simulative approach for evaluating alternative feeding scenarios in a kanban
system," International Journal of Production Research, vol. 54, no. 14, pp. 4228-4239, 2016/07/17 2016.
[20] A. S. Xanthopoulos, D. E. Koulouriotis, and P. N. Botsaris, "Single-stage Kanban system with deterioration failures and condition-based
preventive maintenance," Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 142, pp. 111-122, 10// 2015.
[21] T.-H. Hou and W.-C. Hu, "An integrated MOGA approach to determine the Pareto-optimal kanban number and size for a JIT system,"
Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 5912-5918, 5// 2011.
[22] H. Ullah, "A Petri net model for the integration of purchasing, production and packaging using Kanban system," Advances in Production
Engineering & Management, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 187-200, 12/ 2014.
[23] J. Strohhecker, R. Sibbel, and M. Dick, "Integrating Kanban principles in a pharmaceutical campaign production system," Production
Planning & Control. The Management of Operations, vol. 25, no. 15, pp. 1247-63, / 2014.
[24] F. Yunmei and F. Juntao, "Optimal design of flexible Kanban system for a multi-stage manufacturing line," International Journal of
Innovative Computing, Information & Control, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1885-96, 10/ 2014.
[25] Y. Khojasteh-Ghamari, "Developing a framework for performance analysis of a production process controlled by Kanban and CONWIP,"
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 61-71, 02/ 2012.
[26] F. Magnino and P. Valigi, "A Petri net approach to deadlock analysis for classes of kanban systems," in Robotics and Automation, 2000.
Proceedings. ICRA'00. IEEE International Conference on, 2000, vol. 3, pp. 2877-2882: IEEE.
[27] C. J. Lin, F. F. Chen, and Y. M. Chen, "Knowledge kanban system for virtual research and development," Robotics and Computer-
Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 119-134, 2013.
[28] H. K. Raju and Y. T. Krishnegowda, "Kanban pull and flow - a transparent workflow for improved quality and productivity in software
development," in Fifth International Conference on Advances in Recent Technologies in Communication and Computing (ARTCom 2013),
20-21 Sept. 2013, Stevenage, UK, 2014, pp. 44-51: IET.
[29] S. É. R. Ferrão and E. D. Canedo, "A study of the applicability of an agile methodology scrum allied to the Kanban method," in 2015 10th
Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 2015, pp. 1-6.
[30] A. Hui, "Lean Change: Enabling Agile Transformation through Lean Startup, Kotter and Kanban: An Experience Report," in 2013 Agile
Conference, 2013, pp. 169-174.
[31] X. Wang, K. Conboy, and O. Cawley, "“Leagile” software development: An experience report analysis of the application of lean approaches
in agile software development," Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 1287-1299, 6// 2012.
[32] S. Nakazawa and T. Tanaka, "Development and Application of Kanban Tool Visualizing the Work in Progress," in 2016 5th IIAI
International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI), 10-14 July 2016, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 2016, pp. 908-13: IEEE
Computer Society.
538 Krishnan Krishnaiyer et al. / Procedia Manufacturing 17 (2018) 531–538
8 Author name / Procedia Manufacturing 00 (2018) 000–000

[33] J. Hurtado. (2014, 12/23/2016). Open Kanban - Open Source Initiative to create a Kanban core that is Agile, Lean and Free. Available:
https://github.com/agilelion/open-kanban
[34] V. F. de Souza, A. L'Erario, J. A. Fabri, and J. A. Goncalves, "Model for monitoring in distributed projects: An experiment using Kanban
and Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN)," in 2016 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 15-
18 June 2016, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016, p. 5 pp.: IEEE.
[35] A. Tregubov and J. A. Lane, "Simulation of Kanban-based Scheduling for Systems of Systems: Initial Results," Procedia Computer Science,
vol. 44, pp. 224-233, 2015/01/01 2015.
[36] J. Heidenberg and I. Porres, "Metrics functions for kanban guards," in Engineering of Computer Based Systems (ECBS), 2010 17th IEEE
International Conference and Workshops on, 2010, pp. 306-310: IEEE.
[37] V. Dorca, R. Munteanu, S. Popescu, A. Chioreanu, and C. Peleskei, "Agile approach with Kanban in information security risk management,"
in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics (AQTR), 2016, pp. 1-6.
[38] M. Thürer, M. Stevenson, and C. W. Protzman, "COBACABANA (Control of Balance by Card Based Navigation): An alternative to kanban
in the pure flow shop?," International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 166, pp. 143-151, 8// 2015.
[39] C. E. Onyeocha, J. Khoury, and J. Geraghty, "A comparison of Kanban-like control strategies in a multi-product manufacturing system
under erratic demand," in 2013 Winter Simulation Conference - (WSC 2013), 8-11 Dec. 2013, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2013, pp. 2730-41:
IEEE.
[40] J. Qing, P. Xue-tao, and Z. Zhong, "On solving JIT production problems for small batch orders based on E-Kanban visualization," in
Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA), 2011 Third International Conference on, 2011, vol. 2, pp. 757-761:
IEEE.
[41] J.-l. Guo, J.-y. Teng, S.-q. Li, D.-y. Wan, and X. Jiang, "Study on Electronic Kanban Management System in Steel Structure Engineering of
an International Expo Centre," Advanced Materials Research, vol. 621, pp. 375-80, / 2013.
[42] S.-C. Oh and J. Shin, "A semantic e-Kanban system for network-centric manufacturing: technology, scale-free convergence, value and cost-
sharing considerations," International Journal of Production Research, vol. 50, no. 19, pp. 5292-5316, 2012/10/01 2012.
[43] L. Chai, "e-based inter-enterprise supply chain Kanban for demand and order fulfilment management," in Emerging Technologies and
Factory Automation, 2008. ETFA 2008. IEEE International Conference on, 2008, pp. 33-35: IEEE.
[44] K. P. Krishnaiyer, Priya, "Designing Simple Electronic Kanban-Based Decision Support Systems: A Letter Shop Case Study," in ASQ Lean
Six Sigma Conference, Phoenix, Arizona, 2009.
[45] G. MacKerron, M. Kumar, and V. Kumar, "A Case Study on E-Kanban Implementation: A Framework for Successful Implementation," in
Supply Chain Strategies, Issues and Models, U. Ramanathan and R. Ramanathan, Eds. London: Springer London, 2014, pp. 99-112.
[46] T. Al-Hawari and F. Aqlan, "A software application for E-Kanban-based WIP control in the aluminium industry," International Journal of
Modelling in Operations Management, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 119-137, 2012.
[47] G. MacKerron, M. Kumar, V. Kumar, and A. Esain, "Supplier replenishment policy using e-Kanban: a framework for successful
implementation," Production Planning Control. The Management of Operations, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 161-75, / 2014.
[48] K. Krishnaiyer and F. F. Chen, "Web-based Visual Decision Support System (WVDSS) for letter shop," Robotics and Computer-Integrated
Manufacturing, 02/01/2017 2017.

You might also like