You are on page 1of 7

Corporate Mis-governance

Poor corporate governance can lead to a wide range of negative consequences


for companies, shareholders, employees, and society as a whole.
Here are some international examples of poor corporate governance:
1. Enron Corporation: Enron is perhaps one of the most famous examples
of corporate governance failure. In the early 2000s, it was revealed that
the company had engaged in extensive accounting fraud to hide its
financial losses and liabilities. This led to the bankruptcy of Enron, the
loss of jobs for thousands of employees, and significant losses for
shareholders.
2. WorldCom: WorldCom, a telecommunications company, was involved in
a massive accounting scandal in the early 2000s. The company inflated
its earnings by over $11 billion through fraudulent accounting practices.
This scandal resulted in WorldCom filing for bankruptcy and wiping out
billions in shareholder value.
3. Lehman Brothers: The collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008 played a
pivotal role in the global financial crisis. The company's poor risk
management, excessive leverage, and lack of transparency in its financial
reporting were key contributors to its downfall.
4. Volkswagen (VW) Emissions Scandal: In 2015, VW admitted to installing
software in its diesel vehicles to cheat emissions tests. This not only
harmed the environment but also eroded trust in the company and
resulted in significant financial penalties and legal consequences.
5. Wells Fargo: Wells Fargo faced a scandal in 2016 when it was revealed
that the bank had opened millions of unauthorized customer accounts
to meet aggressive sales targets. This unethical behavior and the
subsequent cover-up led to regulatory fines, lawsuits, and damage to
the bank's reputation.
6. Theranos: Theranos, a health technology company, claimed to have
developed a revolutionary blood-testing device. However, it was later
revealed that the technology didn't work as claimed, and the company
engaged in fraudulent activities. Founder Elizabeth Holmes faced legal
action, and the company dissolved.
7. Boeing 737 MAX Crisis: Boeing faced severe criticism for the
development and certification of its 737 MAX aircraft, which was
involved in two deadly crashes in 2018 and 2019. Poor decision-making,
inadequate safety oversight, and a lack of transparency in the company's
relationship with regulators were highlighted as contributing factors.
8. Tyco International: Tyco International faced a scandal in the early 2000s
when its top executives, including CEO Dennis Kozlowski, were found to
have engaged in embezzlement and corporate fraud. The company's
corporate governance practices came under scrutiny, and Kozlowski was
convicted and imprisoned.
9. Olympus Corporation: In 2011, Olympus, a Japanese manufacturer of
optical and medical equipment, was embroiled in a scandal involving a
massive accounting cover-up. The company had hidden losses for
decades through fraudulent mergers and acquisitions. This led to a loss
of investor confidence and regulatory investigations.
10.Satyam Computer Services: In 2009, the chairman of Satyam Computer
Services, Ramalinga Raju, admitted to a massive accounting fraud of over
$1 billion. The company had inflated its profits for years, leading to a
collapse in shareholder value and severe damage to the reputation of
the Indian IT industry.
11.BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill: In 2010, the Deepwater Horizon oil rig,
operated by BP, exploded in the Gulf of Mexico, causing one of the
largest environmental disasters in history. Poor safety practices,
inadequate risk management, and lack of oversight were cited as
contributing factors.
12.Valeant Pharmaceuticals: Valeant faced scrutiny for its business model,
which relied heavily on acquiring other pharmaceutical companies and
dramatically increasing drug prices. This aggressive approach to profit
maximization resulted in legal investigations, a plummeting stock price,
and reputational damage.
13.Toshiba Accounting Scandal: In 2015, Toshiba admitted to overstating
its profits by $1.2 billion over several years. The scandal led to the
resignation of top executives, a massive loss of shareholder value, and
investigations by regulators.
14.Carillion: A British construction and facilities management company,
Carillion, collapsed in 2018 due to poor financial management, high
levels of debt, and a lack of transparency. The failure had significant
ramifications for public projects and pension funds.
15.Nortel Networks: Nortel, a Canadian telecommunications equipment
manufacturer, filed for bankruptcy in 2009. The company had been
plagued by accounting scandals, alleged financial mismanagement, and
an inability to adapt to changing market conditions.
16.Steinhoff International: A multinational retail conglomerate, Steinhoff,
faced a major accounting scandal in 2017 when it was discovered that
the company had overstated its profits by billions of dollars. This led to a
sharp decline in the company's share price and investigations in multiple
countries.
17.PG&E California Wildfires: Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) faced
allegations that its poor maintenance of electrical infrastructure
contributed to devastating wildfires in California. The company filed for
bankruptcy in 2019, and its corporate governance practices were heavily
criticized.
Examples of poor corporate governance in India:
1. Satyam Computer Services: As mentioned earlier, the Satyam scandal in
2009 is one of the most infamous corporate governance failures in India.
The company's founder and chairman, Ramalinga Raju, admitted to a
massive accounting fraud, inflating profits by over $1 billion.
2. IL&FS (Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services): IL&FS, a major
infrastructure finance company in India, faced a crisis in 2018 when it
defaulted on its debt payments. The crisis revealed issues of poor
governance, with allegations of mismanagement and a lack of
transparency.
3. Kingfisher Airlines: The downfall of Kingfisher Airlines, owned by Vijay
Mallya, is another example of poor corporate governance. The airline
accumulated significant debt, failed to pay employees, and eventually
ceased operations in 2012.
4. Vijay Mallya and United Breweries Group: Beyond Kingfisher Airlines,
Vijay Mallya and the United Breweries Group faced accusations of
financial irregularities and mismanagement, leading to substantial debt
and legal troubles.
5. Nirav Modi and the PNB Scam: The Punjab National Bank (PNB) scam
came to light in 2018 when it was revealed that jeweler Nirav Modi and
his associates had defrauded the bank of over $2 billion. The scandal
raised questions about the bank's internal controls and oversight.
6. Videocon Industries: Videocon Industries, a diversified conglomerate,
faced allegations of corporate governance lapses, including excessive
debt, related-party transactions, and inadequate disclosures. The
company subsequently faced insolvency proceedings.
7. Fortis Healthcare: Fortis Healthcare, one of India's leading hospital
chains, faced governance issues related to financial mismanagement,
including the misappropriation of funds by the promoters. These issues
raised concerns about the quality of healthcare services provided.
8. Ranbaxy Laboratories: Ranbaxy Laboratories, a pharmaceutical
company, faced allegations of manufacturing and regulatory compliance
violations including the submission of falsified data to regulatory
authorities. These actions raised concerns about the company's
corporate governance and quality control. The company's actions led to
investigations, legal penalties, and a loss of trust in the pharmaceutical
industry.
9. Infrastructure Development Finance Company (IDFC): IDFC, a major
infrastructure finance company, faced criticism for its governance
practices, including concerns about related-party transactions and the
adequacy of risk management systems.
10.The 2G Spectrum Scandal: This high-profile scandal involved the
allocation of 2G spectrum licenses at significantly undervalued prices. It
revealed instances of corruption and political interference, raising
questions about transparency and fairness in the allocation process.
11.ICICI Bank-Videocon Loan Controversy: In 2018, ICICI Bank faced
allegations of a conflict of interest involving its CEO, Chanda Kochhar, in
approving loans to the Videocon group. The controversy raised
questions about the bank's corporate governance and lending practices.
12.Tata Group-Cyrus Mistry Dispute: The Tata Group, one of India's largest
conglomerates, faced a high-profile boardroom battle when Cyrus Mistry
was removed as the chairman of Tata Sons in 2016. The dispute brought
to light issues related to governance and board dynamics within the
group.
These cases demonstrate various instances of poor corporate governance in
India, which have resulted in financial losses, regulatory scrutiny, legal actions,
and reputational damage for the companies and individuals involved. Effective
corporate governance is critical for maintaining trust in India's business
environment.

Case Study on Governance issues in Yes Bank,


Yes Bank one of India's prominent private sector banks, faced significant
governance issues and a crisis in 2020. The crisis was marked by concerns
related to poor corporate governance, risk management, and financial
stability.
Background: Yes Bank was founded in 2004 by Rana Kapoor and Ashok Kapur.
It quickly gained a reputation for aggressive lending and rapid growth.
However, concerns started to surface over time due to its exposure to stressed
sectors and the quality of its loan book.
Key Governance Issues:
1. Excessive Concentration of Power: Rana Kapoor served as the Managing
Director and CEO of Yes Bank from its inception until 2018 when the
Reserve Bank of India (RBI) curtailed his term due to governance
concerns. During his tenure, Kapoor wielded significant influence over
the bank's board and operations, leading to concerns about a lack of
checks and balances.
2. Risk Management and Lending Practices: Yes Bank's rapid growth was
fueled by aggressive lending, particularly to companies in sectors like
real estate and infrastructure. Many of these loans turned out to be
non-performing assets (NPAs) as economic conditions deteriorated. The
bank's risk assessment and credit underwriting practices were called into
question.
3. Corporate Governance Failures: The bank's board composition and
functioning raised concerns about corporate governance. There were
allegations of inadequate oversight, conflicts of interest, and lapses in
risk management practices.
4. Evasion of Reporting Norms: Yes Bank was accused of concealing its
true financial position by underreporting NPAs. There were allegations
of evergreening, a practice where troubled loans are extended or
restructured to avoid classifying them as NPAs.
The Crisis Unfolds:
The crisis at Yes Bank reached its peak in 2020:
1. Deteriorating Financial Health: The bank's financial health had been
steadily deteriorating, with rising NPAs, dwindling capital adequacy, and
a liquidity crunch. This led to a loss of confidence among depositors,
shareholders, and creditors.
2. RBI Intervention: In March 2020, the RBI took control of Yes Bank to
prevent a collapse. The central bank superseded the board and imposed
a moratorium on withdrawals, limiting depositors' access to their funds.
3. Rescue Plan: To revive the bank, a consortium of Indian financial
institutions, led by State Bank of India (SBI), stepped in with a bailout
plan. Under the plan, SBI and other investors infused capital into Yes
Bank, resulting in a significant dilution of existing shareholders' equity.
Aftermath and Regulatory Changes:
1. Changes in Leadership: Prashant Kumar was appointed as the new CEO
and MD of Yes Bank after the crisis. The RBI also overhauled the bank's
board, bringing in individuals with banking and financial expertise.
2. Strengthened Regulatory Oversight: The crisis prompted the RBI and
other regulatory authorities to reevaluate their oversight mechanisms
and corporate governance norms for banks and financial institutions.
Stricter regulations were introduced to prevent a recurrence of such
events.
3. Impact on Stakeholders: Shareholders of Yes Bank incurred substantial
losses due to the dilution of equity, and depositors faced challenges in
accessing their funds during the moratorium.
4. Legal Actions: Investigations were launched to examine the bank's
actions leading up to the crisis, including allegations of wrongdoing by
former top executives. Legal proceedings and regulatory actions against
those involved continue.
In conclusion, Yes Bank's governance issues and subsequent crisis serve as a
cautionary tale about the importance of effective corporate governance, risk
management, and regulatory oversight in the banking sector. The incident
underscored the need for robust checks and balances to safeguard the
interests of stakeholders and maintain financial stability.

You might also like