You are on page 1of 29

Space Exploration Technologies

Corporation

WESAMHELOU
PRATEEK JAIN
NISHY MATHEW
ANDREW ROSS
SpaceX Making History
Introduction

 Commercial orbital transportation services


 Advanced rockets and spacecraft

 Founder: Elon Musk


 PayPal and Tesla Motors co-founder

 Invested $100 million USD of his own money in the company,


SpaceX, in 2002
 SpaceX today is valued around $1.3 billion USD and after
2013 when they send off COST2+ the company is estimated to
be worth $2.4 billion USD
 2/3 of the company owned by Elon Musk
Introduction cont.

 Space Exploration Technologies Corporation is also called SpaceX:


 Founded in 2002 byElon Musk
 Employees : 1800
 Vice President: Ken Bowesox
 Headquartered in Hawthorne California
 Launch facilities at the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida and
Vandenberg Air Force Base in California
 a rocket development facility in McGregor, Texas; and offices in Washington, DC.
 Inventions:Drangon Space craft
 Contracts: NASA, American government, International agencies
and goverments
 Future projects: Falcon Heavy system, NASA‘s robotic Mars
mission in 2018,
Introduction cont.

• Mission:
 Develop space transportations, with the ultimate goal of making it
possible for humans to live on other planets.
• Future vision:
 Keep the technological advances, innovative ideas, and
groundbreaking research happening.
 To send humans to Mars within 10 to 20 years.
 Creating reusable aircraft which has never been attempted
successfully in the past.
Company Goals

 He was trying to understand why rockets were so expensive


and wanted to make spaceflight routine and affordable
 His goal is to ―revolutionize space transportation and
ultimately make it possible for people to live on other planets‖
 ― Ultimately, our goal is to reduce costs by over a factor of ten,
saving billions of tax dollars and helping to launch a new age
of discovery,‖
 Manifest of over 40 launches to deliver commercial satellites
to orbit.
 Announced its plans for Falcon Heavy, the most powerful
rocket in the world
 Current endeavors involve ‗reusable rocket‘ concept
 Falcon
 Dragon
Customers/Market

 Falcon family launch vehicles


 Medium and heavy lift launch capabilities

 Any inclination and altitude (low Earth orbit to


geosynchronous orbit to planetary missions)
 $4 billion in contracts and more than 40 launches on
its manifest
 Over 60% commercial
Patents and IPRs

 They DO NOT file patents, Musk says, because ―we


try not to provide a recipe by which China can copy
us and we find our inventions coming right back at
us.‖
 But he talks freely about SpaceX‘s approach to rocket
design, which stems from one core principle:
Simplicity enables both reliability and low cost.
Think of cars, Musk says. ―Is a Ferrari more reliable
than a Toyota Corolla or a Honda Civic?‖
Financial Situation

 First 10 years of operation


 $1 billion in funding
 Private equity: 20%
 Elon Musk: 10%
 Investors: 10%
 Founders Fund, Draper Fisher Jurvetson

 Long-term launch and development contracts: 50%

 40+ contracts for launch missions


 Down payments at signing
 Progress payments
Pricing

 What sets SpaceX apart?


 Prices

 Falcon Heavy expectations


 ―Our performance will increase and our prices will
decline over time,‖ he writes on SpaceX‘s Web site,
―as is the case with every other technology.‖
Marketing Plan/Competition

 Small market with HIGH risk HIGH reward


 Relies completely upon past performance

 First-mover market advantage/Economies of Scale?


 COTS program

 Commercial launches

 ―Red Dragon‖ Mars mission concept?

 Orbital Sciences, Andrews Space, Boeing, Planet


Space, SpaceHab, RocketplaneKistler, Venturer
Aerospace, SpaceDev, t/Space, Constellation
Services International, Lockheed Martin
IPO?

 The decision to take SpaceX public depends on


having a ―highly predictable revenue stream,‖ Musk
said at the company‘s headquarters in Hawthorne,
California.

 ―SpaceX doesn‘t absolutely need to go public, so it‘s


best to delay going public until we have a steady
stream of launches occurring,‖ he said. Late 2013 is
the most likely timing, he said.
Organization Structure

 Silicon Valley tech firm


 Workforce at SpaceX- average age is around 30
 Flat organizational structure
 Unorthodox approaches
 Corporate structure
 Manufacturing responsibility is organized
 Atmosphere of collaboration
Business Model

 Rewritten the rules by adopting a new business model


and cutting-edge technologies
 Simplicity, low cost, and reliability go hand in hand.
 Speed in decision making and delivery
 Majority of manufacturing in-house
 Simple, proven designs with a primary focus on reliability
 Higher product quality - tight collaboration between
design and manufacturing
 NASA made its expertise and specialized facilities
available to SpaceX
Innovation

 First commercial company to recover a spacecraft


returning from orbit
 True engine out reliability
 World's first fully reusable launch vehicles.
 Replace expensive government vehicles as a way into
orbit.
 Reusable Dragon cargo capsule is set to become the
first private spacecraft to visit the International Space
Station.
Products

 The Falcon Launch Vehicle Family provides


breakthrough advances in reliability, cost, flight
environment and time to launch.
 Falcon 1 is a two stage, liquid oxygen and rocket
grade kerosene (RP-1) powered launch vehicle
 Falcon 9- wider diameter
 Falcon Heavy- heavy lift launch vehicle
 Dragon is a free-flying, reusable spacecraft
Engine Technology

 Merlin 1-D engine, Kestrel engine- clean sheet design,


both been developed from scratch
 PICA heat shields
 Friction Washer Technology
 Advanced composite materials to enhance the
performance of its Falcon rocket and Dragon capsule
 Developed a launch pad release system
Space X

GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS
Why did NASA exit from this?

 NASA conducted an internal study.

 Private firms can develop and operate


more efficiently and affordably than a
government bureaucracy.

 Without COTS agency cannot achieve


objectives of the Vision for Space
Exploration.
Incentives by NASA to promote

 In 2006 NASA announced Commercial Orbital


Transportation Services (COTS) program

 First round consisted of $500 Million of funding by


NASA.
 SpaceX and RocketplaneKistler (RpK) won Phase I

 June 18, 2007, NASA signed separate non-


reimbursable Space Act Agreements with four firms
 No financial support, only information
Incentives by NASA to promote

 In Dec 2008, SpaceX contracted for resupply


services for the ISS.
 12 missions for SpaceX

 While NASA spends 500 million on one flight,


SpaceX marks it at $54 million.
How will they make money?

 Betting on NASA giving enough business in the next


10 years.

 Other commercial customers able to use these


rockets

 SpaceX has billion dollars of private contracts with


satellite operators to launch their satellites.
Challenges for Space X

 Seven launches since its inception, three of which


were catastrophic failures

 Can they transform from boutique space


development firm into essentially a production
house?

 Heavily dependent on NASA contracts and will


continue to be for many, many years.
Challenges for Space X

 Government oversight and regulations

 Company is banking on combination of increased


demand and cost avoidance to under-price
competitors.

 Company relies on vertical integration — pulling


parts and component production in-house
Management Lessons

 ―Numbers will never compensate for talent in


getting the right answer. It will tend to slow
down progress, and will make the task
incredibly expensive.‖ – Musk

 ―Rocket engineering is not like ditch digging‖


– Musk
 Need one person to do it right, rather than 100.

 Make workplace enjoyable


Management Lessons

 Triple sign-off for all major critical operations

 Lessons from SpaceX applied on Tesla


 Only all aluminum car in North America
Thank You!

QUESTIONS?

You might also like