Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Activity/Assignment
However, portfolio does not only have a good attribute or have an advantage. It also has many
disadvantages. Based on my research, the first disadvantage of portfolio is in assessing students
unjustifiably. According to Cicmanec & Viecknicki in 1994, multiple choice items were type of
assessments that was better seen as good and fair in assessing the students’ performance over to
portfolios. In addition, according to Stecher in 1998, & Koretz et al. in 1994, some teachers see portfolios
as a worthwhile burden with tangible results in instruction and student motivation. Teachers also report
difficulties implementing portfolio assessment successfully in their own classroom due to its complexity
(Calfee & Perfumo, 1993; Padilla et al., 1996) Moreover, another disadvantage of using portfolio is very
time consuming for teachers to score students’ works and to assess students’ performance over time in
the crowded classroom (Birgin, 2006). Furthermore, in the students’ side, according to Maarten J. Brown
in his paper: The Positives and Negatives of Student Portfolio Assessments N/D, the downside of Student
Portfolio is its low reliability of scoring. To overcome this downside, it is important to use structured
rubrics in the tests of the learners' assignments. Furthermore, a good student portfolio comes with a
considerable effort and commitment from all individuals involved. Regards to grading a SP, this can be
challenging since every learner is going to be different. A solid rubric can help a teacher evaluate the
content of a SP. However, there are plenty of room for subjectivity when comparing one SP to another,
thus making it difficult to assign grades equally.