Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Using Recycled Waste Tyre in Concrete Paving Blocks
Using Recycled Waste Tyre in Concrete Paving Blocks
net/publication/247857227
CITATIONS READS
17 2,143
3 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Tung-Chai Ling (Bill) on 25 March 2014.
Abstract
There is general agreement amongst stakeholders that waste tyres should be better ma-
naged both to preserve valuable resources and to prevent environmental damage due to
improper disposal. The objective of this study is to promote a practical use and acceptance
of disposing crumb rubber in concrete paving blocks (CPB) by end user. Existing CPB is
characterized as a composite material with high compressive strength but with a low
toughness. By adding rubber into CPB, the toughness is improved while meeting minimum
strength requirements. A total of 4300 rubberized concrete paving blocks (RCPB) were
produced in a commercial plant, and 348 RCPB were tested for compression and abrasion
performance as prescribed by the Concrete Masonry Association of Australia (CMAA). In
addition, sound absorption, voids and skid resistance were tested in accordance to Ameri-
can Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). The tests results revealed that the rubber
substitution should not exceed 20 % by sand volume, which caused excessive reductions in
compressive strength. Further investigations showed that sound absorption and toughness
was improved as the rubber content in the mix increased. The RCPB specimens had a sig-
nificant capability in absorbing dynamic loading and in resisting crack propagation. Such
behaviour may be beneficial for pavements that require good impact resistance properties.
Keywords: Materials technology/ Recycling of materials/ Strength and testing of materials
1. Introduction
2. Research background
One of the most common environmental issues in the contemporary world is related to
the management they are of pneumatic tyre, which is not readily biodegradable. Every
year, approximately 800 million new tyres are produced in every region of the world, in
various sizes and types (Serumagard, 1999). Although the lifetime of some tyres are pro-
longed, but ultimately they will be discarded as waste materials. Majority of such tyres
will end up in the already congested landfill or they become mosquito breeding places and
give the worst effects when burnt. The melting tyres also produced large quantities of oil,
which will contribute to the contamination of soil and ground water.
Recent statistics in Malaysia indicated that there is an increase of more than 100 % in
the number of registered vehicles within these ten years. The current thirteen million ve-
hicles are producing a large number of scrap tyres. Therefore, the Department of Environ-
mental has put a stop to the open burning and burying of waste tyres as they will cause air
pollution and land instability. Even though several agencies and municipal councils are in-
volved in waste management, they often have no clear direction in relation to waste man-
agement. Only a few companies take the shredding process further by producing crumb
rubber and rubber powder. The cost of crumb rubber is about RM 1000 (1 US dollar = RM
3.5) per ton. Therefore, as an engineer and researcher, there is a need to seek and identify
economic and environmental friendly methods to manage these tyres in different civil en-
gineering applications.
For the last 20 years, introduction of scrap tyres rubber into asphalt concrete pavement
has solved the problem of waste tyres. Several investigations showed that strength and
compressibility of shredded tyres in concrete form can be engineered to meet the require-
ments by increasing the cement content. On the other hand, owing to the unique characte-
ristic of tyre (rubber), it is expected that by adding crumb rubber into concrete mixture, it
can increase the toughness (energy absorption capacity) of concrete considerably (Toutan-
ji, 1996, Naik & Siddique, 2004, Li, et al., 2004, Hermandez-olivares et al., 2002, Ling
2
and Nor, 2007). However, the initial cost of rubberized asphalt is 40 to 100 % higher than
that of conventional asphalt, moreover, its long term benefits are uncertain (Fedroff et al.,
1996).
Limited laboratory tests results have shown that the incorporation of waste tyre rubber
(crumb rubber) in concrete pedestrian block, reduces the weight and considerably increas-
es toughness and skid resistance (Sukonrasukkul & Chaikaew, 2006). However, such
combination causes less abrasion resistant and is not as strong as the conventional block.
Hence, the blocks produced are considered not applicable for trafficked pavement.
To resolve these problems (low strength and slow production by hand-pressed method),
various means are attempted to improve the strength and to reduce tyre wastes in a massive
quantity. This study is aimed to promote a practical use and acceptance of using crumb
rubber in CPB by potential end users. Therefore, an investigation of manufacturing
processes and feasibility of producing CPB incorporating crumb rubber in a commercial
plant setting is carried out. In addition to that, the CPB quality and strength are expected to
be improved by using specialised manufacturing equipment (under vibration and extreme
pressure) based on formulations developed in laboratory trials (Ling et al., 2009).
3. Experimental details
3.1. Materials
The rubber granules named crumb rubber used in this study were recycled from dis-
carded car tyre as shown in Fig. 1. Crumb rubber is a fine material and is produced by me-
chanical shredding with the gradation close to that of sand (Fig. 2). Two particle sizes of
crumb rubber: 1 – 3 mm and 1 – 5 mm were used as a partial substitute for fine sand and
coarse sand in facing layer and body layer, respectively in the production of CPB. All the
particle sizes of crumb rubber passed BS sieve no. 4 (4.75 mm).
Other concreting materials such as cement, sand, aggregates, additive (Rheobuild 1000
superplasticizer) and full-scale facilities of factory plant machine were supplied by a
commercial plant. The physical and mechanical properties of both sand and aggregate are
given in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. All materials used in this study are commercially
available in Malaysia.
Fig. 1. Waste car tyre being left at landfill Fig. 2. Crumb rubber
Note: Fine sand used for facing layer; coarse sand used for body layer.
T1 & T2 T3 & T4
Property
Fine sand Coarse sand Fine sand Coarse sand
Silt content (%) 5.6 5.7 5.6 7.6
Moisture content (%) 5.2 8.5 5.2 9.0
Fineness modulus 1.8 3.0 1.8 2.9
The control CPB mix proportion of cement:aggregate:sand used was 1:1.9:3.8 by weight
with a additive-cement ratio of 0.06. The mix proportions used in the CPB products ranged
between 0.39 – 0.45water cement ratio (w/c) for 290 – 330 kg/m3 cement content, as ap-
propriate to the products under investigation. The volume fraction of rubber was varied as
0 %, 10 %, 20 % and 30 % named T1, T2, T3 and T4, respectively. Table 3 shows the
mixing proportioning for the components of these RCPB. A total of 4300 RCPB including
control samples were cast and 438 were tested.
Mix ratio Cement content (kg) W/C ratio Rubber content (%)
Mix symbol Facing Body
Facing Body Facing Body Facing Body
(C:S) (C:A:S)
T1 1:2.3 1:1.9:3.8 617 328 0.23 0.45 0 0
T2 1:2.1 1:1.9:3.4 585 317 0.23 0.43 8.8 9.7
T3 1:1.9 1:1.9:3.0 604 274 0.29 0.48 21.6 19.4
T4 1:1.7 1:1.9:2.6 574 286 0.26 0.39 30.4 29.0
Note: C:A:S = (cement:aggregate:sand)
4
were mixed in the body mix mixer. On the other hand, fine sand, aggregate, cement and 1
– 3 mm crumb rubber were mixed in the face mix mixer for approximately 1 min. After
mixing for 1 min, water was added to the materials in both mixers and mixed for another 1
min. The procedure of mixing and adding water was iterated until the desired moisture
content for these semi-dry mixtures was obtained.
The ready mixtures were transferred from the pan mixer to a feed hopper. The amount in
the feed hopper was controlled by an automatic weighting system. The hopper discharged
the correct amount of concrete into the mould in the block making machine. The RCPB
were fabricated by block making machine in steel moulds with internal dimensions of 210
mm in length, 105 mm in width and 60 mm in depth. Firstly, the mould was filled with the
body mix and vibration and pressing were applied. The face mix was then poured into the
mould for the second layer, and then final compaction and vibration were applied for 4 s at
the frequency of 60 Hz. The hydraulic ram was released and the head lifted to allow early
stripping of RCPB from the steel moulds. The detailed process of making RCPB can be re-
ferred to previous research (Ling and Nor, 2006).
6
4. Results and Discussions
4.1. Properties of Fresh RCPB
Each batch of fresh RCPB produced was checked manually by sampling the specimens
from the pallet, looking for colour variations, both external and internal. Weight and di-
mensions of five sampling RCPB were checked in accordance to CMAA. Table 4 shows
the properties of fresh RCPB. The weight of fresh RCPB which decreases with the in-
crease in the percentage of rubber content could be attributed by low specific gravity of
rubber particles. Moreover, an increase in rubber content increases the air content, which
in turn reduces the unit weight of the mixtures. This may be due to the non-polar nature of
rubber particles and their tendency to entrap air in their rough surfaces. Also when rubber
is added to a concrete mixture, it may attract air as it has the tendency to repel water, and
then air may adhere to the rubber particles.
However, comparing the T2, T3 and T4, the adhesion between the crumb rubber and the
surrounding cement paste was affected significantly when the crumb rubber content keeps
increasing up to 20 % and above. This is because while plant machine applied a high com-
paction, crumb rubber would be compressed and after the compaction, the hydraulic ram
was released and the crumb rubber would return to the actual size resulting in micro cracks
and voids between the interfaces in concrete matrix. This resulted in more voids in RCPB
and tends to absorb more water.
It was found that there was a relationship between the crumb rubber content and density
of the RCPB as shown in Fig. 6. It was observed that, as the crumb rubber content keeps
increasing, this in turn reduced the apparent density, bulk density for dry, bulk density for
after immersion and bulk density for boil in the water. The incorporation crumb rubber up
to 30 % in RCPB reduced the (T4) density by 8.0 %, 8.3 %, 6.2 % and 7.3 % over the con-
trol specimens for the apparent density and bulk density for dry, after immersion and boil
in the water, respectively.
8
Fig. 6. Relationship between crumb rubber content and density
Therefore, comparing the rate of abrasion index, T3 and T4 were much higher than T1
and T2 which exhibited an increase in the abrasion index up to 104 % and 138 % as the
compressive strength kept increasing up to 21.92 MPa and 32.07 MPa, respectively.
The maximum abrasion index and compressive strength achieved for T1, T2, T3 and T4
were (1.06, 60.41), (1.27, 64.68), (1.52, 32.07) and (1.14, 21.92), respectively. These re-
sults show that as the crumb rubber content increased in RCPB, it did not show any signif-
icant effect to abrasion index even though the rubber particles were weaker. This may be
attributed to the rubber particles on facing layer given a protection layer (which is elasti-
cally deformable) for RCPB to be abraded. Therefore, reasoning presented for rubber par-
ticles in RCPB may not be applicable for abrasion resistance of other types of material
mixed in CPB.
On the other hand, the amount of crumb rubber significantly affected the development
of compressive strength in RCPB. This could be attributed by stress concentrations of
higher volume crumb rubber content in RCPB. The strength may also be affected signifi-
cantly due to the loss of adhesion between the crumb rubber and the surrounding cement
paste.
10
Fig. 9. Relationship between skid resistance and rubber content under dried-surface and
wet-surface condition
Furthermore, at the same replacement level, the BPN value under dried-surface condi-
tion was higher than that of RCPB under wet condition. This is reasonable since the
wet/soaking appearance at the RCPB surface produced a more slippery surface texture,
thus reduced skid resistance. The decrement was higher at a high level of rubber content
(T4) over the low level of rubber content (T1), which accounted for a 13.7 % and 5.7 %
reduction in BPN, respectively. However, all control specimens and RCPB produced in
this study met the minimum requirement of ASTM.
Fig. 11. Failure patterns of T1, T2, T3 and T4 blocks: (a) plan view; (b) side view
12
5. Conclusions
This paper describes the potential use of recycled waste tyres (crumb rubber) as an ag-
gregate in RCPB production for pedestrian and trafficked pavement end user. Four differ-
ent percentages of crumb rubber including control mix were designed for RCPB produc-
tion by commercial plant equipment and conventional processes. It is found that there were
no complications when applying the mixtures to full-scale production in factory.
Crumb rubber is a fine material with the gradation close to that of coarse sand. There-
fore replacement of sand is the most suitable choice than other particles in RCPB produc-
tion. The rubber particles are not as strong as basic items in CPB but have very high
toughness characteristic (elastically deformable). For this reason it is suggested that the
rubber substitution should not exceed 20 % in RCPB for trafficked pavement application.
The substitution amount of 10 % (T2) seemed more viable and provides higher strength
(because it is made under vibration and extreme pressure) and moderate toughness to the
RCPB which could be of great advantage to the environment and trafficked pavement ap-
plication. It is because RCPB will be more flexible and soft to the surface which provides a
better riding quality.
On the other hand, T3 and T4 with low strength and high toughness characteristics can
be introduced for specific purposes such as sidewalks and playground which do not require
a high strength RCPB and may be viable for other applications, depending on the percen-
tage of crumb rubber used. RCPB incorporating crumb rubber which was found to have
slightly higher sound absorption coefficients may resolve the noise generation problem
faced by conventional concrete block pavement. A series of laboratory accelerated loading
test was also carried out by the author and encouraging results on structural performance
of RCPB pavement were obtained (Ling et al, 2008). Therefore, RCPB products can be in-
troduced for varied paving application.
References
American Society of Testing and Materials. Standard Test Method for Measured Surface
Frictional Properties Using British Pendulum Tester. ASTM, 1993, ASTM E 303.
American Society of Testing and Materials. Standard Test Method for Impedance and Ab-
sorption of Acoustical Materials by Impedance Tube Method, ASTM, United State,
2004, ASTM C 384.
American Society of Testing and Materials. Standard Test Method for Density, Absorp-
tion, and Voids in Hardened Concrete. ASTM, United State, 2006, ASTM C 642.
Chan, D. & Poon, C. S. (2006). Using recycled construction waste as aggregate for paving
blocks. Magazine of Concrete Research 159, No. 2, 83–91.
Concrete Masonry Association of Australian. Specification for Concrete Segmental Paving
Units. CMAA, Australia, 1996, MA 20.
Fedroff, D., Ahmad, S. & Savas, B. Z. (1996). Mechanical properties of concrete with
ground waste tyre rubber. Transportation Research Record 1532, 66–72.
Hermandez-olivares, F., Barluenga, G., Bollati, M. & Witoszek, B. (2002). Static and dy-
namic behavior of recycled tire rubber-filled concrete. Cement and Concrete Research
32, No. 10, 1587 – 1596.
Karasawa, A., Suda, S., Naito, H. and Fujiwara, N. Application of fly ash to concrete pav-
ing block. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on concrete block paving,
Sun City, South Africa, 2003, pp. 343–352.