Aastha Manoj Sonwane v.

Manoj Tukaram Sonwane

This transfer petition has been filed by the petitioner-wife seeking transfer of the proceedings
filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 filed by the respondent husband in the
Court of Principal Judge, Family Court at Nashik Road, Nashik, Maharashtra to the Court of
Principal Judge, Family Courts, South West District, Dwarka Court, Dwarka, New Delhi. This
transfer petition is allowed.

Seema v. Rakesh Kumar

The wife seeks the transfer of the procedings for restitution of conjugal rights filed by her
husband in Gaziabad by Jagadhri, where she lived now. She said that she cannot defend the case
properly in Gaziabad as she is dependent on her father. The petition was allowed.

Deepa v. Anil Panikler

The wife seeks the transfer of the procedings for restitution of conjugal rights filed by her
husband in the court of judicial commissioner to the competent court in Trichur. The wife stays
in Trichur and has no source of income. Apart from that, she cannot safely take the journey. The
petition was allowed.

Jagatguru Shri Shakkaracharya Jyotish Peethadhiswar Shri Swami Swaroopanand

Saraswati v. Ramji Tripathi Lal Bihari Tripathi, now calling himself Swami Shatitanand
Saraswati and others (MP HC) (Para 10)
Suit pending in Court subordinate to High Court — High Court can transfer it to Court
subordinate to another High Court under section 23 of the CPC.

Shubangi Anand Joshi v. Anand Jayant Joshi (BOM)

Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 100 of 2015 is filed by the wife inter alia praying for
transfer of the Marriage Petition No. A-2521 of 2012 and Custody Petition No. D-6 of 2013
pending in the file of the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai to the Family Court at Kolhapur. The
court held that the wife has made her case without any doubt and the Family Court at Bandra is
directed to transmit the papers and proceedings of Marriage Petition No. A-2521 of 2012 and
Custody Petition No. D-6 of 2013 to the Family Court at Kolhapur expeditiously and the same
are directed to be heard together.
 It is the case of the applicant wife that in the month of May 2015 the applicant has shifted to
Kolhapur where her parents are permanently staying with minor child. The applicant is also not
keeping good health. It is the case of the applicant that the applic ant cannot attend the
proceeding at Mumbai along with her child.

Vineet Krishnakumar Chawla v. Shilpa Vineet Chawla (BOM)

Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 119 of 2021 is filed by the wife by which she is seeking
transfer of the Custody Petition, i.e. Petition D No. 2 of 2020 filed by the husband in the Family
Court at Pune to the Family Court at Thane since the wife along with her seven year old child is
residing in Thane. Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 119 of 2021 is allowed by transferring
the Custody Petition D. No. 2 of 2020 filed by the husband in the Family Court at Pune to the
Family Court at Thane.