Professional Documents
Culture Documents
axonal outgrowth and neuronal regenera- their standardization and fine structural noted elsewhere (14), the key question is not
tion via their interaction with myelin-associ- characterization is lacking (1, 13). Most so much whether sticky Aβ oligomers bind
ated inhibitors (11). That PirB appears to be of the identified Aβ receptors seem to pre- a particular receptor, but whether such Aβ
responsible for only 50% of the binding of Aβ fer oligomeric forms of Aβ, but it is as yet receptor–mediated pathways are function-
to neurons in culture echoes similar observa- unclear what these oligomeric species look ally meaningful and can ultimately be used
tions made with PrPC (12) and suggests that like, or whether all identified receptors bind to create novel therapies.
other receptors also play a role in mediating to the same oligomers. Finally, and perhaps
Aβ neurotoxicity effects. Finally, engage- most important, the structural basis of the References and Notes
1. I. Benilova et al., Nat. Neurosci. 15, 349 (2012).
ment of this neuroimmune receptor might Aβ oligomer–receptor interaction remains 2. T. Kim et al., Science 341, 1399 (2013).
play a role in hypothetical immunological poorly characterized. Do the numerous “Aβ 3. J. Syken, T. Grandpre, P. O. Kanold, C. J. Shatz, Science
aspects of Aβ-mediated toxicity. receptors” simply reflect the “sticky” nature 313, 1795 (2006).
The plethora of Aβ receptors now iden- of Aβ oligomeric species, or is there a par- 4. T. Takai, Immunology 115, 433 (2005).
5. G. S. Huh et al., Science 290, 2155 (2000).
tified has not yet resolved a nagging ques- ticular “pathological conformation” in some 6. C. M. William et al., J. Neurosci. 32, 8004 (2012).
tion in the field: What features characterize a of the putative oligomeric intermediates that 7. I. Benilova, B. De Strooper, Mol. Med. 2, 289 (2010).
canonical Aβ receptor? The crucial issue in promotes interaction with specific recep- 8. Y. Verdier, M. Zarándi, B. Penke, J. Pept. Sci. 10, 229
(2004).
this debate is the lack of definition of what is tors? For instance, FcγRIIb has a preference 9. M. Cissé et al., Nature 469, 47 (2011).
called “toxic” Aβ (1). Aβ preparations used for Aβ42 over Aβ40 oligomers, and the flex- 10. T. I. Kam et al., J. Clin. Invest. 123, 2791 (2013).
EARTH SCIENCE
M
any hypotheses have been invoked ance of animal groups, their diversification, One essential component of the Cambrian
to explain the rapid diversifi- the emergence of marine ecosystems with explosion is the advent of bilaterian develop-
cation of animal species in the “modern” trophic structures, or all of these? mental systems. Bilaterians are animals with
early Cambrian (541million to 515 million The timing of the diversification of animal a longitudinal plane of symmetry and spe-
years ago), ranging from starbursts in the groups is now fairly well known, allowing cialized internal organ systems, and include
Milky Way to intrinsic genomic reorganiza- a clear distinction to be made between the most living animals with the notable excep-
tion and developmental patterning. Recent first appearances of high-level animal crown tions of sponges, cnidarians, and some minor
hypotheses for the Cambrian explosion fall groups in the Neoproterozoic (1000 million to groups. It has been argued that the origin of
into three main categories: developmental/ 541 million years ago), followed by the main the bilaterian gut and the ability to feed on
genetic, ecologic, and abiotic/environmen- diversification of animal groups, a substantial large prey items (macrophagy) around 650
tal, with geochemical hypotheses forming increase in morphological disparity, and the million years ago in turn enabled the evo-
an abundant and distinctive subset of the emergence of complex food webs in the early lution of large body sizes and skeletons in
last (1). Most of these hypotheses have been Cambrian (2–4). Molecular clock estimates response to seabed predation pressures (5).
posited as stand-alone processes that were predict that the earliest members of many This ignores, however, an apparent >100-
the main cause of the explosion, yet many animal groups, including sponges, cnidar- million-year gap between the evolutionary
of them are tightly interlinked and codepen- ians, and bilaterians, lived 850 million to 635 innovation and its consequences. Develop-
dent. The rapid diversification of animals in million years ago. Yet molecular clocks and mental systems must have been in place to
the early Cambrian is likely to have been the the fossil record together indicate that more enable the macroevolutionary cascade, but
result of a complex interplay of biotic and than 100 extant animal phyla and classes first the clues for the causes of the Cambrian diver-
abiotic processes (see the first figure). appeared in the Cambrian; only a handful pre- sification must lie closer to 540 million years.
One challenge relates to the precise defi- date the start of the Cambrian. Two events are By then, stem bilaterians had already evolved
nition of the explosion. Is it the first appear- thus distinguishable, with the origin of high- the developmental tool kit to exploit the com-
level animal groups temporally distant to plex mosaic of opportunities that arose (6).
1
Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks the abrupt increase in diversity and disparity With macrophagy in place, the emer-
Road, Oxford OX1 3PW, UK. 2Department of Earth
Sciences, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK. within the Cambrian—the Cambrian explo- gence of complex food webs was a crucial
E-mail: paul.smith@oum.ox.ac.uk sion in the strict sense (see the second figure). driver for diversity increase in the Cambrian
Cambrian
ions into the oceans. Calcium concentra- 5. K. J. Peterson et al., Paleobiology 31 (suppl.), 36 (2005).
6. D. H. Erwin, E. H. Davidson, Development 129, 3021
tions in seawater increased almost three- (2002).
541
fold in the early Cambrian, and this input EB
7. N. J. Butterfield, Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 81 (2011).
Ediacaran
may have directly facilitated the origin of 8. R. H. T. Callow, M. D. Brasier, Earth Sci. Rev. 96, 207
(2009).
biomineralization (14). The input of phos- 9. D. J. E. Murdock, P. C. J. Donoghue, Cells Tiss. Organs 194,
phate provided simultaneous nutrient flux to 98 (2011).
shallow-water areas (12, 13). 635
10. R. Wood, A. Y. Zhuravlev, Earth Sci. Rev. 115, 249 (2012).
11. S. E. Peters, R. R. Gaines, Nature 484, 363 (2012).
Each hypothesis outlined here is a via-
12. P. J. Cook, J. H. Shergold, Nature 308, 231 (1984).
ble mechanism for increasing mean spe- Times of change. The major diversification of 13. M. D. Brasier, R. H. T. Callow, Mem. Ass. Austral. Palaeon-
cies diversity within habitat, differentiation marine taxa at high taxonomic levels between 635 tol. 34, 377 (2007).
between habitats, and/or total regional bio- and 443 million years ago [after (2)]. The red box 14. S. T. Brennan, T. K. Lowenstein, J. Horita, Geology 32, 473
(2004).
diversity. However, it is unlikely that any indicates the time interval discussed in the text. EB,
single casual mechanism can explain the Ediacaran biota. 10.1126/science.1239450
Editor's Summary
Article Tools Visit the online version of this article to access the personalization and
article tools:
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/341/6152/1355
Science (print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published weekly, except the last week
in December, by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1200 New York
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. Copyright 2016 by the American Association for the
Advancement of Science; all rights reserved. The title Science is a registered trademark of AAAS.