INTRODUCTION

Divorce is defined as the legal dissolution of a marriage by a court or other competent

body. While global divorce trends reveal significant variations between developed and
developing countries, the focus of this paper shifts to the local context, specifically the
Philippines. In the Philippines, divorce is not legally recognized, and the only options for
terminating a marriage are annulment and declaration of nullity of marriage, both of which
come with high economic costs. The difference of annulment with divorce is that divorce
dissolves a valid marriage, allowing both parties to remarry, while annulment declares the
marriage null and void from its inception, essentially stating that a legal marriage never existed.
Despite this, there is a noticeable increase in union dissolution cases, both legally and
informally.

Examining the reasons for divorce globally provides insights into complex and varied
factors such as infidelity, financial problems, lack of communication, and domestic violence.
However, the Philippine context reveals domestic violence as a significant issue, with 1 in 4
women experiencing physical or sexual violence by an intimate partner, surpassing the global
average. This local context adds urgency to the discussion on legalizing divorce.

Globally, the effects of divorce are diverse, impacting individuals and families differently.
Women tend to benefit more from divorce when laws are favorable to wives. However, in the
Philippines, divorced women may face a 27 percent decrease in their standard of living, with 20
percent falling into poverty post-divorce. Addressing the financial vulnerability of women
post-separation becomes a critical aspect of local divorce considerations.

While it is defined globally that divorce is a legal process allowing remarriage, the
Philippine legal landscape presents limited options. Divorce remains unrecognized, and
individuals seeking to end their marriage face the choices of annulment, declaration of nullity of
marriage, legal separation, or, if they are part of the Muslim population, divorce. The associated
economic costs and complexities make divorce a challenging process.

Within the existing legal framework, annulment stands as an alternative to divorce in the
Philippines. However, the lengthy and expensive nature of annulment proceedings contributes
to the challenges faced by couples seeking separation. Therefore, alongside the call for
legalizing divorce, there is a need to reform annulment processes, making them more accessible
and less financially burdensome for Filipinos.
 Transitioning from global divorce trends to the local Philippine scenario emphasizes the
necessity of legalizing divorce and reforming annulment. The absence of the divorce option in
the country contributes to the challenges faced by couples seeking separation. The survey
conducted in 2022, indicating that approximately half of the respondents supported the divorce
bill, highlights the growing demand for legal reform in the Philippines.

ARGUMENTS

The evolving global landscape of divorce laws signals a transformative shift towards
more accessible and compassionate dissolution procedures. This movement recognizes the
importance of individual autonomy within marital relationships, urging legal reforms that align
with contemporary societal values. However, in the Philippines, the absence of divorce
legislation, coupled with the stringent prohibition of divorce by the Catholic Church, has woven
an intricate web of legal complexities. Christian countries have varying views on divorce, with
some allowing it under certain circumstances, while others prohibit it altogether.

According to recent statistics, almost 25% of marriages within the Christian faith end in
divorce. The Catholic Church historically opposed the legalization of civil divorce in Catholic
countries, and although it permits annulment under a narrow set of circumstances, it prohibits
divorce. Most Protestant churches discourage divorce, but the way divorce is addressed varies.
For example, the United Church of Christ permits divorce and allows for the possibility of
remarriage, while denominations such as the Mennonite Christian Fellowship and Evangelical
Methodist Church permit divorce but discourage remarriage. The Eastern Orthodox Church
permits divorce and remarriage in church in certain circumstances, but its divorce rules are
stricter than civil divorce in most countries. For the Eastern Orthodox, marriage is
"indissoluble," and permitting remarriage is an act of compassion. Divorce rates vary
significantly worldwide, and the factors influencing them are complex. In some countries,
traditional values discourage divorce, while in others, economic stability can be a factor.
Religious beliefs often serve as an obstacle towards divorce since many religions view marriage
as sacred.

The Philippines is a predominantly Christian country, with approximately 80% of the

population identifying as Catholic. The Catholic Church has historically opposed the legalization
of divorce in Catholic countries, and the Philippines is no exception. The Catholic hierarchy in
the Philippines views divorce as "anti-family" and "anti-life," and those who endorse it are seen
as job-sharing with the devil. The absence of divorce legislation in the Philippines is largely due
to the influence of the Catholic Church, which wields considerable power over politics in the
country. Although the Constitution formally recognizes the separation between church and
state, the Catholic Church still has significant influence over political decisions. Despite the
opposition of the Catholic Church, there is growing support for the legalization of divorce in the
Philippines. In fact, surveys indicate significant support for the legalization of divorce in the
Philippines, with more than half of Filipino adults surveyed favoring divorce for "irreconcilably
separated couples," according to a nationwide survey by the Social Weather Stations (SWS),
with 53% in agreement. This support has been consistently growing over the years, as
evidenced by surveys conducted in 2011, 2014, and 2017, which showed an increasing trend in
favor of divorce legalization. Additionally, a survey from Octa Research found that 40% of
Filipino adults support the legalization of divorce in the country. Moreover, during the 2022
elections in the Philippines, approximately half of the respondents expressed support for the
divorce bill. This rising support is also evident in the president's openness to the idea of
legalizing divorce. These findings collectively demonstrate a significant and increasing level of
public endorsement for the legalization of divorce in the Philippines.

The ongoing discourse and movement towards more compassionate divorce laws in the
Philippines reflect a growing acknowledgment of individual rights within marriages and signify a
crucial step towards promoting healthier family dynamics and granting individuals agency and
empowerment within relationships. Currently, the only legal ways for a married couple to
separate in the Philippines are separation, annulment, or divorce (for Muslim citizens).
Annulment is a lengthy and expensive court proceeding, and steep legal fees and mounds of
paperwork make it practically impossible for many. As a result, a staggering 95% of Filipinos are
left navigating the challenging paths of pursuing nullity of marriage or annulment—processes
fraught with uncertainty, high costs, and prolonged legal procedures.

Consequently, the prevalent resort to informal separations, especially by individuals

from economically disadvantaged backgrounds, underscores the pressing need for a more
empathetic and practical approach to addressing marital challenges. The impetus for advocating
divorce provision in the Philippines is firmly rooted in empowering individuals in untenable
marriages. The proposed reforms aim to respect individuals' autonomy and acknowledge their
fundamental right to seek happiness and fulfillment within their personal lives.

Proponents of divorce legislation emphasize the dire necessity of introducing

mechanisms that enable couples to legally terminate marriages without enduring the intricate
and financially burdensome processes of annulment or legal separation. The core of these
reforms lies in embracing no-fault or unilateral divorce mechanisms, aligning with global trends
to simplify the dissolution process. Such reforms not only streamline legal procedures but also
ensure the equitable distribution of property, encourage fair measures for child support, and
promote joint custody arrangements, ultimately fostering healthier familial structures and
protecting the rights of all involved parties.

Extensive global research examining the impact of divorce law reforms provides
compelling evidence supporting the positive outcomes associated with such legislation. Studies
reveal that these changes allow individuals to exit harmful relationships, encourage shared
responsibilities in child-rearing post-divorce, and establish economic fairness. Moreover, these
reforms have shown associations with increased female labor force participation, improved
marriage quality in the long term, higher household savings, and reduced instances of domestic
violence and female suicide in neighboring countries.

Such promising correlations underscore the multifaceted benefits of implementing

divorce legislation in the Philippines and advocate for a more empathetic legal pathway for
those encountering irreparable marital challenges. The ongoing discourse and movement
towards more compassionate divorce laws in the Philippines reflect a growing acknowledgment
of individual rights within marriages. It signifies a crucial step towards promoting healthier
family dynamics and aligns with granting individuals agency and empowerment within
relationships.

The push for enacting divorce legislation in the Philippines emphasizes the urgent need
to recognize personal autonomy, safeguard individual well-being, and establish equitable
solutions within familial transitions. Hence, such legislation would serve as a legal remedy and a
pivotal societal shift towards respecting personal choices, ensuring fairness, and fostering
healthier domestic structures within the Philippines. The time has come for the nation to
embrace divorce legislation as a means to empower its citizens, protect their rights, and
cultivate a more just and compassionate society.

In advocating for the legalization of divorce in the Philippines, we emphasize key points
that underscore the fundamental principles of individual rights, historical alignment with global
norms, and the pressing need for accessible legal alternatives. As we delve into the multifaceted
reasons supporting this stance, our argument revolves around the recognition of divorce as a
basic human right, the imperative of historical context to modernize family laws, the limitations
of existing options, shifting societal attitudes, the necessity to protect vulnerable individuals,
the potential for second chances at love and happiness, and the ongoing movement toward
compassionate legal frameworks. Together, these key points form a comprehensive and
compelling argument for the legalization of divorce in the Philippines, reflecting the evolving
needs and perspectives of its society.
 The campaign to legalize divorce in the Philippines frames it as a fundamental human
right. Denying people the right to divorce can be seen as a violation of their individual rights.
Granting individuals the autonomy to make decisions about their marriages aligns with the
principles of basic human rights, allowing them the freedom to navigate their personal lives.

The Philippines is the only country in the world, aside from the Vatican, that has not
legalized absolute divorce. Legalizing divorce would bring the country in line with global norms
and modernize its family laws. This shift towards alignment with international standards reflects
a commitment to progress and adaptability, recognizing the need to evolve family laws in
response to changing societal attitudes.

Currently, the only legal ways for a married couple to separate in the Philippines are
separation, annulment, or divorce for Muslim citizens. Annulment, a lengthy and expensive
court proceeding, makes it practically impossible for many. Legalizing divorce would provide a
more accessible and affordable alternative for those seeking to end their marriages. This
supports the idea that legal options for separation should be inclusive, ensuring that individuals
from various economic backgrounds have equal access to the dissolution of marriages.

Public opinion on divorce in the Philippines has shifted over time, with surveys showing
that half of Filipinos now support divorce. This indicates a growing acknowledgment of
individual rights within marriages and a recognition of the diverse reasons for seeking divorce.
The evolving public opinion emphasizes the need for legal frameworks that reflect the changing
attitudes towards marriage and divorce in the Philippines.

The divorce bill must not only allow divorce in circumstances of abuse but also protect
women who are financially vulnerable after separating from their husbands. Policies
surrounding divorce should include provisions to aid Filipinas in becoming financially
independent. Ensuring that divorce laws address the specific challenges faced by women
highlights the importance of gender equality and protection of vulnerable individuals within the
legal system.

Divorce can be seen as a second chance at love and happiness. Denying people the right
to divorce can be seen as denying them this opportunity. Recognizing divorce as an opportunity
for personal growth and happiness emphasizes the importance of individuals having the ability
to navigate their relationships and seek fulfillment in their personal lives.

The ongoing discourse and movement towards more compassionate divorce laws in the
Philippines reflect a growing acknowledgment of individual rights within marriages. This
signifies a crucial step towards promoting healthier family dynamics and granting individuals
agency and empowerment within relationships. The push for compassionate divorce laws
underscores the need for legal frameworks that prioritize the well-being and individual rights of
those involved in marital relationships.

COUNTER ARGUMENTS

Children of Broken Homes: Divorce can destabilize the lives of children, leading to emotional
and psychological challenges. Research suggests that children from divorced families may face
higher rates of academic problems, behavioral issues, and emotional distress.

● Rebuttal: While divorce can present challenges for children, a reevaluation of its impact
is necessary. Firstly, the quality of the parental relationship is pivotal. In instances of
marital conflict, divorce can offer relief by removing children from toxic environments.
Moreover, the way parents handle the divorce process significantly influences outcomes.
Effective co-parenting, open communication, and prioritizing the child's needs
contribute to successful adaptation.A strong support system is another key factor.
Children from divorced families can thrive when surrounded by nurturing environments,
positive role models, and professional support. Emphasizing stability in post-divorce
living arrangements and routines further contributes to a sense of security.
Children's individual resilience must not be underestimated. Factors such as
temperament, age, and the level of conflict preceding divorce play crucial roles in
adaptation. Some children even develop increased resilience and coping skills through
the experience. Access to resources is also instrumental. Adequate educational,
emotional, and psychological support can mitigate negative impacts on academic
performance and emotional well-being. Investing in such services during and after
divorce is crucial. Comparative studies suggest that divorce alone may not be the sole
determinant of negative outcomes. Factors like the quality of parenting, family
relationships, and overall support are equally—if not more—influential. Studies reveal
that issues like poverty, parental conflict, and pre-existing challenges have substantial
effects on children, irrespective of divorce.

Marriage Counselling: Instead of resorting to divorce, couples should explore marriage

counselling or therapy to address their issues. Many relationships can be salvaged through
professional help, and divorce should be seen as a last resort.

● Rebuttal: Marriage counselling can indeed be beneficial for some couples, it is essential
to recognize its limitations and acknowledge scenarios where divorce may be a valid and
 necessary option. Firstly, not all couples find success in marriage counselling. The
effectiveness of counselling depends on various factors, including the willingness of both
partners to actively participate and the nature of the issues at hand. In cases of
deep-seated resentment, irreparable trust issues, or fundamental differences in values,
counselling may prove insufficient to resolve the underlying problems. Moreover, the
financial and time commitments associated with ongoing counselling sessions can be
significant barriers for many couples. Access to quality counselling services may also be
limited, particularly in certain geographic locations or for individuals with financial
constraints. Consequently, viewing marriage counselling as a universally accessible and
effective solution oversimplifies the complexities of individual circumstances. In
situations involving abuse, toxic dynamics, or irreconcilable differences, divorce may be
the most responsible and healthiest choice for all parties involved, including any
children. Insisting on marriage counselling as the sole alternative may perpetuate
harmful situations and delay the inevitable. Additionally, the notion of divorce as a last
resort does not account for cases where individuals have genuinely grown apart or
evolved in divergent directions. In such instances, divorce can be a means of
acknowledging personal growth and fostering individual well-being rather than clinging
to an outdated or unfulfilling partnership.

Religious Values: Divorce may conflict with religious beliefs that emphasize the sanctity of
marriage. Some argue that individuals should prioritize their commitment to their religious
values over personal desires for separation.

● Rebuttal: The argument against divorce based on religious values, emphasizing the
sanctity of marriage, is a viewpoint deeply rooted in moral and spiritual convictions.
However, we cannot generalize base on the majority of religions in the Philippines
because even some individuals facing marital challenges within the confines of a
religious framework may experience internal conflicts and emotional distress. Insisting
on the preservation of marriage solely for religious reasons can lead to prolonged
suffering, perpetuating an environment that may be detrimental to the mental and
emotional health of those involved. Moreover, the understanding and interpretation of
religious teachings on divorce vary widely among religious denominations and individual
believers. Many religious communities recognize that compassion and understanding
should guide the application of religious principles, and rigid adherence to a no-divorce
stance may not account for the diverse circumstances individuals face. But that not
always the case, individuals can still prioritize their commitment to religious values while
also acknowledging the need for personal well-being. Religious teachings often
emphasize love, compassion, and understanding, values that can extend to decisions
 aimed at fostering individual happiness and a healthier family environment. Additionally,
society evolves, and interpretations of religious teachings may adapt over time. Some
religious communities have become more inclusive and understanding of the
complexities surrounding divorce, recognizing the importance of supporting individuals
in their pursuit of a balanced and fulfilling life.

Financial Impact: Divorce often leads to financial strain, as couples have to divide assets,
potentially face alimony or child support payments, and maintain separate households. This
financial burden can be a significant downside to divorce.

● Rebuttal: Divorce involves the division of assets, it also allows individuals to regain
control over their financial futures. This newfound autonomy can enable them to make
independent financial decisions, pursue career opportunities, and allocate resources
based on personal priorities. In many cases, the long-term financial independence
achieved through divorce can outweigh the short-term challenges. Moreover, financial
considerations should not overshadow the importance of emotional and mental
well-being. Staying in a marriage solely for financial reasons can lead to a compromised
quality of life, potential resentment, and increased stress. Recognizing the value of
personal happiness and mental health is paramount, and divorcing to achieve a healthier
emotional state may justify the associated financial adjustments. The financial impact of
divorce is not solely negative. While there may be initial challenges, individuals often
find ways to rebuild their financial stability. Pursuing education, career advancement,
and adapting to a changed financial landscape are common outcomes that can lead to
long-term financial success.

Impact on Mental Health: Divorce can have a detrimental effect on the mental health of
individuals, leading to increased stress, anxiety, and depression. The emotional toll of ending a
marriage may outweigh the perceived benefits of pursuing personal happiness.

● Rebuttal: It is inevitable that divorce may initially cause stress, anxiety, and depression,
staying in an unhappy or unhealthy marriage can have equally, if not more, severe
consequences for mental well-being. The chronic stress and emotional strain resulting
from a troubled marriage can lead to long-term mental health issues, and divorce may
provide relief from such sustained distress. Moreover, the negative mental health
outcomes associated with divorce are not universal. Many individuals experience a
period of emotional healing and personal growth after divorce. With the right support
systems, therapy, and self-care, individuals can navigate the challenges and emerge
stronger, more resilient, and with improved mental well-being.
Commitment and Perseverance: Marriage is a commitment that requires perseverance through
tough times. Advocates for this viewpoint argue that couples should work through challenges
and develop resilience, rather than giving up when facing difficulties.

● Rebuttal: Advocating for unwavering perseverance may inadvertently perpetuate

unhealthy relationships marked by toxicity, abuse, or irreconcilable differences. In
instances where a marriage becomes detrimental to the mental, emotional, or physical
well-being of one or both partners, persevering at all costs can hinder personal growth
and lead to prolonged suffering. Furthermore, the emphasis on commitment should not
overshadow the potential for personal development that can arise from navigating life's
challenges independently. The notion that ending a marriage equates to giving up may
disregard the resilience and strength required to make the difficult decision to pursue a
different path for the sake of personal well-being. In some cases, individuals may evolve
in ways that lead them down divergent paths, and insisting on perpetual commitment
may hinder the natural progression of personal development and fulfillment. Also, the
belief that ending a marriage is synonymous with giving up does not acknowledge the
efforts and emotional work that often precede the decision to divorce. Individuals may
exhaust all possibilities, including counseling and compromise, before recognizing that
separation is the most responsible and healthiest choice for both parties involved.

Social Stigma: Divorce can still carry a social stigma in some communities or cultures. Individuals
may face judgement, isolation, or discrimination, which could be a deterrent for pursuing
divorce, even in unhealthy relationships.

● Rebuttal: Perpetuating the social stigma around divorce contributes to a culture of

silence and shame, preventing individuals from seeking support or making decisions that
align with their best interests. Creating open dialogues about the complexities of
relationships and acknowledging that divorce can be a responsible and courageous
choice is crucial in challenging and changing societal attitudes. Education and awareness
campaigns can help dispel myths surrounding divorce and highlight the various reasons
individuals may choose to end a marriage, emphasizing that it is not always indicative of
personal failure or irresponsibility. Additionally, highlighting positive stories of
individuals who have navigated divorce and emerged stronger can serve as powerful
counter-narratives to prevailing stigmas. Sharing diverse experiences fosters a more
nuanced understanding of the challenges and opportunities associated with divorce,
reducing the isolation felt by those facing societal judgment.
Impact on Extended Family: Counterargument: Divorce doesn't just affect the couple involved; it
has a ripple effect on extended family members. Children, in particular, may have strained
relationships with grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins as a result of the divorce.

● Rebuttal: An assumption that divorce inevitably leads to strained relationships does not
account for the resilience and adaptability inherent in many family structures. Open
communication among family members, especially parents, can play a pivotal role in
helping children understand the changes and maintaining healthy connections with
extended family members. Divorce can provide an opportunity for extended family
members to offer support and stability during a challenging time. Grandparents, aunts,
uncles, and cousins can become pillars of strength, providing emotional support and
guidance to children as they adapt to the new family dynamics.

Effects on Future Relationships: Counterargument: Divorce can impact an individual's ability to

form stable, long-term relationships in the future. Some argue that those who have experienced
divorce may be hesitant to commit fully, fearing a repeat of past failures.

● Rebuttal: Divorce can provide valuable lessons and insights that contribute to personal
development. Individuals who have experienced divorce may gain a deeper
understanding of their needs, preferences, and communication styles, fostering
self-awareness that can enhance the success of future relationships. Moreover, the
assumption that divorce inherently leads to commitment issues overlooks the resilience
and adaptability of individuals. Many people actively engage in self-reflection,
counselling, or therapy after a divorce to address challenges and develop the emotional
intelligence necessary for healthy future relationships. The stigma surrounding divorce
has diminished over time, allowing for more understanding and acceptance in society.
Many individuals who have experienced divorce find that potential partners are
increasingly open to understanding the complexities of past relationships, recognizing
that personal growth often arises from challenging life experiences.

Cultural and Legal Variations: Counterargument: Divorce laws and cultural perceptions vary
widely across different societies. What may be acceptable in one culture might be frowned
upon in another. Therefore, advocating for divorce as a universally positive option may not
consider these variations.

● Rebuttal: Acknowledging cultural variations does not undermine the positive aspects of
divorce but emphasizes the need for a culturally sensitive approach. Understanding that
societal norms and legal frameworks differ allows for the development of tailored
 strategies and support systems that align with the values and expectations of diverse
communities. Advocating for divorce as a positive option does not imply imposing a
particular cultural viewpoint on others. Instead, it encourages individuals to assess their
unique circumstances and make decisions that align with their well-being, while
respecting the cultural context in which those decisions are made. By fostering
understanding and challenging stigmas associated with divorce, societies can work
towards creating more inclusive and supportive environments for individuals navigating
this complex life transition.

SUMMARY

The affirmative side is in favour for the legalization of divorce in the Philippines due to it
promising benefits to both party in marriage. Rooted in the principle of individual autonomy,
proponents emphasize that legalizing divorce provides a streamlined and accessible avenue for
couples to end untenable marriages, contrasting with the intricate and financially burdensome
processes of annulment or nullity of marriage. The proposed legislation is viewed as a means to
ensure equitable distribution of property, protect the rights of all parties involved, and promote
healthier family dynamics through comprehensive provisions for child support and custody
arrangements. Drawing on positive outcomes observed in other countries, supporters believe
that legalizing divorce contributes to increased female labor force participation, improved
long-term marriage quality, higher household savings, and reduced instances of domestic
violence and female suicide. Ultimately, the affirmative stance underscores the importance of
respecting personal choices, empowering individuals to pursue paths that lead to happiness and
fulfillment, and aligning with contemporary values that prioritize individual agency within
marital relationships.
REFERENCES:

CEDadiantiTyClea. (2022, April 7). The Philippines is right to reject divorce.

BusinessWorld Online.
https://www.bworldonline.com/opinion/2022/04/07/441032/the-philippines-is-right-to-reject-
divorce/#google_vignette
Reasons for and against divorce. (2017, April 16). HuffPost.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/reasons-for-and-against_b_9702398
Custodio, J. (2018). Acknowledgment of Divorce in the Philippines. HG.org. Retrieved
from
[HG.org](https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/acknowledgment-of-divorce-in-the-philippines-2009
0)
Divorce in the Philippines. (n.d.). Wikipedia. Retrieved from
[Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divorce_in_the_Philippines)
Fernandez, A. (2015). A World of Pain for Divorce Seekers in the Philippines. The Atlantic.
Retrieved from [The
Atlantic](https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/06/divorce-philippines-annul
ment/396449/)
IGG - Institute for Geoinformatics and Geography. (n.d.). Divorce Prohibition in the
Philippines: A System Serving the Patriarchy. Retrieved from
[IGG](https://igg-geo.org/en/divorce-prohibition-in-the-philippines-a-system-serving-the-patria
rchy/)
IPL.org. (n.d.). Advantages Of Divorce In The Philippines - 1222 Words. Retrieved from
[IPL.org](https://www.ipl.org/essay/Advantages-Of-Divorce-In-The-Philippines-FJJCLQL2NSG)
Lagman, J. D., Castro, G. S., & Castro, R. (2020). The Rise of Divorce, Separation, and
Cohabitation in the Philippines. Demographic Research, 43, 1397–1428. [Demographic
Research](https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol36/50/36-50.pdf)
Statista. (2023). Philippines: Opinion on Passing the Divorce Bill 2019-2021. Retrieved
from
[Statista](https://www.statista.com/statistics/1338694/philippines-opinion-on-passing-the-divo
rce-bill/)
World Data Lab. (n.d.). Divorce Rates in the World. Retrieved from
[Divorce.com](https://divorce.com/blog/divorce-rates-in-the-world/)
Our World in Data. (n.d.). Marriages and Divorces. Retrieved from [Our World in
Data](https://ourworldindata.org/marriages-and-divorces)
Unified Lawyers. (n.d.). Global Divorce Rates Statistics. Retrieved from [Unified
Lawyers](https://www.unifiedlawyers.com.au/blog/global-divorce-rates-statistics/)
 Cision News. (2023). Data Analysts on World Divorce Rates: Ranking of Countries from
Highest to Lowest Risk of Getting Divorced. Retrieved from
[Cision](https://news.cision.com/abcd-agency-ug/r/data-analysts-on-world-divorce-rates--ranki
ng-of-countries-from-highest-to-lowest-risk-of-getting-di,c3747396)
OECD. (2022). Marriage and Divorce Rates. Retrieved from
[OECD](https://www.oecd.org/els/family/SF_3_1_Marriage_and_divorce_rates.pdf)
My Houston Divorce Lawyer. (n.d.). Christian divorce rates. Retrieved from
https://www.myhoustondivorce.lawyer/christian-divorce/rates/
Wikipedia. (n.d.). Christian views on divorce. Retrieved from
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_views_on_divorce
Wise Voter. (n.d.). Divorce rate by country. Retrieved from
https://wisevoter.com/country-rankings/divorce-rate-by-country/
Wikipedia. (n.d.). Religion and divorce. Retrieved from
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_and_divorce
Divorce.com. (n.d.). Divorce rates in the world. Retrieved from
https://divorce.com/blog/divorce-rates-in-the-world/
Xinhua Net. (2018, March 9). Divorce becomes legal in the Philippines.
http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2018-03/09/c_137028037.htm
The New York Times. (2023, November 4). Philippines, Last Holdout Against Divorce,
Takes Step to Legalize It.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/04/world/asia/philippines-divorce-illegal-legislation.html
Rappler. (2023). Legalizing divorce in the Philippines: Survey (September 30 - October 4,
2023).
https://www.rappler.com/philippines/legalizing-divorce-survey-september-30-october-4-2023-o
cta-research/
Statista. (n.d.). Philippines: Opinion on passing the divorce bill as of 2023.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1338694/philippines-opinion-on-passing-the-divorce-bill/
Manila Bulletin. (2023, December 4). Octa survey: 51% of Filipinos oppose legalizing
divorce. https://mb.com.ph/2023/12/4/octa-survey-51-of-filipinos-oppose-legalizing-divorce