While it is important to acknowledge the adverse effects of parental divorce on a child's educational

attainment. The paragraph presents a study that delves into the experiences and perceptions of women
in cohabitation in the Philippines regarding the legalization of divorce. The study employs a qualitative
research design and grounded theory analysis method to gather insights from participants. The research
uncovers three key factors family history, religion, and outside sources that shape the participants' views
on divorce. Additionally, it highlights a notable contrast in how married women and single women in
cohabitation perceive marriage. However, this perception of marriage doesn't seem to significantly
influence their stance on divorce. Most notably, the majority of participants expressed support for the
legalization of divorce, particularly in cases involving abusive relationships (Collantes et al. 2023). This
study is crucial in several ways. First, it recognizes the importance of understanding the unique
perspectives of women in cohabitation in a context where divorce is not yet legal. By focusing on this
specific demographic, the research brings to light the experiences of those who might be most directly
affected by such a change in legislation. This insight can inform future policy decisions and help address
the specific needs and concerns of this group. The revelation of the three key factors influencing
participants' views - family history, religion, and outside sources underscores the complex nature of
people's attitudes towards divorce. It indicates that these women's perspectives are not formed in
isolation but are deeply rooted in their personal histories, religious beliefs, and external influences. This
understanding is crucial for policymakers, as it highlights the need to approach the issue of divorce
legalization with sensitivity to these multifaceted influences. The finding of differing perceptions of
marriage between married and cohabiting women is an intriguing observation.

It suggests that there might be unique challenges and dynamics within cohabitating relationships in the
context of the Philippines. While this difference doesn't directly impact their views on divorce, it implies
that there may be particular nuances in the relationships of women in cohabitation that deserve further
exploration and consideration. The most striking revelation is the overwhelming support for the
legalization of divorce, particularly in cases of abusive relationships. This finding not only sheds light on
the urgent need for legal reforms in the Philippines but also underscores the importance of providing a
safety net for individuals trapped in abusive marriages. The study contributes to the ongoing discourse
on the topic and could serve as valuable evidence for advocates and policymakers working toward the
legalization of divorce in the country. In conclusion, this study is a significant contribution to our
understanding of the complex issue of divorce legalization in the Philippines, with a specific focus on the
perspectives of women in cohabitation. It emphasizes the importance of considering their unique
experiences, the multifaceted influences that shape their views, and the urgent need for legal reforms to
protect those in abusive relationships. This research highlights the necessity of taking a comprehensive
and empathetic approach to this social and legal issue, recognizing the nuances and challenges faced by
those directly impacted.
The argument presented in this paragraph advocates for the reintroduction of absolute divorce into
Philippine law, and it does so from several compelling angles, including legal, pragmatic, and rights-based
perspectives.

First and foremost, it is essential to address the historical context outlined in the paragraph. The
Philippines, like many other countries, once had provisions for absolute divorce, both during pre-colonial
times and the Japanese occupation. This historical perspective highlights that the absence of absolute
divorce is not a longstanding tradition in the country, and it suggests that legal changes can and should
adapt to evolving societal needs and values. From a legal perspective, the argument makes a strong case
for the reintroduction of absolute divorce by pointing out that it would strengthen the institution of the
family. While some opponents of divorce may argue that it weakens families, the thesis contends that in
cases of irreparable marital conflict, divorce can offer a more amicable and constructive way to dissolve a
marriage. By providing a legal process for divorce, the state can regulate and oversee the separation,
ensuring fair treatment of both parties and safeguarding the interests of any children involved.

Furthermore, the argument asserts that the absence of absolute divorce is discriminatory based on
social class, religion, and nationality. This is a powerful point that underlines the unequal treatment of
different groups within Philippine society. While Muslims and foreigners are allowed access to absolute
divorce, the majority of Filipino citizens are denied this right. Such discrimination undermines the
principles of equality and justice. The thesis also argues that the current legal framework, which includes
nullity, annulment, and legal separation, is inadequate in addressing the complex and varied situations of
married couples. These alternatives can be costly, time-consuming, and emotionally draining. Absolute
divorce can provide a more efficient and straightforward solution for couples who genuinely wish to end
their marriages. Importantly, the thesis emphasizes that the reintroduction of absolute divorce aligns
with international human rights obligations. Many international human rights agreements support the
right to marry and the right to divorce. The absence of an option for absolute divorce in Philippine law
could be viewed as a failure to meet these obligations (Library and Archives Canada, 2019).
Reintroducing divorce would bring the Philippines in line with international standards and human rights
principles. Finally, the argument touches upon the critical issue of spousal violence. It suggests that
divorce can serve as a preventive measure against domestic abuse. By providing an accessible route out
of an abusive marriage, divorce can protect vulnerable individuals, particularly women, from further
harm. This is a compelling argument for introducing a legal option for absolute divorce.

In conclusion, the thesis for the reintroduction of absolute divorce in the Philippines is built on solid
legal, pragmatic, and rights based grounds. It acknowledges the historical context and highlights the
benefits of divorce for families, the legal framework, and human rights compliance. Moreover, it
underscores the discriminatory nature of the existing legal system and its potential to address issues
related to spousal violence. These arguments collectively make a persuasive case for the Philippines to
consider revising its stance on divorce and to provide its citizens with the option of absolute divorce.
References:

Collantes, A. J. A. (2023, January 1). “Divorce in the eyes of women": Examining the

experience of women in cohabitation that shapes their perception of the legalization of

divorce. http://dspace.cas.upm.edu.ph/xmlui/handle/123456789/2402

Library and Archives Canada. (2022, September 1). Item – Theses Canada.

https://library-archives.canada.ca/eng/services/services-libraries/theses/Pages/item.aspx?

idNumber=1032963815