Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Advanced Informatics School, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 541000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
skhan2@live.utm.my, {nzairah,nurazean.kl}@utm.my
1 Introduction
In recent years the development of e-government services has migrated from static
websites to social media [1]. Social media is defined by Harris and Rea [2] as “the
perceived second generation of web development and design which facilitates secure
online communication, information sharing, interoperability and collaboration on world
wide web”. Unlike static government websites based on one-way interaction, social
media provides more interactive features for citizens’ to understand e-government and
serves as a two-way dialogue channel between government and public [1]. Social media
enables users to generate their content and share up-to-date information in real time
environment. Government organizations need to wait for citizens to visit their e-govern‐
ment websites. On the contrary using social media sites can allow government organi‐
zations to reach closer to their citizens. Government organizations around the world
have started using social media to rebuild their relationship with citizens’ and increase
their level of engagement and participation. Social media is easily accessible and very
cheap to afford now days. This is particularly important in developing countries that do
not have a dedicated online portal for public consultation [3, 4]. According to the latest
survey of United Nations, 152 out of 193 UN countries (four out of five) offer social
networking features on their national portals [4]. Government organizations use social
media for various functions but not limited to communicating current events, disaster
and disease alerts, weather reporting, disseminating awareness about various govern‐
ment jobs, education, tourism, law enforcement, political campaigns etc. [3, 5].
However, despite of having the popularity of social media among governments, its
acceptance among citizens’ is still a serious issue [6]. The efforts of government organ‐
izations and potential value of social media cannot be displayed without addressing
citizens trust to use these services [1, 3].
Trust is a major concern that develops citizens willingness to participate with
government and use its electronic services. Previous studies have confirmed the
significant role of trust in citizens’ adoption of e-government service [6, 7].
According to Al-Khouri [8] developing trust is the most important parameter to
promote citizens’ participation in e-government services. However, there is limited
prior focus on how to generate citizens’ trust to increase their level of participation
in these services [7]. Previous studies have not paid much attention in context of
using social media as a technology for e-government services, especially in a devel‐
oping country like Pakistan. Though a few studies have highlighted the significance
of trust as an essential determinant for citizen-government engagement through
social media [3, 9]. However, there is lack of thorough investigation to identify the
factors that can generate citizens’ trust in context of using social media for e-govern‐
ment services. This paper fills this gap and examines citizens’ trust factors from
multiple perspectives. A model will be proposed to identify those factors that may
impact citizens’ trust to use social media for e-government services. The identifica‐
tion of these factors will assist government organizations in understanding citizens’
trust aspects to use these services. This will help to strengthen collaboration and
engagement of government organizations with citizen’s in a more transparent and
cost-effective way.
2 Methodology
This section discusses different concepts of trust and related studies for establishing the
background and context of this paper.
1004 S. Khan et al.
Trust is a very rich concept that covers a wide range of relationships with a variety of
objects. Trust has been defined as the willingness of one party to depends on unfamiliar
party where the trustor does not have credible meaningful information or bonds with
trusted party [14]. There are two targets trust in online services. The entity providing
services and the mechanism through which service is provided. Therefore, it’s important
that characteristics of both vendor and the supporting technological platform should be
considered before using any service [15]. The literature shows that majority of previous
studies have addressed technical aspect of technology and government factors as impor‐
tant antecedents of trust in e-government services [7]. Some previous studies have also
reflected perceived risk as an important factor influencing trust, along with technical and
government factors [7, 16]. Though citizen aspect was also discussed by some
Towards the Development of a Citizens’ Trust Model 1005
researchers but has not been addressed thoroughly with other trust factors in context of
e-government services [7]. There are very few studies that have also used multidimen‐
sional approach to highlight factors influencing trust. For example, Beldad, Geest [17]
categorized trust in online environment into three dimensions: which are Internet user
based, Organization based and Web based determinants of trust in online Environment.
Similarly, Alzahrani, Al-Karaghouli [7] added four factors in their framework to identify
antecedents of citizens trust in e-government services, which are technology, govern‐
ment agencies, perceived risk and citizens’ characteristics. However, those studies were
limited on e-government websites using general technological characteristics of internet.
Social media involves a variety of information from various sources and is likely to be
more sensitive and risky than e-government websites. Although being a relatively new
approach of e-government practice, there is some prior research on social media in
government [18]. Trust has been highlighted as a significant contributor on citizens
intention to use social media for communicating with government organizations. For
example ALotaibi, Ramachandran [9] mentioned public trust as an important dimension
of government-public relationship in using government social media services. Similarly,
Park, Kang [3] also emphasized that building citizen’s trust is very critical in commu‐
nication of government organizations through social media. Table 1 shows antecedents
of trust discussed in previous studies from multiple perspectives including technology,
risk, government and citizens factors.
The literature reflects that that focus of majority of previous studies was only on
technological and government factors with a very little attention on other aspects of
citizen’s trust. In addition, the factors were selected randomly without any proper cate‐
gorization in most of the previous studies. Though few studies used multiple perspec‐
tives of trust, but their research was limited on e- government websites. There are very
few studies in context of citizens trust to use social media for government services.
Therefore, this can be argued that there is a missing gap of research to examine antece‐
dents of citizen’s trust from multiple perspectives in context of using social media for
e-government services.
4 Proposed Model
An integrated model has been developed to provide a holistic view of influential factors
on citizen’s trust leading towards their intention to participate in government social
media services as illustrated in Fig. 1. The theoretical foundation of this model is based
on two streams of literature: i.e. TAM (Technology acceptance model) and the relevant
literature on multiple trust aspects. The connections between trust and TAM has been
validated in majority of previous literature showing a significant relationship of PEOU
(perceived ease of use) and PU (perceived usefulness) with trust in online environment
[34, 35]. This paper contributes in identifying antecedents of trust in context of using
social media for e-government services where there is hardly any thorough model avail‐
able in previous research. Furthermore, this paper also adds a factor of culture as ante‐
cedent of trust which must not be ignored to ensure the success of an e-government
initiative [9]. The model illustrated in Fig. 1 provides a comprehensive understanding
of citizen’s trust factors from multiple trust perspectives including individual
Towards the Development of a Citizens’ Trust Model 1007
characteristics, government factors, risk factors, culture and social media characteristics.
These perspectives are discussed as under:
Individual Characteristics
H1
Disposition to Trust
Government Factors
H2
Ability
Benevolence
H3
Integrity
H4
Risk Factors
H5
Privacy risk
Trust in Government H 14
H6
Security risk Social media services
H7
Culture Intention to participate
H 13
Uncertainty avoidance
H8
Perceived Usefulness H 15
Social media Characteristics
H9
Structural Assurances
H 11
Information Quality H 10
H 12
Perceived ease of use
Risk is an important determinant that can negatively influence citizens’ behavior to trust
in online government services [10]. In context of e-government, the technological risks
such as privacy and security have been identified as the most significant factors influ‐
encing citizens’ trust towards adoption of these services [7, 26]. Therefore, this paper
also considers security and privacy as antecedents of citizens’ trust in using social media
for e-government services.
4.4 Culture
5 Discussion
This paper proposes an integrated model of citizens’ trust in context of using social
media for e-government services. This model contributes to provide a multidimensional
perspective of citizens’ trust including individual characteristics, government factors,
risk factors, culture and social media characteristics. There is hardly any previous thor‐
ough model available in this context. In addition, this model also includes a very impor‐
tant dimension of culture to determine its relationship with citizens’ trust towards
government social media services.
There are several research and practical implications of this study. This paper fills
the research gap due to lack of studies in context of using social media for e-government
services. Further the proposed model is intended to be empirically examined in Pakistan.
Being a developing country where the citizens’ participation with government is at a
very low level, government organizations are required to introduce the concept of using
social media for government services and encourage citizens to use these services. The
results can assist them to gain citizens trust and increase their participation in govern‐
ment social media services. Though the scope of this study is limited in Pakistan, but
we believe with confidence that the results can be further enhanced and generalized in
other contexts as well.
6 Conclusion
While majority of previous studies in relationship of trust between people and govern‐
ment were conducted on e-government websites, this paper presents multiple antece‐
dents of citizens’ trust in context of using social media for e-government services. The
constructs were extracted based on their causal relationships that were empirically
1010 S. Khan et al.
validated in multiple contexts in previous studies. This paper is an attempt to fill the
literature gap due to lack of studies in context of using social media for government
services especially in a developing country like Pakistan. The proposed model can be
used by both researchers and practitioners to analyze and suggest recommendation to
enhance citizens’ trust in using government social media services.
References
1. Hao, X., Zheng, D., Zeng, Q.: How to strenghthen social media interactivity of e-government.
Online Inf. Rev. 40(1), 79–96 (2016)
2. Harris, A.L., Rea, A.: Web 2.0 and virtual world technologies: a growing impact on IS
education. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 20(2), 137–144 (2009)
3. Park, M.J., Kang, D., Rho, J.J., Lee, D.H.: Policy role of social media in developing public
trust: twitter communication with government leaders. Publ. Manag. Rev. 18(9), 1265–1288
(2016)
4. UNPAN: United Nations E-government Survey. The Department of Economic and Social
Affairs, New York (2016)
5. Park, M.J., Choi, H., Kim, S.K., Rho, J.J.: Trust in government’s social media service and
citizen’s patronage behavior. Telemat. Inform. 32(4), 629–641 (2015)
6. Alharbi, A., Kang, K., Hawryszkiewycz, I.: The influence of trust and subjective norms on
citizens intentions to engage in E-participation on E-government websites. In: Australian
Conference on Information Systems (2015)
7. Alzahrani, L., Al-Karaghouli, W., Weerakkody, V.: Analysing the critical factors influencing
trust in e-government adoption from citizens’ perspective: a systematic review and a
conceptual framework. Int. Bus. Rev. 26(1), 164–175 (2017)
8. Al-Khouri, A.M.: E-government in Arab countries: a 6-staged roadmap to develop the public
sector. J. Manag. Strategy 4(1), 80 (2013)
9. Alotaibi, R.M., Ramachandran, M., Kor, A.-L., Hosseinian-Far, A.: Factors affecting
citizens’ use of social media to communicate with the government: a proposed model.
Electron. J. e-Gov. 14(1), 60 (2016)
10. Rehman, M., Esichaikul, V., Kamal, M.: Factors influencing e-government adoption in
Pakistan. Transforming Gov. People Process Policy 6(3), 258–282 (2012)
11. Susanto, T.D., Aljoza, M.: Individual acceptance of e-government services in a developing
country: dimensions of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use and the importance
of trust and social influence. Proc. Comput. Sci. 72, 622–629 (2015)
12. Haider, Z., Shuwen, C., Lalani, F., Mangi, A.A.: Adoption of e-government in Pakistan:
supply perspective. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 6, 55–63 (2015)
13. Yusuf, A.: State of social media in Pakistan. https://propakistani.pk/2016/01/26/state-of-
social-media-in-pakistan-in-2016/. Accessed 15 July 2016
14. McKnight, D.H., Choudhury, V., Kacmar, C.: Developing and validating trust measures for
e-commerce: an integrative typology. Inf. Syst. Res. 13(3), 334–359 (2002)
15. Bélanger, F., Carter, L.: Trust and risk in e-government adoption. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 17(2),
165–176 (2008)
16. Ranaweera, H.M.B.P.: Perspective of trust towards e-government initiatives in Sri Lanka.
SpringerPlus 5(1), 22 (2016)
17. Beldad, A., Geest, T., Jong, M., Steehouder, M.: A cue or two and I’ll trust you: determinants
of trust in government organizations in terms of their processing and usage of citizens personal
information disclosed online. Gov. Inf. Q. 29, 41 (2012)
Towards the Development of a Citizens’ Trust Model 1011
18. Warren, A.M., Sulaiman, A., Jaafar, N.I.: Social media effects on fostering online civic
engagement and building citizen trust and trust in institutions. Gov. Inf. Q. 31(2), 291–301
(2014)
19. Rodrigues, G., Sarabdeen, J., Balasubramanian, S.: Factors that influence consumer adoption
of e-government services in the UAE: a UTAUT model perspective. J. Internet Commer.
15(1), 18–39 (2016)
20. Weerakkody, V., et al.: Are U.K. citizens satisfied with e-government services? Identifying
and testing antecedents of satisfaction. Inf. Syst. Manag. 33(4), 331–343 (2016)
21. Lorenzo-Romero, C., Chiappa, G., Alarcon-del-Amo, M.: The users adoption and usage of
social network sites: an empirical investigation in the context of Italy. In: International
Marketing Trends Conference, Italy (2013)
22. Mohajerani, S., Shahrekordi, S.Z., Azarlo, M.: The impact of privacy and security concerns,
trust in technology and information quality on trust in e-government and intention to use e-
government. In: 9th International Conference on e-Commerce in Developing Countries: With
Focus on e-Business (ECDC). IEEE (2015)
23. Wang, T., Lu, Y.: Determinants of trust in e-government. In: International Conference on
Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering (CiSE) (2010)
24. Zhao, F., Khan, M.S.: An empirical study of e-government service adoption: culture and
behavioral intention. Int. J. Publ. Adm. 36(10), 710–722 (2013)
25. Alsaghier, H., Hussain, R.: Conceptualization of trust in the e-government context: a
qualitative analysis. In: Active Citizen Participation in E-Government: A Global Perspective,
pp. 528–557. IGI Global (2012)
26. Abu-Shanab, E.: Antecedents of trust in e-government services: an empirical test in Jordan.
Transform. Gov. People Process Policy 8(4), 480–499 (2014)
27. Colesca, S.E.: Understanding trust in e-government. Eng. Econ. 63(4), 7 (2009)
28. Carter, L., Weerakkody, V., Phillips, B., Dwivedi, Y.K.: Citizen adoption of e-government
services: exploring citizen perceptions of online services in the United States and United
Kingdom. Inf. Syst. Manag. 33(2), 124–140 (2016)
29. Colquitt, J.A., Scott, B.A., LePine, J.A.: Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: a meta-
analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. J. Appl.
Psychol. 92(4), 909 (2007)
30. Fuller, M.A., Serva, M.A., Baroudi, J.: Clarifying the integration of trust and TAM in e-
commerce environments: implications for systems design and management. IEEE Trans. Eng.
Manag. 57(3), 380–393 (2010)
31. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H.: The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for
management: a field quasi-experiment. J. Appl. Psychol. 84(1), 123 (1999)
32. Ayyash, M.M., Ahmad, K., Singh, D.: Investigating the effect of information systems factors
on trust in e-government initiative adoption in Palestinian public sector. Res. J. Appl. Sci.
Eng. Technol. 5(15), 3865–3875 (2013)
33. Alam, S.S., Ahmad, M., Khatibi, A.A., Ahsan, M.N.: Factors affecting trust in publishing
personal information in online social network: an empirical study of Malaysia’s Klang Valley
users. Geogr. Malays. J. Soc. Space 12(2), 132–143 (2016)
34. Belanche, D., Casaló, L.V., Flavián, C.: Integrating trust and personal values into the
technology acceptance model: the case of e-government services adoption. Cuadernos de
Economía y Dirección de la Empresa 15(4), 192–204 (2012)
35. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W.: Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated
model. MIS Q. 27(1), 51–90 (2003)
1012 S. Khan et al.
36. Kivijari, H., Leppanen, A., Hallikainen, P.: Technology trust: from antecedents to perceived
performance effects. In: 46th International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer
Society, Hawaii (2013)
37. Pennington, R., Wilcox, H.D., Grover, V.: The role of system trust in business-to-consumer
transactions. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 20(3), 197–226 (2003)
38. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four
longitudinal field studies. Manag. Sci. 46(2), 186–204 (2000)
39. Tung, F.-C., Chang, S.-C., Chou, C.-M.: An extension of trust and TAM model with IDT in
the adoption of the electronic logistics information system in HIS in the medical industry.
Int. J. Med. Inform. 77(5), 324–335 (2008)
40. Yoo, D.-H., Ko, D.-S., Yeo, I.-S.: Effect of user’s trust in usefulness, attitude and intention
for mobile sports content services. J. Phys. Educ. Sport 17, 92 (2017)
41. Doney, P.M., Cannon, J.P., Mullen, M.R.: Understanding the influence of national culture on
the development of trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23(3), 601–620 (1998)
42. Xin, H., Techatassanasoontorn, A.A., Tan, F.B.: Antecedents of consumer trust in mobile
payment adoption. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 55(4), 1–10 (2015)
43. Gefen, D., Heart, T.H.: On the need to include national culture as a central issue in e-commerce
trust beliefs. J. Glob. Inf. Manag. (JGIM) 14(4), 1–30 (2006)
44. Hofstede, G.: Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. McGraw Hill, New York
(1997)
45. Srite, M., Karahanna, E.: The role of espoused national cultural values in technology
acceptance. MIS Q. 30, 679–704 (2006)