Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Table of contents
1. Multiculturalism in Britain vs in the USA
2. Prejudice
3. Racism
4. Migration: push & pull factors
5. British immigration vs American immigration
6. Easter Europeans in the UK vs Hispanics in America
7. USA: melting pot or salad bowl?
8. Acculturation vs Assimilation
9. Example: Acculturation in "My Son the Fanatic"
10. My Son the Fanatic by Hanif Kureishi
1
Prejudice One-track mind & Stereotypes
“Britishness" the pride in the British values A one-track mind refers to someone who is excessively
• immigrants are a danger for the UK focused on one particular thing, idea, or perspective to the
• change society and traditions exclusion of others.
→ Britain becomes less and less british
• steal the jobs Stereotypes are generalisations or assumptions made
• only want to take advantage of the social about a group of people based on their race, gender,
security and health system ethnicity, religion, or other characteristics. They are often
• are criminal based on limited or incomplete information & can be
inaccurate and harmful.
Second generation immigrants
• live in two different cultures ➯ Stereotypes often arise from a one-track mind
→ problem of identity perspective: When individuals rely on a narrow set of
• at home → culture of family assumptions/experiences to inform their views of a
→ distance particular group, they may overlook the diversity and
→ not speaking the native language complexity of that group, and may be more likely to rely on
→ never visited the country simplistic or harmful stereotypes.
• school & free time → British culture ➯ Stereotypes can reinforce a one-track mind, as
individuals who hold stereotypes may be less likely to seek
out diverse perspectives or challenge their existing beliefs.
Racism
Definition: “prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism by an individual, community, or institution against a
person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that
is a minority or marginalised.” (Oxford Languages)
2
Racism as a topic in “Shooting an Elephant”
• Colonialism: the protagonist works as a sub-divisional police officer of Moulmein, a town of the British
colony Burma
• He is harassed by the Burmese and they treat him and all other Europeans with disrespect although not
openly rebelling against them → he describes this as an “anti-European feeling” (p. 7, ll. 4f.)
• He gets to see the “dirty work of Empire” (p. 8, l.1): prisoners in cages & men who got struck with bamboos
→ “intolerable sense of guilt” (l. 6)
• the protagonist feels stuck between his “hatred of the empire” (p. 8, l. 13), his sense against the
“oppressors, the British” (p. 7, l. 23) and his “rage” (p. 8, l. 13) against the Burmese constantly insulting him
• All in all: highly racist treatment of the native inhabitants of Burma, their rage against their oppressors
(“discrimination” of European people) results out of a feeling of powerlessness towards them
Migration
Push factors Pull factors
British immigration
1. The Windrush generation in the late 40's:
• 1948: the generation was named after the ship (West Indies (Jamaica))
• They had no jobs, wanted better opportunities
• Jamaica was too small
• They helped to rebuild Britain after the Second World War, where prior in the service in the armed
forces
• Expected a better life
• Had no friends, had to deal with racism, they refused to exit, the race relation act in 1965 helped them
out
• They joined the armed forces because it dealt as an equal opportunity for them in front of their
employers
2. Asian immigration in the late 60's
3. Gast European workers after 2000
Pro Contra
• Immigrants helped to restore the original order in • Immigrants steal the jobs of the real British
Britain after the 2nd world war people → now low skilled jobs
• more successful because of many immigrants, • EU migrants push down wages & make it more
many different mindsets difficult for low-skilled UK workers to get jobs
• EU migrants are more productive & have little • Immigration from the EU is a threat to security,
negative impact on jobs and wages making it easier for terrorists & criminals to
• Immigration is not a threat to security: the UK has enter the UK
the powers to block terrorists & criminals from • Multiculturalism → doesn't need more culture
entering the UK
3
American immigration
• 19th century = immigration of European immigrants
• 20th century:
• first half → people escaping the communism (Russian/Asian)
• then → massive Chinese immigration, Hispanics, Koreans, Japanese mixed century
(marked by both world wars and mass killing on Jews)
• 1965: main influx of Asians after 2nd world war & Quatas Act
Pro Contra
• Needed for economic reasons • Could be terrorists
(agricultural, construction jobs = low-skilled jobs) • Take away jobs
• Do jobs nobody else wants to do (menial jobs) • Live on the taxpayers' money
• Work hard to make a living, to make ends meet • Commit crimes
• Pay taxes • They change the neighbourhood it becomes less
• Boost the economy because they increase demand valuable
• They are needed in many areas like agriculture • Foreigners don't want to integrate themselves
(fruit pickers, cleaning services, nannies) • Immigrants don't want to learn the language
• Integrate quickly because they (still) believe in the
American Dream
• America has always been a country of immigrants
• Learn the language
Thoughts on the UK/US • life in the UK is not better • thankful for current situation
• miserable living conditions • would not recommend coming to the US
• many immigrants went back to • Americans are always in a rush and
Poland working too much
Thoughts on home country • life in Poland is better • people were happier and less stressed in
• after 2007 migration decreased Mexico
because of economic growth and less • even if you were poor you would give to
unemployment in Poland those who had less
4
USA — Melting Pot or Salad Bowl?
Melting Pot
• People of many different cultures come together and assimilate into one cultural group
(adoption or acception of a new culture)
• Idea of the USA as a nation of nations: people of different cultures and religions “melt” together
→ they lose their own identities and take on an American one
• Refers to the groups of immigrants moving to the US from 1820 to 1960: mostly European immigrants
adopting English as their first language and changing their lifestyle completely
Salad Bowl
• Each ethnic group keeps its own culture
→ many different cultures living together but their differences remain visible and people are not “melting”
into one group
• Like in a salad, all ingredients come together but you can clearly see the differences
• Refers to immigrants of the second half of the 20th century and today: immigrants keep their own culture
and assimilation has not necessarily been their goal
• People from diverse backgrounds form a whole one on the basis of equality and mutual acceptance
→ cultural pluralism and multiculturalism
Should one use those concepts to describe the society of the USA?
Pro Contra
Melting Pot • very patriotic • based on stereotypes of people with a different origin
• emphasises uniformity • there is a dominant culture and other cultures should be
subordinate
• original identities should be given up to create something
new
Salad bowl • focus on multiculturalism • based on stereotypes of people with a different origin
• keeping of the “original” • historically incorrect → Native Americans as the original
identity population of the USA are neglected
• not mentioning the engraving differences within societies
5
Acculturation vs Assimilation
Acculturation
• A minority group adopts the cultural patterns of a dominant group
• Reciprocal acculturation → the dominant group adopts patterns from the minority group as well
(change of diet, clothing, language and/or behaviour)
Assimilation
• Focuses on different aspects from acculturation
• Process of a person or group resembling another group step by step
• Dominant group absorbs the minority group → individual culture is no longer visible
• Full assimilation → all members of different groups are similar to each other and cannot be separated into
their former groups anymore
Parvez: deculturation • Becomes part of the Western world, • Ali criticises Parvez: “You are too implicated
urge to fit in in Western civilization.” (p. 26, l. 21 f.)
• Refusal of his old cultural habits/his • “Surely it wasn’t a crime to have a drink when
religious beliefs he wanted one ?” (p. 25, ll. 15 f.)
(he eats pork & drinks alcohol) • Parvez orders his wife to cook pork sausages:
• Happy about his life in England “You're Not in the village now. This is
England. We have to fit in.” (p. 26, ll. 16 f.)
• “But I love England” (p. 27, l. 23)
“old Ali”: • Shares common interests with • His room sambled a “tangle of clothes, books,
integration/assimilation other British teenagers (music, British cricket bats and videogames” (p. 19, ll. 3 f.)
girlfriend, Western clothes) • “computer disks, videotapes,new books,
• Ties between him & his parent’s and fashionable clothes” (p. 19, l. 10 f.) were
cultural background are not very strong part of his life
“new Ali”: rejection • Developed hatred towards the • He rejects pleasures such as playing the
Western world guitar (p. 19, ll. 19 ff.)
• Doesn’t see himself as a part of the • His idea of the West: “a sink of hypocrites,
Western world anymore adulterers, homosexuals, drugusers and
• Radical religious beliefs prostitutes'' (p. 27, ll. 1f.)
• Supports the idea of jihad • Ali explained “he himself was not
(intolerance towards other beliefs/ “inferior”; there was more to the world
opinions) than the West” (p. 29, ll. 8 ff.)
• “I, and millions of others, will gladly give
our lives for the cause. “ (p. 27, ll. 6f.)
6
My Son the Fanatic — Hanif Kureishi
Summary
• Parvez notices that his son has changed and suspects that he is selling drugs
• Bettina advises Parvez to look after this son and search for clues
• Parvez goes through Ali’s room but does not find anything
• Ali has become religious
• Parvez and Ali go to a restaurant for dinner
• Ali criticises Parvez’s western lifestyle
• Parvez thinks about kicking his son out
• Bettina tries to start a conversation with Ali
• she feels offended by Ali and leaves
• Parvez is angry because of Ali’s behaviour, so he starts drinking
• finally Parvez beats up Ali while he is praying
• “Who is the fanatic now?”
“My Son the Fanatic” explores the ways in which the father-son relationship is further complicated by the
internal and external pressures of immigration and the desire to assimilate. Parvez is a first-generation
immigrant whose opportunities have been limited, so he wants his son, Ali, to have a better life in England.
Characters
Parvez Ali
• immigrated from Pakistan to England • second generation immigrant
• Punjabi; grew up in Lahore • good student; supposed to become an
• taxi driver; works with other Punjabi taxi drivers accountant
• dreams of doing well in England • has given up his relationship and hobbies
• married, but does not see his wife much due to his job to follow the way of Islam
• no interest in religion due to bad memories in Pakistan • turns into a religious fanatic following
• reading the Quran was mandatory fundamental beliefs
• works a lot to provide for his son • isolates himself and gives his belongings
• assimilated to Western culture: drinks alcohol, eats away
pork etc. • from a social young student to a cold
fundamentalist
Bettina • despises Western culture
• prostitute • criticises his father’s behaviour
• friends with Parvez
• wants to help Parvez
• understanding and patient
• represents Western lifestyle
Important quotes
“Was it asking too much for Ali to get a good job, marry the right girl, and start a family? Once this
happened, Parvez would be happy.” (p. 20 l. 26-29)
Parvez knew he was getting drunk, but he couldn’t stop himself. Ali had a horrible look, full of disgust and
censure. It was as if he hated his father. (p. 25 l. 24ff)
“You’re not in the village now: This is England. We have to fit in.” (p. 26 l. 16f)
“But I love England” [...] “They let you do almost anything here.”
“That is the problem,” Ali said. (p. 27 l. 24f)
“He hoped Ali would compliment him on the beard he was growing, but Ali didn’t appear to notice it.”
(p. 29 l. 16f)
“All over the world our people are oppressed”, was the boy’s reply. “I know,” Parvez
answered not entirely sure who “our people” were. (p. 30 l. 12-15)
7
The message of the short story
Hanif Kureishi wrote his story as early as 1994, and a couple of years later Britain and the world experienced
the eruption of Islamic extremism into violence.
The most horrific of these attacks against Western capitalism carried out in the name of religion occurred
on September 11, 2001 (9/11) with the destruction of the World Trade Centre in New York which caused the
death of 3,000 people.
London became a target on July 7, 2005, when fundamentalist young men with an Islamic background
carried out suicide bombings in London's Underground, killing 52 people and mutilating dozens.
In videotaped statements they explained their religious motivation, saying their action was a
protest against military intervention of the West in Afghanistan.
The actions of "homegrown terrorists" shocked people in England, and led to second thoughts about the
blessings of a multicultural society. Extremists like the "7/7" bombers represent only a tiny fraction of
Britain's Muslim community, but in his story Kureishi issued a warning of the consequences of failed
integration in an increasingly ethnically and racially diverse society.
Topics
Father-son relationship
• different views and opinions Clash of cultures
Immigration • British vs. Pakistani culture
• Parvez came from Pakistan to Great • religion vs. culture
Britain to provide a good life for Ali Rebellion
Fitting in: identity crisis • Ali opposes his father
• Ali does not feel British nor Pakistani • Ali’s behaviour is seen as rebellious; no
(second generation immigrant) longer follows his father’s orders
• does not know where he belongs Generation gap
• religion gives Ali a sense of belonging • conflict between father and son; two
somewhere different generations
• Parvez adopts Western culture while Ali • different generations = different views
declines it • Ali does not live up to Parvez’s
Religion expectations (successful, married and
• main conflict: Ali becoming religious and a family)
Parvez disliking religion • Parvez does not understand Ali’s
• Ali criticises his father for not living like a perspective
good Muslim • two people with a stubborn mindset
• Parvez has negative connections with who do not want to accept each
religion other’s lifestyle
traditions modernism
shame-based guilt-based
hierarchy equality
role of women: patriarchal role of women: have a better place in society (“equalised”)
8
Different attitudes towards Western society
• works hard to succeed & climb the social ladder; • gets rid of everything that symbolises the
his main aim is to help his son get a good decadent Western lifestyle and materialism
education • beliefs that British culture brings harm such as
= opportunity, materialism, competition drugs, alcohol, prostitution etc.
• society with no rules
• climbing socially & achieving success has become
irrelevant to him
→ does not want to follow the path his father has
laid out for him
Second-generation immigrants
Ali represents a new generation of young muslims:
• Second-generation immigrants are born and raised in Britain → lack of cultural identity; does not feel
accepted in Britain
• in contrast to their parents they do not want to adopt the culture anymore
• uncompromising adherence to the Koran is their way to establish an identity
• influenced and led by extremely conservative Muslim leaders
• repudiate capitalist ideas & the striving for material success
• condemn Western immoral and decadent behaviour
• distance themselves from the rest of society
9
Comparison
Ali (My Son the Fanatic) Miriam (A Pair of Jeans)
second-generation immigrants
• gets rid of everything that symbolises the decadent • embraces a new set of values while wearing traditional
Western lifestyle and materialism to him clothing: wants to impress; acts out a role of a demure
→ cleared his room of all electronic gadgets and and elegant bride & daughter-in-law
fashionable clothes • feels independent while wearing Western clothing
• goes to the mosque regularly & prays five times a day • dresses modestly at social events
• preaches about the law of Islam, necessity of jihad (the • respects her parents culture
struggle of religious Muslims against infidels or holy
war) & the merciless punishment of anybody who does
not live life in accordance with the Koran
• criticises his father for adhering to Western principles • gets judged by other Muslims since most girls that wear
& lectures him on immoral behaviour revealing clothes are known as rebellious and wild
→ rebels against his family’s adopted culture • is influenced by Western culture
→ Her fiance's parents (Begum & Ayub) question her
truthfulness & if she is right for their son;
see her behaviour as disrespectful & shameful;
do not support the Western society & think that you can
only choose one culture
• has a one-track mind: is only interested in Islam • is interested in both British and Pakistani culture;
does not want to decide → “hybrid”
fanatic about religion fanatic about Western lifestyle unable to see life from another
perspective
gives up his old life to follow obsessed with his son’s lack of trust and compromises
Islam changed behaviour
would give his life for jihad asserts his beliefs with violence trying to change each other
In conclusion, although Parvez and Ali can both be considered fanatics using a very loose definition of the
word, it is more likely that the author is using the term ironically to point out how people embracing
different cultures clash when they adopt viewpoints that are too narrow and uncompromising.
10