A Summary and Analysis of Henrik Ibsen’s Hedda Gabler

The role of Hedda Gabler, the female lead and title-role in Henrik Ibsen’s celebrated 1890
play Hedda Gabler, has been called ‘the female Hamlet’, because, as the Prince of Denmark is
the role many male actors (and quite a few female ones) have wanted to play, so women in the
world of theatre want to give their distinctive interpretation of Hedda Gabler.

Hedda Gabler is a tragedy whose plot and, in particular, characterisation demand close analysis,
but before we get to those matters, here’s a brief summary of the play.

Hedda Gabler has married a rather dull academic, a cultural historian named Jørgen Tesman,
but she continues to use her maiden name. At the beginning of the play, they have just
returned from their long honeymoon.

Tesman appears to have a glittering academic future ahead of him, and a professorship is in the
offing, especially since his rival for the position, Ejlert Løvborg, has taken himself out of the
running by taking to drink. Tesman’s aunt Julie, whom he dotes on, has helped him out
financially so he could set up a home for himself and his new wife.

But there’s one fly in the ointment: Hedda Gabler herself. She seems to thrive on mischief, or
on ‘rubbing people up the wrong way’, as the phrase has it. Soon after they have arrived home,
Hedda deliberately insults her husband by pretending to mistake his aunt’s hat for some hat the
lowly maid has left behind.

Hedda’s old schoolfriend, Thea Elvsted, turns up, announcing that she has walked out on her
husband. She’s looking for Løvborg, who shares her passion for radical politics. Hedda was
involved with Løvborg before she married Tesman, and seems to be jealous of Elvsted’s relative
freedom.

Judge Brack turns up and announces that Tesman and Løvborg will, after all, be competing with
each other for the professorship. Hedda, annoyed by her husband, plays with her father’s
pistols. Hedda shoots one of the pistols at Judge Brack, missing him deliberately, just to get a
reaction from him. She tells him that she married her husband out of pity and that she is boring
herself to death in this marriage. (Brack suggests spicing things up with a menage a trois, but
she rejects this kind proposal.)

Then Løvborg shows up and also tries it on, when he shows Hedda his scholarly work and tells
her that she is his muse, when in reality, it appears Thea was the one who helped him with it.
She rejects his advances, too, and then the men all go off to a party, and Hedda taunts Thea
Elvsted. When the men return the following day, it all kicks off: Løvborg, who had given up the
booze, started drinking again at the party and got involved in a fight. He rebuffs Thea, telling
her he’s torn up his manuscript; he confides the truth to Hedda, that, in his drunken state, he’s
lost it.
In reality, Tesman has found his rival’s manuscript, but plans to do the honourable thing and
return it to Løvborg. Hedda, seeing how distraught her former beau is, hands Løvborg one of
her father’s pistols and goads him to use it on himself. When left on her own, Hedda throws his
manuscript into the stove, announcing to the absent Thea that she is burning Thea and
Løvborg’s ‘baby’.

When Hedda tells Tesman what she has done, he is shocked, but when she lies and says she did
it purely for her husband’s sake, so he will get the professorship, he forgives her. Aunt Julie,
meanwhile, is convinced that Hedda is expecting a baby of her own (a real one, rather than a
manuscript).

We then learn that Løvborg has shot himself, and Tesman and Thea bond over his lost
manuscript, which they begin recreating from memory, in his … well, in his memory. Hedda is
convinced Løvborg shot himself because she goaded him to do it. But this is false: Brack tells
her that he did so in a brothel, in his private parts. Løvborg did, however, use the pistol Hedda
gave him, and this would make Hedda’s life difficult if the police found out. Brack tells her he
will keep silent … as long as she keeps him sweet.

Hedda, realising Brack has her in his power, goes to the back of the room and shoots herself
with her father’s other pistol. The play ends with Brack saying: ‘No one does that. No one.’

Hedda Gabler: analysis

In some ways, the key to understanding Hedda Gabler – and its title character, Hedda Gabler –
is by analysing the contrast between her and her schoolfriend, Thea Elvsted. Thea is, in some
ways, what Nora from Ibsen’s A Doll’s House might have been after she walked out
on her husband at the end of Ibsen’s earlier play (which we have analysed here). By contrast,
Hedda Gabler might be said to represent what would have happened if Nora hadn’t left her
husband but had remained with him, even after she has had her epiphany about what their
marriage is really like.

Tesman, similarly, is painted as a rather feminine figure: his scholarly research is on domestic
matters, he clucks over his aunt (who clucks over him back), and he is obsessed with ‘soft’
domestic comforts, such as his slippers. Like his ancestor from Ibsen’s earlier A Doll’s House,
Torvald Helmer, he is a husband who wants to be ‘secure’ and ‘comfortable’: a wife, a home, a
steady job, a life. But what kind of life is that, Hedda invites us to ask – especially for the wife?

what Nora from Ibsen’s A Doll’s House might have been after she walked out on her husband at
the end of Ibsen’s earlier play (which we have analysed here). By contrast, Hedda Gabler might
be said to represent what would have happened if Nora hadn’t left her husband but had
remained with him, even after she has had her epiphany about what their marriage is really
like.
Tesman, similarly, is painted as a rather feminine figure: his scholarly research is on domestic
matters, he clucks over his aunt (who clucks over him back), and he is obsessed with ‘soft’
domestic comforts, such as his slippers. Like his ancestor from Ibsen’s earlier A Doll’s House,
Torvald Helmer, he is a husband who wants to be ‘secure’ and ‘comfortable’: a wife, a home, a
steady job, a life. But what kind of life is that, Hedda invites us to ask – especially for the wife?

Hedda Gabler, as the name indicates, never really accepts her married life. She has married
Tesman out of pity, she tells Brack, and she mocks her husband’s devotion to his aunts, to the
point of insensitivity and coldness. She refuses to become ‘Hedda Tesman’ in anything other
than legal documentation: in her heart, she is still Hedda Gabler.

Of course, this doesn’t mean she is her own woman, either: Gabler is her father’s name, and
Hedda Gabler is her father’s daughter through-and-through. Her father was a military man, a
general, whose portrait watches over the events of the play, and whose pistols lead to the
deaths of both Løvborg and Hedda herself. This strong, military, masculine presence stands in
stark contrast to those feminine influences over her husband’s life and behaviour.

In calling his play Hedda Gabler, Ibsen doesn’t necessarily endorse Hedda’s reluctance to
commit to her marriage: he simply reflects who the character is. Ibsen famously said that
nothing he wrote was ‘tendentious’. In other words, he seeks to explore rather than to instruct,
to present a complex issue from both sides and to get the audience thinking about the issues
put forward them on stage. Hedda is cold-hearted, cruel, even monstrous at times – if she is
pregnant, as Aunt Julie suspects, her final act seems even more shocking to us – in the way she
goads Løvborg to end it all and taunts Thea Elvsted.

But at the same time, being trapped in a passionless marriage at a time when marriage was the
only reasonable option for so many women, she has some justification for being ‘bored to
death’.

But whether it’s the boredom that kills her in the end, or whether – ironically – it’s the rather
exciting and dangerous scandal her actions get her caught up in, is something worth pondering.
How in control of her own life is she? Hedda is someone who wishes to own and direct the
‘narrative’ of her life: she wants, above all, to be a kind of Iago figure, in the sense that the
scheming villain from Shakespeare’s Othello is, in a sense, the stage manager or ‘director’ of
the play in which he appears, setting in motion all of the major events that take place.

But she is mistaken. Her boredom does lead to her death, but only when the mischief she
unleashes – the burning of Løvborg’s manuscript (which actually brings her husband and
another woman together, bonding over the scholarly task of reconstructing it), and the goading
of Løvborg with her father’s pistol – leads to genuine tragedy and the risk of genuine scandal.

Then she finds herself, ironically enough, back where Nora Helmer found herself at the
beginning of Ibsen’s earlier play, A Doll’s House: in the thrall of another man who can threaten
to reveal her secret and destroy her life at any moment. Hedda refuses to live like that, but
 what does her final act on stage represent? Has she taken control of her life’s narrative in the
most extreme day, or taken the easy way out? Has she lost control of the narrative altogether?

She is, after all, proved wrong about Løvborg: she gave him the means to end his life, by
handing him the pistol, but not the motivation. Hedda Gabler is such a rewarding play because
of these complexities we find in the play’s title-character, but she is as much a failed Iago as she
is ‘the female Hamlet’.

Image: via Wikimedia Commons.

Share this:



 Email
 Save
 Share on Tumblr
 Share

 More


Like this:

Related
The Best Henrik Ibsen Plays Everyone Should Read

A Summary and Analysis of Henrik Ibsen’s Ghosts

A Brief History of Tragedy

Tags: Analysis, Hedda Gabler, Henrik Ibsen, Literature, Plays

Comments are closed.

Search

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this site and receive notifications of new posts by
email.

Email Address

Subscribe
 Interesting Literature is a participant in the Amazon EU Associates Programme, an affiliate
advertising programme designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by linking
to Amazon.co.uk.

INTERESTING LITERATURE

 Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2022 Interesting Literature Designed by WPZOOM

Of course, this doesn’t mean she is her own woman, either: Gabler is her father’s name, and
Hedda Gabler is her father’s daughter through-and-through. Her father was a military man, a
general, whose portrait watches over the events of the play, and whose pistols lead to the
deaths of both Løvborg and Hedda herself. This strong, military, masculine presence stands in
stark contrast to those feminine influences over her husband’s life and behaviour.

In calling his play Hedda Gabler, Ibsen doesn’t necessarily endorse Hedda’s reluctance to
commit to her marriage: he simply reflects who the character is. Ibsen famously said that
nothing he wrote was ‘tendentious’. In other words, he seeks to explore rather than to instruct,
to present a complex issue from both sides and to get the audience thinking about the issues
put forward them on stage. Hedda is cold-hearted, cruel, even monstrous at times – if she is
pregnant, as Aunt Julie suspects, her final act seems even more shocking to us – in the way she
goads Løvborg to end it all and taunts Thea Elvsted.

But at the same time, being trapped in a passionless marriage at a time when marriage was the
only reasonable option for so many women, she has some justification for being ‘bored to
death’.

But whether it’s the boredom that kills her in the end, or whether – ironically – it’s the rather
exciting and dangerous scandal her actions get her caught up in, is something worth pondering.
How in control of her own life is she? Hedda is someone who wishes to own and direct the
‘narrative’ of her life: she wants, above all, to be a kind of Iago figure, in the sense that the
scheming villain from Shakespeare’s Othello is, in a sense, the stage manager or ‘director’ of
the play in which he appears, setting in motion all of the major events that take place.

But she is mistaken. Her boredom does lead to her death, but only when the mischief she
unleashes – the burning of Løvborg’s manuscript (which actually brings her husband and
another woman together, bonding over the scholarly task of reconstructing it), and the goading
of Løvborg with her father’s pistol – leads to genuine tragedy and the risk of genuine scandal.

Then she finds herself, ironically enough, back where Nora Helmer found herself at the
beginning of Ibsen’s earlier play, A Doll’s House: in the thrall of another man who can threaten
to reveal her secret and destroy her life at any moment. Hedda refuses to live like that, but
what does her final act on stage represent? Has she taken control of her life’s narrative in the
most extreme day, or taken the easy way out? Has she lost control of the narrative altogether?
She is, after all, proved wrong about Løvborg: she gave him the means to end his life, by
handing him the pistol, but not the motivation. Hedda Gabler is such a rewarding play because
of these complexities we find in the play’s title-character, but she is as much a failed Iago as she
is ‘the female Hamlet’.